June 2012 - mpi-forum - mailman3.cels.anl.gov

Re: [Mpi-forum] MPI 3.0 passed tickets
by Jeff Squyres 12 Jun '12

12 Jun '12

Fab and I both noted in the last round that #279 was completed months ago. On Jun 11, 2012, at 9:55 PM, Richard Graham wrote: > Updated ticket status attached. Please send me correction. I have not added in the tickets that passed in the last meeting. > > Thanks, > Rich > > From: mpi-forum-bounces(a)lists.mpi-forum.org [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Richard Graham > Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 8:57 PM > To: mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > Subject: [Mpi-forum] MPI 3.0 passed tickets > > Please remember that the goal is to have all the changes voted in so far integrated into the draft standard. > > Rich > <MPI 3.0 tickets for inclusion.xlsx>_______________________________________________ > mpi-forum mailing list > mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum -- Jeff Squyres jsquyres(a)cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] MPI 3.0 passed tickets
by Richard Graham 11 Jun '12

11 Jun '12

Updated ticket status attached. Please send me correction. I have not added in the tickets that passed in the last meeting. Thanks, Rich From: mpi-forum-bounces(a)lists.mpi-forum.org [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Richard Graham Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 8:57 PM To: mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org Subject: [Mpi-forum] MPI 3.0 passed tickets Please remember that the goal is to have all the changes voted in so far integrated into the draft standard. Rich

1 0

MPI 3.0 passed tickets
by Richard Graham 11 Jun '12

11 Jun '12

Please remember that the goal is to have all the changes voted in so far integrated into the draft standard. Rich

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] Slides / Formal readings
by Richard Graham 06 Jun '12

06 Jun '12

No formal readings that I can remember. Rich -----Original Message----- From: mpi-forum-bounces(a)lists.mpi-forum.org [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jeff Squyres Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 9:16 AM To: MPI Forum list Subject: [Mpi-forum] Slides / Formal readings 1. Please send me your slides from the Japan meeting. (I have slides from Torsten already) 2. Were there any formal readings in the Japan meeting? I ask because I'm filling in http://meetings.mpi-forum.org/secretary/2012/05/votes.php. Thanks. -- Jeff Squyres jsquyres(a)cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/ _______________________________________________ mpi-forum mailing list mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] Voting results
by Richard Graham 01 Jun '12

01 Jun '12

Martyn, How could things be improved ? There is a link to the 3.0 effort from the main page, and the draft standard is available there. Up until recently there has not been much of substance to add to the draft standard - the big new functionality has just been voted in recently, and should go up on the web site in the near future (as soon as we complete the process of integration). As far as work in progress, would it be helpful if there was some sort of indication as to what is actually been considered, vs. just a pile of "stuff" ? Rich From: mpi-forum-bounces(a)lists.mpi-forum.org [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Martyn Foster Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2012 4:11 AM To: Main MPI Forum mailing list Subject: Re: [Mpi-forum] Voting results On May 31, 2012 1:58 AM, "George Bosilca" <bosilca(a)eecs.utk.edu<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > Another valid issue raised during this meeting was about the blessing from the user community. Interestingly enough for a standard targeted toward a user community, such an issue was never brought forward. I think users should be an important factor in our decisions, as important as their contributions to the ongoing discussions. And yes the forum should grant them a significant period of time between the moment when we vote a ticket and the moment when this ticket gets into the standard. Our users will clearly take advantage of such a grace period to thoughtfully evaluate the proposal and raise any issues they might have encountered. We should have done this from day one! Having a passing interest in one or two issues pertaining to mpi 3, I was rather surprised at just how opaque this group is. Theres nothing linked from the top level web site and no draft since 2010. That leaves user exposure to people dedicated enough to follow the lists, and delve into trac to find out whats going on. I cant see a list of eligible voting parties... which by definition appears to be a list in flux defined by meeting attendance, with meetings overwhelmingly in one geography. I would be surprised if many users are able to follow the process in a meaningful way, possibly exempting US labs and a few other institutions actively participating. Martyn

1 0

MEETING?
by Marc Snir 01 Jun '12

01 Jun '12

I DON'T REMEMBER: R U AROUND TODAY?

