July 2012 - mpi-forum - mailman3.cels.anl.gov

Re: [Mpi-forum] Changes to the Approved branch
by Jeff Squyres 03 Jul '12

03 Jul '12

I'm still reviewing the Fortran changes in the binding chapter, but otherwise the binding chapter appears to be done. 140, 182, 204, 229 (still under review), 274, 279 On Jul 2, 2012, at 5:25 PM, Richard Graham wrote: > Attached is the latest version of the tickets that have been voted into the 3.0 draft standard, and what I think their status is. Please send in updates to this. At this stage the doc is too out of sync to drop a draft standard. PLEASE let me know if you will be putting in your chapter changes this week, so we can find someone else to apply the changes. The datatype chapter should be done this coming weekend, but I donï¿½t know about the rest. > > Thanks, > Rich > <MPI 3.0 tickets for inclusion.xlsx>_______________________________________________ > mpi-forum mailing list > mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum -- Jeff Squyres jsquyres(a)cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/

1 0

tickets affecting I/O chapter
by Rajeev Thakur 03 Jul '12

03 Jul '12

I have applied tickets 140 (const) and 182 (change legal to valid) to the I/O chapter. If any other ticket needs to be applied to the I/O chapter, let me know. Rajeev

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] Changes to the Approved branch
by Richard Graham 03 Jul '12

03 Jul '12

:-) thanks !!! -----Original Message----- From: Bronis R. de Supinski [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2012 7:17 AM To: Richard Graham Cc: Main MPI Forum mailing list Subject: RE: [Mpi-forum] Changes to the Approved branch Rich: OK, being thorough rather than grumpy: My reading is that 140, 182, 204, 207, 255 do not affect EI and Tools. 229, 265 and 266 have been implemented in EI and/or Tools as appropriate. So, yes, those tickets are all done as far as EI and Tools are concerned. Bronis On Tue, 3 Jul 2012, Richard Graham wrote: > Yes, you should not have to dig through tickets to find the changes that should be made - it is really the author's responsibility to do so. However, when it comes to the ptp chapter at least, few have done this (some have been very good at this), so for the sake of getting the doc out, have gone and looked through tickets to see if I can figure out if it impacts my chapter. The reason the spreadsheet I sent out was so opaque is that I did not have time to go through each ticket and figure out what chapters they impact - ticket authors were asked to provide this information. > > As for 182 - it is a very nicely documented ticket, and I checked - your chapters are not impacted. > > Rich > > -----Original Message----- > From: Bronis R. de Supinski [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2012 1:54 AM > To: Richard Graham > Cc: Main MPI Forum mailing list > Subject: RE: [Mpi-forum] Changes to the Approved branch > > > > Rich: > > I think your question is mis-phrased as it requires me to dredge through tickets and see if they impact the EI and Tools chapters. I have implemented every ticket that I have been notified affects them. > > For a sampling, yes, 266 is done in the tools chapter; the Fortran changes were implemented by Rolf (and subsequently verified); tickets that Fab owns are all implemented as far as I know since he was good about notifying as soon as they passed (sampling deeper, I beleive 140 has no changes for EI or tools while 265 was implemented in EI but has no changes for tools. My search for MPI 3.0 tickets does not return 182... > > Bronis > > > > > On Mon, 2 Jul 2012, Richard Graham wrote: > >> So, 140, 182, 204, 207., 229, 255, 265, and 266 are all done ? >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: mpi-forum-bounces(a)lists.mpi-forum.org >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bronis R. >> de Supinski >> Sent: Monday, July 02, 2012 7:45 PM >> To: Main MPI Forum mailing list >> Subject: Re: [Mpi-forum] Changes to the Approved branch >> >> >> Rich: >> >> I am not exactly certain how to read your spreadsheet but my understanding is that all tickets that affect EI and tools have been completed in those chapters. >> >> Bronis >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, 2 Jul 2012, Richard Graham wrote: >> >>> Attached is the latest version of the tickets that have been voted into the 3.0 draft standard, and what I think their status is. Please send in updates to this. At this stage the doc is too out of sync to drop a draft standard. PLEASE let me know if you will be putting in your chapter changes this week, so we can find someone else to apply the changes. The datatype chapter should be done this coming weekend, but I don't know about the rest. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Rich >>> >> >

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] Changes to the Approved branch
by Bronis R. de Supinski 03 Jul '12

