Re: [Mpi-forum] MPI-3 implementations status
Just for my own enlightenment, can someone explain why MPICH can have F08 bindings already while some of its derivatives do not? Is it simply a matter of lag in rebasing against upstream or of official support, which requires their own QA? Or something else? Jeff On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 12:14 PM, Balaji, Pavan <[email protected]> wrote:
Thanks everyone for sending the updates to your implementation status. I’ve consolidated all input so far into the attached slide. Tianhe folks said that they need some more time to add information about the last empty cell they have for their implementation. I’ll send out an updated slide once they get back to me.
Regards,
— Pavan
On Jun 9, 2014, at 12:34 AM, Balaji, Pavan <[email protected]> wrote:
Folks,
With ISC coming up, I wanted to make sure the status of all MPI-3 implementations is accurately reflected on the attached implementations slide (which will be put up on the Forum website and will be used at ISC talks and BoFs).
If there is any inaccuracy in the status, please let us know. I know that some implementations are planning for a release at ISC which will change this status. In such cases, please send me a note with the change and the date when the change needs to be made public and I’ll take care of it.
Thanks,
— Pavan
<mpi-implementations.pptx>_______________________________________________ mpi-forum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum
-- Pavan Balaji ✉️ http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji
_______________________________________________ mpi-forum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum
-- Jeff Hammond [email protected] http://jeffhammond.github.io/
participants (1)
-
Jeff Hammond