December 2014 - mpiwg-hybridpm - mailman3.cels.anl.gov

Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Hybrid telecon
by Steven Oyanagi 16 Dec '14

16 Dec '14

Hi Jeff, Notice is said “most likely”. You never know. :) - Steve -----Original Message----- From: Jeff Hammond <jeff.science(a)gmail.com> Reply-To: "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org" <mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org> Date: Tuesday, December 16, 2014 at 11:32 AM To: "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org" <mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org> Subject: Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Hybrid telecon >You mean MPI isn't so much fun that Cray people do it on vacation? > >:-) > >Jeff > >On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 9:06 AM, Steven Oyanagi <sko(a)cray.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> If there is a meeting on 12/29, most likely no one from Cray will >>attend. >> That meeting falls during Cray's week long holiday shutdown. >> - Steve >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Jim Dinan <james.dinan(a)gmail.com> >> Reply-To: "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org" >> <mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org> >> Date: Tuesday, December 16, 2014 at 8:46 AM >> To: "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org" >> <mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org> >> Subject: Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Hybrid telecon >> >>>That's fine by me. >>> >>>On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 6:17 PM, Balaji, Pavan >>><balaji(a)anl.gov> wrote: >>> >>> >>>I think people assumed it wasn't happening because there wasn't any >>>email >>>till very late. Unfortunately, the next call is during the holidays. >>>Shall we cancel that call and meet again in January? >>> >>> -- Pavan >>> >>>> On Dec 15, 2014, at 11:12 AM, Jim Dinan <james.dinan(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Also, the PDF with feedback is now attached the trac ticket #380. >>>> >>>> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Jim Dinan <james.dinan(a)gmail.com> >>>>wrote: >>>> I'm on the bridge if anyone wants to discuss. Otherwise, I'll drop by >>>>quarter past the hour. >>>> >>>> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Jim Dinan <james.dinan(a)gmail.com> >>>>wrote: >>>> I have not yet produced a new version of the proposal with the changes >>>>incorporated, but they are all captured in the attached PDF. I'm happy >>>>to meet to review these, if folks want to. One item that bears >>>>discussion is the change that would cause MPI_Group_compare >>> operations to result in MPI_ALIASED when the group arguments belong to >>>different processes. >>>> >>>> ~Jim. >>>> >>>> On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 7:05 AM, Balaji, Pavan <balaji(a)anl.gov> wrote: >>>> Jim, >>>> >>>> Do you want to discuss the changes suggested at the Forum for the >>>>endpoints reading at the call on Monday, or do you need more time? >>>> >>>> Since that's the only agenda item for now, we'll cancel the call if >>>>you >>>>are not ready yet. >>>> >>>> There was some reasonable interest in the independent communicators >>>>proposal. At least enough to encourage me to pursue it. I'm going to >>>>take it offline for a bit to work on it and get some implementation >>>>experience before bringing it back up again. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> -- Pavan >>>> >>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list >>>> mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org >>>> >>>http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm >>><http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list >>>> mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org >>>> >>>http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm >>><http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm> >>> >>> >>> >>>-- >>>Pavan Balaji ✉️ >>>http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji >>> >>>_______________________________________________ >>>mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list >>>mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org >>>http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list >> mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org >> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm > > > >-- >Jeff Hammond >jeff.science(a)gmail.com >http://jeffhammond.github.io/ >_______________________________________________ >mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list >mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org >http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm

1 0

Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Hybrid telecon
by Jeff Hammond 16 Dec '14