03 Jul '12

Rich: OK, being thorough rather than grumpy: My reading is that 140, 182, 204, 207, 255 do not affect EI and Tools. 229, 265 and 266 have been implemented in EI and/or Tools as appropriate. So, yes, those tickets are all done as far as EI and Tools are concerned. Bronis On Tue, 3 Jul 2012, Richard Graham wrote: > Yes, you should not have to dig through tickets to find the changes that should be made - it is really the author's responsibility to do so. However, when it comes to the ptp chapter at least, few have done this (some have been very good at this), so for the sake of getting the doc out, have gone and looked through tickets to see if I can figure out if it impacts my chapter. The reason the spreadsheet I sent out was so opaque is that I did not have time to go through each ticket and figure out what chapters they impact - ticket authors were asked to provide this information. > > As for 182 - it is a very nicely documented ticket, and I checked - your chapters are not impacted. > > Rich > > -----Original Message----- > From: Bronis R. de Supinski [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2012 1:54 AM > To: Richard Graham > Cc: Main MPI Forum mailing list > Subject: RE: [Mpi-forum] Changes to the Approved branch > > > > Rich: > > I think your question is mis-phrased as it requires me to dredge through tickets and see if they impact the EI and Tools chapters. I have implemented every ticket that I have been notified affects them. > > For a sampling, yes, 266 is done in the tools chapter; the Fortran changes were implemented by Rolf (and subsequently verified); tickets that Fab owns are all implemented as far as I know since he was good about notifying as soon as they passed (sampling deeper, I beleive 140 has no changes for EI or tools while 265 was implemented in EI but has no changes for tools. My search for MPI 3.0 tickets does not return 182... > > Bronis > > > > > On Mon, 2 Jul 2012, Richard Graham wrote: > >> So, 140, 182, 204, 207., 229, 255, 265, and 266 are all done ? >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: mpi-forum-bounces(a)lists.mpi-forum.org >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bronis R. >> de Supinski >> Sent: Monday, July 02, 2012 7:45 PM >> To: Main MPI Forum mailing list >> Subject: Re: [Mpi-forum] Changes to the Approved branch >> >> >> Rich: >> >> I am not exactly certain how to read your spreadsheet but my understanding is that all tickets that affect EI and tools have been completed in those chapters. >> >> Bronis >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, 2 Jul 2012, Richard Graham wrote: >> >>> Attached is the latest version of the tickets that have been voted into the 3.0 draft standard, and what I think their status is. Please send in updates to this. At this stage the doc is too out of sync to drop a draft standard. PLEASE let me know if you will be putting in your chapter changes this week, so we can find someone else to apply the changes. The datatype chapter should be done this coming weekend, but I don't know about the rest. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Rich >>> >> >

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] Changes to the Approved branch
by Richard Graham 03 Jul '12

03 Jul '12

Yes, you should not have to dig through tickets to find the changes that should be made - it is really the author's responsibility to do so. However, when it comes to the ptp chapter at least, few have done this (some have been very good at this), so for the sake of getting the doc out, have gone and looked through tickets to see if I can figure out if it impacts my chapter. The reason the spreadsheet I sent out was so opaque is that I did not have time to go through each ticket and figure out what chapters they impact - ticket authors were asked to provide this information. As for 182 - it is a very nicely documented ticket, and I checked - your chapters are not impacted. Rich -----Original Message----- From: Bronis R. de Supinski [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2012 1:54 AM To: Richard Graham Cc: Main MPI Forum mailing list Subject: RE: [Mpi-forum] Changes to the Approved branch Rich: I think your question is mis-phrased as it requires me to dredge through tickets and see if they impact the EI and Tools chapters. I have implemented every ticket that I have been notified affects them. For a sampling, yes, 266 is done in the tools chapter; the Fortran changes were implemented by Rolf (and subsequently verified); tickets that Fab owns are all implemented as far as I know since he was good about notifying as soon as they passed (sampling deeper, I beleive 140 has no changes for EI or tools while 265 was implemented in EI but has no changes for tools. My search for MPI 3.0 tickets does not return 182... Bronis On Mon, 2 Jul 2012, Richard Graham wrote: > So, 140, 182, 204, 207., 229, 255, 265, and 266 are all done ? > > -----Original Message----- > From: mpi-forum-bounces(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bronis R. > de Supinski > Sent: Monday, July 02, 2012 7:45 PM > To: Main MPI Forum mailing list > Subject: Re: [Mpi-forum] Changes to the Approved branch > > > Rich: > > I am not exactly certain how to read your spreadsheet but my understanding is that all tickets that affect EI and tools have been completed in those chapters. > > Bronis > > > > > On Mon, 2 Jul 2012, Richard Graham wrote: > >> Attached is the latest version of the tickets that have been voted into the 3.0 draft standard, and what I think their status is. Please send in updates to this. At this stage the doc is too out of sync to drop a draft standard. PLEASE let me know if you will be putting in your chapter changes this week, so we can find someone else to apply the changes. The datatype chapter should be done this coming weekend, but I don't know about the rest. >> >> Thanks, >> Rich >> >

