November 2014 - mpi-forum - mailman3.cels.anl.gov

Hotel information
by Richard Graham 21 Nov '14

21 Nov '14

Here is the information on the hotel block at the Milpitas Residence Inn. We have a room block twice as large as expected, so I figured that for the two that have talked to me specifically about this, there will be no problem getting a room in the block. Ten (10) Studio Suites on Sunday, December 7, 2014 through Thursday, December 11,2014 for a total of Three or four nights. This is a 72 hour cancellation or to make any changes for any rooms under the MPIC code for the negotiated rate of $199.00 per night. Final cut off to books rooms will be November 30, 2014 I ended up needing to call the hotel to get the rate - the name of the contact person is Tina Slominski, and the hotel phone number is 408 941 9222. Rich

1 0

Info Keys Ticket
by Jim Dinan 21 Nov '14

21 Nov '14

Hi All, The hybrid working group would like to put forward ticket #461 ( https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/461) for consideration for MPI 3.1, with a formal reading at the upcoming December meeting. This ticket proposes the no_any_tag and no_any_source info keys, on which we have achieved consensus. We continue to have vigorous and productive debate on additional communicator info keys proposals that have been captured in #381. We will pursue these additional proposals for MPI 4.0. Thanks and see you in December, ~Jim.

1 0

Don't forget to register
by Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) 21 Nov '14

21 Nov '14

The Forum meeting is in just about 2 weeks -- don't forget to register! http://meetings.mpi-forum.org/Dec_2014_logistics.php -- Jeff Squyres jsquyres(a)cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/

1 0

Agenda posted
by Schulz Martin 17 Nov '14

17 Nov '14

Hi all, I posted a first version of the agenda for the December MPI forum based on the input I have gotten so far. It¹s at: http://meetings.mpi-forum.org/secretary/2014/12/agenda.php Please let me know if I missed anything or if you still have additional requests. Also, please keep in mind that the deadline for announcing errata items, readings, and votes is next Monday (today in one week!). Thanks! Martin ________________________________________________________________________ Martin Schulz, schulzm(a)llnl.gov, http://scalability.llnl.gov/ CASC @ Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, USA

1 0

Dec meeting registration
by Richard Graham 17 Nov '14

17 Nov '14

The registration link is up and running at: http://a3.acteva.com/orderbooking/bookEvent/A341537 Still working on arranging for a block of rooms at the Milpitas Residence Inn. Rich

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] MPI-3 implementations status
by Fab Tillier 16 Nov '14

16 Nov '14

Hi Pavan, Can you add a * for NBC for MS-MPI please? Must have missed it in my update. Thanks, -Fab From: mpi-forum [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Balaji, Pavan Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2014 7:18 PM To: mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org Subject: Re: [Mpi-forum] MPI-3 implementations status All, Attached are the final updated slides with the MPI-3 implementations status. These include updates from Tianhe and Microsoft compared to the previous version. Regards — Pavan > On Nov 14, 2014, at 2:14 PM, Balaji, Pavan <balaji(a)anl.gov<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > Thanks everyone for sending the updates to your implementation status. I’ve consolidated all input so far into the attached slide. Tianhe folks said that they need some more time to add information about the last empty cell they have for their implementation. I’ll send out an updated slide once they get back to me. > > Regards, > > — Pavan > > > > On Jun 9, 2014, at 12:34 AM, Balaji, Pavan <balaji(a)anl.gov<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > Folks, > > > > With ISC coming up, I wanted to make sure the status of all MPI-3 implementations is accurately reflected on the attached implementations slide (which will be put up on the Forum website and will be used at ISC talks and BoFs). > > > > If there is any inaccuracy in the status, please let us know. I know that some implementations are planning for a release at ISC which will change this status. In such cases, please send me a note with the change and the date when the change needs to be made public and I’ll take care of it. > > > > Thanks, > > > > — Pavan > > > > <mpi-implementations.pptx>_______________________________________________ > > mpi-forum mailing list > > mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org<mailto:[email protected]> > > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum > > -- > Pavan Balaji ✉️ > http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji > > <mpi-implementations.pptx>_______________________________________________ > mpi-forum mailing list > mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org<mailto:[email protected]> > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum -- Pavan Balaji ✉️ http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] MPI-3 implementations status
by Balaji, Pavan 15 Nov '14

