February 2022 - mpiwg-hybridpm - mailman3.cels.anl.gov

HACC WG Today
by Jim Dinan 16 Feb '22

16 Feb '22

Hi All, The HACC WG will meet at the usual time today, 10-11am ET. We are using the common Zoom meeting shared by both HACC and Persistence WGs. Connection details are on our wiki [1]. Jaime Arteaga from Intel will give a presentation on the oneAPI Level Zero APIs used for lower-level programming of Intel GPUs. Thank you to Maria Garzaran for arranging today's speaker. Best regards, ~Jim. [1] https://github.com/mpiwg-hybrid/mpi-standard/wiki (Note, if the link gives you a 404 error you need to log into GitHub and/or be added to the mpiwg-hybrid group. Ping me if you need help.)

1 0

Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] GitHub Discussions
by Benson Muite 15 Feb '22

15 Feb '22

Hi Jim, Have not found Slack very useful for this. Find some level of mailbox notifications are useful, though discussion can occur on another platform. Benson On 2/14/22 5:59 PM, Jim Dinan wrote: > Hi Benson, > > These are all good suggestions. My concern is that this is a > relatively small group, and dividing our attention across several > different platforms could be counterproductive. Presently we have > email, slack, github, and regular meetings. If we can get the > engagement that we're looking for without adding another platform, I > think I would prefer to try that first, even if it's not perfect. This > was the rationale for enabling GitHub discussions, but we don't seem > to be using them yet. Would be interested to hear from you and others > if you feel that we're missing something that could > significantly boost productivity or engagement. > > Cheers, > ~Jim. > > On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 2:37 AM Benson Muite via mpiwg-hybridpm > <mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > Thanks for setting this up and reposting slides, this enables > efficient tracking of discussions without needing to watch many > long recordings to find the relevant snippet of information from a > working group session. Would you consider trying out software such as: > Discourse - https://www.discourse.org/ <https://www.discourse.org/> > Loomio - https://www.loomio.com/ <https://www.loomio.com/> > Decidim - https://decidim.org <https://decidim.org> > Discussions really ties in to just one platform and may not be > helpful for straw polls. If so, would be happy to run one of > these on a cloud provider. These also have filtered mailing list > modes, and allow grouping of discussions by topic. Other tools > such as Redmine or Jira could also help structure technical > discussions better and have good Git integration. > > Regards, > Benson > > On 1/28/22 12:24 AM, Jim Dinan via mpiwg-hybridpm wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> You might have received an announcement that I enabled >> discussions on GitHub. I'm hopeful that this will give us an >> online forum that works a little better for discussion than >> issues, which can become hard to follow when there is a lot of >> discussion. Please feel free to try it out: >> https://github.com/mpiwg-hybrid/hybrid-issues/discussions >> <https://github.com/mpiwg-hybrid/hybrid-issues/discussions> >> >> ~Jim. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list >> mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org <mailto:[email protected]> >> https://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/mpiwg-hybridpm <https://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/mpiwg-hybridpm> > > > _______________________________________________ > mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list > mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > <mailto:[email protected]> > https://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/mpiwg-hybridpm > <https://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/mpiwg-hybridpm> >

1 0

Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] GitHub Discussions
by Jim Dinan 14 Feb '22

14 Feb '22

Hi Benson, These are all good suggestions. My concern is that this is a relatively small group, and dividing our attention across several different platforms could be counterproductive. Presently we have email, slack, github, and regular meetings. If we can get the engagement that we're looking for without adding another platform, I think I would prefer to try that first, even if it's not perfect. This was the rationale for enabling GitHub discussions, but we don't seem to be using them yet. Would be interested to hear from you and others if you feel that we're missing something that could significantly boost productivity or engagement. Cheers, ~Jim. On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 2:37 AM Benson Muite via mpiwg-hybridpm < mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org> wrote: > Hi Jim, > > Thanks for setting this up and reposting slides, this enables efficient > tracking of discussions without needing to watch many long recordings to > find the relevant snippet of information from a working group session. > Would you consider trying out software such as: > Discourse - https://www.discourse.org/ > Loomio - https://www.loomio.com/ > Decidim - https://decidim.org > Discussions really ties in to just one platform and may not be helpful for > straw polls. If so, would be happy to run one of these on a cloud > provider. These also have filtered mailing list modes, and allow grouping > of discussions by topic. Other tools such as Redmine or Jira could also > help structure technical discussions better and have good Git integration. > > Regards, > Benson > > On 1/28/22 12:24 AM, Jim Dinan via mpiwg-hybridpm wrote: > > Hi All, > > You might have received an announcement that I enabled discussions on > GitHub. I'm hopeful that this will give us an online forum that works a > little better for discussion than issues, which can become hard to follow > when there is a lot of discussion. Please feel free to try it out: > https://github.com/mpiwg-hybrid/hybrid-issues/discussions > > ~Jim. > > _______________________________________________ > mpiwg-hybridpm mailing [email protected]://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/mpiwg-hybridpm > > > _______________________________________________ > mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list > mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > https://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/mpiwg-hybridpm >

1 0

Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] GitHub Discussions
by Benson Muite 11 Feb '22

11 Feb '22

Hi Jim, Thanks for setting this up and reposting slides, this enables efficient tracking of discussions without needing to watch many long recordings to find the relevant snippet of information from a working group session. Would you consider trying out software such as: Discourse - https://www.discourse.org/ Loomio - https://www.loomio.com/ Decidim - https://decidim.org Discussions really ties in to just one platform and may not be helpful for straw polls. If so, would be happy to run one of these on a cloud provider. These also have filtered mailing list modes, and allow grouping of discussions by topic. Other tools such as Redmine or Jira could also help structure technical discussions better and have good Git integration. Regards, Benson On 1/28/22 12:24 AM, Jim Dinan via mpiwg-hybridpm wrote: > Hi All, > > You might have received an announcement that I enabled discussions on > GitHub. I'm hopeful that this will give us an online forum that works > a little better for discussion than issues, which can become hard to > follow when there is a lot of discussion. Please feel free to try it > out: https://github.com/mpiwg-hybrid/hybrid-issues/discussions > <https://github.com/mpiwg-hybrid/hybrid-issues/discussions> > > ~Jim. > > _______________________________________________ > mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list > mpiwg-hybridpm(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > https://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/mpiwg-hybridpm

1 0

No Meeting This Week
by Jim Dinan 07 Feb '22

07 Feb '22

Hi All, The Persistence WG will be meeting this Wednesday. No HACC meeting. Best, ~Jim.

1 0

Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Call for Topics
by Jim Dinan 02 Feb '22

02 Feb '22

Hi All, We don't have any topics that are ready for discussion this week in either the Persistence or HACC working groups, so today's meeting is cancelled. Best, ~Jim. On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 4:19 PM Jim Dinan <james.dinan(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > [ Cross-posted to Hybrid and Persistence WG lists ] > > Please send topics that you would like to cover this week. The hybrid > working group met last week, so we will prioritize topics from the > persistence working group if there are any up for discussion. > > Cheers, > ~Jim. >

1 0