Shame on you! Craig On Aug 8, 2008, at 11:43 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote:

Can we suck Fortran into this group? ;-) Just kidding.

Cisco seconds this proposal and would like to participate.

On Aug 8, 2008, at 1:34 PM, Adam Moody wrote:

...

Hello all, I'd like to propose a new Miscellaneous working group as a placeholder for ideas which don't nicely fit into any of the existing working groups. At the moment, here are the topics I'd like to include in such a group.

* Recommending standard names and options for MPI compiler wrappers, in the same way the 2.0 makes recommendations about mpiexec * Assembling test suites for 2.2 and 3.0, perhaps not blessed by the standard, but a place where all MPI developers can download and/ or contribute tests to check their MPI meets the spec (or rather doesn't fail to meet the spec for some particular test case) * Organizing a survey to identify features that users currently use in MPI, and for feedback on new features proposed for 3.0 * Recommending standard tools interfaces, like MPIR_PROCDESC

I'm willing to chair this group. Are there other organizations who would support it? -Adam Moody LLNL _______________________________________________ mpi-forum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum

-- Jeff Squyres Cisco Systems

_______________________________________________ mpi-forum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum