June 2016 - mpiwg-hybridpm - mailman3.cels.anl.gov

Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change
by Steven Oyanagi 08 Jun '16

08 Jun '16

Hi, Sorry, I was unclear in my last message. Changes were made per the review of changes for pages 201-300 in previous working group meetings. My inquiry was about the changes to the TEX source of the MPI standard. Did I have to do anything unusual in the case where “MPI “ was inserted? I just inserted the string “MPI “ in those cases. MPI isn’t some special tag that has be denoted in an different way, is it? - Steve -----Original Message----- From: Steve Oyanagi <sko(a)cray.com> Date: Wednesday, June 8, 2016 at 11:27 AM To: "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org" <mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org> Subject: Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change >Hi, > >I think I have the changes for 201-300 done and correctly committed to the >branch. Please check that I got the git stuff correct, and take a glance >at my commit to make sure I didn’t forget to do something. I assume in >most cases I just had to insert “MPI “ before process. Was I suppose to >do anything else? > >Please let me know if further changes are needed. > - Steve > >-----Original Message----- >From: Steve Oyanagi <sko(a)cray.com> >Date: Tuesday, June 7, 2016 at 6:12 PM >To: "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org" ><mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org> >Subject: Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change > >>Hello, >> >>FYI - I have the changes done, just need to proof-read a bit and then >>will >>commit, probably tonight or tomorrow morning. Hope that’s soon enough >>for >>you folks. >> - Steve >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: mpiwg-hybridpm <mpiwg-hybridpm-bounces(a)mpi-forum.org> on behalf of >>Pavan Balaji <balaji(a)anl.gov> >>Reply-To: "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org" <mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org> >>Date: Tuesday, June 7, 2016 at 1:46 PM >>To: "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org" >><mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org> >>Subject: Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change >> >>>Steve, >>> >>>Thanks. If you are unable to push the changes in due to access regions, >>>you can send your patch to me. I'll apply it. >>> >>>I'll try to figure out who can make the change to the reply-to field. >>> >>> -- Pavan >>> >>>> On Jun 7, 2016, at 1:38 PM, Steven Oyanagi <sko(a)cray.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Pavan, >>>> >>>> Sorry, I never got around to actually making the changes. I had >>>>problems >>>> finding the repositories until I >>>> discovered that I had never gotten access to them. Since then I ran >>>>out >>>> of time to work on the changes. >>>> >>>> Now that they are a priority, I will try to get this done quickly. >>>>Most >>>> of the changes are straight-forward. >>>> >>>> Also - E-mail from he mailing list comes with the wrong “Reply-To” >>>>field. >>>> I got burned by this once before (Jim Dinan graciously pointed me to >>>>the >>>> right address) but I didn’t realize the issue was in the message. I >>>>think >>>> the “Reply-to” field below should be >>>>"mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.xn--org-9o0a. >>>> Note that the address in the Reply-to field is missing the “lists.” >>>>part. >>>> - Steve >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: mpiwg-hybridpm <mpiwg-hybridpm-bounces(a)mpi-forum.org> on behalf >>>>of >>>> Pavan Balaji <balaji(a)anl.gov> >>>> Reply-To: "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org" >>>><mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org> >>>> Date: Tuesday, June 7, 2016 at 1:19 PM >>>> To: "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org" >>>> <mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org> >>>> Subject: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change >>>> >>>>> Hi Steve, >>>>> >>>>> We had gone over your changes from "process" to "MPI process" for >>>>>pages >>>>> 201-300 in one of the previous telecons, but we don't see your >>>>>changes >>>>>in >>>>> git. Did you commit your changes in? If not, can you please commit >>>>>them >>>>> as soon as possible into the `origin/hybrid-process-clarification` >>>>>branch >>>>> on [email protected]:mpiwg-hybrid/mpi-standard.git? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> >>>>> -- Pavan >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list >>>>> mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org >>>>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list >>>> mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org >>>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm >>> >>>_______________________________________________ >>>mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list >>>mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org >>>http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm >> >

1 0

Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change
by Steven Oyanagi 08 Jun '16

