June 2016 - mpiwg-hybridpm - mailman3.cels.anl.gov

Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Is there a hybrid working group telecom today?
by Balaji, Pavan 27 Jun '16

27 Jun '16

Steve, We'll not be having the call today. We'll be restarting them soon. -- Pavan > On Jun 27, 2016, at 10:47 AM, Steven Oyanagi <sko(a)cray.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > My calendar says there should be hybrid working group telecom today. Is > there one? > > Thanks, > - Steve > > _______________________________________________ > mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list > mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm

1 0

Is there a hybrid working group telecom today?
by Steven Oyanagi 27 Jun '16

27 Jun '16

Hi, My calendar says there should be hybrid working group telecom today. Is there one? Thanks, - Steve

1 0

telecom today (Mon 6/13/2016)?
by Steven Oyanagi 13 Jun '16

13 Jun '16

Hi, Just wondering - is there a telecom today? - Steve

1 0

Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change
by Steven Oyanagi 08 Jun '16

08 Jun '16

Hi, Please see the branch fix_hybrid-process-clarification which should be a branch off of hybrid-process-clarification that can be fast-forward merged on to the hybrid-process-clarification branch. I fixed my 100 pages, Jeff Hammond’s commit, and part of Dan Holems’ commit. Dan’s commit affected two files, but oddly the second of the two files was already fixed for “MPI” -> “\MPI/“. Note also that I do not have the capability at this time to convert the Tex source into a final document (not installed on my macbook) so there might be some issues in this branch and my original commit that a format would uncover. Let me know if anything else needs to be done. - Steve -----Original Message----- From: Steve Oyanagi <sko(a)cray.com> Date: Wednesday, June 8, 2016 at 5:04 PM To: "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org" <mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org> Subject: Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change >Hi, > >I may have a simple way of fixing my changes which, if it works, could be >used to fix Dan’s changes. Let me see what I can do. > - Steve > >-----Original Message----- >From: mpiwg-hybridpm <mpiwg-hybridpm-bounces(a)mpi-forum.org> on behalf of >Jeff Hammond <jeff.science(a)gmail.com> >Reply-To: "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org" <mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org> >Date: Wednesday, June 8, 2016 at 5:00 PM >To: "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org" <mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org> >Cc: "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org" ><mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org> >Subject: Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change > >>mea culpa >> >> >>i'll provide free coffee to whoever fixes my bug. you can collect your >>free coffee at any Intel campus ;-) >> >> >>jeff >> >> >>On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 2:47 PM, Steven Oyanagi >><sko(a)cray.com> wrote: >> >>Hi, >> >>First off, sorry, but I probably won’t be able to get the changes done >>today. At this point I suspect you don’t need them for this meeting. If >>you do, let me know and I will try to get them done quick. >> >>I do note we have not be consistent about putting things in as \MPI/. I >>note that Jeff Hammond’s change on Mar 1 (7c911456d - change process to >>MPI process) did not use \MPI/. Pavan’s mod is right, it did use \MPI/. >>Dan’s mod (12aa5e1c - Clarification of word 'process', pages 101-200 >>from >>Feb 5th does *not* use \MPI/, it inserts “MPI “. It may be I looked at >>Dan’s mod and thought it was Pavan’s. >> - Steve >> >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Pavan Balaji <balaji(a)anl.gov> >>Date: Wednesday, June 8, 2016 at 2:28 PM >>To: "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org" >><mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org> >>Cc: Pavan Balaji <balaji(a)anl.gov>, Steve Oyanagi <sko(a)cray.com> >>Subject: Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change >> >>>Steve, >>> >>>You should use \MPI/ in latex. >>> >>> -- Pavan >>> >>>> On Jun 8, 2016, at 11:33 AM, Steven Oyanagi <sko(a)cray.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Sorry, I was unclear in my last message. Changes were made per the >>>>review >>>> of changes for pages 201-300 in previous working group meetings. My >>>> inquiry was about the changes to the TEX source of the MPI standard. >>>>Did I >>>> have to do anything unusual in the case where “MPI “ was inserted? I >>>>just >>>> inserted the string “MPI “ in those cases. MPI isn’t some special tag >>>> that has be denoted in an different way, is it? >>>> - Steve >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Steve Oyanagi <sko(a)cray.com> >>>> Date: Wednesday, June 8, 2016 at 11:27 AM >>>> To: "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org" >>>> <mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org> >>>> Subject: Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> I think I have the changes for 201-300 done and correctly committed >>>>>to >>>>>the >>>>> branch. Please check that I got the git stuff correct, and take a >>>>>glance >>>>> at my commit to make sure I didn’t forget to do something. I assume >>>>>in >>>>> most cases I just had to insert “MPI “ before