16 Dec '14

You mean MPI isn't so much fun that Cray people do it on vacation? :-) Jeff On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 9:06 AM, Steven Oyanagi <sko(a)cray.com> wrote: > Hi, > > If there is a meeting on 12/29, most likely no one from Cray will attend. > That meeting falls during Cray's week long holiday shutdown. > - Steve > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jim Dinan <james.dinan(a)gmail.com> > Reply-To: "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org" > <mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org> > Date: Tuesday, December 16, 2014 at 8:46 AM > To: "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org" > <mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org> > Subject: Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Hybrid telecon > >>That's fine by me. >> >>On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 6:17 PM, Balaji, Pavan >><balaji(a)anl.gov> wrote: >> >> >>I think people assumed it wasn't happening because there wasn't any email >>till very late. Unfortunately, the next call is during the holidays. >>Shall we cancel that call and meet again in January? >> >> -- Pavan >> >>> On Dec 15, 2014, at 11:12 AM, Jim Dinan <james.dinan(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Also, the PDF with feedback is now attached the trac ticket #380. >>> >>> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Jim Dinan <james.dinan(a)gmail.com> >>>wrote: >>> I'm on the bridge if anyone wants to discuss. Otherwise, I'll drop by >>>quarter past the hour. >>> >>> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Jim Dinan <james.dinan(a)gmail.com> >>>wrote: >>> I have not yet produced a new version of the proposal with the changes >>>incorporated, but they are all captured in the attached PDF. I'm happy >>>to meet to review these, if folks want to. One item that bears >>>discussion is the change that would cause MPI_Group_compare >> operations to result in MPI_ALIASED when the group arguments belong to >>different processes. >>> >>> ~Jim. >>> >>> On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 7:05 AM, Balaji, Pavan <balaji(a)anl.gov> wrote: >>> Jim, >>> >>> Do you want to discuss the changes suggested at the Forum for the >>>endpoints reading at the call on Monday, or do you need more time? >>> >>> Since that's the only agenda item for now, we'll cancel the call if you >>>are not ready yet. >>> >>> There was some reasonable interest in the independent communicators >>>proposal. At least enough to encourage me to pursue it. I'm going to >>>take it offline for a bit to work on it and get some implementation >>>experience before bringing it back up again. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> -- Pavan >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> _______________________________________________ >>> mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list >>> mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org >>> >>http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm >><http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list >>> mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org >>> >>http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm >><http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm> >> >> >> >>-- >>Pavan Balaji ✉️ >>http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji >> >>_______________________________________________ >>mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list >>mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org >>http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm >> >> >> >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list > mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm -- Jeff Hammond jeff.science(a)gmail.com http://jeffhammond.github.io/

1 0

Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Hybrid telecon
by Steven Oyanagi 16 Dec '14

16 Dec '14

Hi, If there is a meeting on 12/29, most likely no one from Cray will attend. That meeting falls during Cray's week long holiday shutdown. - Steve -----Original Message----- From: Jim Dinan <james.dinan(a)gmail.com> Reply-To: "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org" <mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org> Date: Tuesday, December 16, 2014 at 8:46 AM To: "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org" <mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org> Subject: Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Hybrid telecon >That's fine by me. > >On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 6:17 PM, Balaji, Pavan ><balaji(a)anl.gov> wrote: > > >I think people assumed it wasn't happening because there wasn't any email >till very late. Unfortunately, the next call is during the holidays. >Shall we cancel that call and meet again in January? > > -- Pavan > >> On Dec 15, 2014, at 11:12 AM, Jim Dinan <james.dinan(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Also, the PDF with feedback is now attached the trac ticket #380. >> >> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Jim Dinan <james.dinan(a)gmail.com> >>wrote: >> I'm on the bridge if anyone wants to discuss. Otherwise, I'll drop by >>quarter past the hour. >> >> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Jim Dinan <james.dinan(a)gmail.com> >>wrote: >> I have not yet produced a new version of the proposal with the changes >>incorporated, but they are all captured in the attached PDF. I'm happy >>to meet to review these, if folks want to. One item that bears >>discussion is the change that would cause MPI_Group_compare > operations to result in MPI_ALIASED when the group arguments belong to >different processes. >> >> ~Jim. >> >> On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 7:05 AM, Balaji, Pavan <balaji(a)anl.gov> wrote: >> Jim, >> >> Do you want to discuss the changes suggested at the Forum for the >>endpoints reading at the call on Monday, or do you need more time? >> >> Since that's the only agenda item for now, we'll cancel the call if you >>are not ready yet. >> >> There was some reasonable interest in the independent communicators >>proposal. At least enough to encourage me to pursue it. I'm going to >>take it offline for a bit to work on it and get some implementation >>experience before bringing it back up again. >> >> Thanks, >> >> -- Pavan >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> _______________________________________________ >> mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list >> mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org >> >http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm ><http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm> >> _______________________________________________ >> mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list >> mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org >> >http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm ><http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm> > > > >-- >Pavan Balaji ✉️ >http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji > >_______________________________________________ >mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list >mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org >http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm > > > > >

1 0

Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Hybrid telecon
by Jim Dinan 16 Dec '14