08 Jun '16

Hi, I think I have the changes for 201-300 done and correctly committed to the branch. Please check that I got the git stuff correct, and take a glance at my commit to make sure I didn’t forget to do something. I assume in most cases I just had to insert “MPI “ before process. Was I suppose to do anything else? Please let me know if further changes are needed. - Steve -----Original Message----- From: Steve Oyanagi <sko(a)cray.com> Date: Tuesday, June 7, 2016 at 6:12 PM To: "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org" <mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org> Subject: Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change >Hello, > >FYI - I have the changes done, just need to proof-read a bit and then will >commit, probably tonight or tomorrow morning. Hope that’s soon enough for >you folks. > - Steve > >-----Original Message----- >From: mpiwg-hybridpm <mpiwg-hybridpm-bounces(a)mpi-forum.org> on behalf of >Pavan Balaji <balaji(a)anl.gov> >Reply-To: "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org" <mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org> >Date: Tuesday, June 7, 2016 at 1:46 PM >To: "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org" ><mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org> >Subject: Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change > >>Steve, >> >>Thanks. If you are unable to push the changes in due to access regions, >>you can send your patch to me. I'll apply it. >> >>I'll try to figure out who can make the change to the reply-to field. >> >> -- Pavan >> >>> On Jun 7, 2016, at 1:38 PM, Steven Oyanagi <sko(a)cray.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Pavan, >>> >>> Sorry, I never got around to actually making the changes. I had >>>problems >>> finding the repositories until I >>> discovered that I had never gotten access to them. Since then I ran >>>out >>> of time to work on the changes. >>> >>> Now that they are a priority, I will try to get this done quickly. >>>Most >>> of the changes are straight-forward. >>> >>> Also - E-mail from he mailing list comes with the wrong “Reply-To” >>>field. >>> I got burned by this once before (Jim Dinan graciously pointed me to >>>the >>> right address) but I didn’t realize the issue was in the message. I >>>think >>> the “Reply-to” field below should be >>>"mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.xn--org-9o0a. >>> Note that the address in the Reply-to field is missing the “lists.” >>>part. >>> - Steve >>> >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: mpiwg-hybridpm <mpiwg-hybridpm-bounces(a)mpi-forum.org> on behalf >>>of >>> Pavan Balaji <balaji(a)anl.gov> >>> Reply-To: "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org" <mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org> >>> Date: Tuesday, June 7, 2016 at 1:19 PM >>> To: "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org" >>> <mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org> >>> Subject: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change >>> >>>> Hi Steve, >>>> >>>> We had gone over your changes from "process" to "MPI process" for >>>>pages >>>> 201-300 in one of the previous telecons, but we don't see your changes >>>>in >>>> git. Did you commit your changes in? If not, can you please commit >>>>them >>>> as soon as possible into the `origin/hybrid-process-clarification` >>>>branch >>>> on [email protected]:mpiwg-hybrid/mpi-standard.git? >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> -- Pavan >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list >>>> mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org >>>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list >>> mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org >>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm >> >>_______________________________________________ >>mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list >>mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org >>http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm >

1 0

Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change
by Steven Oyanagi 07 Jun '16

07 Jun '16

Hello, FYI - I have the changes done, just need to proof-read a bit and then will commit, probably tonight or tomorrow morning. Hope that’s soon enough for you folks. - Steve -----Original Message----- From: mpiwg-hybridpm <mpiwg-hybridpm-bounces(a)mpi-forum.org> on behalf of Pavan Balaji <balaji(a)anl.gov> Reply-To: "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org" <mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org> Date: Tuesday, June 7, 2016 at 1:46 PM To: "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org" <mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org> Subject: Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change >Steve, > >Thanks. If you are unable to push the changes in due to access regions, >you can send your patch to me. I'll apply it. > >I'll try to figure out who can make the change to the reply-to field. > > -- Pavan > >> On Jun 7, 2016, at 1:38 PM, Steven Oyanagi <sko(a)cray.com> wrote: >> >> Hi Pavan, >> >> Sorry, I never got around to actually making the changes. I had >>problems >> finding the repositories until I >> discovered that I had never gotten access to them. Since then I ran out >> of time to work on the changes. >> >> Now that they are a priority, I will try to get this done quickly. Most >> of the changes are straight-forward. >> >> Also - E-mail from he mailing list comes with the wrong “Reply-To” >>field. >> I got burned by this once before (Jim Dinan graciously pointed me to the >> right address) but I didn’t realize the issue was in the message. I >>think >> the “Reply-to” field below should be >>"mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.xn--org-9o0a. >> Note that the address in the Reply-to field is missing the “lists.” >>part. >> - Steve >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: mpiwg-hybridpm <mpiwg-hybridpm-bounces(a)mpi-forum.org> on behalf of >> Pavan Balaji <balaji(a)anl.gov> >> Reply-To: "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org" <mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org> >> Date: Tuesday, June 7, 2016 at 1:19 PM >> To: "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org" >> <mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org> >> Subject: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change >> >>> Hi Steve, >>> >>> We had gone over your changes from "process" to "MPI process" for pages >>> 201-300 in one of the previous telecons, but we don't see your changes >>>in >>> git. Did you commit your changes in? If not, can you please commit >>>them >>> as soon as possible into the `origin/hybrid-process-clarification` >>>branch >>> on [email protected]:mpiwg-hybrid/mpi-standard.git? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> -- Pavan >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list >>> mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org >>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm >> >> _______________________________________________ >> mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list >> mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org >> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm > >_______________________________________________ >mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list >mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org >http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm

1 0

Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change
by Balaji, Pavan 07 Jun '16

