September 2012 - mpi-forum - mailman3.cels.anl.gov

Re: [Mpi-forum] Meeting schedule for 2013
by Jeff Squyres 26 Sep '12

26 Sep '12

I don't remember there being a majority for the 2-2 option here in Vienna -- am I remembering last week incorrectly? I definitely can't do 2 international meetings next week. On Sep 26, 2012, at 8:02 PM, Richard Graham wrote: > This was discussed and there was another vote at the meeting in Vienna. This note is just a follow up to the discussions at that meeting. > > Rich > > -----Original Message----- > From: mpi-forum-bounces(a)lists.mpi-forum.org [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Schulz, Martin > Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 7:36 PM > To: Bronis R. de Supinski; Main MPI Forum mailing list > Subject: Re: [Mpi-forum] Meeting schedule for 2013 > > Hi Rich, > > I have the same recollection as Bronis and Mohamad. I thought there was a strong majority (at least at the Chicago meeting) for a 3-1 solution with alternating non-US locations (one year Asia, one year Europe, but not both in one year - as it also shows on the current tentative meeting calendar for next year). I know this is not fair to everyone, but the group (again, at least in Chicago, which was pretty complete, though, since we were wrapping up 3.0) felt that this would maximize active participation. > > Martin > > > On Sep 26, 2012, at 9:39 AM, Bronis R. de Supinski wrote: > >> >> Rich: >> >> I would have to disagree. At best, you are splitting hairs to say this >> option was not voted on. In the "alternate" >> years, it is simply the 2-2 option that was voted on and did not come >> anywhere near the 3-1 option in terms of votes. >> >> The arguments against 2-2 (even in alternating years) still apply. It >> significantly lowers attendance by active participants. >> >> Bronis >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, 26 Sep 2012, Richard Graham wrote: >> >>> Such decisions are not made lightly - I assure you this. This was discussed at the last meeting, and this was an option that was not voted on. However, this was discussed again at the end of the meeting, and some at EuroMPI. >>> >>> Rich >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: mpi-forum-bounces(a)lists.mpi-forum.org >>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mohamad >>> Chaarawi >>> Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 6:30 PM >>> To: mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org >>> Subject: Re: [Mpi-forum] Meeting schedule for 2013 >>> >>> Hi Rich, >>> >>> On 9/26/2012 10:30 AM, Richard Graham wrote: >>>> Therefore, I propose to keep the European meeting of the Forum in >>>> conjunction with EuroMPI, and every other year also have a meeting >>>> in Japan. With this in mind, here is the proposed schedule for 2012 >>> >>> The majority at the last meeting in Chicago were against having 2 meetings internationally. We had several votes on different formations (4-0, 3-1, and 2-2), and 3-1 was the majority vote. >>> >>> It would have been fair to have a similar vote in Europe and see how the participants vote.. >>> Did the attendance at the Vienna meeting vote on a different schedule, or is your change coming from just some concerns (which are also valid) from some people? >>> >>> Can we have a formal organizational Vote by eligible organizations on this instead of just scheduling meetings based on suggestions that vary from meeting to meeting? >>> This vote can be done over the phone. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Mohamad >>> _______________________________________________ >>> mpi-forum mailing list >>> mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org >>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> mpi-forum mailing list >>> mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org >>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> mpi-forum mailing list >> mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org >> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum > > ________________________________________________________________________ > Martin Schulz, schulzm(a)llnl.gov, http://people.llnl.gov/schulzm CASC @ Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, USA > > > > > _______________________________________________ > mpi-forum mailing list > mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum > > _______________________________________________ > mpi-forum mailing list > mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum -- Jeff Squyres jsquyres(a)cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] Meeting schedule for 2013
by Richard Graham 26 Sep '12