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] Forum Registration: AmEx?
by TERRY DONTJE 03 Jul '12

03 Jul '12

Thanks Rich, I appreciate your efforts. --td On 7/2/2012 3:50 PM, Richard Graham wrote: > I will see if we can do something different next time - it has never been an issue in the past, so did not even think to ask. > > Sorry for the inconvenience, > Rich > > -----Original Message----- > From: mpi-forum-bounces(a)lists.mpi-forum.org [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jeff Squyres > Sent: Monday, July 02, 2012 3:49 PM > To: Main MPI Forum mailing list > Subject: Re: [Mpi-forum] Forum Registration: AmEx? > > Ditto. > > That being said, I'm not stepping up to handle Forum registration :-), but it certainly would be nice if we could accept AmEx again... > > > > > On Jul 2, 2012, at 3:25 PM, TERRY DONTJE wrote: > >> Well this sucks. It's not insurmountable but it definitely causes me some pain getting my expense reports approved. >> >> --td >> >> On 7/2/2012 12:07 PM, Richard Graham wrote: >>> I asked, and unfortunately this is not possible. The particular vendor providing the support does not support AmEx. >>> >>> Sorry, >>> Rich >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: >>> mpi-forum-bounces(a)lists.mpi-forum.org >>> [mailto:[email protected] >>> ] On Behalf Of Jeff Squyres >>> Sent: Monday, July 02, 2012 10:05 AM >>> To: MPI Forum list >>> Subject: [Mpi-forum] Forum Registration: AmEx? >>> >>> Rich -- >>> >>> Is it possible to get the Forum meeting registration to accept AmEx? It only lists Visa and MC right now. >>> >>> Thanks. >>> >>> >> -- >> Terry D. Dontje | Principal Software Engineer Developer Tools >> Engineering | +1.781.442.2631 Oracle - Performance Technologies >> 95 Network Drive, Burlington, MA 01803 Email terry.dontje(a)oracle.com >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> mpi-forum mailing list >> mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org >> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum > > -- > Jeff Squyres > jsquyres(a)cisco.com > For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/ > > > _______________________________________________ > mpi-forum mailing list > mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum > > _______________________________________________ > mpi-forum mailing list > mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum -- Terry D. Dontje | Principal Software Engineer Developer Tools Engineering | +1.781.442.2631 Oracle *- Performance Technologies* 95 Network Drive, Burlington, MA 01803 Email terry.dontje(a)oracle.com <mailto:[email protected]>

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] "const" ticket needs to be applied
by Rolf Rabenseifner 03 Jul '12

03 Jul '12

> Terms: Rolf Rabenseifner DONE ----- Original Message ----- > From: "William Gropp" <wgropp(a)illinois.edu> > To: "Main MPI Forum mailing list" <mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org> > Sent: Monday, July 2, 2012 5:56:39 PM > Subject: Re: [Mpi-forum] "const" ticket needs to be applied > See http://meetings.mpi-forum.org/mpi3.0_chapter_wgs.php for the list > of chapter authors. These specific chapters are: > > Dynamic: David Solt > Environment: George Bosilca > Point-to-Point: Rich Graham > Datatypes: George Bosilca > Terms: Rolf Rabenseifner > > Bill > > William Gropp > Director, Parallel Computing Institute > Deputy Director for Research > Institute for Advanced Computing Applications and Technologies > Paul and Cynthia Saylor Professor of Computer Science > University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign > > > > On Jun 30, 2012, at 7:17 PM, Rajeev Thakur wrote: > > > Looks like several chapters are missing the "const" ticket (#140): > > https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/140 > > > > Dynamic Processes > > Environment Management (chap-inquiry) > > Point-to-point Communication > > Datatypes > > Terms and Conventions > > > > I just added it to the I/O chapter by merging from > > https://svn.crest.iu.edu/svn/mpi-forum-docs/trunk/working-groups/mpi-3/bw-c… > > . (but having svn checkin permission issues, hence not checked in > > yet) > > > > Rajeev > > _______________________________________________ > > mpi-forum mailing list > > mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum > > > _______________________________________________ > mpi-forum mailing list > mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum -- Dr. Rolf Rabenseifner . . . . . . . . . .. email rabenseifner(a)hlrs.de High Performance Computing Center (HLRS) . phone ++49(0)711/685-65530 University of Stuttgart . . . . . . . . .. fax ++49(0)711 / 685-65832 Head of Dpmt Parallel Computing . . . www.hlrs.de/people/rabenseifner Nobelstr. 19, D-70550 Stuttgart, Germany . (Office: Allmandring 30)

