June 2009 - mpi-forum - mailman3.cels.anl.gov

Re: [Mpi-forum] July 27-29 MPI Forum meeting
by Richard Graham 30 Jun '09

30 Jun '09

For those that plan to take advantage of the hotel room block, please register ASAP. We need to send the list of guests in this week, but I have asked to see if we can get an extension on this. Thanks, Rich On 6/26/09 8:26 AM, "Richard Graham" <rlgraham(a)ornl.gov> wrote: > Just to clarify someone new is helping with registration, and in an attempt > to make the hotel registration process clearer, ended up confusing people. > Nothing has changed in the registration process. I have asked that the > wording on the registration page be changed, and that it say that hotel > confirmation will be sent separately, as it has been all along. > > Sorry for the confusion, > Rich > > > On 6/26/09 6:06 AM, "Richard Graham" <rlgraham(a)ornl.gov> wrote: > >> Nothing has changed in the actual procedure - I will ask to have the >> registration form fixed. >> >> Rich >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: mpi-forum-bounces(a)lists.mpi-forum.org >> <mpi-forum-bounces(a)lists.mpi-forum.org> >> To: Main MPI Forum mailing list <mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org> >> Sent: Fri Jun 26 04:51:46 2009 >> Subject: Re: [Mpi-forum] July 27-29 MPI Forum meeting >> >> Rich and Jeff, >> >> there is an inconsistency regarding the hotel reservation: >> >> - The registration form >> https://www.ornl.gov/ccsd_registrations/nccs_mpi_forums/ >> indicates: >> "The Blackstone Renaissance, 636 South Michigan Ave., reservations are >> done separately from this form. >> Please select the nights you will be reserving at the hotel." >> >> - The logistics page >> http://meetings.mpi-forum.org/Jul_2009_logistics.php >> tells: >> "To reserve a hotel room at this hotel, please indicate on the meeting >> registration form which nights you would like to stay at the hotel, >> and ORNL's conference folks will make the reservation in one block." >> >> Which one is correct? >> >> Best regards >> Rolf >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, 25 Jun 2009 16:23:42 -0400 >> Richard Graham <rlgraham(a)ornl.gov> wrote: >>> > The registration for the July meeting of the MPI forum in Chicago is >>> >not >>> > on-line. This can be accessed from the meetings home page at >>> > http://meetings.mpi-forum.org/ >>> > or directly at >>> > https://www.ornl.gov/ccsd_registrations/nccs_mpi_forums/ >>> > >>> > A preliminary agenda is also posted please let me know if you want >>> >items >>> > added, deleted, or moved around. >>> > >>> > Thanks, >>> > Rich >> >> Dr. Rolf Rabenseifner . . . . . . . . . .. email rabenseifner(a)hlrs.de >> High Performance Computing Center (HLRS) . phone ++49(0)711/685-65530 >> University of Stuttgart . . . . . . . . .. fax ++49(0)711 / 685-65832 >> Head of Dpmt Parallel Computing . . . www.hlrs.de/people/rabenseifner >> Nobelstr. 19, D-70550 Stuttgart, Germany . (Office: Allmandring 30) >> _______________________________________________ >> mpi-forum mailing list >> mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org >> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum >> >> _______________________________________________ >> mpi-forum mailing list >> mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org >> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum >> > > > _______________________________________________ > mpi-forum mailing list > mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] July 27-29 MPI Forum meeting
by Richard Graham 26 Jun '09

