October 2012 - mpi-forum - mailman3.cels.anl.gov

Re: [Mpi-forum] html version of mpi-3.0
by William Gropp 29 Oct '12

29 Oct '12

I'm working on it. I have an approximate version, but the tools I've tried have had trouble with the size of the document. Probably not before the end of the year. Bill William Gropp Director, Parallel Computing Institute Deputy Director for Research Institute for Advanced Computing Applications and Technologies Paul and Cynthia Saylor Professor of Computer Science University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign On Oct 29, 2012, at 2:39 PM, Rob Latham wrote: > though it would not be official, will there be unofficial html > versions of mpi-3 as there were for mpi-2.1 and mpi-2.2 ? > > ==rob > > -- > Rob Latham > Mathematics and Computer Science Division > Argonne National Lab, IL USA > _______________________________________________ > mpi-forum mailing list > mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum

1 0

html version of mpi-3.0
by Rob Latham 29 Oct '12

29 Oct '12

though it would not be official, will there be unofficial html versions of mpi-3 as there were for mpi-2.1 and mpi-2.2 ? ==rob -- Rob Latham Mathematics and Computer Science Division Argonne National Lab, IL USA

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] "Draft" MPI-3 docs listed on meetings.mpi-forum.org
by William Gropp 17 Oct '12

17 Oct '12

Yes, I think that the drafts should be removed. Bill William Gropp Director, Parallel Computing Institute Deputy Director for Research Institute for Advanced Computing Applications and Technologies Paul and Cynthia Saylor Professor of Computer Science University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign On Oct 17, 2012, at 8:51 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote: > Should the drafts be taken down? > > I notice that there's a big, bold, "Drafts of the MPI-3 standard are now posted on line at the MPI 3.0 meeting page." notice on the front page. Should that be taken down, too? > > -- > Jeff Squyres > jsquyres(a)cisco.com > For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/ > > > _______________________________________________ > mpi-forum mailing list > mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] "Draft" MPI-3 docs listed on meetings.mpi-forum.org
by Rolf Rabenseifner 17 Oct '12

17 Oct '12

In my opinion, the draft should be removed from http://meetings.mpi-forum.org/MPI_3.0_main_page.php and http://meetings.mpi-forum.org/ On http://meetings.mpi-forum.org/ the wording This website contains information about the activities of the MPI Forum for the creation of MPI versions 2.1, 2.2, and 3.0. should read (with "and next") This website contains information about the activities of the MPI Forum for the creation of MPI versions 2.1, 2.2, 3.0, and next. Best regards Rolf ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jeff Squyres" <jsquyres(a)cisco.com> > To: "MPI Forum list" <mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org> > Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 3:51:37 PM > Subject: [Mpi-forum] "Draft" MPI-3 docs listed on meetings.mpi-forum.org > Should the drafts be taken down? > > I notice that there's a big, bold, "Drafts of the MPI-3 standard are > now posted on line at the MPI 3.0 meeting page." notice on the front > page. Should that be taken down, too? > > -- > Jeff Squyres > jsquyres(a)cisco.com > For corporate legal information go to: > http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/ > > > _______________________________________________ > mpi-forum mailing list > mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum -- Dr. Rolf Rabenseifner . . . . . . . . . .. email rabenseifner(a)hlrs.de High Performance Computing Center (HLRS) . phone ++49(0)711/685-65530 University of Stuttgart . . . . . . . . .. fax ++49(0)711 / 685-65832 Head of Dpmt Parallel Computing . . . www.hlrs.de/people/rabenseifner Nobelstr. 19, D-70550 Stuttgart, Germany . (Office: Allmandring 30)

1 0

"Draft" MPI-3 docs listed on meetings.mpi-forum.org
by Jeff Squyres 17 Oct '12

17 Oct '12

Should the drafts be taken down? I notice that there's a big, bold, "Drafts of the MPI-3 standard are now posted on line at the MPI 3.0 meeting page." notice on the front page. Should that be taken down, too? -- Jeff Squyres jsquyres(a)cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] Meeting schedule for 2013
by Richard Graham 10 Oct '12

