October 2010 - mpi-forum - mailman3.cels.anl.gov

Re: [Mpi-forum] Draft standard - take II
by Jeff Squyres 26 Oct '10

26 Oct '10

On Oct 26, 2010, at 10:39 AM, Rolf Rabenseifner wrote: >> Additionally, there were frontmatter changes yesterday on the trunk >> last night that were made after the branch. Do they need to come over >> to the branch? > > Which branch? What is going on? Bill / Rich -- Can you explain exactly what is the process for this draft document? I made the branch yesterday, but even I am somewhat confused by the process at this point. Thanks! -- Jeff Squyres jsquyres(a)cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] Draft standard - take II
by Rolf Rabenseifner 26 Oct '10

26 Oct '10

> Additionally, there were frontmatter changes yesterday on the trunk > last night that were made after the branch. Do they need to come over > to the branch? Which branch? What is going on? Do we have a ticket to which we report our chapter PDF reviews? > removed superfluous paragraph after review from Yutaka Ishikawa and > Hidejuki Jitsumoto Yes, it is okay - but it was complicated to make a review about Ticket 109, svn revision 628. For all other chapters: My recommentation is to compare to rev 495 If all changes compared to rev 495 are okay (i.e., do not need any Forum vote, and are clearly marked with Bill's macros) then the chapter is okay. Exceptions, are - Chapters 5, Biblio, and Appendices A.2.3, A.3.3, A3.4.3 and B. Change-Log: here ticket 109 is included - Frontmatter: MPI-3.0 is introduced - all the rest: "no changes" Test: cd chap-xxxx svn diff -r 495:629 | grep '^[++-]' My reviews: 0. chap-frontm - MANY CHANGES --> reviews are necessary Review of .tex and .pdf is needed 1. chap-intro - SEVERAL CHANGES --> reviews are necessary All changes are clearly markuped, i.e., make reviewdoc and reviewing colored mpi-report.pdf should be enough 2. chap-terms - no changes 3. chap-pt2pt - no changes (only a new Latex label) 4. chap-datatypes - no changes 5. chap-coll -->>>>> See ticket 109 for all review-discussions 6. chap-context - no changes 7. chap-topol - no changes 8. chap-inquiry - no changes (only an unused macro is commented out) 9. chap-misc - no changes 10. chap-dynamic - no changes 11. chap-one-side - no changes 12. chap-ei - no changes 13. chap-io - no changes 14. chap-prof - one formatting change: MPI\_SEND --> \mpifunc{MPI\_SEND} 15. chap-deprecated - no changes 16. chap-binding - no changes Should be okay, because ticket 109 has nothing specific to this chapter A.1 chap-appLang - no changes Should be okay, because ticket 109 has nothing specific to this chapter ONE EXCEPTION: 3 times definition of MPI_User_function in A.1.3 see PDF reviews of Ticket 109 B chap-changes - Review is needed Result of my (automated) reviews: Manual reviews are only needed for - Frontmatter - 1 Intro - 5 Coll - 14 Profiling (controling this one change) - A.1.3 due to the reported issues in ticket 109 - B Change-Log Best regards Rolf ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jeff Squyres" <jsquyres(a)cisco.com> > To: "Main MPI Forum mailing list" <mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org> > Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 2:54:15 PM > Subject: Re: [Mpi-forum] Draft standard - take II > For example, these changes on the trunk are a little alarming. Who is > the collectives chapter chair -- is it Torsten? It is not marked on > the web page. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > r618 | htor | 2010-10-24 20:38:04 -0400 (Sun, 24 Oct 2010) | 1 line > Changed paths: > M /trunk/MPI-3.0/chap-coll/coll.tex > > removed superfluous paragraph after review from Yutaka Ishikawa and > Hidejuki Jitsumoto > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Whoa -- removed a whole paragraph? Wasn't this text voted on (multiple > times)? Maybe removing that specific text is ok, but that log message > gives me a little pause, for example... > > Additionally, there were frontmatter changes yesterday on the trunk > last night that were made after the branch. Do they need to come over > to the branch? > > > > On Oct 26, 2010, at 8:47 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote: > > > On Oct 25, 2010, at 9:28 PM, Graham, Richard L. wrote: > > > >> Just a friendly reminder that we are trying to get the draft > >> standard out before SC, and were aiming to have people review their > >> sections by mid last week. By my records the only chapters that > >> have passed WG reviews are: > >> - Environment management > >> - Profiling Interface > >> > >> I am equating 100% WG review == section reviewed. > > > > I'm not sure I understand. Are you looking for an affirmation from > > every single member of every single WG? I thought that the committee > > chair reporting back would be enough. > > > >> Please make your best effort to complete reviews ASAP, so we can > >> get this out the door. > > > > Which are we reviewing, the trunk or the branch? (I don't think that > > this has been conveyed to the Forum yet) > > > > Both changed as of yesterday. > > > > -- > > Jeff Squyres > > jsquyres(a)cisco.com > > For corporate legal information go to: > > http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/ > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > mpi-forum mailing list > > mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum > > > -- > Jeff Squyres > jsquyres(a)cisco.com > For corporate legal information go to: > http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/ > > > _______________________________________________ > mpi-forum mailing list > mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum -- Dr. Rolf Rabenseifner . . . . . . . . . .. email rabenseifner(a)hlrs.de High Performance Computing Center (HLRS) . phone ++49(0)711/685-65530 University of Stuttgart . . . . . . . . .. fax ++49(0)711 / 685-65832 Head of Dpmt Parallel Computing . . . www.hlrs.de/people/rabenseifner Nobelstr. 19, D-70550 Stuttgart, Germany . (Office: Allmandring 30)