07 Jun '16

Steve, Thanks. If you are unable to push the changes in due to access regions, you can send your patch to me. I'll apply it. I'll try to figure out who can make the change to the reply-to field. -- Pavan > On Jun 7, 2016, at 1:38 PM, Steven Oyanagi <sko(a)cray.com> wrote: > > Hi Pavan, > > Sorry, I never got around to actually making the changes. I had problems > finding the repositories until I > discovered that I had never gotten access to them. Since then I ran out > of time to work on the changes. > > Now that they are a priority, I will try to get this done quickly. Most > of the changes are straight-forward. > > Also - E-mail from he mailing list comes with the wrong “Reply-To” field. > I got burned by this once before (Jim Dinan graciously pointed me to the > right address) but I didn’t realize the issue was in the message. I think > the “Reply-to” field below should be "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.xn--org-9o0a. > Note that the address in the Reply-to field is missing the “lists.” part. > - Steve > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: mpiwg-hybridpm <mpiwg-hybridpm-bounces(a)mpi-forum.org> on behalf of > Pavan Balaji <balaji(a)anl.gov> > Reply-To: "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org" <mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org> > Date: Tuesday, June 7, 2016 at 1:19 PM > To: "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org" > <mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org> > Subject: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change > >> Hi Steve, >> >> We had gone over your changes from "process" to "MPI process" for pages >> 201-300 in one of the previous telecons, but we don't see your changes in >> git. Did you commit your changes in? If not, can you please commit them >> as soon as possible into the `origin/hybrid-process-clarification` branch >> on [email protected]:mpiwg-hybrid/mpi-standard.git? >> >> Thanks, >> >> -- Pavan >> >> _______________________________________________ >> mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list >> mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org >> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm > > _______________________________________________ > mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list > mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm

1 0

Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change
by Steven Oyanagi 07 Jun '16

07 Jun '16

Hi, My mail client is driving me crazy today. Can someone on the list (other than Krishna) please confirm that my response to Pavan got out to the mailing list? Thanks, - Steve -----Original Message----- From: Steve Oyanagi <sko(a)cray.com> Date: Tuesday, June 7, 2016 at 1:38 PM To: "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org" <mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org> Subject: Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change >Hi Pavan, > >Sorry, I never got around to actually making the changes. I had problems >finding the repositories until I >discovered that I had never gotten access to them. Since then I ran out >of time to work on the changes. > >Now that they are a priority, I will try to get this done quickly. Most >of the changes are straight-forward. > >Also - E-mail from he mailing list comes with the wrong “Reply-To” field. >I got burned by this once before (Jim Dinan graciously pointed me to the >right address) but I didn’t realize the issue was in the message. I think >the “Reply-to” field below should be "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.xn--org-9o0a. > Note that the address in the Reply-to field is missing the “lists.” part. > - Steve > > > >-----Original Message----- >From: mpiwg-hybridpm <mpiwg-hybridpm-bounces(a)mpi-forum.org> on behalf of >Pavan Balaji <balaji(a)anl.gov> >Reply-To: "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org" <mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org> >Date: Tuesday, June 7, 2016 at 1:19 PM >To: "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org" ><mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org> >Subject: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change > >>Hi Steve, >> >>We had gone over your changes from "process" to "MPI process" for pages >>201-300 in one of the previous telecons, but we don't see your changes in >>git. Did you commit your changes in? If not, can you please commit them >>as soon as possible into the `origin/hybrid-process-clarification` branch >>on [email protected]:mpiwg-hybrid/mpi-standard.git? >> >>Thanks, >> >> -- Pavan >> >>_______________________________________________ >>mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list >>mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org >>http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm >

1 0

Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change
by Steven Oyanagi 07 Jun '16

07 Jun '16

Hi Pavan, Sorry, I never got around to actually making the changes. I had problems finding the repositories until I discovered that I had never gotten access to them. Since then I ran out of time to work on the changes. Now that they are a priority, I will try to get this done quickly. Most of the changes are straight-forward. Also - E-mail from he mailing list comes with the wrong “Reply-To” field. I got burned by this once before (Jim Dinan graciously pointed me to the right address) but I didn’t realize the issue was in the message. I think the “Reply-to” field below should be "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.xn--org-9o0a. Note that the address in the Reply-to field is missing the “lists.” part. - Steve -----Original Message----- From: mpiwg-hybridpm <mpiwg-hybridpm-bounces(a)mpi-forum.org> on behalf of Pavan Balaji <balaji(a)anl.gov> Reply-To: "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org" <mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org> Date: Tuesday, June 7, 2016 at 1:19 PM To: "mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org" <mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org> Subject: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change >Hi Steve, > >We had gone over your changes from "process" to "MPI process" for pages >201-300 in one of the previous telecons, but we don't see your changes in >git. Did you commit your changes in? If not, can you please commit them >as soon as possible into the `origin/hybrid-process-clarification` branch >on [email protected]:mpiwg-hybrid/mpi-standard.git? > >Thanks, > > -- Pavan > >_______________________________________________ >mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list >mpiwg-hybridpm(a)mpi-forum.org >http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm

1 0

Process -> MPI process change
by Balaji, Pavan 07 Jun '16

07 Jun '16

Hi Steve, We had gone over your changes from "process" to "MPI process" for pages 201-300 in one of the previous telecons, but we don't see your changes in git. Did you commit your changes in? If not, can you please commit them as soon as possible into the `origin/hybrid-process-clarification` branch on [email protected]:mpiwg-hybrid/mpi-standard.git? Thanks, -- Pavan

1 0