16 Dec '14

That's fine by me. On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 6:17 PM, Balaji, Pavan <balaji(a)anl.gov> wrote: > > > I think people assumed it wasn't happening because there wasn't any email > till very late. Unfortunately, the next call is during the holidays. > Shall we cancel that call and meet again in January? > > -- Pavan > > > On Dec 15, 2014, at 11:12 AM, Jim Dinan <james.dinan(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Also, the PDF with feedback is now attached the trac ticket #380. > > > > On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Jim Dinan <james.dinan(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > > I'm on the bridge if anyone wants to discuss. Otherwise, I'll drop by > quarter past the hour. > > > > On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Jim Dinan <james.dinan(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > > I have not yet produced a new version of the proposal with the changes > incorporated, but they are all captured in the attached PDF. I'm happy to > meet to review these, if folks want to. One item that bears discussion is > the change that would cause MPI_Group_compare operations to result in > MPI_ALIASED when the group arguments belong to different processes. > > > > ~Jim. > > > > On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 7:05 AM, Balaji, Pavan <balaji(a)anl.gov> wrote: > > Jim, > > > > Do you want to discuss the changes suggested at the Forum for the > endpoints reading at the call on Monday, or do you need more time? > > > > Since that's the only agenda item for now, we'll cancel the call if you > are not ready yet. > > > > There was some reasonable interest in the independent communicators > proposal. At least enough to encourage me to pursue it. I'm going to take > it offline for a bit to work on it and get some implementation experience > before bringing it back up again. > > > > Thanks, > > > > -- Pavan > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > _______________________________________________ > > mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list > > mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm > > _______________________________________________ > > mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list > > mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm > > -- > Pavan Balaji ✉️ > http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji > > _______________________________________________ > mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list > mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm >

1 0

Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Hybrid telecon
by Balaji, Pavan 15 Dec '14

15 Dec '14

I think people assumed it wasn't happening because there wasn't any email till very late. Unfortunately, the next call is during the holidays. Shall we cancel that call and meet again in January? -- Pavan > On Dec 15, 2014, at 11:12 AM, Jim Dinan <james.dinan(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Also, the PDF with feedback is now attached the trac ticket #380. > > On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Jim Dinan <james.dinan(a)gmail.com> wrote: > I'm on the bridge if anyone wants to discuss. Otherwise, I'll drop by quarter past the hour. > > On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Jim Dinan <james.dinan(a)gmail.com> wrote: > I have not yet produced a new version of the proposal with the changes incorporated, but they are all captured in the attached PDF. I'm happy to meet to review these, if folks want to. One item that bears discussion is the change that would cause MPI_Group_compare operations to result in MPI_ALIASED when the group arguments belong to different processes. > > ~Jim. > > On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 7:05 AM, Balaji, Pavan <balaji(a)anl.gov> wrote: > Jim, > > Do you want to discuss the changes suggested at the Forum for the endpoints reading at the call on Monday, or do you need more time? > > Since that's the only agenda item for now, we'll cancel the call if you are not ready yet. > > There was some reasonable interest in the independent communicators proposal. At least enough to encourage me to pursue it. I'm going to take it offline for a bit to work on it and get some implementation experience before bringing it back up again. > > Thanks, > > -- Pavan > > Sent from my iPhone > _______________________________________________ > mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list > mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm > _______________________________________________ > mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list > mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm -- Pavan Balaji ✉️ http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji

1 0

Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Hybrid telecon
by Jim Dinan 15 Dec '14

15 Dec '14

Also, the PDF with feedback is now attached the trac ticket #380. On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Jim Dinan <james.dinan(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > I'm on the bridge if anyone wants to discuss. Otherwise, I'll drop by > quarter past the hour. > > On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Jim Dinan <james.dinan(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I have not yet produced a new version of the proposal with the changes >> incorporated, but they are all captured in the attached PDF. I'm happy to >> meet to review these, if folks want to. One item that bears discussion is >> the change that would cause MPI_Group_compare operations to result in >> MPI_ALIASED when the group arguments belong to different processes. >> >> ~Jim. >> >> On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 7:05 AM, Balaji, Pavan <balaji(a)anl.gov> wrote: >>> >>> Jim, >>> >>> Do you want to discuss the changes suggested at the Forum for the >>> endpoints reading at the call on Monday, or do you need more time? >>> >>> Since that's the only agenda item for now, we'll cancel the call if you >>> are not ready yet. >>> >>> There was some reasonable interest in the independent communicators >>> proposal. At least enough to encourage me to pursue it. I'm going to take >>> it offline for a bit to work on it and get some implementation experience >>> before bringing it back up again. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> -- Pavan >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> _______________________________________________ >>> mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list >>> mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org >>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm >>> >>