26 Jun '09

Just to clarify someone new is helping with registration, and in an attempt to make the hotel registration process clearer, ended up confusing people. Nothing has changed in the registration process. I have asked that the wording on the registration page be changed, and that it say that hotel confirmation will be sent separately, as it has been all along. Sorry for the confusion, Rich On 6/26/09 6:06 AM, "Richard Graham" <rlgraham(a)ornl.gov> wrote: > Nothing has changed in the actual procedure - I will ask to have the > registration form fixed. > > Rich > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: mpi-forum-bounces(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > <mpi-forum-bounces(a)lists.mpi-forum.org> > To: Main MPI Forum mailing list <mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org> > Sent: Fri Jun 26 04:51:46 2009 > Subject: Re: [Mpi-forum] July 27-29 MPI Forum meeting > > Rich and Jeff, > > there is an inconsistency regarding the hotel reservation: > > - The registration form > https://www.ornl.gov/ccsd_registrations/nccs_mpi_forums/ > indicates: > "The Blackstone Renaissance, 636 South Michigan Ave., reservations are > done separately from this form. > Please select the nights you will be reserving at the hotel." > > - The logistics page > http://meetings.mpi-forum.org/Jul_2009_logistics.php > tells: > "To reserve a hotel room at this hotel, please indicate on the meeting > registration form which nights you would like to stay at the hotel, > and ORNL's conference folks will make the reservation in one block." > > Which one is correct? > > Best regards > Rolf > > > > > On Thu, 25 Jun 2009 16:23:42 -0400 > Richard Graham <rlgraham(a)ornl.gov> wrote: >> > The registration for the July meeting of the MPI forum in Chicago is >> >not >> > on-line. This can be accessed from the meetings home page at >> > http://meetings.mpi-forum.org/ >> > or directly at >> > https://www.ornl.gov/ccsd_registrations/nccs_mpi_forums/ >> > >> > A preliminary agenda is also posted please let me know if you want >> >items >> > added, deleted, or moved around. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Rich > > Dr. Rolf Rabenseifner . . . . . . . . . .. email rabenseifner(a)hlrs.de > High Performance Computing Center (HLRS) . phone ++49(0)711/685-65530 > University of Stuttgart . . . . . . . . .. fax ++49(0)711 / 685-65832 > Head of Dpmt Parallel Computing . . . www.hlrs.de/people/rabenseifner > Nobelstr. 19, D-70550 Stuttgart, Germany . (Office: Allmandring 30) > _______________________________________________ > mpi-forum mailing list > mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum > > _______________________________________________ > mpi-forum mailing list > mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum >

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] July 27-29 MPI Forum meeting
by Graham, Richard L. 26 Jun '09

26 Jun '09

Nothing has changed in the actual procedure - I will ask to have the registration form fixed. Rich ----- Original Message ----- From: mpi-forum-bounces(a)lists.mpi-forum.org <mpi-forum-bounces(a)lists.mpi-forum.org> To: Main MPI Forum mailing list <mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org> Sent: Fri Jun 26 04:51:46 2009 Subject: Re: [Mpi-forum] July 27-29 MPI Forum meeting Rich and Jeff, there is an inconsistency regarding the hotel reservation: - The registration form https://www.ornl.gov/ccsd_registrations/nccs_mpi_forums/ indicates: "The Blackstone Renaissance, 636 South Michigan Ave., reservations are done separately from this form. Please select the nights you will be reserving at the hotel." - The logistics page http://meetings.mpi-forum.org/Jul_2009_logistics.php tells: "To reserve a hotel room at this hotel, please indicate on the meeting registration form which nights you would like to stay at the hotel, and ORNL's conference folks will make the reservation in one block." Which one is correct? Best regards Rolf On Thu, 25 Jun 2009 16:23:42 -0400 Richard Graham <rlgraham(a)ornl.gov> wrote: > The registration for the July meeting of the MPI forum in Chicago is >not > on-line. This can be accessed from the meetings home page at > http://meetings.mpi-forum.org/ > or directly at > https://www.ornl.gov/ccsd_registrations/nccs_mpi_forums/ > > A preliminary agenda is also posted please let me know if you want >items > added, deleted, or moved around. > > Thanks, > Rich Dr. Rolf Rabenseifner . . . . . . . . . .. email rabenseifner(a)hlrs.de High Performance Computing Center (HLRS) . phone ++49(0)711/685-65530 University of Stuttgart . . . . . . . . .. fax ++49(0)711 / 685-65832 Head of Dpmt Parallel Computing . . . www.hlrs.de/people/rabenseifner Nobelstr. 19, D-70550 Stuttgart, Germany . (Office: Allmandring 30) _______________________________________________ mpi-forum mailing list mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] July 27-29 MPI Forum meeting
by Rolf Rabenseifner 26 Jun '09

