March 2011 - mpi-forum - mailman3.cels.anl.gov

Re: [Mpi-forum] Confusion about new 1 sided
by Rajeev Thakur 28 Mar '11

28 Mar '11

Jeff, I printed out the old and the new, and as far as I can tell, everything is there, but there are so many changes that things are not exactly in the same spot. Rajeev On Mar 28, 2011, at 9:19 AM, Rajeev Thakur wrote: > Text has been moved around in the chapter, so green text may not appear in exactly the same location in 2.2. > > > On Mar 28, 2011, at 9:13 AM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote: > >> ...and green text that is not in 2.2. >> >> Did the wrong document get posted? >> >> Sent from my phone. No type good. >> >> On Mar 28, 2011, at 10:07 AM, "Rajeev Thakur" <thakur(a)mcs.anl.gov> wrote: >> >>> It should be that green=old text to be deleted, red=new text. What specific case are your referring to? >>> >>> Rajeev >>> >>> >>> On Mar 28, 2011, at 8:39 AM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote: >>> >>>> I'm tryin to read the new doc that Bill sent around and it does not seem to be comparable to the 2.2 doc. Ie, the changes anddeletions highlighted in red and green do not appear in the actual 2.2 text. >>>> >>>> So what exactly are the red and green in this document? What is being added anddeleted from the original 2.2 doc? >>>> >>>> Sent from my phone. No type good. >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> mpi-forum mailing list >>>> mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org >>>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> mpi-forum mailing list >>> mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org >>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum >> >> _______________________________________________ >> mpi-forum mailing list >> mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org >> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum >

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] Confusion about new 1 sided
by Rajeev Thakur 28 Mar '11

28 Mar '11

The black text may be from some other location in 2.2. On Mar 28, 2011, at 9:12 AM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote: > The first 2 pages have black text that is not on 2.2. > > Sent from my phone. No type good. > > On Mar 28, 2011, at 10:07 AM, "Rajeev Thakur" <thakur(a)mcs.anl.gov> wrote: > >> It should be that green=old text to be deleted, red=new text. What specific case are your referring to? >> >> Rajeev >> >> >> On Mar 28, 2011, at 8:39 AM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote: >> >>> I'm tryin to read the new doc that Bill sent around and it does not seem to be comparable to the 2.2 doc. Ie, the changes anddeletions highlighted in red and green do not appear in the actual 2.2 text. >>> >>> So what exactly are the red and green in this document? What is being added anddeleted from the original 2.2 doc? >>> >>> Sent from my phone. No type good. >>> _______________________________________________ >>> mpi-forum mailing list >>> mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org >>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> mpi-forum mailing list >> mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org >> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum > > _______________________________________________ > mpi-forum mailing list > mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] Confusion about new 1 sided
by Rajeev Thakur 28 Mar '11

28 Mar '11

Text has been moved around in the chapter, so green text may not appear in exactly the same location in 2.2. On Mar 28, 2011, at 9:13 AM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote: > ...and green text that is not in 2.2. > > Did the wrong document get posted? > > Sent from my phone. No type good. > > On Mar 28, 2011, at 10:07 AM, "Rajeev Thakur" <thakur(a)mcs.anl.gov> wrote: > >> It should be that green=old text to be deleted, red=new text. What specific case are your referring to? >> >> Rajeev >> >> >> On Mar 28, 2011, at 8:39 AM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote: >> >>> I'm tryin to read the new doc that Bill sent around and it does not seem to be comparable to the 2.2 doc. Ie, the changes anddeletions highlighted in red and green do not appear in the actual 2.2 text. >>> >>> So what exactly are the red and green in this document? What is being added anddeleted from the original 2.2 doc? >>> >>> Sent from my phone. No type good. >>> _______________________________________________ >>> mpi-forum mailing list >>> mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org >>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> mpi-forum mailing list >> mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org >> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum > > _______________________________________________ > mpi-forum mailing list > mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] Confusion about new 1 sided
by Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) 28 Mar '11

28 Mar '11

...and green text that is not in 2.2. Did the wrong document get posted? Sent from my phone. No type good. On Mar 28, 2011, at 10:07 AM, "Rajeev Thakur" <thakur(a)mcs.anl.gov> wrote: > It should be that green=old text to be deleted, red=new text. What specific case are your referring to? > > Rajeev > > > On Mar 28, 2011, at 8:39 AM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote: > >> I'm tryin to read the new doc that Bill sent around and it does not seem to be comparable to the 2.2 doc. Ie, the changes anddeletions highlighted in red and green do not appear in the actual 2.2 text. >> >> So what exactly are the red and green in this document? What is being added anddeleted from the original 2.2 doc? >> >> Sent from my phone. No type good. >> _______________________________________________ >> mpi-forum mailing list >> mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org >> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum > > > _______________________________________________ > mpi-forum mailing list > mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] Confusion about new 1 sided
by Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) 28 Mar '11