10 Oct '12

This clearly needs to be fixed, as suggested, we could do this the previous week, or could move this to May or July - what are folks preferences ? Rich -----Original Message----- From: mpi-forum-bounces(a)lists.mpi-forum.org [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Schulz, Martin Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 11:23 PM To: Underwood, Keith D Cc: Main MPI Forum mailing list Subject: Re: [Mpi-forum] Meeting schedule for 2013 On Oct 9, 2012, at 9:19 PM, Underwood, Keith D wrote: > Yeah, just remember that June is a hard time to schedule. IPDPS is at the end of May. SC PC meeting is June 24-25. Yes, agreed - I think a week earlier may work, but we need consensus, of course. Martin > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: mpi-forum-bounces(a)lists.mpi-forum.org [mailto:mpi-forum- >> bounces(a)lists.mpi-forum.org] On Behalf Of Schulz, Martin >> Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 11:16 PM >> To: Main MPI Forum mailing list >> Subject: Re: [Mpi-forum] Meeting schedule for 2013 >> >> Hi all, >> >> I don't want to debate the location discussion further - I agree >> let's leave that for the December meeting. >> >> I would like to bring up, though, that the June dates (independent of >> location) overlap with one of the premier conferences in HPC, namely ICS. >> The note on the spreadsheet was not intended as an organization >> conflict, but as a general comment since this will likely affect more >> people. If we still have flexibility in the dates, which it seems we >> have, we should consider moving that. Otherwise, this can only reduce participation. >> >> Martin >> >> >> On Oct 9, 2012, at 9:56 AM, Richard Graham wrote: >> >>> This is why I mentioned that we would probably close on this in San >>> Jose, as >> participation in this was rather low. If folks do not want to >> discuss this further, we can stick to what we already voted on. >>> >>> Rich >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: mpi-forum-bounces(a)lists.mpi-forum.org >>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jeff >>> Squyres >>> Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 11:54 AM >>> To: Main MPI Forum mailing list >>> Subject: Re: [Mpi-forum] Meeting schedule for 2013 >>> >>> On Oct 9, 2012, at 11:45 AM, Richard Graham wrote: >>> >>>> [rich] what is this based on ? >>> >>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mpi-forum/2012/10/2291.php >>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mpi-forum/2012/10/2295.php >>> >>> HDF snuck in late this morning and added another row before I made >>> the >> spreadsheet read-only. :-) So there are now 13 responses, not 12. >>> >>> -- >>> Jeff Squyres >>> jsquyres(a)cisco.com >>> For corporate legal information go to: >>> http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/ >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> mpi-forum mailing list >>> mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org >>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> mpi-forum mailing list >>> mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org >>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum >> >> __________________________________________________________ >> ______________ >> Martin Schulz, schulzm(a)llnl.gov, http://people.llnl.gov/schulzm CASC >> @ Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, USA >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> mpi-forum mailing list >> mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org >> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum ________________________________________________________________________ Martin Schulz, schulzm(a)llnl.gov, http://people.llnl.gov/schulzm CASC @ Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, USA _______________________________________________ mpi-forum mailing list mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] Meeting schedule for 2013
by Schulz, Martin 09 Oct '12

09 Oct '12

On Oct 9, 2012, at 9:19 PM, Underwood, Keith D wrote: > Yeah, just remember that June is a hard time to schedule. IPDPS is at the end of May. SC PC meeting is June 24-25. Yes, agreed - I think a week earlier may work, but we need consensus, of course. Martin > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: mpi-forum-bounces(a)lists.mpi-forum.org [mailto:mpi-forum- >> bounces(a)lists.mpi-forum.org] On Behalf Of Schulz, Martin >> Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 11:16 PM >> To: Main MPI Forum mailing list >> Subject: Re: [Mpi-forum] Meeting schedule for 2013 >> >> Hi all, >> >> I don't want to debate the location discussion further - I agree let's leave that >> for the December meeting. >> >> I would like to bring up, though, that the June dates (independent of >> location) overlap with one of the premier conferences in HPC, namely ICS. >> The note on the spreadsheet was not intended as an organization conflict, >> but as a general comment since this will likely affect more people. If we still >> have flexibility in the dates, which it seems we have, we should consider >> moving that. Otherwise, this can only reduce participation. >> >> Martin >> >> >> On Oct 9, 2012, at 9:56 AM, Richard Graham wrote: >> >>> This is why I mentioned that we would probably close on this in San Jose, as >> participation in this was rather low. If folks do not want to discuss this >> further, we can stick to what we already voted on. >>> >>> Rich >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: mpi-forum-bounces(a)lists.mpi-forum.org >>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jeff >>> Squyres >>> Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 11:54 AM >>> To: Main MPI Forum mailing list >>> Subject: Re: [Mpi-forum] Meeting schedule for 2013 >>> >>> On Oct 9, 2012, at 11:45 AM, Richard Graham wrote: >>> >>>> [rich] what is this based on ? >>> >>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mpi-forum/2012/10/2291.php >>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mpi-forum/2012/10/2295.php >>> >>> HDF snuck in late this morning and added another row before I made the >> spreadsheet read-only. :-) So there are now 13 responses, not 12. >>> >>> -- >>> Jeff Squyres >>> jsquyres(a)cisco.com >>> For corporate legal information go to: >>> http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/ >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> mpi-forum mailing list >>> mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org >>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> mpi-forum mailing list >>> mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org >>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum >> >> __________________________________________________________ >> ______________ >> Martin Schulz, schulzm(a)llnl.gov, http://people.llnl.gov/schulzm CASC @ >> Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, USA >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> mpi-forum mailing list >> mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org >> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum ________________________________________________________________________ Martin Schulz, schulzm(a)llnl.gov, http://people.llnl.gov/schulzm CASC @ Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, USA