26 Jun '09

Rich and Jeff, there is an inconsistency regarding the hotel reservation: - The registration form https://www.ornl.gov/ccsd_registrations/nccs_mpi_forums/ indicates: "The Blackstone Renaissance, 636 South Michigan Ave., reservations are done separately from this form. Please select the nights you will be reserving at the hotel." - The logistics page http://meetings.mpi-forum.org/Jul_2009_logistics.php tells: "To reserve a hotel room at this hotel, please indicate on the meeting registration form which nights you would like to stay at the hotel, and ORNL's conference folks will make the reservation in one block." Which one is correct? Best regards Rolf On Thu, 25 Jun 2009 16:23:42 -0400 Richard Graham <rlgraham(a)ornl.gov> wrote: > The registration for the July meeting of the MPI forum in Chicago is >not > on-line. This can be accessed from the meetings home page at > http://meetings.mpi-forum.org/ > or directly at > https://www.ornl.gov/ccsd_registrations/nccs_mpi_forums/ > > A preliminary agenda is also posted ï¿½ please let me know if you want >items > added, deleted, or moved around. > > Thanks, > Rich Dr. Rolf Rabenseifner . . . . . . . . . .. email rabenseifner(a)hlrs.de High Performance Computing Center (HLRS) . phone ++49(0)711/685-65530 University of Stuttgart . . . . . . . . .. fax ++49(0)711 / 685-65832 Head of Dpmt Parallel Computing . . . www.hlrs.de/people/rabenseifner Nobelstr. 19, D-70550 Stuttgart, Germany . (Office: Allmandring 30)

1 0

July 27-29 MPI Forum meeting
by Richard Graham 25 Jun '09

25 Jun '09

The registration for the July meeting of the MPI forum in Chicago is not on-line. This can be accessed from the meetings home page at http://meetings.mpi-forum.org/ or directly at https://www.ornl.gov/ccsd_registrations/nccs_mpi_forums/ A preliminary agenda is also posted please let me know if you want items added, deleted, or moved around. Thanks, Rich

1 0

Votes/slides from Menlo Park meeting
by Jeff Squyres 15 Jun '09

15 Jun '09

Posted here: http://meetings.mpi-forum.org/secretary/2009/06/ Notes: 1. Some of the vote numbers that I read audibly during the meeting may have been incorrect. Those shown on the web page should be final: http://meetings.mpi-forum.org/secretary/2009/06/votes.php 2. I have amended the slides that I presented at the end of the meeting ("Troublesome tickets") and updated to be more specific on the definition of "troublesome" and therefore included a few more tickets in the slides: http://meetings.mpi-forum.org/secretary/2009/06/slides/mpi-menlo-park-vote-… -- Jeff Squyres Cisco Systems

1 0

URL for SVN repo
by Jeff Squyres 09 Jun '09

09 Jun '09

As discussed in the June Menlo Park Forum meeting, the URL for the SVN repo for the MPI documents is: https://svn.mpi-forum.org/svn/mpi-forum-docs/trunk The username and password for the Forum-wide read-only account was given out in the meeting. DO NOT SEND THE USERNAME AND PASSWORD ON PUBLIC MAILING LISTS! -- Jeff Squyres Cisco Systems

1 0

slides
by Jeff Squyres 09 Jun '09

09 Jun '09

Please don't forget to send me your slides after you present (e.g., there were multiple slide decks presented in the hybrid wg yesterday). Thanks! -- Jeff Squyres Cisco Systems

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] [Mpi-22] The const proposal - Ticket 140
by Pavan Balaji 05 Jun '09

