August 2008 - mpi-forum - mailman3.cels.anl.gov

mpdboot error
by Maicon Sartin 30 Aug '08

30 Aug '08

Hi, i am with a problem for start mpdboot with two machine, when i start the mpdboot with 1 host this functions normally in any a of two machine, but with more of that 1 happens the error folowing: mpdboot_maq2 (handle_mpd_output 406): from mpd on maq1, invalid port info: no_port This happens in any machine, in the two machines is disable firewal and the SSH is functions normally. Thanks. -- Maicon A. Sartin mapsartin(a)gmail.com

1 0

Sept 3-5 meeting location information
by Richard Graham 29 Aug '08

29 Aug '08

The MPI Forum will meet this coming week, Sept 3-5, 2008 at The Computer Science and Informatics Centre, University College Dublin. Specific information: Wed: CSI lecture theatre Thur: CSI lecture theatre Fri: CSI B1.08 The delivery address: The Computer Science and Informatics Centre, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4 Rich

1 0

MPI Forum meeting Sept 3-5,2008 - Agenda
by Richard Graham 12 Aug '08

12 Aug '08

The ³final² agenda is posted. Please let me know if there is someone that did not get the time slot they needed. I will do my best to keep this one from changing. Thanks, Rich

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] Proposal to establish the Miscellaneous Working Group
by Jeff Brown 12 Aug '08

12 Aug '08

At 11:34 AM 8/8/2008, you wrote: >Hello all, >I'd like to propose a new Miscellaneous working group as a >placeholder for ideas which don't nicely fit into any of the >existing working groups. At the moment, here are the topics I'd >like to include in such a group. > >* Recommending standard names and options for MPI compiler wrappers, >in the same way the 2.0 makes recommendations about mpiexec this one could map into the ABI WG >* Assembling test suites for 2.2 and 3.0, perhaps not blessed by the >standard, but a place where all MPI developers can download and/or >contribute tests to check their MPI meets the spec (or rather >doesn't fail to meet the spec for some particular test case) Why not blessed by the standard? An official compliance test suite is a great idea. >* Organizing a survey to identify features that users currently use >in MPI, and for feedback on new features proposed for 3.0 >* Recommending standard tools interfaces, like MPIR_PROCDESC > >I'm willing to chair this group. Are there other organizations who >would support it? LANL would support this. Jeff

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] MPI Forum meeting Sept 3-5,2008
by Richard Graham 08 Aug '08

08 Aug '08

One more request. I know that people would like to have the agenda fixed well in advance of the meeting, but just today had two more request for changes. I will set the ³final² agenda by the end of the day Monday, 8/11/2008, so if there are any changes that people want, please let me know by Monday, 8/11/2008. Thanks, Rich On 8/8/08 3:06 PM, "Richard Graham" <rlgraham(a)ornl.gov> wrote: > We will need to go ahead with logistics for the upcoming meeting in Dublin > within a week or so. I am aware of people who are planning to attend the > Forum, but have not registered. Please register by the end of next week, > Friday, 8/15/2008. We will base the food order on the number of people who > have registered by that date. The link to the registration page is: > https://www.ornl.gov/ccsd_registrations/nccs_mpi_forums/ > > Thanks, > Rich > > _______________________________________________ > mpi-forum mailing list > mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] Proposal to establish the Miscellaneous Working Group
by Seppo Sahrakorpi 08 Aug '08

08 Aug '08

Hi all, TotalView Technologies supports this too. Thanks, Seppo on 8/8/2008 1:34 PM Adam Moody said the following: > Hello all, > I'd like to propose a new Miscellaneous working group as a placeholder > for ideas which don't nicely fit into any of the existing working > groups. At the moment, here are the topics I'd like to include in such > a group. > > * Recommending standard names and options for MPI compiler wrappers, in > the same way the 2.0 makes recommendations about mpiexec > * Assembling test suites for 2.2 and 3.0, perhaps not blessed by the > standard, but a place where all MPI developers can download and/or > contribute tests to check their MPI meets the spec (or rather doesn't > fail to meet the spec for some particular test case) > * Organizing a survey to identify features that users currently use in > MPI, and for feedback on new features proposed for 3.0 > * Recommending standard tools interfaces, like MPIR_PROCDESC > > I'm willing to chair this group. Are there other organizations who > would support it? > -Adam Moody > LLNL > _______________________________________________ > mpi-forum mailing list > mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum -- Seppo Sahrakorpi Partner Technologies Engineer TotalView Technologies, 24 Prime Parkway, Natick, MA 01760 http://www.totalviewtech.com seppo(a)totalviewtech.com -- 508-652-7781

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] Proposal to establish the Miscellaneous Working Group
by William Gropp 08 Aug '08