15 Nov '14

All, Attached are the final updated slides with the MPI-3 implementations status. These include updates from Tianhe and Microsoft compared to the previous version. Regards — Pavan > On Nov 14, 2014, at 2:14 PM, Balaji, Pavan <balaji(a)anl.gov> wrote: > > > Thanks everyone for sending the updates to your implementation status. I’ve consolidated all input so far into the attached slide. Tianhe folks said that they need some more time to add information about the last empty cell they have for their implementation. I’ll send out an updated slide once they get back to me. > > Regards, > > — Pavan > > > > On Jun 9, 2014, at 12:34 AM, Balaji, Pavan <balaji(a)anl.gov> wrote: > > > > Folks, > > > > With ISC coming up, I wanted to make sure the status of all MPI-3 implementations is accurately reflected on the attached implementations slide (which will be put up on the Forum website and will be used at ISC talks and BoFs). > > > > If there is any inaccuracy in the status, please let us know. I know that some implementations are planning for a release at ISC which will change this status. In such cases, please send me a note with the change and the date when the change needs to be made public and I’ll take care of it. > > > > Thanks, > > > > — Pavan > > > > <mpi-implementations.pptx>_______________________________________________ > > mpi-forum mailing list > > mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum > > -- > Pavan Balaji ✉️ > http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji > > <mpi-implementations.pptx>_______________________________________________ > mpi-forum mailing list > mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum -- Pavan Balaji ✉️ http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] MPI-3 implementations status
by Balaji, Pavan 14 Nov '14

14 Nov '14

> On Nov 14, 2014, at 2:18 PM, Jeff Hammond <jeff.science(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Just for my own enlightenment, can someone explain why MPICH can have > F08 bindings already while some of its derivatives do not? Is it > simply a matter of lag in rebasing against upstream or of official > support, which requires their own QA? Or something else? Several of them just haven’t rebased to the appropriate release of mpich. Most derivatives should get it for free, with no changes required on their part. - Pavan -- Pavan Balaji ✉️ http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] MPI-3 implementations status
by Jeff Hammond 14 Nov '14

14 Nov '14

Just for my own enlightenment, can someone explain why MPICH can have F08 bindings already while some of its derivatives do not? Is it simply a matter of lag in rebasing against upstream or of official support, which requires their own QA? Or something else? Jeff On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 12:14 PM, Balaji, Pavan <balaji(a)anl.gov> wrote: > > Thanks everyone for sending the updates to your implementation status. I’ve > consolidated all input so far into the attached slide. Tianhe folks said > that they need some more time to add information about the last empty cell > they have for their implementation. I’ll send out an updated slide once > they get back to me. > > Regards, > > — Pavan > > >> On Jun 9, 2014, at 12:34 AM, Balaji, Pavan <balaji(a)anl.gov> wrote: >> >> Folks, >> >> With ISC coming up, I wanted to make sure the status of all MPI-3 >> implementations is accurately reflected on the attached implementations >> slide (which will be put up on the Forum website and will be used at ISC >> talks and BoFs). >> >> If there is any inaccuracy in the status, please let us know. I know that >> some implementations are planning for a release at ISC which will change >> this status. In such cases, please send me a note with the change and the >> date when the change needs to be made public and I’ll take care of it. >> >> Thanks, >> >> — Pavan >> >> <mpi-implementations.pptx>_______________________________________________ >> mpi-forum mailing list >> mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org >> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum > > -- > Pavan Balaji ✉️ > http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji > > > _______________________________________________ > mpi-forum mailing list > mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum -- Jeff Hammond jeff.science(a)gmail.com http://jeffhammond.github.io/

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] MPI-3 implementations status
by Balaji, Pavan 14 Nov '14

14 Nov '14

Thanks everyone for sending the updates to your implementation status. I’ve consolidated all input so far into the attached slide. Tianhe folks said that they need some more time to add information about the last empty cell they have for their implementation. I’ll send out an updated slide once they get back to me. Regards, — Pavan > On Jun 9, 2014, at 12:34 AM, Balaji, Pavan <balaji(a)anl.gov> wrote: > > Folks, > > With ISC coming up, I wanted to make sure the status of all MPI-3 implementations is accurately reflected on the attached implementations slide (which will be put up on the Forum website and will be used at ISC talks and BoFs). > > If there is any inaccuracy in the status, please let us know. I know that some implementations are planning for a release at ISC which will change this status. In such cases, please send me a note with the change and the date when the change needs to be made public and I’ll take care of it. > > Thanks, > > — Pavan > > <mpi-implementations.pptx>_______________________________________________ > mpi-forum mailing list > mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum -- Pavan Balaji ✉️ http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji

1 0