28 Mar '11

The first 2 pages have black text that is not on 2.2. Sent from my phone. No type good. On Mar 28, 2011, at 10:07 AM, "Rajeev Thakur" <thakur(a)mcs.anl.gov> wrote: > It should be that green=old text to be deleted, red=new text. What specific case are your referring to? > > Rajeev > > > On Mar 28, 2011, at 8:39 AM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote: > >> I'm tryin to read the new doc that Bill sent around and it does not seem to be comparable to the 2.2 doc. Ie, the changes anddeletions highlighted in red and green do not appear in the actual 2.2 text. >> >> So what exactly are the red and green in this document? What is being added anddeleted from the original 2.2 doc? >> >> Sent from my phone. No type good. >> _______________________________________________ >> mpi-forum mailing list >> mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org >> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum > > > _______________________________________________ > mpi-forum mailing list > mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] Confusion about new 1 sided
by Rajeev Thakur 28 Mar '11

28 Mar '11

It should be that green=old text to be deleted, red=new text. What specific case are your referring to? Rajeev On Mar 28, 2011, at 8:39 AM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote: > I'm tryin to read the new doc that Bill sent around and it does not seem to be comparable to the 2.2 doc. Ie, the changes anddeletions highlighted in red and green do not appear in the actual 2.2 text. > > So what exactly are the red and green in this document? What is being added anddeleted from the original 2.2 doc? > > Sent from my phone. No type good. > _______________________________________________ > mpi-forum mailing list > mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] Confusion about new 1 sided
by William Gropp 28 Mar '11

28 Mar '11

These are alternatives that depend on another chapter. Bill On Mar 28, 2011, at 8:49 AM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote: > What are the htor comments on page 4? > > Sent from my phone. No type good. > > On Mar 28, 2011, at 9:43 AM, "Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)" <jsquyres(a)cisco.com > > wrote: > >> I'm tryin to read the new doc that Bill sent around and it does not >> seem to be comparable to the 2.2 doc. Ie, the changes anddeletions >> highlighted in red and green do not appear in the actual 2.2 text. >> >> So what exactly are the red and green in this document? What is >> being added anddeleted from the original 2.2 doc? >> >> Sent from my phone. No type good. >> _______________________________________________ >> mpi-forum mailing list >> mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org >> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum > > _______________________________________________ > mpi-forum mailing list > mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum William Gropp Deputy Director for Research Institute for Advanced Computing Applications and Technologies Paul and Cynthia Saylor Professor of Computer Science University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] Confusion about new 1 sided
by Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) 28 Mar '11

28 Mar '11

What are the htor comments on page 4? Sent from my phone. No type good. On Mar 28, 2011, at 9:43 AM, "Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)" <jsquyres(a)cisco.com> wrote: > I'm tryin to read the new doc that Bill sent around and it does not seem to be comparable to the 2.2 doc. Ie, the changes anddeletions highlighted in red and green do not appear in the actual 2.2 text. > > So what exactly are the red and green in this document? What is being added anddeleted from the original 2.2 doc? > > Sent from my phone. No type good. > _______________________________________________ > mpi-forum mailing list > mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum

1 0

Confusion about new 1 sided
by Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) 28 Mar '11

28 Mar '11

I'm tryin to read the new doc that Bill sent around and it does not seem to be comparable to the 2.2 doc. Ie, the changes anddeletions highlighted in red and green do not appear in the actual 2.2 text. So what exactly are the red and green in this document? What is being added anddeleted from the original 2.2 doc? Sent from my phone. No type good.

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] MPI_Count "ticket 0" updates
by Graham, Richard L. 18 Mar '11

18 Mar '11

This should not reset the clock. The process is working - you got the text out 2 weeks before the meeting, and people are reading it. Rich ----- Original Message ----- From: Jeff Squyres [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, March 18, 2011 01:46 PM To: Main MPI Forum mailing list <mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org> Subject: Re: [Mpi-forum] MPI_Count "ticket 0" updates ...and we missed one "e.g.," that Adam wanted. Now fixed. So here's a question: do these "ticket 0" kinds of changes reset the clock on the formal reading? --> Yes, they should. We have reset the clock on tickets for smaller things than this before. --> No, they should not. The whole concept of "ticket 0" is to be a kinder, gentler Forum in an attempt to lower the bar to readability fixes. What do you think? If they do reset the clock, we'll happily discard them and go back to the PDF that was sent on Monday (i.e., that PDF is still available on #265). None of Adam's changes affect the meaning of the proposed text; they just make it read better. We'll then introduce the "ticket 0" changes when (if) the MPI_Count changes are voted in (i.e.: we do not want to reset the clock). On Mar 18, 2011, at 8:13 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote: > Adam Moody provided a bunch of "ticket 0"-esque updates to the MPI_Count text. I have uploaded a new PDF to the ticket: > > https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/265 > > For those who can't uncompress .bz2 files, I uploaded a full PDF here: > > http://www.open-mpi.org/~jsquyres/one-count-to-rule-them-all/ > > -- > Jeff Squyres > jsquyres(a)cisco.com > For corporate legal information go to: > http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/ > > > _______________________________________________ > mpi-forum mailing list > mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum -- Jeff Squyres jsquyres(a)cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/ _______________________________________________ mpi-forum mailing list mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum

1 0