November 2014 - mpi-forum - mailman3.cels.anl.gov

Re: [Mpi-forum] MPI-3 implementations status
by Balaji, Pavan 14 Nov '14

14 Nov '14

Thanks, added. — Pavan > On Nov 14, 2014, at 2:23 AM, Kawashima, Takahiro <t-kawashima(a)jp.fujitsu.com> wrote: > > Dear Pavan, > > Fujitsu's update is attached. > > Best regards, > Takahiro Kawashima, > MPI development team, > Fujitsu > >> Folks, >> >> With SC coming up, I want to make sure the attached slide on the MPI-3 implementations status is up to date. >> >> Please take a look at your implementation’s status and let me know if any changes are to be made. Particularly, the cells that say “Q3 ’14” need to be changed to “Done” or replaced with some future date. >> >> The updated slide will be presented at the various BoFs and other talks. > <mpi-implementations_fujitu-updated.pptx>_______________________________________________ > mpi-forum mailing list > mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum -- Pavan Balaji ✉️ http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] MPI-3 implementations status
by Kawashima, Takahiro 14 Nov '14

14 Nov '14

Dear Pavan, Fujitsu's update is attached. Best regards, Takahiro Kawashima, MPI development team, Fujitsu > Folks, > > With SC coming up, I want to make sure the attached slide on the MPI-3 implementations status is up to date. > > Please take a look at your implementation’s status and let me know if any changes are to be made. Particularly, the cells that say “Q3 ’14” need to be changed to “Done” or replaced with some future date. > > The updated slide will be presented at the various BoFs and other talks.

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] MPI-3 implementations status
by Balaji, Pavan 13 Nov '14

13 Nov '14

Rolf, The check marks are not meant to say that each feature is available on *all* platforms supported by the implementation. For all check marks, platform-specific restrictions apply. E.g., shared memory windows support is not available for many implementations on FreeBSD, but we don’t explicitly mark that either. I will put a generic caveat at the bottom of the slide. — Pavan > On Nov 13, 2014, at 2:33 AM, Rolf Rabenseifner <rabenseifner(a)hlrs.de> wrote: > > Dear Pavan, > > I'm not sure whether in some of the MPI libraries > the "mpi_f08" module works only with a TS29113 Compiler > and not with all Compilers that are supported by the "mpi" module. > > Such a restrictions is not needed nor intended > by MPI-3.0. > MPI-3.0 has the same requirements for both, > the "mpi" and the "mpi_f08" module. > > If an MPI-3.0 implementation has such a restriction, > it should be mentioned in the table. > > Best regards > Rolf > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Pavan Balaji" <balaji(a)anl.gov> >> To: "Jonathan Perkins" <perkinjo(a)cse.ohio-state.edu> >> Cc: mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org >> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2014 3:32:11 AM >> Subject: Re: [Mpi-forum] MPI-3 implementations status >> >> >> Thanks, fixed. >> >>> On Nov 12, 2014, at 8:29 PM, Jonathan Perkins <perkinjo(a)cse.ohio-state.edu> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Pavan. I just wanted to update about F08 Binding support with >>> MVAPICH2. Recently we made a release (MVAPICH2 2.1a) based upon MPICH >>> 3.1.2. With this I believe we can check the F08 Binding support box as >>> well. >>> >>> On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 01:26:40AM +0000, Balaji, Pavan wrote: >>>> Folks, >>>> >>>> With SC coming up, I want to make sure the attached slide on the MPI-3 >>>> implementations status is up to date. >>>> >>>> Please take a look at your implementation’s status and let me know if any >>>> changes are to be made. Particularly, the cells that say “Q3 ’14” need >>>> to be changed to “Done” or replaced with some future date. >>>> >>>> The updated slide will be presented at the various BoFs and other talks. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> — Pavan >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Pavan Balaji ✉️ >>>> http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji >>>> >>> >>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> mpi-forum mailing list >>>> mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org >>>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Jonathan Perkins >> >> -- >> Pavan Balaji ✉️ >> http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji >> >> _______________________________________________ >> mpi-forum mailing list >> mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org >> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum > > -- > Dr. Rolf Rabenseifner . . . . . . . . . .. email rabenseifner(a)hlrs.de > High Performance Computing Center (HLRS) . phone ++49(0)711/685-65530 > University of Stuttgart . . . . . . . . .. fax ++49(0)711 / 685-65832 > Head of Dpmt Parallel Computing . . . www.hlrs.de/people/rabenseifner > Nobelstr. 19, D-70550 Stuttgart, Germany . . . . (Office: Room 1.307) > _______________________________________________ > mpi-forum mailing list > mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum -- Pavan Balaji ✉️ http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] MPI-3 implementations status
by Rolf Rabenseifner 13 Nov '14

