January 2011 - mpi-forum - mailman3.cels.anl.gov

Re: [Mpi-forum] SVN management
by Jeff Squyres 07 Jan '11

07 Jan '11

On Jan 7, 2011, at 1:51 PM, Martin Schulz wrote: > What is the process for the transition, though, and when exactly are > you planning to do this? I was planning to add a set of changes to > the MPIT document today (ahead of our next WG TelCon on Monday) > and others may be in a similar situation and I want to make sure this > doesn't mess things up. I was planning to do this starting at 4pm US Eastern today. But that was a relatively arbitrary deadline for myself; I just wanted to get it done. If you're not finished in the next 2 hours, just let me know and I can do it Monday instead. -- Jeff Squyres jsquyres(a)cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] SVN management
by Martin Schulz 07 Jan '11

07 Jan '11

Hi Jeff, On Jan 7, 2011, at 10:28 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote: > On Jan 5, 2011, at 11:28 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote: > >> I meant: this upcoming Friday (Jan 7) by 4pm US Eastern time. If a discussion starts and continues past this time, no problem -- I just wanted a timeout on a lack of replies because everyone heartily agrees / doesn't care. :-) > > Last chance to make SVN comments... No comments, this all sounds good to me. What is the process for the transition, though, and when exactly are you planning to do this? I was planning to add a set of changes to the MPIT document today (ahead of our next WG TelCon on Monday) and others may be in a similar situation and I want to make sure this doesn't mess things up. Thanks, Martin > > -- > Jeff Squyres > jsquyres(a)cisco.com > For corporate legal information go to: > http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/ > > > _______________________________________________ > mpi-forum mailing list > mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum ________________________________________________________________________ Martin Schulz, schulzm(a)llnl.gov, http://people.llnl.gov/schulzm CASC @ Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, USA

1 0

Which document to reference when creating new tickets?
by Fab Tillier 07 Jan '11

07 Jan '11

Hi Folks, Now that we have a 3.0 draft posted publicly, which document should be referenced when creating tickets? Should tickets still reference page and line numbers from the 2.2 standard, or should they instead reference the 3.0 draft 1 document? As we create new drafts, will in-progress tickets need to be updated to reference the latest released draft? Lastly, I think it would be much nicer to have the 3.0 draft available from the MPI Documents section of the website, rather than under the meetings information section (which incidentally includes "for 2010" in the link on the main forum page.) -Fab

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] SVN management
by Jeff Squyres 07 Jan '11

07 Jan '11

On Jan 5, 2011, at 11:28 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote: > I meant: this upcoming Friday (Jan 7) by 4pm US Eastern time. If a discussion starts and continues past this time, no problem -- I just wanted a timeout on a lack of replies because everyone heartily agrees / doesn't care. :-) Last chance to make SVN comments... -- Jeff Squyres jsquyres(a)cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] FW: Minor EI Chapter Revision
by George Bosilca 06 Jan '11

06 Jan '11

The group was put on hold due to lack of interest. Yann, if you're interested, we can talk about reviving the wg during the February meeting. george. On Jan 6, 2011, at 12:17 , Bronis R. de Supinski wrote: > > Yann: > > Re: >> I miss so many chapters and discussions in this forum I might have >> missed this point as well. A question: does the forum intents to >> integrate some parts of Rob Latham's work on generalized request in a >> second stage or was it decided not to dig further that way (the 2d >> proposal on the GR wiki) ? > > That question is one to pose to generalized request working > group, which the wiki indicates is on hold. To the best of > my knowledge the only active proposals to modify the EI > chapter are from the hybrid programming working group. > > If you would like to revive the GR stuff then you should speak > to someone involved in that working group (George Bosilica?). > > Bronis > > > >> Thanks >> Yann >> >> On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 06:59:04AM -0800, Bronis R. de Supinski wrote: >>> >>> All: >>> >>> The External Interfaces Chapter Committee (i.e., Pavan, >>> Doug and I) have gone over the existing text in the EI >>> chapter and suggest a few minor revisions that are >>> shown as ticket 0 changes in the attached. I have also >>> attached this to the Hybrid Working Group page on the Twiki: >>> >>> https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/raw-attachment/wiki/MPI3Hybrid… >>> >>> I will present this version at the February meeting. We >>> would like to adopt it as the baseline for major proposals >>> that will come from the Hybrid Working Group. >>> >>> Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, >>> >>> Bronis >> >> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> mpi-forum mailing list >>> mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org >>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum >> >> >> -- >> Yann Kalemkarian >> HPC Software Dept. >> Bull Open Software R&D >> 1 rue de Provence, BP 208 >> 38432 Echirolles Cedex >> France >> > _______________________________________________ > mpi-forum mailing list > mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] FW: Minor EI Chapter Revision
by Bronis R. de Supinski 06 Jan '11

06 Jan '11

Yann: Re: > I miss so many chapters and discussions in this forum I might have > missed this point as well. A question: does the forum intents to > integrate some parts of Rob Latham's work on generalized request in a > second stage or was it decided not to dig further that way (the 2d > proposal on the GR wiki) ? That question is one to pose to generalized request working group, which the wiki indicates is on hold. To the best of my knowledge the only active proposals to modify the EI chapter are from the hybrid programming working group. If you would like to revive the GR stuff then you should speak to someone involved in that working group (George Bosilica?). Bronis > Thanks > Yann > > On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 06:59:04AM -0800, Bronis R. de Supinski wrote: >> >> All: >> >> The External Interfaces Chapter Committee (i.e., Pavan, >> Doug and I) have gone over the existing text in the EI >> chapter and suggest a few minor revisions that are >> shown as ticket 0 changes in the attached. I have also >> attached this to the Hybrid Working Group page on the Twiki: >> >> https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/raw-attachment/wiki/MPI3Hybrid… >> >> I will present this version at the February meeting. We >> would like to adopt it as the baseline for major proposals >> that will come from the Hybrid Working Group. >> >> Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, >> >> Bronis > > >> _______________________________________________ >> mpi-forum mailing list >> mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org >> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum > > > -- > Yann Kalemkarian > HPC Software Dept. > Bull Open Software R&D > 1 rue de Provence, BP 208 > 38432 Echirolles Cedex > France >

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] Minor EI Chapter Revision
by Bronis R. de Supinski 06 Jan '11

06 Jan '11

Bill: Re: > This looks pretty good. One question: > > Page 12, line 44, should this be "the appropriate null pointers may be > passed in their place" (plural pointers)? Yes, it should. Good catch. I will make the change later today and send and post the revision. Bronis > Bill > > On Jan 6, 2011, at 8:59 AM, Bronis R. de Supinski wrote: > >> >> All: >> >> The External Interfaces Chapter Committee (i.e., Pavan, >> Doug and I) have gone over the existing text in the EI >> chapter and suggest a few minor revisions that are >> shown as ticket 0 changes in the attached. I have also >> attached this to the Hybrid Working Group page on the Twiki: >> >> https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/raw-attachment/wiki/MPI3Hybrid… >> >> I will present this version at the February meeting. We >> would like to adopt it as the baseline for major proposals >> that will come from the Hybrid Working Group. >> >> Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, >> >> Bronis >> <ei-2.pdf><ATT00001..txt> > > William Gropp > Deputy Director for Research > Institute for Advanced Computing Applications and Technologies > Paul and Cynthia Saylor Professor of Computer Science > University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign > > > > >

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] Minor EI Chapter Revision
by William Gropp 06 Jan '11

06 Jan '11

This looks pretty good. One question: Page 12, line 44, should this be "the appropriate null pointers may be passed in their place" (plural pointers)? Bill On Jan 6, 2011, at 8:59 AM, Bronis R. de Supinski wrote: > > All: > > The External Interfaces Chapter Committee (i.e., Pavan, > Doug and I) have gone over the existing text in the EI > chapter and suggest a few minor revisions that are > shown as ticket 0 changes in the attached. I have also > attached this to the Hybrid Working Group page on the Twiki: > > https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/raw-attachment/wiki/MPI3Hybrid… > > I will present this version at the February meeting. We > would like to adopt it as the baseline for major proposals > that will come from the Hybrid Working Group. > > Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, > > Bronis > <ei-2.pdf><ATT00001..txt> William Gropp Deputy Director for Research Institute for Advanced Computing Applications and Technologies Paul and Cynthia Saylor Professor of Computer Science University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign

1 0

Minor EI Chapter Revision
by Bronis R. de Supinski 06 Jan '11

06 Jan '11

All: The External Interfaces Chapter Committee (i.e., Pavan, Doug and I) have gone over the existing text in the EI chapter and suggest a few minor revisions that are shown as ticket 0 changes in the attached. I have also attached this to the Hybrid Working Group page on the Twiki: https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/raw-attachment/wiki/MPI3Hybrid… I will present this version at the February meeting. We would like to adopt it as the baseline for major proposals that will come from the Hybrid Working Group. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, Bronis

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] SVN management
by Jeff Squyres 05 Jan '11

05 Jan '11

On Jan 5, 2011, at 11:22 AM, Dave Goodell wrote: >> I'm putting a timeout on other comments; if I hear nothing else back before 4pm US Eastern this Friday (Jan 5 2011), I'll assume that everyone is fine with me making these changes. > > Do you mean Jan 7 2011? Err... yes. Sorry. I meant: this upcoming Friday (Jan 7) by 4pm US Eastern time. If a discussion starts and continues past this time, no problem -- I just wanted a timeout on a lack of replies because everyone heartily agrees / doesn't care. :-) -- Jeff Squyres jsquyres(a)cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/

1 0