August 2008 - mpi-forum - mailman3.cels.anl.gov

Re: [Mpi-forum] Proposal to establish the Miscellaneous Working Group
by Craig Rasmussen 08 Aug '08

08 Aug '08

Shame on you! Craig On Aug 8, 2008, at 11:43 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote: > Can we suck Fortran into this group? ;-) Just kidding. > > Cisco seconds this proposal and would like to participate. > > > On Aug 8, 2008, at 1:34 PM, Adam Moody wrote: > >> Hello all, >> I'd like to propose a new Miscellaneous working group as a >> placeholder for ideas which don't nicely fit into any of the >> existing working groups. At the moment, here are the topics I'd >> like to include in such a group. >> >> * Recommending standard names and options for MPI compiler >> wrappers, in the same way the 2.0 makes recommendations about mpiexec >> * Assembling test suites for 2.2 and 3.0, perhaps not blessed by >> the standard, but a place where all MPI developers can download and/ >> or contribute tests to check their MPI meets the spec (or rather >> doesn't fail to meet the spec for some particular test case) >> * Organizing a survey to identify features that users currently use >> in MPI, and for feedback on new features proposed for 3.0 >> * Recommending standard tools interfaces, like MPIR_PROCDESC >> >> I'm willing to chair this group. Are there other organizations who >> would support it? >> -Adam Moody >> LLNL >> _______________________________________________ >> mpi-forum mailing list >> mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org >> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum > > > -- > Jeff Squyres > Cisco Systems > > _______________________________________________ > mpi-forum mailing list > mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] Proposal to establish the Miscellaneous Working Group
by Jeff Squyres 08 Aug '08

08 Aug '08

Can we suck Fortran into this group? ;-) Just kidding. Cisco seconds this proposal and would like to participate. On Aug 8, 2008, at 1:34 PM, Adam Moody wrote: > Hello all, > I'd like to propose a new Miscellaneous working group as a > placeholder for ideas which don't nicely fit into any of the > existing working groups. At the moment, here are the topics I'd > like to include in such a group. > > * Recommending standard names and options for MPI compiler wrappers, > in the same way the 2.0 makes recommendations about mpiexec > * Assembling test suites for 2.2 and 3.0, perhaps not blessed by the > standard, but a place where all MPI developers can download and/or > contribute tests to check their MPI meets the spec (or rather > doesn't fail to meet the spec for some particular test case) > * Organizing a survey to identify features that users currently use > in MPI, and for feedback on new features proposed for 3.0 > * Recommending standard tools interfaces, like MPIR_PROCDESC > > I'm willing to chair this group. Are there other organizations who > would support it? > -Adam Moody > LLNL > _______________________________________________ > mpi-forum mailing list > mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum -- Jeff Squyres Cisco Systems

1 0

Proposal to establish the Miscellaneous Working Group
by Adam Moody 08 Aug '08

08 Aug '08

Hello all, I'd like to propose a new Miscellaneous working group as a placeholder for ideas which don't nicely fit into any of the existing working groups. At the moment, here are the topics I'd like to include in such a group. * Recommending standard names and options for MPI compiler wrappers, in the same way the 2.0 makes recommendations about mpiexec * Assembling test suites for 2.2 and 3.0, perhaps not blessed by the standard, but a place where all MPI developers can download and/or contribute tests to check their MPI meets the spec (or rather doesn't fail to meet the spec for some particular test case) * Organizing a survey to identify features that users currently use in MPI, and for feedback on new features proposed for 3.0 * Recommending standard tools interfaces, like MPIR_PROCDESC I'm willing to chair this group. Are there other organizations who would support it? -Adam Moody LLNL

1 0