13 Nov '14

Dear Pavan, I'm not sure whether in some of the MPI libraries the "mpi_f08" module works only with a TS29113 Compiler and not with all Compilers that are supported by the "mpi" module. Such a restrictions is not needed nor intended by MPI-3.0. MPI-3.0 has the same requirements for both, the "mpi" and the "mpi_f08" module. If an MPI-3.0 implementation has such a restriction, it should be mentioned in the table. Best regards Rolf ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Pavan Balaji" <balaji(a)anl.gov> > To: "Jonathan Perkins" <perkinjo(a)cse.ohio-state.edu> > Cc: mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2014 3:32:11 AM > Subject: Re: [Mpi-forum] MPI-3 implementations status > > > Thanks, fixed. > > > On Nov 12, 2014, at 8:29 PM, Jonathan Perkins <perkinjo(a)cse.ohio-state.edu> > > wrote: > > > > Hi Pavan. I just wanted to update about F08 Binding support with > > MVAPICH2. Recently we made a release (MVAPICH2 2.1a) based upon MPICH > > 3.1.2. With this I believe we can check the F08 Binding support box as > > well. > > > > On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 01:26:40AM +0000, Balaji, Pavan wrote: > >> Folks, > >> > >> With SC coming up, I want to make sure the attached slide on the MPI-3 > >> implementations status is up to date. > >> > >> Please take a look at your implementation’s status and let me know if any > >> changes are to be made. Particularly, the cells that say “Q3 ’14” need > >> to be changed to “Done” or replaced with some future date. > >> > >> The updated slide will be presented at the various BoFs and other talks. > >> > >> Regards, > >> > >> — Pavan > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Pavan Balaji ✉️ > >> http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji > >> > > > > > >> _______________________________________________ > >> mpi-forum mailing list > >> mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > >> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum > > > > > > -- > > Jonathan Perkins > > -- > Pavan Balaji ✉️ > http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji > > _______________________________________________ > mpi-forum mailing list > mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum -- Dr. Rolf Rabenseifner . . . . . . . . . .. email rabenseifner(a)hlrs.de High Performance Computing Center (HLRS) . phone ++49(0)711/685-65530 University of Stuttgart . . . . . . . . .. fax ++49(0)711 / 685-65832 Head of Dpmt Parallel Computing . . . www.hlrs.de/people/rabenseifner Nobelstr. 19, D-70550 Stuttgart, Germany . . . . (Office: Room 1.307)

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] MPI-3 implementations status
by Balaji, Pavan 12 Nov '14

12 Nov '14

Thanks, fixed. > On Nov 12, 2014, at 8:29 PM, Jonathan Perkins <perkinjo(a)cse.ohio-state.edu> wrote: > > Hi Pavan. I just wanted to update about F08 Binding support with > MVAPICH2. Recently we made a release (MVAPICH2 2.1a) based upon MPICH > 3.1.2. With this I believe we can check the F08 Binding support box as > well. > > On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 01:26:40AM +0000, Balaji, Pavan wrote: >> Folks, >> >> With SC coming up, I want to make sure the attached slide on the MPI-3 implementations status is up to date. >> >> Please take a look at your implementation’s status and let me know if any changes are to be made. Particularly, the cells that say “Q3 ’14” need to be changed to “Done” or replaced with some future date. >> >> The updated slide will be presented at the various BoFs and other talks. >> >> Regards, >> >> — Pavan >> >> >> >> -- >> Pavan Balaji ✉️ >> http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji >> > > >> _______________________________________________ >> mpi-forum mailing list >> mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org >> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum > > > -- > Jonathan Perkins -- Pavan Balaji ✉️ http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] MPI-3 implementations status
by Jonathan Perkins 12 Nov '14

12 Nov '14

Hi Pavan. I just wanted to update about F08 Binding support with MVAPICH2. Recently we made a release (MVAPICH2 2.1a) based upon MPICH 3.1.2. With this I believe we can check the F08 Binding support box as well. On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 01:26:40AM +0000, Balaji, Pavan wrote: > Folks, > > With SC coming up, I want to make sure the attached slide on the MPI-3 implementations status is up to date. > > Please take a look at your implementation’s status and let me know if any changes are to be made. Particularly, the cells that say “Q3 ’14” need to be changed to “Done” or replaced with some future date. > > The updated slide will be presented at the various BoFs and other talks. > > Regards, > > — Pavan > > > > -- > Pavan Balaji ✉️ > http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji > > _______________________________________________ > mpi-forum mailing list > mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum -- Jonathan Perkins

1 0

MPI-3 implementations status
by Balaji, Pavan 12 Nov '14

12 Nov '14

Folks, With SC coming up, I want to make sure the attached slide on the MPI-3 implementations status is up to date. Please take a look at your implementation’s status and let me know if any changes are to be made. Particularly, the cells that say “Q3 ’14” need to be changed to “Done” or replaced with some future date. The updated slide will be presented at the various BoFs and other talks. Regards, — Pavan -- Pavan Balaji ✉️ http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] December 2014 Meeting / Agenda
by Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) 12 Nov '14

12 Nov '14

Martin -- The Fortran WG would like to get some plenary time to discuss two topics: - Deprecate MPI_SIZEOF - Deprecate mpif.h Thanks. On Nov 4, 2014, at 1:09 AM, Schulz Martin <schulzm(a)llnl.gov> wrote: > Hi all, > > I put up an initial roster for the December meeting in San Jose. As usual, I am planning to arrange WG meeting in the beginning of the meeting (until Tuesday noon or evening depending on the requests that I get), followed by the plenaries. Votes will be Thursday morning. > > For the plenaries, I would like to try something different, based on the experience at the forum in Japan: instead of having a fixed schedule, I’ll put up a list of topics that we need to cover and we’ll go through them in order, but not necessarily with a fixed schedule. We basically followed this scheme in Japan (out of necessity since we had to redo the agenda on the fly due to the missed quorum) and this worked fairly well and allowed for enough discussions for the topics that needed them. I’ll still try to keep track of overall time to make sure we get through with the agenda, in particular with the items to be voted on, but I would like to avoid that this dictates the schedule. > > For the WG leads: please send me any requests for WG time or plenary items as soon as you can (even if you need to revise that later), so we can start building a more concrete agenda. Also, please let me know of any tickets that you want read or voted on as part of errata. I have pre-populated the agenda with the second and first votes, since those are fixed – but please also double check those. The deadline for announcing tickets for readings or votes is as usual 2 weeks before the forum, which is the Monday 11/24, I.e., the Monday of Thanksgiving week. > > Thanks! > > Martin > > > > ________________________________________________________________________ > Martin Schulz, schulzm(a)llnl.gov, http://scalability.llnl.gov/ > CASC @ Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, USA > > _______________________________________________ > mpi-forum mailing list > mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum -- Jeff Squyres jsquyres(a)cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] error of running the MPICH2
by Bland, Wesley B. 09 Nov '14

09 Nov '14

This mailing list is not for user questions. It's for the standardization body. Please direct your question to discuss(a)mpich.org<mailto:[email protected]>. On Nov 9, 2014, at 3:29 AM, Chafik sanaa <san.chafik(a)gmail.com<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: I am trying to run MPICH2 from the Windows 7 environment but I can't get the wmpiexec.exe working and get the following error message: Error: No smpd passphrase specified through the registry or .smpd file, exiting.i have already registered user account in mpiexec.exe _______________________________________________ mpi-forum mailing list mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org<mailto:[email protected]> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum

1 0

error of running the MPICH2
by Chafik sanaa 09 Nov '14

09 Nov '14

*I am trying to run MPICH2 from the Windows 7 environment but I can't get **the wmpiexec.exe working and get the following error message:** Error: No smpd passphrase specified through the registry or .smpd file, **exiting.**i have already registered user account in mpiexec.exe*

1 0