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] Meeting schedule for 2013
by Underwood, Keith D 09 Oct '12

09 Oct '12

Yeah, just remember that June is a hard time to schedule. IPDPS is at the end of May. SC PC meeting is June 24-25. > -----Original Message----- > From: mpi-forum-bounces(a)lists.mpi-forum.org [mailto:mpi-forum- > bounces(a)lists.mpi-forum.org] On Behalf Of Schulz, Martin > Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 11:16 PM > To: Main MPI Forum mailing list > Subject: Re: [Mpi-forum] Meeting schedule for 2013 > > Hi all, > > I don't want to debate the location discussion further - I agree let's leave that > for the December meeting. > > I would like to bring up, though, that the June dates (independent of > location) overlap with one of the premier conferences in HPC, namely ICS. > The note on the spreadsheet was not intended as an organization conflict, > but as a general comment since this will likely affect more people. If we still > have flexibility in the dates, which it seems we have, we should consider > moving that. Otherwise, this can only reduce participation. > > Martin > > > On Oct 9, 2012, at 9:56 AM, Richard Graham wrote: > > > This is why I mentioned that we would probably close on this in San Jose, as > participation in this was rather low. If folks do not want to discuss this > further, we can stick to what we already voted on. > > > > Rich > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: mpi-forum-bounces(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jeff > > Squyres > > Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 11:54 AM > > To: Main MPI Forum mailing list > > Subject: Re: [Mpi-forum] Meeting schedule for 2013 > > > > On Oct 9, 2012, at 11:45 AM, Richard Graham wrote: > > > >> [rich] what is this based on ? > > > > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mpi-forum/2012/10/2291.php > > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mpi-forum/2012/10/2295.php > > > > HDF snuck in late this morning and added another row before I made the > spreadsheet read-only. :-) So there are now 13 responses, not 12. > > > > -- > > Jeff Squyres > > jsquyres(a)cisco.com > > For corporate legal information go to: > > http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/ > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > mpi-forum mailing list > > mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum > > > > _______________________________________________ > > mpi-forum mailing list > > mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum > > __________________________________________________________ > ______________ > Martin Schulz, schulzm(a)llnl.gov, http://people.llnl.gov/schulzm CASC @ > Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, USA > > > > > _______________________________________________ > mpi-forum mailing list > mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] Meeting schedule for 2013
by Schulz, Martin 09 Oct '12

09 Oct '12

Hi all, I don't want to debate the location discussion further - I agree let's leave that for the December meeting. I would like to bring up, though, that the June dates (independent of location) overlap with one of the premier conferences in HPC, namely ICS. The note on the spreadsheet was not intended as an organization conflict, but as a general comment since this will likely affect more people. If we still have flexibility in the dates, which it seems we have, we should consider moving that. Otherwise, this can only reduce participation. Martin On Oct 9, 2012, at 9:56 AM, Richard Graham wrote: > This is why I mentioned that we would probably close on this in San Jose, as participation in this was rather low. If folks do not want to discuss this further, we can stick to what we already voted on. > > Rich > > -----Original Message----- > From: mpi-forum-bounces(a)lists.mpi-forum.org [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jeff Squyres > Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 11:54 AM > To: Main MPI Forum mailing list > Subject: Re: [Mpi-forum] Meeting schedule for 2013 > > On Oct 9, 2012, at 11:45 AM, Richard Graham wrote: > >> [rich] what is this based on ? > > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mpi-forum/2012/10/2291.php > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mpi-forum/2012/10/2295.php > > HDF snuck in late this morning and added another row before I made the spreadsheet read-only. :-) So there are now 13 responses, not 12. > > -- > Jeff Squyres > jsquyres(a)cisco.com > For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/ > > > _______________________________________________ > mpi-forum mailing list > mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum > > _______________________________________________ > mpi-forum mailing list > mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum ________________________________________________________________________ Martin Schulz, schulzm(a)llnl.gov, http://people.llnl.gov/schulzm CASC @ Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, USA

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] Meeting schedule for 2013
by Richard Graham 09 Oct '12

09 Oct '12

This is why I mentioned that we would probably close on this in San Jose, as participation in this was rather low. If folks do not want to discuss this further, we can stick to what we already voted on. Rich -----Original Message----- From: mpi-forum-bounces(a)lists.mpi-forum.org [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jeff Squyres Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 11:54 AM To: Main MPI Forum mailing list Subject: Re: [Mpi-forum] Meeting schedule for 2013 On Oct 9, 2012, at 11:45 AM, Richard Graham wrote: > [rich] what is this based on ? http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mpi-forum/2012/10/2291.php http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mpi-forum/2012/10/2295.php HDF snuck in late this morning and added another row before I made the spreadsheet read-only. :-) So there are now 13 responses, not 12. -- Jeff Squyres jsquyres(a)cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/ _______________________________________________ mpi-forum mailing list mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum

1 0