08 Aug '08

The University of Illinois supports this. Bill On Aug 8, 2008, at 12:34 PM, Adam Moody wrote: > Hello all, > I'd like to propose a new Miscellaneous working group as a placeholder > for ideas which don't nicely fit into any of the existing working > groups. At the moment, here are the topics I'd like to include in > such > a group. > > * Recommending standard names and options for MPI compiler > wrappers, in > the same way the 2.0 makes recommendations about mpiexec > * Assembling test suites for 2.2 and 3.0, perhaps not blessed by the > standard, but a place where all MPI developers can download and/or > contribute tests to check their MPI meets the spec (or rather doesn't > fail to meet the spec for some particular test case) > * Organizing a survey to identify features that users currently use in > MPI, and for feedback on new features proposed for 3.0 > * Recommending standard tools interfaces, like MPIR_PROCDESC > > I'm willing to chair this group. Are there other organizations who > would support it? > -Adam Moody > LLNL > _______________________________________________ > mpi-forum mailing list > mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum William Gropp Paul and Cynthia Saylor Professor of Computer Science University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign

1 0

MPI Forum meeting Sept 3-5,2008
by Richard Graham 08 Aug '08

08 Aug '08

We will need to go ahead with logistics for the upcoming meeting in Dublin within a week or so. I am aware of people who are planning to attend the Forum, but have not registered. Please register by the end of next week, Friday, 8/15/2008. We will base the food order on the number of people who have registered by that date. The link to the registration page is: https://www.ornl.gov/ccsd_registrations/nccs_mpi_forums/ Thanks, Rich

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] Proposal to establish the Miscellaneous Working Group
by Supalov, Alexander 08 Aug '08

08 Aug '08

Thanks. Intel will support this. -----Original Message----- From: mpi-forum-bounces(a)lists.mpi-forum.org [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Adam Moody Sent: Friday, August 08, 2008 7:34 PM To: mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org Subject: [Mpi-forum] Proposal to establish the Miscellaneous Working Group Hello all, I'd like to propose a new Miscellaneous working group as a placeholder for ideas which don't nicely fit into any of the existing working groups. At the moment, here are the topics I'd like to include in such a group. * Recommending standard names and options for MPI compiler wrappers, in the same way the 2.0 makes recommendations about mpiexec * Assembling test suites for 2.2 and 3.0, perhaps not blessed by the standard, but a place where all MPI developers can download and/or contribute tests to check their MPI meets the spec (or rather doesn't fail to meet the spec for some particular test case) * Organizing a survey to identify features that users currently use in MPI, and for feedback on new features proposed for 3.0 * Recommending standard tools interfaces, like MPIR_PROCDESC I'm willing to chair this group. Are there other organizations who would support it? -Adam Moody LLNL _______________________________________________ mpi-forum mailing list mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum --------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel GmbH Dornacher Strasse 1 85622 Feldkirchen/Muenchen Germany Sitz der Gesellschaft: Feldkirchen bei Muenchen Geschaeftsfuehrer: Douglas Lusk, Peter Gleissner, Hannes Schwaderer Registergericht: Muenchen HRB 47456 Ust.-IdNr. VAT Registration No.: DE129385895 Citibank Frankfurt (BLZ 502 109 00) 600119052 This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] Proposal to establish the Miscellaneous Working Group
by Rainer Keller 08 Aug '08

08 Aug '08

Hello dear Adam, thanks for starting the group. We would support this and participate. With best regards, Rainer On Freitag, 8. August 2008, Adam Moody wrote: > Hello all, > I'd like to propose a new Miscellaneous working group as a placeholder > for ideas which don't nicely fit into any of the existing working > groups. At the moment, here are the topics I'd like to include in such > a group. > > * Recommending standard names and options for MPI compiler wrappers, in > the same way the 2.0 makes recommendations about mpiexec > * Assembling test suites for 2.2 and 3.0, perhaps not blessed by the > standard, but a place where all MPI developers can download and/or > contribute tests to check their MPI meets the spec (or rather doesn't > fail to meet the spec for some particular test case) > * Organizing a survey to identify features that users currently use in > MPI, and for feedback on new features proposed for 3.0 > * Recommending standard tools interfaces, like MPIR_PROCDESC > > I'm willing to chair this group. Are there other organizations who > would support it? > -Adam Moody > LLNL > _______________________________________________ > mpi-forum mailing list > mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum -- ---------------------------------------------------------------- Dipl.-Inf. Rainer Keller http://www.hlrs.de/people/keller HLRS Tel: ++49 (0)711-685 6 5858 Nobelstrasse 19 Fax: ++49 (0)711-685 6 5832 70550 Stuttgart email: keller(a)hlrs.de Germany AIM/Skype:rusraink

1 0