26 Sep '12

This was discussed and there was another vote at the meeting in Vienna. This note is just a follow up to the discussions at that meeting. Rich -----Original Message----- From: mpi-forum-bounces(a)lists.mpi-forum.org [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Schulz, Martin Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 7:36 PM To: Bronis R. de Supinski; Main MPI Forum mailing list Subject: Re: [Mpi-forum] Meeting schedule for 2013 Hi Rich, I have the same recollection as Bronis and Mohamad. I thought there was a strong majority (at least at the Chicago meeting) for a 3-1 solution with alternating non-US locations (one year Asia, one year Europe, but not both in one year - as it also shows on the current tentative meeting calendar for next year). I know this is not fair to everyone, but the group (again, at least in Chicago, which was pretty complete, though, since we were wrapping up 3.0) felt that this would maximize active participation. Martin On Sep 26, 2012, at 9:39 AM, Bronis R. de Supinski wrote: > > Rich: > > I would have to disagree. At best, you are splitting hairs to say this > option was not voted on. In the "alternate" > years, it is simply the 2-2 option that was voted on and did not come > anywhere near the 3-1 option in terms of votes. > > The arguments against 2-2 (even in alternating years) still apply. It > significantly lowers attendance by active participants. > > Bronis > > > > > On Wed, 26 Sep 2012, Richard Graham wrote: > >> Such decisions are not made lightly - I assure you this. This was discussed at the last meeting, and this was an option that was not voted on. However, this was discussed again at the end of the meeting, and some at EuroMPI. >> >> Rich >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: mpi-forum-bounces(a)lists.mpi-forum.org >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mohamad >> Chaarawi >> Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 6:30 PM >> To: mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org >> Subject: Re: [Mpi-forum] Meeting schedule for 2013 >> >> Hi Rich, >> >> On 9/26/2012 10:30 AM, Richard Graham wrote: >>> Therefore, I propose to keep the European meeting of the Forum in >>> conjunction with EuroMPI, and every other year also have a meeting >>> in Japan. With this in mind, here is the proposed schedule for 2012 >> >> The majority at the last meeting in Chicago were against having 2 meetings internationally. We had several votes on different formations (4-0, 3-1, and 2-2), and 3-1 was the majority vote. >> >> It would have been fair to have a similar vote in Europe and see how the participants vote.. >> Did the attendance at the Vienna meeting vote on a different schedule, or is your change coming from just some concerns (which are also valid) from some people? >> >> Can we have a formal organizational Vote by eligible organizations on this instead of just scheduling meetings based on suggestions that vary from meeting to meeting? >> This vote can be done over the phone. >> >> Thanks, >> Mohamad >> _______________________________________________ >> mpi-forum mailing list >> mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org >> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum >> >> _______________________________________________ >> mpi-forum mailing list >> mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org >> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum >> > _______________________________________________ > mpi-forum mailing list > mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum ________________________________________________________________________ Martin Schulz, schulzm(a)llnl.gov, http://people.llnl.gov/schulzm CASC @ Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, USA _______________________________________________ mpi-forum mailing list mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] Meeting schedule for 2013
by Schulz, Martin 26 Sep '12

26 Sep '12

Hi Rich, I have the same recollection as Bronis and Mohamad. I thought there was a strong majority (at least at the Chicago meeting) for a 3-1 solution with alternating non-US locations (one year Asia, one year Europe, but not both in one year - as it also shows on the current tentative meeting calendar for next year). I know this is not fair to everyone, but the group (again, at least in Chicago, which was pretty complete, though, since we were wrapping up 3.0) felt that this would maximize active participation. Martin On Sep 26, 2012, at 9:39 AM, Bronis R. de Supinski wrote: > > Rich: > > I would have to disagree. At best, you are splitting hairs > to say this option was not voted on. In the "alternate" > years, it is simply the 2-2 option that was voted on and > did not come anywhere near the 3-1 option in terms of votes. > > The arguments against 2-2 (even in alternating years) still > apply. It significantly lowers attendance by active participants. > > Bronis > > > > > On Wed, 26 Sep 2012, Richard Graham wrote: > >> Such decisions are not made lightly - I assure you this. This was discussed at the last meeting, and this was an option that was not voted on. However, this was discussed again at the end of the meeting, and some at EuroMPI. >> >> Rich >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: mpi-forum-bounces(a)lists.mpi-forum.org [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mohamad Chaarawi >> Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 6:30 PM >> To: mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org >> Subject: Re: [Mpi-forum] Meeting schedule for 2013 >> >> Hi Rich, >> >> On 9/26/2012 10:30 AM, Richard Graham wrote: >>> Therefore, I propose to keep the European meeting of the Forum in >>> conjunction with EuroMPI, and every other year also have a meeting in >>> Japan. With this in mind, here is the proposed schedule for 2012 >> >> The majority at the last meeting in Chicago were against having 2 meetings internationally. We had several votes on different formations (4-0, 3-1, and 2-2), and 3-1 was the majority vote. >> >> It would have been fair to have a similar vote in Europe and see how the participants vote.. >> Did the attendance at the Vienna meeting vote on a different schedule, or is your change coming from just some concerns (which are also valid) from some people? >> >> Can we have a formal organizational Vote by eligible organizations on this instead of just scheduling meetings based on suggestions that vary from meeting to meeting? >> This vote can be done over the phone. >> >> Thanks, >> Mohamad >> _______________________________________________ >> mpi-forum mailing list >> mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org >> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum >> >> _______________________________________________ >> mpi-forum mailing list >> mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org >> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum >> > _______________________________________________ > mpi-forum mailing list > mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum ________________________________________________________________________ Martin Schulz, schulzm(a)llnl.gov, http://people.llnl.gov/schulzm CASC @ Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, USA

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] Meeting schedule for 2013
by Bronis R. de Supinski 26 Sep '12

26 Sep '12

Rich: I would have to disagree. At best, you are splitting hairs to say this option was not voted on. In the "alternate" years, it is simply the 2-2 option that was voted on and did not come anywhere near the 3-1 option in terms of votes. The arguments against 2-2 (even in alternating years) still apply. It significantly lowers attendance by active participants. Bronis On Wed, 26 Sep 2012, Richard Graham wrote: > Such decisions are not made lightly - I assure you this. This was discussed at the last meeting, and this was an option that was not voted on. However, this was discussed again at the end of the meeting, and some at EuroMPI. > > Rich > > -----Original Message----- > From: mpi-forum-bounces(a)lists.mpi-forum.org [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mohamad Chaarawi > Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 6:30 PM > To: mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > Subject: Re: [Mpi-forum] Meeting schedule for 2013 > > Hi Rich, > > On 9/26/2012 10:30 AM, Richard Graham wrote: >> Therefore, I propose to keep the European meeting of the Forum in >> conjunction with EuroMPI, and every other year also have a meeting in >> Japan. With this in mind, here is the proposed schedule for 2012 > > The majority at the last meeting in Chicago were against having 2 meetings internationally. We had several votes on different formations (4-0, 3-1, and 2-2), and 3-1 was the majority vote. > > It would have been fair to have a similar vote in Europe and see how the participants vote.. > Did the attendance at the Vienna meeting vote on a different schedule, or is your change coming from just some concerns (which are also valid) from some people? > > Can we have a formal organizational Vote by eligible organizations on this instead of just scheduling meetings based on suggestions that vary from meeting to meeting? > This vote can be done over the phone. > > Thanks, > Mohamad > _______________________________________________ > mpi-forum mailing list > mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum > > _______________________________________________ > mpi-forum mailing list > mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum >

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] Meeting schedule for 2013
by Richard Graham 26 Sep '12

26 Sep '12

Such decisions are not made lightly - I assure you this. This was discussed at the last meeting, and this was an option that was not voted on. However, this was discussed again at the end of the meeting, and some at EuroMPI. Rich -----Original Message----- From: mpi-forum-bounces(a)lists.mpi-forum.org [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mohamad Chaarawi Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 6:30 PM To: mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org Subject: Re: [Mpi-forum] Meeting schedule for 2013 Hi Rich, On 9/26/2012 10:30 AM, Richard Graham wrote: > Therefore, I propose to keep the European meeting of the Forum in > conjunction with EuroMPI, and every other year also have a meeting in > Japan. With this in mind, here is the proposed schedule for 2012 The majority at the last meeting in Chicago were against having 2 meetings internationally. We had several votes on different formations (4-0, 3-1, and 2-2), and 3-1 was the majority vote. It would have been fair to have a similar vote in Europe and see how the participants vote.. Did the attendance at the Vienna meeting vote on a different schedule, or is your change coming from just some concerns (which are also valid) from some people? Can we have a formal organizational Vote by eligible organizations on this instead of just scheduling meetings based on suggestions that vary from meeting to meeting? This vote can be done over the phone. Thanks, Mohamad _______________________________________________ mpi-forum mailing list mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] Meeting schedule for 2013
by Mohamad Chaarawi 26 Sep '12

26 Sep '12

Hi Rich, On 9/26/2012 10:30 AM, Richard Graham wrote: > Therefore, I propose to keep the European meeting of the Forum in > conjunction with EuroMPI, and every other year also have a meeting in > Japan. With this in mind, here is the proposed schedule for 2012 The majority at the last meeting in Chicago were against having 2 meetings internationally. We had several votes on different formations (4-0, 3-1, and 2-2), and 3-1 was the majority vote. It would have been fair to have a similar vote in Europe and see how the participants vote.. Did the attendance at the Vienna meeting vote on a different schedule, or is your change coming from just some concerns (which are also valid) from some people? Can we have a formal organizational Vote by eligible organizations on this instead of just scheduling meetings based on suggestions that vary from meeting to meeting? This vote can be done over the phone. Thanks, Mohamad

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] Meeting schedule for 2013
by Jeff Hammond 26 Sep '12