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] Voting results
by Martyn Foster 01 Jun '12

01 Jun '12

On May 31, 2012 1:58 AM, "George Bosilca" <bosilca(a)eecs.utk.edu> wrote: > Another valid issue raised during this meeting was about the blessing from the user community. Interestingly enough for a standard targeted toward a user community, such an issue was never brought forward. I think users should be an important factor in our decisions, as important as their contributions to the ongoing discussions. And yes the forum should grant them a significant period of time between the moment when we vote a ticket and the moment when this ticket gets into the standard. Our users will clearly take advantage of such a grace period to thoughtfully evaluate the proposal and raise any issues they might have encountered. We should have done this from day one! Having a passing interest in one or two issues pertaining to mpi 3, I was rather surprised at just how opaque this group is. Theres nothing linked from the top level web site and no draft since 2010. That leaves user exposure to people dedicated enough to follow the lists, and delve into trac to find out whats going on. I cant see a list of eligible voting parties... which by definition appears to be a list in flux defined by meeting attendance, with meetings overwhelmingly in one geography. I would be surprised if many users are able to follow the process in a meaningful way, possibly exempting US labs and a few other institutions actively participating. Martyn

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] MPI 3.0 Passed tickets
by Jeff Squyres 01 Jun '12

01 Jun '12

Looks like the Language Bindings chapter is affected by 3 tickets: - 274: committed moments ago - 279: as Fab noted, committed months ago - 229: (new Fortran) Waiting for Rolf to come back from vacation I don't think any of us can make progress on 229 without assistance from Rolf. On May 29, 2012, at 1:49 AM, Richard Graham wrote: > Attached is the list of tickets that have passed all but the final 3.0 chapter vote, and have not yet been incorporated into the approved version ï¿½ some were taken care of as this list was being created. I have included the ticket number, ticket owner, and the affected chapter. > > Authors: Please send me an update on the affected chapters, AND work with each of the chapter authors to make sure the changes get moved into the approved section. > > >>> As we discussed at the current meeting, THE GOAL IS TO GET ALL PASSED CHANGES INTO THE APPROVED REPOSITORY BY JUNE 15. << > The goal is to let people start to read over the new version of the standard before the July meeting, so that we can get a draft out for comment 1-2 weeks after the July meeting, and allow for comments before the final vote in Sept. If you canï¿½t make that date, please let me know ASAP, so we will find someone else who can do the work. > > Thanks, > Rich > <MPI 3.0 tickets for inclusion.xlsx>_______________________________________________ > mpi-forum mailing list > mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum -- Jeff Squyres jsquyres(a)cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] MPI Forum services migration: part 1
by Jeff Squyres 01 Jun '12

01 Jun '12

The migration is now complete. Let me know if you run into any problems. On Jun 1, 2012, at 6:54 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote: > Don't forget -- these services will be offline while they are migrated starting in about 2 hours. > > On May 30, 2012, at 2:47 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote: > >> Be advised that I have received the following message from our Indiana U. hosting provider. SVN/Trac will be unavailable during the time frame described below. >> >> More migrations will follow (e.g., web services) in the coming weeks; stay tuned. >> >> ----- >> We are planning to move all the services of svn.open-mpi.org and svn.mpi-forum.org to the new server (tiger.crest.iu.edu) on June 1st, 2012. >> >> Date: June 1st, 2012 >> Time: >> - 6:00am-10:00am Pacific US time >> - 7:00am-11:00am Mountain US time >> - 8:00am-12:00pm Central US time >> - 9:00am-1:00pm Eastern US time >> - 2:00pm-6:00pm GMT >> >> * The services to migrate from sourcehaven to tiger >> - subversion >> - trac >> - svnmanager >> - opengrok >> >> During the migration, the above services will not be available. >> ----- >> >> -- >> Jeff Squyres >> jsquyres(a)cisco.com >> For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/ >> >> >> -- >> Jeff Squyres >> jsquyres(a)cisco.com >> For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/ >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> mpi-forum mailing list >> mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org >> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum > > > -- > Jeff Squyres > jsquyres(a)cisco.com > For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/ > > > _______________________________________________ > mpi-forum mailing list > mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum -- Jeff Squyres jsquyres(a)cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] MPI Forum services migration: part 1
by Jeff Squyres 01 Jun '12

01 Jun '12

Don't forget -- these services will be offline while they are migrated starting in about 2 hours. On May 30, 2012, at 2:47 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote: > Be advised that I have received the following message from our Indiana U. hosting provider. SVN/Trac will be unavailable during the time frame described below. > > More migrations will follow (e.g., web services) in the coming weeks; stay tuned. > > ----- > We are planning to move all the services of svn.open-mpi.org and svn.mpi-forum.org to the new server (tiger.crest.iu.edu) on June 1st, 2012. > > Date: June 1st, 2012 > Time: > - 6:00am-10:00am Pacific US time > - 7:00am-11:00am Mountain US time > - 8:00am-12:00pm Central US time > - 9:00am-1:00pm Eastern US time > - 2:00pm-6:00pm GMT > > * The services to migrate from sourcehaven to tiger > - subversion > - trac > - svnmanager > - opengrok > > During the migration, the above services will not be available. > ----- > > -- > Jeff Squyres > jsquyres(a)cisco.com > For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/ > > > -- > Jeff Squyres > jsquyres(a)cisco.com > For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/ > > > _______________________________________________ > mpi-forum mailing list > mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum -- Jeff Squyres jsquyres(a)cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/

1 0