September 2012 - mpi-forum - mailman3.cels.anl.gov

Planned outage for svn/trac/mailman
by Jeff Squyres 18 Sep '12

18 Sep '12

FYI: Indiana U. needs to reboot our servers next week. Begin forwarded message: > Subject: Reboot the VM (lion and tiger). > Date: September 18, 2012 10:10:34 AM EDT > > Dear All, > > We need to reboot the two VMs (lion and tiger) that are hosting the SVN/trac/mailman services. > > The downtime would be short and the reboot would kick in the new kernels to the system with the following specific schedule: > > Date: Wednesday, September 21, 2012 > Time: > - 5:00am-5:10am Pacific US time > - 6:00am-6:10am Mountain US time > - 7:00am-7:10am Central US time > - 8:00am-8:10am Eastern US time > - 12:00pm-12:10pm GMT > > Please let me know if you have any issues or questions about the short outage. -- Jeff Squyres jsquyres(a)cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] MPI 3.0 Implementation Question
by Richard Graham 18 Sep '12

18 Sep '12

Thanks !!! Rich ----- Original Message ----- From: Kawashima, Takahiro [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2012 05:03 AM To: mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org <mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org> Subject: Re: [Mpi-forum] MPI 3.0 Implementation Question Hi Rich, Sorry for this late reply. Fujitsu MPI is based on Open MPI and basically follows new versions of Open MPI. So please fill all fields as "Open MPI+rel delta" for Fujitsu. The release delta will be within one year or so. Best regards, Takahiro Kawashima, MPI development team, Fujitsu > As of now I have only received responses on this from Open MPI, MPICH, and SGI. Do the other implementations want this information included ? How about Intel, IBM, MVAPICH, NEC, Fujitsu, HP, .... ? > > Thanks, > Rich > > -----Original Message----- > From: mpi-forum-bounces(a)lists.mpi-forum.org [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Richard Graham > Sent: Monday, September 03, 2012 9:52 PM > To: Main MPI Forum mailing list > Subject: Re: [Mpi-forum] MPI 3.0 Implementation Question > > Feel free to add these to the list of your responses. > > Rich > > -----Original Message----- > From: mpi-forum-bounces(a)lists.mpi-forum.org [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Pavan Balaji > Sent: Monday, September 03, 2012 8:25 PM > To: mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > Subject: Re: [Mpi-forum] MPI 3.0 Implementation Question > > > Below is the list for MPICH -- > > On 09/03/2012 07:13 PM, Richard Graham wrote: > > - Nonblocking collectives > > - MPI Tool Interface > > - Distributed Graph > > - Noncollective communicator creation > > Already supported. > > > - RMA enhancements > > - New Fortran bindings > > - Sparse collectives > > - Enhanced Datatype support > > November 2012. > > What about the remaining features that are voted in? > > - hindexed_block > - const bindings > - matched probe > - intercomm modifications to not conflict with pt2pt tags > - comm_split_type > > For MPICH, these are all already supported. > > -- Pavan > > -- > Pavan Balaji > http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji _______________________________________________ mpi-forum mailing list mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] MPI 3.0 Implementation Question
by Kawashima, Takahiro 18 Sep '12