26 Sep '12

On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Cownie, James H <james.h.cownie(a)intel.com> wrote: >> EuroMPI could be renamed e.g. InternationalMPI and held in Asia. > > You might want to discuss that with some Europeans, before deciding it... It was merely a suggestion, as indicated by the "could". I believe Jack Dongarra is the person who makes this decision. > Or, perhaps we'll just decide that since no-one in the US is interested in supercomputing any longer > (or, at least, DoE isn't interested in an HPC show enough to send people or have booths), *we* should > just rename the Supercomputing show series and hold it in Paris, London and Berlin. This is not a correct evaluation of the current DOE travel situation with respect to SC12. We can take it offline if you would like to discuss the facts. The decision was not made _by_ DOE, it was made _for_ DOE by a higher authority. Jeff > -- Jim > > James Cownie <james.h.cownie(a)intel.com> > SSG/DPD/TCAR (Technical Computing, Analyzers and Runtimes) > Tel: +44 117 9071438 > > > -----Original Message----- > From: mpi-forum-bounces(a)lists.mpi-forum.org [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jeff Hammond > Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 4:44 PM > To: Main MPI Forum mailing list > Subject: Re: [Mpi-forum] Meeting schedule for 2013 > > EuroMPI could be renamed e.g. InternationalMPI and held in Asia. Or it could be held in Asia without being renamed. SBAC-PAD was held in New York after something like 23 years in Brazil and being sponsored by the Brazilian Computer Society. > > Jeff > > On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Richard Graham <richardg(a)mellanox.com> wrote: >> Before I post the meeting schedule for 2013, I would like to raise the >> issue that came up on the last day of the meeting in Vienna. We had >> voted to have >> 3 meetings in the US, and alternate between Asia and Japan on the forth one. >> However, there has been quite a bit of concern since that this would >> harm the EuroMPI meeting, and given that this meeting played a big >> part in the reconvening of the forum in the first place, EuroMPI is >> the only meeting that is dedicated to MPI related topics, and the >> convenience of having the conference and forum at the same location. >> I have talked with several folks since, and seems that many are in favor or reconsidering the decision. >> >> >> >> Therefore, I propose to keep the European meeting of the Forum in >> conjunction with EuroMPI, and every other year also have a meeting in Japan. >> With this in mind, here is the proposed schedule for 2012 >> >> >> >> March 14-16 in Kobe Japan (the alternative date clashes with an SC >> planning >> meeting) >> >> June 10-13 - Chicago >> >> Sept 11-13, Madrid, Spain >> >> Dec 9-12, Bay area, CA >> >> >> >> Comments please. >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Rich >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> mpi-forum mailing list >> mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org >> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum > > > > -- > Jeff Hammond > Argonne Leadership Computing Facility > University of Chicago Computation Institute jhammond(a)alcf.anl.gov / (630) 252-5381 http://www.linkedin.com/in/jeffhammond > https://wiki.alcf.anl.gov/parts/index.php/User:Jhammond > > _______________________________________________ > mpi-forum mailing list > mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Intel Corporation (UK) Limited > Registered No. 1134945 (England) > Registered Office: Pipers Way, Swindon SN3 1RJ > VAT No: 860 2173 47 > > This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for > the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution > by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended > recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. > > > _______________________________________________ > mpi-forum mailing list > mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum -- Jeff Hammond Argonne Leadership Computing Facility University of Chicago Computation Institute jhammond(a)alcf.anl.gov / (630) 252-5381 http://www.linkedin.com/in/jeffhammond https://wiki.alcf.anl.gov/parts/index.php/User:Jhammond

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] Meeting schedule for 2013
by Cownie, James H 26 Sep '12

