March 2015 - mpi-forum - mailman3.cels.anl.gov

Re: [Mpi-forum] Text issues with MPI-3.1 point-to-point chapter as at revision r2030
by William Gropp 04 Mar '15

04 Mar '15

Exactly:) One question for the forum is whether they want all such inconsistencies fixed in 3.1, or whether the document is now frozen. Bill On Mar 4, 2015, at 2:34 PM, Daniel Holmes <dholmes(a)epcc.ed.ac.uk> wrote: > Hi Bill, > > Oh ok, I see now - those variables are of type INTEGER continued from the previous line of code. As this sort of continuation should be more indented then the formatting is fine in the new document for these two lines. > > Cheers, > Dan. > > On 04/03/2015 11:55, William Gropp wrote: >> What’s incorrect? The style for the binding is that the continuation lines should be indented. There were many inconsistencies in prior versions and I’ve tried to find and fix these (I’ve missed some, including new ones such as p 79, line 32, which is in fact incorrectly indented). >> >> Bill >> >> On Mar 4, 2015, at 1:13 PM, Daniel Holmes <dholmes(a)epcc.ed.ac.uk> wrote: >> >>> page 79 line 42: white space indenting is incorrect >>> >>> page 80 line 33: white space indenting is incorrect >> > > -- > Dan Holmes > Applications Consultant in HPC Research > EPCC, The University of Edinburgh > James Clerk Maxwell Building > The Kings Buildings > Peter Guthrie Tait Road > Edinburgh > EH9 3FD > T: +44(0)131 651 3465 > E: dholmes(a)epcc.ed.ac.uk > > *Please consider the environment before printing this email.* > The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in > Scotland, with registration number SC005336.

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] Text issues with MPI-3.1 point-to-point chapter as at revision r2030
by Daniel Holmes 04 Mar '15

04 Mar '15

Hi Bill, Oh ok, I see now - those variables are of type INTEGER continued from the previous line of code. As this sort of continuation should be more indented then the formatting is fine in the new document for these two lines. Cheers, Dan. On 04/03/2015 11:55, William Gropp wrote: > Whatï¿½s incorrect? The style for the binding is that the continuation > lines should be indented. There were many inconsistencies in prior > versions and Iï¿½ve tried to find and fix these (Iï¿½ve missed some, > including new ones such as p 79, line 32, which is in fact incorrectly > indented). > > Bill > > On Mar 4, 2015, at 1:13 PM, Daniel Holmes <dholmes(a)epcc.ed.ac.uk > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >> page 79 line 42: white space indenting is incorrect >> >> page 80 line 33: white space indenting is incorrect > -- Dan Holmes Applications Consultant in HPC Research EPCC, The University of Edinburgh James Clerk Maxwell Building The Kings Buildings Peter Guthrie Tait Road Edinburgh EH9 3FD T: +44(0)131 651 3465 E: dholmes(a)epcc.ed.ac.uk *Please consider the environment before printing this email.* The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in Scotland, with registration number SC005336.

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] Text issues with MPI-3.1 point-to-point chapter as at revision r2030
by William Gropp 04 Mar '15

04 Mar '15

What’s incorrect? The style for the binding is that the continuation lines should be indented. There were many inconsistencies in prior versions and I’ve tried to find and fix these (I’ve missed some, including new ones such as p 79, line 32, which is in fact incorrectly indented). Bill On Mar 4, 2015, at 1:13 PM, Daniel Holmes <dholmes(a)epcc.ed.ac.uk> wrote: > page 79 line 42: white space indenting is incorrect > > page 80 line 33: white space indenting is incorrect

1 0

Text issues with MPI-3.1 point-to-point chapter as at revision r2030
by Daniel Holmes 04 Mar '15

04 Mar '15

Hi all, I have compared the MPI-3.1 r2030 draft document with the MPI-3.0 document (for the point to point chapter only) and discovered the following text issues: page 26 line 44: includes "on page 658 and 666" (other page references have been removed) page 29 line 36: spurious comma between close brace and union symbol (same in MPI 3.0, suggested ticket-0 change) page 31 line 28: why does "source" wrap when there is space on the previous line? (same in MPI 3.0, suggested ticket-0 change) page 60 line 22: white space indenting is incorrect page 61 line 11: white space indenting has changed, looks incorrect now page 62 line 13: white space indenting is incorrect page 78 line 4: white space change - was it intentional to incorporate the sequence into the paragraph? page 79 line 42: white space indenting is incorrect page 80 line 33: white space indenting is incorrect Cheers, Dan. -- Dan Holmes Applications Consultant in HPC Research EPCC, The University of Edinburgh James Clerk Maxwell Building The Kings Buildings Peter Guthrie Tait Road Edinburgh EH9 3FD T: +44(0)131 651 3465 E: dholmes(a)epcc.ed.ac.uk *Please consider the environment before printing this email.* The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in Scotland, with registration number SC005336.

1 0

Review copy for MPI 3.1
by Schulz Martin 03 Mar '15

03 Mar '15

Hi all, As discussed today, we have now a review copy of the MPI standard (as of SVN revision 2030) on the webpage. It is linked at the bottom of the issue table on the MPI 3.1 page and is password protected. The password is mpi3forum. Please use this to check for potential white space and formatting issues. Thanks! Martin PS: Thanks to Tony and Puri for creating this PDF! ________________________________________________________________________ Martin Schulz, schulzm(a)llnl.gov, http://scalability.llnl.gov/ CASC @ Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, USA

1 0

Anyone joining the webex?
by Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) 03 Mar '15

03 Mar '15

If anyone is going to join the webex for the plenaries, please let me know (so that we can be sure to join the webex here in the conference room). Thanks. -- Jeff Squyres jsquyres(a)cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/

1 0