process. Was I suppose >>>>>to >>>>> do anything else? >>>>> >>>>> Please let me know if further changes are needed. >>>>> - Steve >>>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: Steve Oyanagi <sko(a)cray.com> >>>>> Date: Tuesday, June 7, 2016 at 6:12 PM >>>>> To: "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org" >>>>> <mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org> >>>>> Subject: Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change >>>>> >>>>>> Hello, >>>>>> >>>>>> FYI - I have the changes done, just need to proof-read a bit and >>>>>>then >>>>>> will >>>>>> commit, probably tonight or tomorrow morning. Hope that’s soon >>>>>>enough >>>>>> for >>>>>> you folks. >>>>>> - Steve >>>>>> >>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>> From: mpiwg-hybridpm <mpiwg-hybridpm-bounces(a)mpi-forum.org> on >>>>>>behalf >>>>>>of >>>>>> Pavan Balaji <balaji(a)anl.gov> >>>>>> Reply-To: "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org" >>>>>><mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org> >>>>>> Date: Tuesday, June 7, 2016 at 1:46 PM >>>>>> To: "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org" >>>>>> <mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org> >>>>>> Subject: Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change >>>>>> >>>>>>> Steve, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks. If you are unable to push the changes in due to access >>>>>>>regions, >>>>>>> you can send your patch to me. I'll apply it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'll try to figure out who can make the change to the reply-to >>>>>>>field. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- Pavan >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Jun 7, 2016, at 1:38 PM, Steven Oyanagi <sko(a)cray.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi Pavan, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Sorry, I never got around to actually making the changes. I had >>>>>>>> problems >>>>>>>> finding the repositories until I >>>>>>>> discovered that I had never gotten access to them. Since then I >>>>>>>>ran >>>>>>>> out >>>>>>>> of time to work on the changes. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Now that they are a priority, I will try to get this done quickly. >>>>>>>> Most >>>>>>>> of the changes are straight-forward. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Also - E-mail from he mailing list comes with the wrong “Reply-To” >>>>>>>> field. >>>>>>>> I got burned by this once before (Jim Dinan graciously pointed me >>>>>>>>to >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>> right address) but I didn’t realize the issue was in the message. >>>>>>>>I >>>>>>>> think >>>>>>>> the “Reply-to” field below should be >>>>>>>> "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.xn--org-9o0a. >>>>>>>> Note that the address in the Reply-to field is missing the >>>>>>>>“lists.” >>>>>>>> part. >>>>>>>> - Steve >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>>> From: mpiwg-hybridpm <mpiwg-hybridpm-bounces(a)mpi-forum.org> on >>>>>>>>behalf >>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>> Pavan Balaji <balaji(a)anl.gov> >>>>>>>> Reply-To: "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org" >>>>>>>> <mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org> >>>>>>>> Date: Tuesday, June 7, 2016 at 1:19 PM >>>>>>>> To: "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org" >>>>>>>> <mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org> >>>>>>>> Subject: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi Steve, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> We had gone over your changes from "process" to "MPI process" for >>>>>>>>> pages >>>>>>>>> 201-300 in one of the previous telecons, but we don't see your >>>>>>>>> changes >>>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>> git. Did you commit your changes in? If not, can you please >>>>>>>>>commit >>>>>>>>> them >>>>>>>>> as soon as possible into the >>>>>>>>>`origin/hybrid-process-clarification` >>>>>>>>> branch >>>>>>>>> on [email protected]:mpiwg-hybrid/mpi-standard.git? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- Pavan >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>> mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list >>>>>>>>> mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org >>>>>>>>> >>http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm >><http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list >>>>>>>> mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org >>>>>>>> >>http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm >><http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list >>>>>>> mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org >>>>>>> >>http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm >><http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list >>>> mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org >>>> >>http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm >><http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm> >>> >> >>_______________________________________________ >>mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list >>mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org >>http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>-- >>Jeff Hammond >>jeff.science(a)gmail.com >>http://jeffhammond.github.io/ >> >