05 Jun '09

If this is being moved to MPI-3, we should consider modifying the ticket to include functions we left behind for backward compatibility. For example: int MPI_Comm_spawn(const char*, /*const*/char*[], int, MPI_Info, int, MPI_Comm, MPI_Comm*, int []); int MPI_Comm_spawn_multiple(int, /*const*/char*[], /*const*/char**[], const int [],/*const*/MPI_Info [], int, MPI_Comm, MPI_Comm*, int []); -- Pavan On 06/02/2009 09:36 AM, Richard Treumann wrote: > Hi Bronis > > To the best of my knowledge, none of the signatories involved in asking > that Ticket 140 not become part of MPI 2.2 consider it inappropriate for > consideration in MPI 3.0 > > This proposal generated real interest among Forum members and I see no > reason for it to be withdrawn entirely. > > Thank you Erez for agreeing to defer this to 3.0. It is a relief to a > number of MPI implementors that if (or when) this becomes part of the > MPI standard, we will have the lead time to do it properly and test it > rigorously. > > Dick Treumann > > Dick Treumann - MPI Team > IBM Systems & Technology Group > Dept X2ZA / MS P963 -- 2455 South Road -- Poughkeepsie, NY 12601 > Tele (845) 433-7846 Fax (845) 433-8363 > > > mpi-forum-bounces(a)lists.mpi-forum.org wrote on 06/01/2009 06:28:29 PM: > > > [image removed] > > > > Re: [Mpi-forum] [Mpi-22] The const proposal - Ticket 140 > > > > Bronis R. de Supinski > > > > to: > > > > Main MPI Forum mailing list > > > > 06/01/2009 06:32 PM > > > > Sent by: > > > > mpi-forum-bounces(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > > > > Cc: > > > > "MPI 2.2" > > > > Please respond to "Bronis R. de Supinski", Main MPI Forum mailing list > > > > > > Erez: > > > > Please do not simply withdraw it. There are a substantial > > portion of us who you convinced this was a good idea and > > what I saw in the feedback was that some found that it > > was outside the scope of 2.2. I think some of those people > > still feel it is a good idea even if that is the case. > > I hope you will press for 3.0. > > > > Bronis > > > > > > On Mon, 1 Jun 2009, Erez Haba wrote: > > > > > With this feedback of my distinguish colleagues, I don't see any > > point of perusing this proposal and I will be withdrawing this > > ticket in the next mpi forum meeting. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > .Erez > > > > > > From: mpi-22-bounces(a)lists.mpi-forum.org [mailto:mpi-22- > > bounces(a)lists.mpi-forum.org] On Behalf Of William Gropp > > > Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 11:37 AM > > > To: MPI 2.2 > > > Cc: Main MPI Forum mailing list > > > Subject: Re: [Mpi-22] [Mpi-forum] The const proposal - Ticket 140 > > > > > > This is an example of why we have two votes - to give everyone a > > chance to take a second look at the issues. I'll note that the > > 17-10 (counting no's and abstains together) is worrisome; while a > > majority vote is the rule, a good standard will make a compelling > > argument for each feature. > > > > > > The process here would normally be to have a debate and then the > > second vote. However, for MPI 2.2, we have the additional > > requirements of limited scope of change to implementations - we > > didn't define what that meant precisely (and that is a good thing), > > but there is a strong argument that limited scope of change would > > require at least a majority of implementations to agree that the > > change is minor. > > > > > > Bill > > > > > > On May 27, 2009, at 12:48 PM, Erez Haba wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi all, I'm not really sure how to respond to this email. I will > > just note that this proposal has passed 1st vote last September with > > the following results. > > > > > > 4. Vote topic: MPI-2.2 const for C bindings, 1st vote: > > > YES: > > > > > > 17 > > > > > > NO: > > > > > > 4 > > > > > > ABSTAIN: > > > > > > 6 > > > > > > MISSED: > > > > > > 0 > > > > > > Result: > > > > > > Ballot passed > > > > > > > > > http://meetings.mpi-forum.org/secretary/2008/09/votes.php > > > > > > since then we decided to postpone the 1st vote to add very few > > minor correction to ticket #46 (the original proposal) and thus > > created ticket #140. > > > > > > I believe that all the points you mention below have been > > discussed in the forum meeting(s). > > > > > > Thanks, > > > .Erez > > > > > > From: mpi-forum-bounces(a)lists.mpi-forum.org<mailto:mpi-forum- > > bounces(a)lists.mpi-forum.org> > [mailto:[email protected] > > ] On Behalf Of Richard Treumann > > > Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 6:53 AM > > > To: Main MPI Forum mailing list > > > Cc: mpi-22(a)lists.mpi-forum.org<mailto:[email protected]> > > > Subject: [Mpi-forum] The const proposal - Ticket 140 > > > > > > > > > All - > > > > > > The signatories of this letter represent the majority of MPI > > implementors participating in the MPI Forum. We are concerned that > > proposal #140 ("Add const Keyword to the C bindings") has a number > > of issues which suggest delaying to MPI-3 would be appropriate. > > > > > > In particular, the proposal: > > > > > > - Is likely to pass a simple majority vote, but does not carry the > > support of the majority of MPI implementors, suggesting consensus > > has not been reached. > > > - Changes 90+ MPI API interfaces, which is not a "trivial" change > > and therefore does not meet the intent of the MPI-2.2 process. > > > - Is not needed to fix any serious bug in the standard text or to > > solve an issue that cannot easily be avoided by the MPI application. > > > - Does not offer any demonstrable optimization opportunities for > > implementation or application, but may constrain future > > implementation opportunities. > > > > > > Therefore, we ask for your assistance in deferring proposal #140 > > to the MPI-3 process, where more time can be spent assessing its impact. > > > > > > Thank you, > > > > > > - Cisco: Jeff Squires > > > - Intel: Alexander Supalov & Keith Underwood > > > - Sandia: Brian Barrett > > > - IBM: Richard Treumann > > > - QLogic: Avneesh Pant > > > - UTenn: George Bosilca > > > - HP: David George Solt > > > - UHouston: Edgar Gabriel > > > - Myricom: Patrick Geoffray > > > - ORNL: Richard Graham > > > - Sun: Terry Dontje > > > - NEC: Hubert Ritzdorf & Jesper Traeff > > > > > > > > > > > > Dick Treumann - MPI Team > > > IBM Systems & Technology Group > > > Dept X2ZA / MS P963 -- 2455 South Road -- Poughkeepsie, NY 12601 > > > Tele (845) 433-7846 Fax (845) 433-8363 > > > <ATT00001.txt> > > > > > > William Gropp > > > Deputy Director for Research > > > Institute for Advanced Computing Applications and Technologies > > > Paul and Cynthia Saylor Professor of Computer Science > > > University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > mpi-forum mailing list > > mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > mpi-22 mailing list > mpi-22(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-22 -- Pavan Balaji http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] [Mpi-22] The const proposal - Ticket 140
by Richard Treumann 02 Jun '09