18 Sep '12

Hi Rich, Sorry for this late reply. Fujitsu MPI is based on Open MPI and basically follows new versions of Open MPI. So please fill all fields as "Open MPI+rel delta" for Fujitsu. The release delta will be within one year or so. Best regards, Takahiro Kawashima, MPI development team, Fujitsu > As of now I have only received responses on this from Open MPI, MPICH, and SGI. Do the other implementations want this information included ? How about Intel, IBM, MVAPICH, NEC, Fujitsu, HP, .... ? > > Thanks, > Rich > > -----Original Message----- > From: mpi-forum-bounces(a)lists.mpi-forum.org [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Richard Graham > Sent: Monday, September 03, 2012 9:52 PM > To: Main MPI Forum mailing list > Subject: Re: [Mpi-forum] MPI 3.0 Implementation Question > > Feel free to add these to the list of your responses. > > Rich > > -----Original Message----- > From: mpi-forum-bounces(a)lists.mpi-forum.org [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Pavan Balaji > Sent: Monday, September 03, 2012 8:25 PM > To: mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > Subject: Re: [Mpi-forum] MPI 3.0 Implementation Question > > > Below is the list for MPICH -- > > On 09/03/2012 07:13 PM, Richard Graham wrote: > > - Nonblocking collectives > > - MPI Tool Interface > > - Distributed Graph > > - Noncollective communicator creation > > Already supported. > > > - RMA enhancements > > - New Fortran bindings > > - Sparse collectives > > - Enhanced Datatype support > > November 2012. > > What about the remaining features that are voted in? > > - hindexed_block > - const bindings > - matched probe > - intercomm modifications to not conflict with pt2pt tags > - comm_split_type > > For MPICH, these are all already supported. > > -- Pavan > > -- > Pavan Balaji > http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] MPI 3.0 implementation time line
by Pavan Balaji 16 Sep '12

16 Sep '12

Ok, even then your slide is incorrect for MPICH2. On your slide, RMA, FTN Bindings, and Large Counts should be "11/12", and everything else should be "Done". Can you please correct it? -- Pavan On 09/16/2012 06:05 AM, Richard Graham wrote: > This was deliberate. It includes only MPI 3 features and the "bigger" features. > > Rich > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Pavan Balaji [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Saturday, September 15, 2012 08:03 PM > To: mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org <mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org> > Subject: Re: [Mpi-forum] MPI 3.0 implementation time line > > Rich, > > Also looks like a large number of features have been dropped on your > slide for some reason. I've listed them again: > > > - Nonblocking collectives > > - MPI Tool Interface > > - Distributed Graph > > - Noncollective communicator creation > > - Sparse collectives > > - hindexed_block > > - const bindings > > - matched probe > > - intercomm modifications to not conflict with pt2pt tags > > - comm_split_type > > Done. > > > - RMA enhancements > > - New Fortran bindings > > - Enhanced Datatype support > > November 2012. > > -- Pavan > > On 09/15/2012 09:56 PM, Pavan Balaji wrote: >> Hi Rich, >> >> For MPICH2, the list is incorrect. Please correct it based on the email >> I sent. >> >> Thanks, >> >> -- Pavan >> >> On 09/14/2012 04:02 PM, Richard Graham wrote: >>> Attached is a slide that summarizes the responses I think I got back >>> from people about the expected time line for implementing MPI 3.0 >>> functionality. Please take a look and send corrections/omissions/ï¿½. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Rich >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> mpi-forum mailing list >>> mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org >>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum >>> >> > -- Pavan Balaji http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] MPI 3.0 implementation time line
by Richard Graham 16 Sep '12

16 Sep '12

This was deliberate. It includes only MPI 3 features and the "bigger" features. Rich ----- Original Message ----- From: Pavan Balaji [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Saturday, September 15, 2012 08:03 PM To: mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org <mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org> Subject: Re: [Mpi-forum] MPI 3.0 implementation time line Rich, Also looks like a large number of features have been dropped on your slide for some reason. I've listed them again: > - Nonblocking collectives > - MPI Tool Interface > - Distributed Graph > - Noncollective communicator creation > - Sparse collectives > - hindexed_block > - const bindings > - matched probe > - intercomm modifications to not conflict with pt2pt tags > - comm_split_type Done. > - RMA enhancements > - New Fortran bindings > - Enhanced Datatype support November 2012. -- Pavan On 09/15/2012 09:56 PM, Pavan Balaji wrote: > Hi Rich, > > For MPICH2, the list is incorrect. Please correct it based on the email > I sent. > > Thanks, > > -- Pavan > > On 09/14/2012 04:02 PM, Richard Graham wrote: >> Attached is a slide that summarizes the responses I think I got back >> from people about the expected time line for implementing MPI 3.0 >> functionality. Please take a look and send corrections/omissions/…. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Rich >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> mpi-forum mailing list >> mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org >> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum >> > -- Pavan Balaji http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji _______________________________________________ mpi-forum mailing list mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] MPI 3.0 implementation time line
by Pavan Balaji 15 Sep '12