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] Draft standard - take II
by Jeff Squyres 26 Oct '10

26 Oct '10

On Oct 26, 2010, at 10:23 AM, Torsten Hoefler wrote: >> Yes "htor" is me. I know htor is you; my question is: are you the chapter chair? (it's not listed on the page) Rich just replied "yes", but it's still not listed on the web page. :-) > I am communicating all such changes to all members of the chapter > committee. This means we have control within the committee. I can > broadcast every change to the whole forum if you want (which might delay > the process). Fair enough; it was just a scary log message. >> Additionally, there were frontmatter changes yesterday on the trunk >> last night that were made after the branch. Do they need to come over >> to the branch? > I think the respective committee (Frontmatter & Introduction) will > review those changes. My point is: does everyone know about the branch and where they're supposed to be editing? -- Jeff Squyres jsquyres(a)cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] Draft standard - take II
by Graham, Richard L. 26 Oct '10

26 Oct '10

Torsten is the chapter chair. Rich On 10/26/10 10:23 AM, "Torsten Hoefler" <htor(a)illinois.edu> wrote: On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 08:54:15AM -0400, Jeff Squyres wrote: > For example, these changes on the trunk are a little alarming. Who is > the collectives chapter chair -- is it Torsten? It is not marked on > the web page. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > r618 | htor | 2010-10-24 20:38:04 -0400 (Sun, 24 Oct 2010) | 1 line > Changed paths: > M /trunk/MPI-3.0/chap-coll/coll.tex > > removed superfluous paragraph after review from Yutaka Ishikawa and Hidejuki Jitsumoto > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Yes "htor" is me. > Whoa -- removed a whole paragraph? Wasn't this text voted on > (multiple times)? Maybe removing that specific text is ok, but that > log message gives me a little pause, for example... I only applied changes that have no impact on semantics whatsoever and are not ambiguous at all and would thus not raise a discussion. Removing a paragraph might sound scary but it was an early copy&paste error. Just check diff and the chapter and you'll see. I apologize for the scary and non-saying commit message :-). As this was a clear wording error (duplicated paragraph due to copy&paste error), I assume that falls under my editorial freedom. I am communicating all such changes to all members of the chapter committee. This means we have control within the committee. I can broadcast every change to the whole forum if you want (which might delay the process). > Additionally, there were frontmatter changes yesterday on the trunk > last night that were made after the branch. Do they need to come over > to the branch? I think the respective committee (Frontmatter & Introduction) will review those changes. Thanks for pointing this out Jeff! Best, Torsten -- bash$ :(){ :|:&};: --------------------- http://www.unixer.de/ ----- Torsten Hoefler | Performance Modeling and Simulation Lead Blue Waters Directorate | University of Illinois (UIUC) 1205 W Clark Street | Urbana, IL, 61801 NCSA Building | +01 (217) 244-7736 _______________________________________________ mpi-forum mailing list mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] Draft standard - take II
by Torsten Hoefler 26 Oct '10

26 Oct '10

On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 08:54:15AM -0400, Jeff Squyres wrote: > For example, these changes on the trunk are a little alarming. Who is > the collectives chapter chair -- is it Torsten? It is not marked on > the web page. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > r618 | htor | 2010-10-24 20:38:04 -0400 (Sun, 24 Oct 2010) | 1 line > Changed paths: > M /trunk/MPI-3.0/chap-coll/coll.tex > > removed superfluous paragraph after review from Yutaka Ishikawa and Hidejuki Jitsumoto > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Yes "htor" is me. > Whoa -- removed a whole paragraph? Wasn't this text voted on > (multiple times)? Maybe removing that specific text is ok, but that > log message gives me a little pause, for example... I only applied changes that have no impact on semantics whatsoever and are not ambiguous at all and would thus not raise a discussion. Removing a paragraph might sound scary but it was an early copy&paste error. Just check diff and the chapter and you'll see. I apologize for the scary and non-saying commit message :-). As this was a clear wording error (duplicated paragraph due to copy&paste error), I assume that falls under my editorial freedom. I am communicating all such changes to all members of the chapter committee. This means we have control within the committee. I can broadcast every change to the whole forum if you want (which might delay the process). > Additionally, there were frontmatter changes yesterday on the trunk > last night that were made after the branch. Do they need to come over > to the branch? I think the respective committee (Frontmatter & Introduction) will review those changes. Thanks for pointing this out Jeff! Best, Torsten -- bash$ :(){ :|:&};: --------------------- http://www.unixer.de/ ----- Torsten Hoefler | Performance Modeling and Simulation Lead Blue Waters Directorate | University of Illinois (UIUC) 1205 W Clark Street | Urbana, IL, 61801 NCSA Building | +01 (217) 244-7736