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] Changes to the Approved branch
by Bronis R. de Supinski 03 Jul '12

03 Jul '12

Rich: I think your question is mis-phrased as it requires me to dredge through tickets and see if they impact the EI and Tools chapters. I have implemented every ticket that I have been notified affects them. For a sampling, yes, 266 is done in the tools chapter; the Fortran changes were implemented by Rolf (and subsequently verified); tickets that Fab owns are all implemented as far as I know since he was good about notifying as soon as they passed (sampling deeper, I beleive 140 has no changes for EI or tools while 265 was implemented in EI but has no changes for tools. My search for MPI 3.0 tickets does not return 182... Bronis On Mon, 2 Jul 2012, Richard Graham wrote: > So, 140, 182, 204, 207., 229, 255, 265, and 266 are all done ? > > -----Original Message----- > From: mpi-forum-bounces(a)lists.mpi-forum.org [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bronis R. de Supinski > Sent: Monday, July 02, 2012 7:45 PM > To: Main MPI Forum mailing list > Subject: Re: [Mpi-forum] Changes to the Approved branch > > > Rich: > > I am not exactly certain how to read your spreadsheet but my understanding is that all tickets that affect EI and tools have been completed in those chapters. > > Bronis > > > > > On Mon, 2 Jul 2012, Richard Graham wrote: > >> Attached is the latest version of the tickets that have been voted into the 3.0 draft standard, and what I think their status is. Please send in updates to this. At this stage the doc is too out of sync to drop a draft standard. PLEASE let me know if you will be putting in your chapter changes this week, so we can find someone else to apply the changes. The datatype chapter should be done this coming weekend, but I don't know about the rest. >> >> Thanks, >> Rich >> >

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] Changes to the Approved branch
by Richard Graham 02 Jul '12

02 Jul '12

So, 140, 182, 204, 207., 229, 255, 265, and 266 are all done ? -----Original Message----- From: mpi-forum-bounces(a)lists.mpi-forum.org [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bronis R. de Supinski Sent: Monday, July 02, 2012 7:45 PM To: Main MPI Forum mailing list Subject: Re: [Mpi-forum] Changes to the Approved branch Rich: I am not exactly certain how to read your spreadsheet but my understanding is that all tickets that affect EI and tools have been completed in those chapters. Bronis On Mon, 2 Jul 2012, Richard Graham wrote: > Attached is the latest version of the tickets that have been voted into the 3.0 draft standard, and what I think their status is. Please send in updates to this. At this stage the doc is too out of sync to drop a draft standard. PLEASE let me know if you will be putting in your chapter changes this week, so we can find someone else to apply the changes. The datatype chapter should be done this coming weekend, but I don't know about the rest. > > Thanks, > Rich >

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] Changes to the Approved branch
by Bronis R. de Supinski 02 Jul '12

02 Jul '12

Rich: I am not exactly certain how to read your spreadsheet but my understanding is that all tickets that affect EI and tools have been completed in those chapters. Bronis On Mon, 2 Jul 2012, Richard Graham wrote: > Attached is the latest version of the tickets that have been voted into the 3.0 draft standard, and what I think their status is. Please send in updates to this. At this stage the doc is too out of sync to drop a draft standard. PLEASE let me know if you will be putting in your chapter changes this week, so we can find someone else to apply the changes. The datatype chapter should be done this coming weekend, but I donï¿½t know about the rest. > > Thanks, > Rich >

1 0