26 Sep '12

> EuroMPI could be renamed e.g. InternationalMPI and held in Asia. You might want to discuss that with some Europeans, before deciding it... Or, perhaps we'll just decide that since no-one in the US is interested in supercomputing any longer (or, at least, DoE isn't interested in an HPC show enough to send people or have booths), *we* should just rename the Supercomputing show series and hold it in Paris, London and Berlin. -- Jim James Cownie <james.h.cownie(a)intel.com> SSG/DPD/TCAR (Technical Computing, Analyzers and Runtimes) Tel: +44 117 9071438 -----Original Message----- From: mpi-forum-bounces(a)lists.mpi-forum.org [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jeff Hammond Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 4:44 PM To: Main MPI Forum mailing list Subject: Re: [Mpi-forum] Meeting schedule for 2013 EuroMPI could be renamed e.g. InternationalMPI and held in Asia. Or it could be held in Asia without being renamed. SBAC-PAD was held in New York after something like 23 years in Brazil and being sponsored by the Brazilian Computer Society. Jeff On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Richard Graham <richardg(a)mellanox.com> wrote: > Before I post the meeting schedule for 2013, I would like to raise the > issue that came up on the last day of the meeting in Vienna. We had > voted to have > 3 meetings in the US, and alternate between Asia and Japan on the forth one. > However, there has been quite a bit of concern since that this would > harm the EuroMPI meeting, and given that this meeting played a big > part in the reconvening of the forum in the first place, EuroMPI is > the only meeting that is dedicated to MPI related topics, and the > convenience of having the conference and forum at the same location. > I have talked with several folks since, and seems that many are in favor or reconsidering the decision. > > > > Therefore, I propose to keep the European meeting of the Forum in > conjunction with EuroMPI, and every other year also have a meeting in Japan. > With this in mind, here is the proposed schedule for 2012 > > > > March 14-16 in Kobe Japan (the alternative date clashes with an SC > planning > meeting) > > June 10-13 - Chicago > > Sept 11-13, Madrid, Spain > > Dec 9-12, Bay area, CA > > > > Comments please. > > > > Thanks, > > Rich > > > > > _______________________________________________ > mpi-forum mailing list > mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum -- Jeff Hammond Argonne Leadership Computing Facility University of Chicago Computation Institute jhammond(a)alcf.anl.gov / (630) 252-5381 http://www.linkedin.com/in/jeffhammond https://wiki.alcf.anl.gov/parts/index.php/User:Jhammond _______________________________________________ mpi-forum mailing list mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum --------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Corporation (UK) Limited Registered No. 1134945 (England) Registered Office: Pipers Way, Swindon SN3 1RJ VAT No: 860 2173 47 This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] Meeting schedule for 2013
by Jeff Hammond 26 Sep '12

26 Sep '12

EuroMPI could be renamed e.g. InternationalMPI and held in Asia. Or it could be held in Asia without being renamed. SBAC-PAD was held in New York after something like 23 years in Brazil and being sponsored by the Brazilian Computer Society. Jeff On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Richard Graham <richardg(a)mellanox.com> wrote: > Before I post the meeting schedule for 2013, I would like to raise the issue > that came up on the last day of the meeting in Vienna. We had voted to have > 3 meetings in the US, and alternate between Asia and Japan on the forth one. > However, there has been quite a bit of concern since that this would harm > the EuroMPI meeting, and given that this meeting played a big part in the > reconvening of the forum in the first place, EuroMPI is the only meeting > that is dedicated to MPI related topics, and the convenience of having the > conference and forum at the same location. I have talked with several folks > since, and seems that many are in favor or reconsidering the decision. > > > > Therefore, I propose to keep the European meeting of the Forum in > conjunction with EuroMPI, and every other year also have a meeting in Japan. > With this in mind, here is the proposed schedule for 2012 > > > > March 14-16 in Kobe Japan (the alternative date clashes with an SC planning > meeting) > > June 10-13 ï¿½ Chicago > > Sept 11-13, Madrid, Spain > > Dec 9-12, Bay area, CA > > > > Comments please. > > > > Thanks, > > Rich > > > > > _______________________________________________ > mpi-forum mailing list > mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum -- Jeff Hammond Argonne Leadership Computing Facility University of Chicago Computation Institute jhammond(a)alcf.anl.gov / (630) 252-5381 http://www.linkedin.com/in/jeffhammond https://wiki.alcf.anl.gov/parts/index.php/User:Jhammond

1 0

Meeting schedule for 2013
by Richard Graham 26 Sep '12

26 Sep '12

Before I post the meeting schedule for 2013, I would like to raise the issue that came up on the last day of the meeting in Vienna. We had voted to have 3 meetings in the US, and alternate between Asia and Japan on the forth one. However, there has been quite a bit of concern since that this would harm the EuroMPI meeting, and given that this meeting played a big part in the reconvening of the forum in the first place, EuroMPI is the only meeting that is dedicated to MPI related topics, and the convenience of having the conference and forum at the same location. I have talked with several folks since, and seems that many are in favor or reconsidering the decision. Therefore, I propose to keep the European meeting of the Forum in conjunction with EuroMPI, and every other year also have a meeting in Japan. With this in mind, here is the proposed schedule for 2012 March 14-16 in Kobe Japan (the alternative date clashes with an SC planning meeting) June 10-13 - Chicago Sept 11-13, Madrid, Spain Dec 9-12, Bay area, CA Comments please. Thanks, Rich

1 0