1 0

Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change
by William Gropp 08 Jun '16

08 Jun '16

Note, I have scripts that I use to check for various problems in the LaTeX files, including this one. I do appreciate all efforts to conform to the style (See “Standard Names” in the instr.tex document), but I will make a pass before a new version of the standard is issued. Bill William Gropp Director, Parallel Computing Institute Thomas M. Siebel Chair in Computer Science Chief Scientist, NCSA University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign On Jun 8, 2016, at 5:04 PM, Steven Oyanagi <sko(a)cray.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I may have a simple way of fixing my changes which, if it works, could be > used to fix Dan’s changes. Let me see what I can do. > - Steve > > -----Original Message----- > From: mpiwg-hybridpm <mpiwg-hybridpm-bounces(a)mpi-forum.org> on behalf of > Jeff Hammond <jeff.science(a)gmail.com> > Reply-To: "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org" <mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org> > Date: Wednesday, June 8, 2016 at 5:00 PM > To: "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org" <mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org> > Cc: "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org" > <mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org> > Subject: Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change > >> mea culpa >> >> >> i'll provide free coffee to whoever fixes my bug. you can collect your >> free coffee at any Intel campus ;-) >> >> >> jeff >> >> >> On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 2:47 PM, Steven Oyanagi >> <sko(a)cray.com> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> First off, sorry, but I probably won’t be able to get the changes done >> today. At this point I suspect you don’t need them for this meeting. If >> you do, let me know and I will try to get them done quick. >> >> I do note we have not be consistent about putting things in as \MPI/. I >> note that Jeff Hammond’s change on Mar 1 (7c911456d - change process to >> MPI process) did not use \MPI/. Pavan’s mod is right, it did use \MPI/. >> Dan’s mod (12aa5e1c - Clarification of word 'process', pages 101-200 from >> Feb 5th does *not* use \MPI/, it inserts “MPI “. It may be I looked at >> Dan’s mod and thought it was Pavan’s. >> - Steve >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Pavan Balaji <balaji(a)anl.gov> >> Date: Wednesday, June 8, 2016 at 2:28 PM >> To: "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org" >> <mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org> >> Cc: Pavan Balaji <balaji(a)anl.gov>, Steve Oyanagi <sko(a)cray.com> >> Subject: Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change >> >>> Steve, >>> >>> You should use \MPI/ in latex. >>> >>> -- Pavan >>> >>>> On Jun 8, 2016, at 11:33 AM, Steven Oyanagi <sko(a)cray.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Sorry, I was unclear in my last message. Changes were made per the >>>> review >>>> of changes for pages 201-300 in previous working group meetings. My >>>> inquiry was about the changes to the TEX source of the MPI standard. >>>> Did I >>>> have to do anything unusual in the case where “MPI “ was inserted? I >>>> just >>>> inserted the string “MPI “ in those cases. MPI isn’t some special tag >>>> that has be denoted in an different way, is it? >>>> - Steve >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Steve Oyanagi <sko(a)cray.com> >>>> Date: Wednesday, June 8, 2016 at 11:27 AM >>>> To: "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org" >>>> <mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org> >>>> Subject: Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> I think I have the changes for 201-300 done and correctly committed to >>>>> the >>>>> branch. Please check that I got the git stuff correct, and take a >>>>> glance >>>>> at my commit to make sure I didn’t forget to do something. I assume >>>>> in >>>>> most cases I just had to insert “MPI “ before process. Was I suppose >>>>> to >>>>> do anything else? >>>>> >>>>> Please let me know if further changes are needed. >>>>> - Steve >>>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: Steve Oyanagi <sko(a)cray.com> >>>>> Date: Tuesday, June 7, 2016 at 6:12 PM >>>>> To: "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org" >>>>> <mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org> >>>>> Subject: Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change >>>>> >>>>>> Hello, >>>>>> >>>>>> FYI - I have the changes done, just need to proof-read a bit and then >>>>>> will >>>>>> commit, probably tonight or tomorrow morning. Hope that’s soon >>>>>> enough >>>>>> for >>>>>> you folks. >>>>>> - Steve >>>>>> >>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>> From: mpiwg-hybridpm <mpiwg-hybridpm-bounces(a)mpi-forum.org> on behalf >>>>>> of >>>>>> Pavan Balaji <balaji(a)anl.gov> >>>>>> Reply-To: "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org" >>>>>> <mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org> >>>>>> Date: Tuesday, June 7, 2016 at 1:46 PM >>>>>> To: "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org" >>>>>> <mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org> >>>>>> Subject: Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change >>>>>> >>>>>>> Steve, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks. If you are unable to push the changes in due to access >>>>>>> regions, >>>>>>> you can send your patch to me. I'll apply it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'll try to figure out who can make the change to the reply-to >>>>>>> field. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- Pavan >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Jun 7, 2016, at 1:38 PM, Steven Oyanagi <sko(a)cray.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi Pavan, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Sorry, I never got around to actually making the changes. I had >>>>>>>> problems >>>>>>>> finding the repositories until I >>>>>>>> discovered that I had never gotten access to them. Since then I >>>>>>>> ran >>>>>>>> out >>>>>>>> of time to work on the changes. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Now that they are a priority, I will try to get this done quickly. >>>>>>>> Most >>>>>>>> of the changes are straight-forward. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Also - E-mail from he mailing list comes with the wrong “Reply-To” >>>>>>>> field. >>>>>>>> I got burned by this once before (Jim Dinan graciously pointed me >>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>> right address) but I didn’t realize the issue was in the message. >>>>>>>> I >>>>>>>> think >>>>>>>> the “Reply-to” field below should be >>>>>>>> "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.xn--org-9o0a. >>>>>>>> Note that the address in the Reply-to field is missing the “lists.” >>>>>>>> part. >>>>>>>> - Steve >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>>> From: mpiwg-hybridpm <mpiwg-hybridpm-bounces(a)mpi-forum.org> on >>>>>>>> behalf >>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>> Pavan Balaji <balaji(a)anl.gov> >>>>>>>> Reply-To: "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org" >>>>>>>> <mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org> >>>>>>>> Date: Tuesday, June 7, 2016 at 1:19 PM >>>>>>>> To: "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org" >>>>>>>> <mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org> >>>>>>>> Subject: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi Steve, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> We had gone over your changes from "process" to "MPI process" for >>>>>>>>> pages >>>>>>>>> 201-300 in one of the previous telecons, but we don't see your >>>>>>>>> changes >>>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>> git. Did you commit your changes in? If not, can you please >>>>>>>>> commit >>>>>>>>> them >>>>>>>>> as soon as possible into the `origin/hybrid-process-clarification` >>>>>>>>> branch >>>>>>>>> on [email protected]:mpiwg-hybrid/mpi-standard.git? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- Pavan >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>> mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list >>>>>>>>> mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org >>>>>>>>> >> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm >> <http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list >>>>>>>> mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org >>>>>>>> >> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm >> <http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list >>>>>>> mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org >>>>>>> >> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm >> <http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list >>>> mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org >>>> >> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm >> <http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list >> mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org >> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Jeff Hammond >> jeff.science(a)gmail.com >> http://jeffhammond.github.io/ >> > > _______________________________________________ > mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list > mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm

1 0

Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change
by Steven Oyanagi 08 Jun '16