1 0

Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Hybrid telecon
by Jim Dinan 15 Dec '14

15 Dec '14

I'm on the bridge if anyone wants to discuss. Otherwise, I'll drop by quarter past the hour. On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Jim Dinan <james.dinan(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > I have not yet produced a new version of the proposal with the changes > incorporated, but they are all captured in the attached PDF. I'm happy to > meet to review these, if folks want to. One item that bears discussion is > the change that would cause MPI_Group_compare operations to result in > MPI_ALIASED when the group arguments belong to different processes. > > ~Jim. > > On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 7:05 AM, Balaji, Pavan <balaji(a)anl.gov> wrote: >> >> Jim, >> >> Do you want to discuss the changes suggested at the Forum for the >> endpoints reading at the call on Monday, or do you need more time? >> >> Since that's the only agenda item for now, we'll cancel the call if you >> are not ready yet. >> >> There was some reasonable interest in the independent communicators >> proposal. At least enough to encourage me to pursue it. I'm going to take >> it offline for a bit to work on it and get some implementation experience >> before bringing it back up again. >> >> Thanks, >> >> -- Pavan >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> _______________________________________________ >> mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list >> mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org >> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm >> >

1 0

Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Hybrid telecon
by Jim Dinan 15 Dec '14

15 Dec '14

I have not yet produced a new version of the proposal with the changes incorporated, but they are all captured in the attached PDF. I'm happy to meet to review these, if folks want to. One item that bears discussion is the change that would cause MPI_Group_compare operations to result in MPI_ALIASED when the group arguments belong to different processes. ~Jim. On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 7:05 AM, Balaji, Pavan <balaji(a)anl.gov> wrote: > > Jim, > > Do you want to discuss the changes suggested at the Forum for the > endpoints reading at the call on Monday, or do you need more time? > > Since that's the only agenda item for now, we'll cancel the call if you > are not ready yet. > > There was some reasonable interest in the independent communicators > proposal. At least enough to encourage me to pursue it. I'm going to take > it offline for a bit to work on it and get some implementation experience > before bringing it back up again. > > Thanks, > > -- Pavan > > Sent from my iPhone > _______________________________________________ > mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list > mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm >

1 0

Hybrid telecon
by Balaji, Pavan 14 Dec '14

14 Dec '14

Jim, Do you want to discuss the changes suggested at the Forum for the endpoints reading at the call on Monday, or do you need more time? Since that's the only agenda item for now, we'll cancel the call if you are not ready yet. There was some reasonable interest in the independent communicators proposal. At least enough to encourage me to pursue it. I'm going to take it offline for a bit to work on it and get some implementation experience before bringing it back up again. Thanks, -- Pavan Sent from my iPhone

1 0

Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Meeting Today
by Jeff Hammond 01 Dec '14

01 Dec '14

<Minutes from todays meeting> Attendees: Jeff and Jim Summary: We discussed 372 in some detail and 297 briefly. Outcomes: - Jeff will remove device and topology from 372, leaving it to focus exclusively on filepaths. - Ticket 372 will be migrated into the I/O WG due to its close connection to file I/O. - Topology and devices will be deferred for the future. - NUMA within shared memory was noted as something for the future, but seems impossible to standardize right now. Please follow ticket 372 if you wish to know more. Jeff On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 8:48 AM, Jim Dinan <james.dinan(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Ok, let's plan to use today's meeting time (10 minutes from now). > > See you then, > ~Jim. > > On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 10:37 AM, Jeff Hammond <jeff.science(a)gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> I'd like to start discussing >> https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/372 in the near >> future. >> >> It may also be worth discussing if this belongs in hybrid or if I >> should move it to I/O, given it takes about filesystems a lot. I >> don't want Rich Graham to force me to change WG two years from now... >> >> Jeff >> >> On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 7:19 AM, Jim Dinan <james.dinan(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> > Hi All, >> > >> > This is a call for agenda items for today's meeting. If there are no >> > topics >> > for discussion, we can cancel today's meeting. >> > >> > Cheers, >> > ~Jim. >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list >> > mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org >> > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm >> >> >> >> -- >> Jeff Hammond >> jeff.science(a)gmail.com >> http://jeffhammond.github.io/ >> _______________________________________________ >> mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list >> mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org >> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm > > > > _______________________________________________ > mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list > mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm -- Jeff Hammond jeff.science(a)gmail.com http://jeffhammond.github.io/

1 0