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] Draft standard - take II
by Jeff Squyres 26 Oct '10

26 Oct '10

For example, these changes on the trunk are a little alarming. Who is the collectives chapter chair -- is it Torsten? It is not marked on the web page. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ r618 | htor | 2010-10-24 20:38:04 -0400 (Sun, 24 Oct 2010) | 1 line Changed paths: M /trunk/MPI-3.0/chap-coll/coll.tex removed superfluous paragraph after review from Yutaka Ishikawa and Hidejuki Jitsumoto ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Whoa -- removed a whole paragraph? Wasn't this text voted on (multiple times)? Maybe removing that specific text is ok, but that log message gives me a little pause, for example... Additionally, there were frontmatter changes yesterday on the trunk last night that were made after the branch. Do they need to come over to the branch? On Oct 26, 2010, at 8:47 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote: > On Oct 25, 2010, at 9:28 PM, Graham, Richard L. wrote: > >> Just a friendly reminder that we are trying to get the draft standard out before SC, and were aiming to have people review their sections by mid last week. By my records the only chapters that have passed WG reviews are: >> - Environment management >> - Profiling Interface >> >> I am equating 100% WG review == section reviewed. > > I'm not sure I understand. Are you looking for an affirmation from every single member of every single WG? I thought that the committee chair reporting back would be enough. > >> Please make your best effort to complete reviews ASAP, so we can get this out the door. > > Which are we reviewing, the trunk or the branch? (I don't think that this has been conveyed to the Forum yet) > > Both changed as of yesterday. > > -- > Jeff Squyres > jsquyres(a)cisco.com > For corporate legal information go to: > http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/ > > > _______________________________________________ > mpi-forum mailing list > mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum -- Jeff Squyres jsquyres(a)cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] Draft standard - take II
by Jeff Squyres 26 Oct '10

26 Oct '10

On Oct 25, 2010, at 9:28 PM, Graham, Richard L. wrote: > Just a friendly reminder that we are trying to get the draft standard out before SC, and were aiming to have people review their sections by mid last week. By my records the only chapters that have passed WG reviews are: > - Environment management > - Profiling Interface > > I am equating 100% WG review == section reviewed. I'm not sure I understand. Are you looking for an affirmation from every single member of every single WG? I thought that the committee chair reporting back would be enough. > Please make your best effort to complete reviews ASAP, so we can get this out the door. Which are we reviewing, the trunk or the branch? (I don't think that this has been conveyed to the Forum yet) Both changed as of yesterday. -- Jeff Squyres jsquyres(a)cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/

1 0

Draft standard - take II
by Graham, Richard L. 25 Oct '10

25 Oct '10

Just a friendly reminder that we are trying to get the draft standard out before SC, and were aiming to have people review their sections by mid last week. By my records the only chapters that have passed WG reviews are: - Environment management - Profiling Interface I am equating 100% WG review == section reviewed. Please make your best effort to complete reviews ASAP, so we can get this out the door. Thanks, Rich

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] Writable MPI-3 author SVN accounts
by Jeff Squyres 25 Oct '10

25 Oct '10

I should be more clear: only chapter committee chairs get writable SVN access, as listed here: http://meetings.mpi-forum.org/mpi3.0_chapter_wgs.php All other Forum members can have read-only access provided by the generic SVN account (intentionally not posted here because the username/password are NOT public information). On Oct 25, 2010, at 7:58 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote: > If you need write access to the MPI-3 SVN repo, please let me know. Only a (very) small number of chapter authors have contacted me so far to get write access. > > Thanks. > > -- > Jeff Squyres > jsquyres(a)cisco.com > For corporate legal information go to: > http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/ > -- Jeff Squyres jsquyres(a)cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/

1 0

AUTO: Richard Treumann/Poughkeepsie/IBM is out of the office until 01/02/2001. (returning 11/01/2010)
by Richard Treumann 25 Oct '10

25 Oct '10

I am out of the office until 11/01/2010. I will be out of the office on vacation the last week of Oct. Back Nov 1. I will not see any email. Note: This is an automated response to your message "[Mpi-forum] Writable MPI-3 author SVN accounts" sent on 10/25/10 7:58:38. This is the only notification you will receive while this person is away.

1 0