08 Jun '16

Hi, I may have a simple way of fixing my changes which, if it works, could be used to fix Dan’s changes. Let me see what I can do. - Steve -----Original Message----- From: mpiwg-hybridpm <mpiwg-hybridpm-bounces(a)mpi-forum.org> on behalf of Jeff Hammond <jeff.science(a)gmail.com> Reply-To: "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org" <mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org> Date: Wednesday, June 8, 2016 at 5:00 PM To: "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org" <mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org> Cc: "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org" <mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org> Subject: Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change >mea culpa > > >i'll provide free coffee to whoever fixes my bug. you can collect your >free coffee at any Intel campus ;-) > > >jeff > > >On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 2:47 PM, Steven Oyanagi ><sko(a)cray.com> wrote: > >Hi, > >First off, sorry, but I probably won’t be able to get the changes done >today. At this point I suspect you don’t need them for this meeting. If >you do, let me know and I will try to get them done quick. > >I do note we have not be consistent about putting things in as \MPI/. I >note that Jeff Hammond’s change on Mar 1 (7c911456d - change process to >MPI process) did not use \MPI/. Pavan’s mod is right, it did use \MPI/. >Dan’s mod (12aa5e1c - Clarification of word 'process', pages 101-200 from >Feb 5th does *not* use \MPI/, it inserts “MPI “. It may be I looked at >Dan’s mod and thought it was Pavan’s. > - Steve > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Pavan Balaji <balaji(a)anl.gov> >Date: Wednesday, June 8, 2016 at 2:28 PM >To: "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org" ><mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org> >Cc: Pavan Balaji <balaji(a)anl.gov>, Steve Oyanagi <sko(a)cray.com> >Subject: Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change > >>Steve, >> >>You should use \MPI/ in latex. >> >> -- Pavan >> >>> On Jun 8, 2016, at 11:33 AM, Steven Oyanagi <sko(a)cray.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Sorry, I was unclear in my last message. Changes were made per the >>>review >>> of changes for pages 201-300 in previous working group meetings. My >>> inquiry was about the changes to the TEX source of the MPI standard. >>>Did I >>> have to do anything unusual in the case where “MPI “ was inserted? I >>>just >>> inserted the string “MPI “ in those cases. MPI isn’t some special tag >>> that has be denoted in an different way, is it? >>> - Steve >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Steve Oyanagi <sko(a)cray.com> >>> Date: Wednesday, June 8, 2016 at 11:27 AM >>> To: "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org" >>> <mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org> >>> Subject: Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I think I have the changes for 201-300 done and correctly committed to >>>>the >>>> branch. Please check that I got the git stuff correct, and take a >>>>glance >>>> at my commit to make sure I didn’t forget to do something. I assume >>>>in >>>> most cases I just had to insert “MPI “ before process. Was I suppose >>>>to >>>> do anything else? >>>> >>>> Please let me know if further changes are needed. >>>> - Steve >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Steve Oyanagi <sko(a)cray.com> >>>> Date: Tuesday, June 7, 2016 at 6:12 PM >>>> To: "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org" >>>> <mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org> >>>> Subject: Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change >>>> >>>>> Hello, >>>>> >>>>> FYI - I have the changes done, just need to proof-read a bit and then >>>>> will >>>>> commit, probably tonight or tomorrow morning. Hope that’s soon >>>>>enough >>>>> for >>>>> you folks. >>>>> - Steve >>>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: mpiwg-hybridpm <mpiwg-hybridpm-bounces(a)mpi-forum.org> on behalf >>>>>of >>>>> Pavan Balaji <balaji(a)anl.gov> >>>>> Reply-To: "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org" >>>>><mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org> >>>>> Date: Tuesday, June 7, 2016 at 1:46 PM >>>>> To: "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org" >>>>> <mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org> >>>>> Subject: Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change >>>>> >>>>>> Steve, >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks. If you are unable to push the changes in due to access >>>>>>regions, >>>>>> you can send your patch to me. I'll apply it. >>>>>> >>>>>> I'll try to figure out who can make the change to the reply-to >>>>>>field. >>>>>> >>>>>> -- Pavan >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Jun 7, 2016, at 1:38 PM, Steven Oyanagi <sko(a)cray.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Pavan, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Sorry, I never got around to actually making the changes. I had >>>>>>> problems >>>>>>> finding the repositories until I >>>>>>> discovered that I had never gotten access to them. Since then I >>>>>>>ran >>>>>>> out >>>>>>> of time to work on the changes. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Now that they are a priority, I will try to get this done quickly. >>>>>>> Most >>>>>>> of the changes are straight-forward. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Also - E-mail from he mailing list comes with the wrong “Reply-To” >>>>>>> field. >>>>>>> I got burned by this once before (Jim Dinan graciously pointed me >>>>>>>to >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> right address) but I didn’t realize the issue was in the message. >>>>>>>I >>>>>>> think >>>>>>> the “Reply-to” field below should be >>>>>>> "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.xn--org-9o0a. >>>>>>> Note that the address in the Reply-to field is missing the “lists.” >>>>>>> part. >>>>>>> - Steve >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>> From: mpiwg-hybridpm <mpiwg-hybridpm-bounces(a)mpi-forum.org> on >>>>>>>behalf >>>>>>> of >>>>>>> Pavan Balaji <balaji(a)anl.gov> >>>>>>> Reply-To: "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org" >>>>>>> <mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org> >>>>>>> Date: Tuesday, June 7, 2016 at 1:19 PM >>>>>>> To: "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org" >>>>>>> <mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org> >>>>>>> Subject: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi Steve, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> We had gone over your changes from "process" to "MPI process" for >>>>>>>> pages >>>>>>>> 201-300 in one of the previous telecons, but we don't see your >>>>>>>> changes >>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>> git. Did you commit your changes in? If not, can you please >>>>>>>>commit >>>>>>>> them >>>>>>>> as soon as possible into the `origin/hybrid-process-clarification` >>>>>>>> branch >>>>>>>> on [email protected]:mpiwg-hybrid/mpi-standard.git? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- Pavan >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list >>>>>>>> mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org >>>>>>>> >http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm ><http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list >>>>>>> mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org >>>>>>> >http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm ><http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list >>>>>> mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org >>>>>> >http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm ><http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list >>> mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org >>> >http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm ><http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm> >> > >_______________________________________________ >mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list >mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org >http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm > > > > > > > > > >-- >Jeff Hammond >jeff.science(a)gmail.com >http://jeffhammond.github.io/ >