15 Sep '12

Sorry about the spam -- Based on the slide, there seems to be an additional row for "new datatypes". Are these MPI-2.2 datatypes? If yes, that's done as well. -- Pavan On 09/15/2012 10:03 PM, Pavan Balaji wrote: > Rich, > > Also looks like a large number of features have been dropped on your > slide for some reason. I've listed them again: > > > - Nonblocking collectives > > - MPI Tool Interface > > - Distributed Graph > > - Noncollective communicator creation > > - Sparse collectives > > - hindexed_block > > - const bindings > > - matched probe > > - intercomm modifications to not conflict with pt2pt tags > > - comm_split_type > > Done. > > > - RMA enhancements > > - New Fortran bindings > > - Enhanced Datatype support > > November 2012. > > -- Pavan > > On 09/15/2012 09:56 PM, Pavan Balaji wrote: >> Hi Rich, >> >> For MPICH2, the list is incorrect. Please correct it based on the email >> I sent. >> >> Thanks, >> >> -- Pavan >> >> On 09/14/2012 04:02 PM, Richard Graham wrote: >>> Attached is a slide that summarizes the responses I think I got back >>> from people about the expected time line for implementing MPI 3.0 >>> functionality. Please take a look and send corrections/omissions/ï¿½. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Rich >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> mpi-forum mailing list >>> mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org >>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum >>> >> > -- Pavan Balaji http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] MPI 3.0 implementation time line
by Pavan Balaji 15 Sep '12

15 Sep '12

Rich, Also looks like a large number of features have been dropped on your slide for some reason. I've listed them again: > - Nonblocking collectives > - MPI Tool Interface > - Distributed Graph > - Noncollective communicator creation > - Sparse collectives > - hindexed_block > - const bindings > - matched probe > - intercomm modifications to not conflict with pt2pt tags > - comm_split_type Done. > - RMA enhancements > - New Fortran bindings > - Enhanced Datatype support November 2012. -- Pavan On 09/15/2012 09:56 PM, Pavan Balaji wrote: > Hi Rich, > > For MPICH2, the list is incorrect. Please correct it based on the email > I sent. > > Thanks, > > -- Pavan > > On 09/14/2012 04:02 PM, Richard Graham wrote: >> Attached is a slide that summarizes the responses I think I got back >> from people about the expected time line for implementing MPI 3.0 >> functionality. Please take a look and send corrections/omissions/ï¿½. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Rich >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> mpi-forum mailing list >> mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org >> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum >> > -- Pavan Balaji http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] MPI 3.0 implementation time line
by Pavan Balaji 15 Sep '12

15 Sep '12

Hi Rich, For MPICH2, the list is incorrect. Please correct it based on the email I sent. Thanks, -- Pavan On 09/14/2012 04:02 PM, Richard Graham wrote: > Attached is a slide that summarizes the responses I think I got back > from people about the expected time line for implementing MPI 3.0 > functionality. Please take a look and send corrections/omissions/ï¿½. > > Thanks, > > Rich > > > > _______________________________________________ > mpi-forum mailing list > mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum > -- Pavan Balaji http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji

1 0

MPI 3.0 implementation time line
by Richard Graham 14 Sep '12

14 Sep '12

Attached is a slide that summarizes the responses I think I got back from people about the expected time line for implementing MPI 3.0 functionality. Please take a look and send corrections/omissions/.... Thanks, Rich

1 0

MPI 3.0 Final draft standard
by Richard Graham 12 Sep '12

12 Sep '12

The final version of the MPI 3.0 draft standard has been uploaded to the meetings web-site. Chapter votes are scheduled for Thursday next week (9/20/2012), and final standard vote on Friday. Rich

1 0