02 Jun '09

Hi Bronis To the best of my knowledge, none of the signatories involved in asking that Ticket 140 not become part of MPI 2.2 consider it inappropriate for consideration in MPI 3.0 This proposal generated real interest among Forum members and I see no reason for it to be withdrawn entirely. Thank you Erez for agreeing to defer this to 3.0. It is a relief to a number of MPI implementors that if (or when) this becomes part of the MPI standard, we will have the lead time to do it properly and test it rigorously. Dick Treumann Dick Treumann - MPI Team IBM Systems & Technology Group Dept X2ZA / MS P963 -- 2455 South Road -- Poughkeepsie, NY 12601 Tele (845) 433-7846 Fax (845) 433-8363 mpi-forum-bounces(a)lists.mpi-forum.org wrote on 06/01/2009 06:28:29 PM: > [image removed] > > Re: [Mpi-forum] [Mpi-22] The const proposal - Ticket 140 > > Bronis R. de Supinski > > to: > > Main MPI Forum mailing list > > 06/01/2009 06:32 PM > > Sent by: > > mpi-forum-bounces(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > > Cc: > > "MPI 2.2" > > Please respond to "Bronis R. de Supinski", Main MPI Forum mailing list > > > Erez: > > Please do not simply withdraw it. There are a substantial > portion of us who you convinced this was a good idea and > what I saw in the feedback was that some found that it > was outside the scope of 2.2. I think some of those people > still feel it is a good idea even if that is the case. > I hope you will press for 3.0. > > Bronis > > > On Mon, 1 Jun 2009, Erez Haba wrote: > > > With this feedback of my distinguish colleagues, I don't see any > point of perusing this proposal and I will be withdrawing this > ticket in the next mpi forum meeting. > > > > Thanks, > > .Erez > > > > From: mpi-22-bounces(a)lists.mpi-forum.org [mailto:mpi-22- > bounces(a)lists.mpi-forum.org] On Behalf Of William Gropp > > Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 11:37 AM > > To: MPI 2.2 > > Cc: Main MPI Forum mailing list > > Subject: Re: [Mpi-22] [Mpi-forum] The const proposal - Ticket 140 > > > > This is an example of why we have two votes - to give everyone a > chance to take a second look at the issues. I'll note that the > 17-10 (counting no's and abstains together) is worrisome; while a > majority vote is the rule, a good standard will make a compelling > argument for each feature. > > > > The process here would normally be to have a debate and then the > second vote. However, for MPI 2.2, we have the additional > requirements of limited scope of change to implementations - we > didn't define what that meant precisely (and that is a good thing), > but there is a strong argument that limited scope of change would > require at least a majority of implementations to agree that the > change is minor. > > > > Bill > > > > On May 27, 2009, at 12:48 PM, Erez Haba wrote: > > > > > > Hi all, I'm not really sure how to respond to this email. I will > just note that this proposal has passed 1st vote last September with > the following results. > > > > 4. Vote topic: MPI-2.2 const for C bindings, 1st vote: > > YES: > > > > 17 > > > > NO: > > > > 4 > > > > ABSTAIN: > > > > 6 > > > > MISSED: > > > > 0 > > > > Result: > > > > Ballot passed > > > > > > http://meetings.mpi-forum.org/secretary/2008/09/votes.php > > > > since then we decided to postpone the 1st vote to add very few > minor correction to ticket #46 (the original proposal) and thus > created ticket #140. > > > > I believe that all the points you mention below have been > discussed in the forum meeting(s). > > > > Thanks, > > .Erez > > > > From: mpi-forum-bounces(a)lists.mpi-forum.org<mailto:mpi-forum- > bounces(a)lists.mpi-forum.org> [mailto:[email protected] > ] On Behalf Of Richard Treumann > > Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 6:53 AM > > To: Main MPI Forum mailing list > > Cc: mpi-22(a)lists.mpi-forum.org<mailto:[email protected]> > > Subject: [Mpi-forum] The const proposal - Ticket 140 > > > > > > All - > > > > The signatories of this letter represent the majority of MPI > implementors participating in the MPI Forum. We are concerned that > proposal #140 ("Add const Keyword to the C bindings") has a number > of issues which suggest delaying to MPI-3 would be appropriate. > > > > In particular, the proposal: > > > > - Is likely to pass a simple majority vote, but does not carry the > support of the majority of MPI implementors, suggesting consensus > has not been reached. > > - Changes 90+ MPI API interfaces, which is not a "trivial" change > and therefore does not meet the intent of the MPI-2.2 process. > > - Is not needed to fix any serious bug in the standard text or to > solve an issue that cannot easily be avoided by the MPI application. > > - Does not offer any demonstrable optimization opportunities for > implementation or application, but may constrain future > implementation opportunities. > > > > Therefore, we ask for your assistance in deferring proposal #140 > to the MPI-3 process, where more time can be spent assessing its impact. > > > > Thank you, > > > > - Cisco: Jeff Squires > > - Intel: Alexander Supalov & Keith Underwood > > - Sandia: Brian Barrett > > - IBM: Richard Treumann > > - QLogic: Avneesh Pant > > - UTenn: George Bosilca > > - HP: David George Solt > > - UHouston: Edgar Gabriel > > - Myricom: Patrick Geoffray > > - ORNL: Richard Graham > > - Sun: Terry Dontje > > - NEC: Hubert Ritzdorf & Jesper Traeff > > > > > > > > Dick Treumann - MPI Team > > IBM Systems & Technology Group > > Dept X2ZA / MS P963 -- 2455 South Road -- Poughkeepsie, NY 12601 > > Tele (845) 433-7846 Fax (845) 433-8363 > > <ATT00001.txt> > > > > William Gropp > > Deputy Director for Research > > Institute for Advanced Computing Applications and Technologies > > Paul and Cynthia Saylor Professor of Computer Science > > University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > mpi-forum mailing list > mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum

1 0