1 0

Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change
by Jeff Hammond 08 Jun '16

08 Jun '16

mea culpa i'll provide free coffee to whoever fixes my bug. you can collect your free coffee at any Intel campus ;-) jeff On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 2:47 PM, Steven Oyanagi <sko(a)cray.com> wrote: > Hi, > > First off, sorry, but I probably won’t be able to get the changes done > today. At this point I suspect you don’t need them for this meeting. If > you do, let me know and I will try to get them done quick. > > I do note we have not be consistent about putting things in as \MPI/. I > note that Jeff Hammond’s change on Mar 1 (7c911456d - change process to > MPI process) did not use \MPI/. Pavan’s mod is right, it did use \MPI/. > Dan’s mod (12aa5e1c - Clarification of word 'process', pages 101-200 from > Feb 5th does *not* use \MPI/, it inserts “MPI “. It may be I looked at > Dan’s mod and thought it was Pavan’s. > - Steve > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Pavan Balaji <balaji(a)anl.gov> > Date: Wednesday, June 8, 2016 at 2:28 PM > To: "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org" > <mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org> > Cc: Pavan Balaji <balaji(a)anl.gov>, Steve Oyanagi <sko(a)cray.com> > Subject: Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change > > >Steve, > > > >You should use \MPI/ in latex. > > > > -- Pavan > > > >> On Jun 8, 2016, at 11:33 AM, Steven Oyanagi <sko(a)cray.com> wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> Sorry, I was unclear in my last message. Changes were made per the > >>review > >> of changes for pages 201-300 in previous working group meetings. My > >> inquiry was about the changes to the TEX source of the MPI standard. > >>Did I > >> have to do anything unusual in the case where “MPI “ was inserted? I > >>just > >> inserted the string “MPI “ in those cases. MPI isn’t some special tag > >> that has be denoted in an different way, is it? > >> - Steve > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Steve Oyanagi <sko(a)cray.com> > >> Date: Wednesday, June 8, 2016 at 11:27 AM > >> To: "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org" > >> <mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org> > >> Subject: Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change > >> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> I think I have the changes for 201-300 done and correctly committed to > >>>the > >>> branch. Please check that I got the git stuff correct, and take a > >>>glance > >>> at my commit to make sure I didn’t forget to do something. I assume in > >>> most cases I just had to insert “MPI “ before process. Was I suppose > >>>to > >>> do anything else? > >>> > >>> Please let me know if further changes are needed. > >>> - Steve > >>> > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: Steve Oyanagi <sko(a)cray.com> > >>> Date: Tuesday, June 7, 2016 at 6:12 PM > >>> To: "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org" > >>> <mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org> > >>> Subject: Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change > >>> > >>>> Hello, > >>>> > >>>> FYI - I have the changes done, just need to proof-read a bit and then > >>>> will > >>>> commit, probably tonight or tomorrow morning. Hope that’s soon enough > >>>> for > >>>> you folks. > >>>> - Steve > >>>> > >>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>> From: mpiwg-hybridpm <mpiwg-hybridpm-bounces(a)mpi-forum.org> on behalf > >>>>of > >>>> Pavan Balaji <balaji(a)anl.gov> > >>>> Reply-To: "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org" > >>>><mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org> > >>>> Date: Tuesday, June 7, 2016 at 1:46 PM > >>>> To: "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org" > >>>> <mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org> > >>>> Subject: Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change > >>>> > >>>>> Steve, > >>>>> > >>>>> Thanks. If you are unable to push the changes in due to access > >>>>>regions, > >>>>> you can send your patch to me. I'll apply it. > >>>>> > >>>>> I'll try to figure out who can make the change to the reply-to field. > >>>>> > >>>>> -- Pavan > >>>>> > >>>>>> On Jun 7, 2016, at 1:38 PM, Steven Oyanagi <sko(a)cray.com> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Hi Pavan, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Sorry, I never got around to actually making the changes. I had > >>>>>> problems > >>>>>> finding the repositories until I > >>>>>> discovered that I had never gotten access to them. Since then I ran > >>>>>> out > >>>>>> of time to work on the changes. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Now that they are a priority, I will try to get this done quickly. > >>>>>> Most > >>>>>> of the changes are straight-forward. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Also - E-mail from he mailing list comes with the wrong “Reply-To” > >>>>>> field. > >>>>>> I got burned by this once before (Jim Dinan graciously pointed me to > >>>>>> the > >>>>>> right address) but I didn’t realize the issue was in the message. I > >>>>>> think > >>>>>> the “Reply-to” field below should be > >>>>>> "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.xn--org-9o0a. > >>>>>> Note that the address in the Reply-to field is missing the “lists.” > >>>>>> part. > >>>>>> - Steve > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>>>> From: mpiwg-hybridpm <mpiwg-hybridpm-bounces(a)mpi-forum.org> on > >>>>>>behalf > >>>>>> of > >>>>>> Pavan Balaji <balaji(a)anl.gov> > >>>>>> Reply-To: "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org" > >>>>>> <mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org> > >>>>>> Date: Tuesday, June 7, 2016 at 1:19 PM > >>>>>> To: "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org" > >>>>>> <mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org> > >>>>>> Subject: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Hi Steve, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> We had gone over your changes from "process" to "MPI process" for > >>>>>>> pages > >>>>>>> 201-300 in one of the previous telecons, but we don't see your > >>>>>>> changes > >>>>>>> in > >>>>>>> git. Did you commit your changes in? If not, can you please > >>>>>>>commit > >>>>>>> them > >>>>>>> as soon as possible into the `origin/hybrid-process-clarification` > >>>>>>> branch > >>>>>>> on [email protected]:mpiwg-hybrid/mpi-standard.git? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> -- Pavan > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>>>> mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list > >>>>>>> mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org > >>>>>>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm > >>>>>> > >>>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>>> mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list > >>>>>> mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org > >>>>>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm > >>>>> > >>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>> mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list > >>>>> mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org > >>>>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm > >>>> > >>> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list > >> mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org > >> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm > > > > _______________________________________________ > mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list > mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm > -- Jeff Hammond jeff.science(a)gmail.com http://jeffhammond.github.io/

1 0

Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change
by Steven Oyanagi 08 Jun '16

08 Jun '16

Hi, First off, sorry, but I probably won’t be able to get the changes done today. At this point I suspect you don’t need them for this meeting. If you do, let me know and I will try to get them done quick. I do note we have not be consistent about putting things in as \MPI/. I note that Jeff Hammond’s change on Mar 1 (7c911456d - change process to MPI process) did not use \MPI/. Pavan’s mod is right, it did use \MPI/. Dan’s mod (12aa5e1c - Clarification of word 'process', pages 101-200 from Feb 5th does *not* use \MPI/, it inserts “MPI “. It may be I looked at Dan’s mod and thought it was Pavan’s. - Steve -----Original Message----- From: Pavan Balaji <balaji(a)anl.gov> Date: Wednesday, June 8, 2016 at 2:28 PM To: "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org" <mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org> Cc: Pavan Balaji <balaji(a)anl.gov>, Steve Oyanagi <sko(a)cray.com> Subject: Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change >Steve, > >You should use \MPI/ in latex. > > -- Pavan > >> On Jun 8, 2016, at 11:33 AM, Steven Oyanagi <sko(a)cray.com> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Sorry, I was unclear in my last message. Changes were made per the >>review >> of changes for pages 201-300 in previous working group meetings. My >> inquiry was about the changes to the TEX source of the MPI standard. >>Did I >> have to do anything unusual in the case where “MPI “ was inserted? I >>just >> inserted the string “MPI “ in those cases. MPI isn’t some special tag >> that has be denoted in an different way, is it? >> - Steve >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Steve Oyanagi <sko(a)cray.com> >> Date: Wednesday, June 8, 2016 at 11:27 AM >> To: "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org" >> <mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org> >> Subject: Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I think I have the changes for 201-300 done and correctly committed to >>>the >>> branch. Please check that I got the git stuff correct, and take a >>>glance >>> at my commit to make sure I didn’t forget to do something. I assume in >>> most cases I just had to insert “MPI “ before process. Was I suppose >>>to >>> do anything else? >>> >>> Please let me know if further changes are needed. >>> - Steve >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Steve Oyanagi <sko(a)cray.com> >>> Date: Tuesday, June 7, 2016 at 6:12 PM >>> To: "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org" >>> <mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org> >>> Subject: Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change >>> >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> FYI - I have the changes done, just need to proof-read a bit and then >>>> will >>>> commit, probably tonight or tomorrow morning. Hope that’s soon enough >>>> for >>>> you folks. >>>> - Steve >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: mpiwg-hybridpm <mpiwg-hybridpm-bounces(a)mpi-forum.org> on behalf >>>>of >>>> Pavan Balaji <balaji(a)anl.gov> >>>> Reply-To: "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org" >>>><mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org> >>>> Date: Tuesday, June 7, 2016 at 1:46 PM >>>> To: "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org" >>>> <mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org> >>>> Subject: Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change >>>> >>>>> Steve, >>>>> >>>>> Thanks. If you are unable to push the changes in due to access >>>>>regions, >>>>> you can send your patch to me. I'll apply it. >>>>> >>>>> I'll try to figure out who can make the change to the reply-to field. >>>>> >>>>> -- Pavan >>>>> >>>>>> On Jun 7, 2016, at 1:38 PM, Steven Oyanagi <sko(a)cray.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi Pavan, >>>>>> >>>>>> Sorry, I never got around to actually making the changes. I had >>>>>> problems >>>>>> finding the repositories until I >>>>>> discovered that I had never gotten access to them. Since then I ran >>>>>> out >>>>>> of time to work on the changes. >>>>>> >>>>>> Now that they are a priority, I will try to get this done quickly. >>>>>> Most >>>>>> of the changes are straight-forward. >>>>>> >>>>>> Also - E-mail from he mailing list comes with the wrong “Reply-To” >>>>>> field. >>>>>> I got burned by this once before (Jim Dinan graciously pointed me to >>>>>> the >>>>>> right address) but I didn’t realize the issue was in the message. I >>>>>> think >>>>>> the “Reply-to” field below should be >>>>>> "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.xn--org-9o0a. >>>>>> Note that the address in the Reply-to field is missing the “lists.” >>>>>> part. >>>>>> - Steve >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>> From: mpiwg-hybridpm <mpiwg-hybridpm-bounces(a)mpi-forum.org> on >>>>>>behalf >>>>>> of >>>>>> Pavan Balaji <balaji(a)anl.gov> >>>>>> Reply-To: "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org" >>>>>> <mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org> >>>>>> Date: Tuesday, June 7, 2016 at 1:19 PM >>>>>> To: "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org" >>>>>> <mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org> >>>>>> Subject: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Steve, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We had gone over your changes from "process" to "MPI process" for >>>>>>> pages >>>>>>> 201-300 in one of the previous telecons, but we don't see your >>>>>>> changes >>>>>>> in >>>>>>> git. Did you commit your changes in? If not, can you please >>>>>>>commit >>>>>>> them >>>>>>> as soon as possible into the `origin/hybrid-process-clarification` >>>>>>> branch >>>>>>> on [email protected]:mpiwg-hybrid/mpi-standard.git? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- Pavan >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list >>>>>>> mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org >>>>>>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list >>>>>> mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org >>>>>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list >>>>> mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org >>>>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm >>>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list >> mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org >> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm >

1 0

Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change
by Steven Oyanagi 08 Jun '16

08 Jun '16

Hi, OK - I did not. I seem to remember, however, when I looked at some of the earlier mods (like yours) that those mods just put in “MPI “. I did note that some commit comment said something about “\MPI/“, which is why I asked. I can go back and change them. Also - should we be using a fork for the working group rather than the master repository? That’s what the MPI Forum instructions seem to indicate. - Steve -----Original Message----- From: Pavan Balaji <balaji(a)anl.gov> Date: Wednesday, June 8, 2016 at 2:28 PM To: "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org" <mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org> Cc: Pavan Balaji <balaji(a)anl.gov>, Steve Oyanagi <sko(a)cray.com> Subject: Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change >Steve, > >You should use \MPI/ in latex. > > -- Pavan > >> On Jun 8, 2016, at 11:33 AM, Steven Oyanagi <sko(a)cray.com> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Sorry, I was unclear in my last message. Changes were made per the >>review >> of changes for pages 201-300 in previous working group meetings. My >> inquiry was about the changes to the TEX source of the MPI standard. >>Did I >> have to do anything unusual in the case where “MPI “ was inserted? I >>just >> inserted the string “MPI “ in those cases. MPI isn’t some special tag >> that has be denoted in an different way, is it? >> - Steve >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Steve Oyanagi <sko(a)cray.com> >> Date: Wednesday, June 8, 2016 at 11:27 AM >> To: "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org" >> <mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org> >> Subject: Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I think I have the changes for 201-300 done and correctly committed to >>>the >>> branch. Please check that I got the git stuff correct, and take a >>>glance >>> at my commit to make sure I didn’t forget to do something. I assume in >>> most cases I just had to insert “MPI “ before process. Was I suppose >>>to >>> do anything else? >>> >>> Please let me know if further changes are needed. >>> - Steve >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Steve Oyanagi <sko(a)cray.com> >>> Date: Tuesday, June 7, 2016 at 6:12 PM >>> To: "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org" >>> <mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org> >>> Subject: Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change >>> >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> FYI - I have the changes done, just need to proof-read a bit and then >>>> will >>>> commit, probably tonight or tomorrow morning. Hope that’s soon enough >>>> for >>>> you folks. >>>> - Steve >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: mpiwg-hybridpm <mpiwg-hybridpm-bounces(a)mpi-forum.org> on behalf >>>>of >>>> Pavan Balaji <balaji(a)anl.gov> >>>> Reply-To: "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org" >>>><mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org> >>>> Date: Tuesday, June 7, 2016 at 1:46 PM >>>> To: "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org" >>>> <mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org> >>>> Subject: Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change >>>> >>>>> Steve, >>>>> >>>>> Thanks. If you are unable to push the changes in due to access >>>>>regions, >>>>> you can send your patch to me. I'll apply it. >>>>> >>>>> I'll try to figure out who can make the change to the reply-to field. >>>>> >>>>> -- Pavan >>>>> >>>>>> On Jun 7, 2016, at 1:38 PM, Steven Oyanagi <sko(a)cray.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi Pavan, >>>>>> >>>>>> Sorry, I never got around to actually making the changes. I had >>>>>> problems >>>>>> finding the repositories until I >>>>>> discovered that I had never gotten access to them. Since then I ran >>>>>> out >>>>>> of time to work on the changes. >>>>>> >>>>>> Now that they are a priority, I will try to get this done quickly. >>>>>> Most >>>>>> of the changes are straight-forward. >>>>>> >>>>>> Also - E-mail from he mailing list comes with the wrong “Reply-To” >>>>>> field. >>>>>> I got burned by this once before (Jim Dinan graciously pointed me to >>>>>> the >>>>>> right address) but I didn’t realize the issue was in the message. I >>>>>> think >>>>>> the “Reply-to” field below should be >>>>>> "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.xn--org-9o0a. >>>>>> Note that the address in the Reply-to field is missing the “lists.” >>>>>> part. >>>>>> - Steve >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>> From: mpiwg-hybridpm <mpiwg-hybridpm-bounces(a)mpi-forum.org> on >>>>>>behalf >>>>>> of >>>>>> Pavan Balaji <balaji(a)anl.gov> >>>>>> Reply-To: "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org" >>>>>> <mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org> >>>>>> Date: Tuesday, June 7, 2016 at 1:19 PM >>>>>> To: "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org" >>>>>> <mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org> >>>>>> Subject: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Steve, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We had gone over your changes from "process" to "MPI process" for >>>>>>> pages >>>>>>> 201-300 in one of the previous telecons, but we don't see your >>>>>>> changes >>>>>>> in >>>>>>> git. Did you commit your changes in? If not, can you please >>>>>>>commit >>>>>>> them >>>>>>> as soon as possible into the `origin/hybrid-process-clarification` >>>>>>> branch >>>>>>> on [email protected]:mpiwg-hybrid/mpi-standard.git? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- Pavan >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list >>>>>>> mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org >>>>>>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list >>>>>> mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org >>>>>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list >>>>> mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org >>>>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm >>>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list >> mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org >> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm >

1 0

Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change
by Balaji, Pavan 08 Jun '16

08 Jun '16

Steve, You should use \MPI/ in latex. -- Pavan > On Jun 8, 2016, at 11:33 AM, Steven Oyanagi <sko(a)cray.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > Sorry, I was unclear in my last message. Changes were made per the review > of changes for pages 201-300 in previous working group meetings. My > inquiry was about the changes to the TEX source of the MPI standard. Did I > have to do anything unusual in the case where “MPI “ was inserted? I just > inserted the string “MPI “ in those cases. MPI isn’t some special tag > that has be denoted in an different way, is it? > - Steve > > -----Original Message----- > From: Steve Oyanagi <sko(a)cray.com> > Date: Wednesday, June 8, 2016 at 11:27 AM > To: "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org" > <mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org> > Subject: Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change > >> Hi, >> >> I think I have the changes for 201-300 done and correctly committed to the >> branch. Please check that I got the git stuff correct, and take a glance >> at my commit to make sure I didn’t forget to do something. I assume in >> most cases I just had to insert “MPI “ before process. Was I suppose to >> do anything else? >> >> Please let me know if further changes are needed. >> - Steve >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Steve Oyanagi <sko(a)cray.com> >> Date: Tuesday, June 7, 2016 at 6:12 PM >> To: "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org" >> <mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org> >> Subject: Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> FYI - I have the changes done, just need to proof-read a bit and then >>> will >>> commit, probably tonight or tomorrow morning. Hope that’s soon enough >>> for >>> you folks. >>> - Steve >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: mpiwg-hybridpm <mpiwg-hybridpm-bounces(a)mpi-forum.org> on behalf of >>> Pavan Balaji <balaji(a)anl.gov> >>> Reply-To: "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org" <mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org> >>> Date: Tuesday, June 7, 2016 at 1:46 PM >>> To: "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org" >>> <mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org> >>> Subject: Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change >>> >>>> Steve, >>>> >>>> Thanks. If you are unable to push the changes in due to access regions, >>>> you can send your patch to me. I'll apply it. >>>> >>>> I'll try to figure out who can make the change to the reply-to field. >>>> >>>> -- Pavan >>>> >>>>> On Jun 7, 2016, at 1:38 PM, Steven Oyanagi <sko(a)cray.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi Pavan, >>>>> >>>>> Sorry, I never got around to actually making the changes. I had >>>>> problems >>>>> finding the repositories until I >>>>> discovered that I had never gotten access to them. Since then I ran >>>>> out >>>>> of time to work on the changes. >>>>> >>>>> Now that they are a priority, I will try to get this done quickly. >>>>> Most >>>>> of the changes are straight-forward. >>>>> >>>>> Also - E-mail from he mailing list comes with the wrong “Reply-To” >>>>> field. >>>>> I got burned by this once before (Jim Dinan graciously pointed me to >>>>> the >>>>> right address) but I didn’t realize the issue was in the message. I >>>>> think >>>>> the “Reply-to” field below should be >>>>> "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.xn--org-9o0a. >>>>> Note that the address in the Reply-to field is missing the “lists.” >>>>> part. >>>>> - Steve >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: mpiwg-hybridpm <mpiwg-hybridpm-bounces(a)mpi-forum.org> on behalf >>>>> of >>>>> Pavan Balaji <balaji(a)anl.gov> >>>>> Reply-To: "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org" >>>>> <mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org> >>>>> Date: Tuesday, June 7, 2016 at 1:19 PM >>>>> To: "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org" >>>>> <mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org> >>>>> Subject: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Steve, >>>>>> >>>>>> We had gone over your changes from "process" to "MPI process" for >>>>>> pages >>>>>> 201-300 in one of the previous telecons, but we don't see your >>>>>> changes >>>>>> in >>>>>> git. Did you commit your changes in? If not, can you please commit >>>>>> them >>>>>> as soon as possible into the `origin/hybrid-process-clarification` >>>>>> branch >>>>>> on [email protected]:mpiwg-hybrid/mpi-standard.git? >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> >>>>>> -- Pavan >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list >>>>>> mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org >>>>>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list >>>>> mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org >>>>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list >>>> mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org >>>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm >>> >> > > _______________________________________________ > mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list > mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm

1 0