September 2013 - Release-team - mailman3.cels.anl.gov

Re: [Release-team] [Kbase-devel] draft punchlist for database builds
by Thomas Brettin 13 Sep '13

13 Sep '13

My understanding is the following. 1) the services have been deployed to production 2) the ubuntu image has been created and is available for download 3) testing of the ubuntu image has not happened 4) the dmg has not been built. Rest of the team, please pipe in. Tom On Sep 13, 2013, at 3:14 PM, Nomi Harris <nlharris(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Does the Data Build next week mean the release (the regular release of dmg services etc, not data) will not happen next week? Any idea where we're at on the release and what the estimated release date is? > Nomi >

1 0

Re: [Release-team] Fwd: Update on NR
by Dan Olson 09 Sep '13

09 Sep '13

I'm not sure you were on the call, but I had said we would initially look at the nightly test results on Tuesday mornings. I did get the nightly build mail last night, it came out at 3:01am central. I'm not sure what happened, but there was a bunch of connection refused messages when it tried to connect to the target VMs. I'm going to rerun it now. ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Thomas Brettin" <brettin(a)mcs.anl.gov> > To: release-team(a)kbase.us > Sent: Monday, September 9, 2013 11:28:54 AM > Subject: [Release-team] Fwd: Update on NR > > > I didn't see an email on the automated build this am. Did they stop? > > > We had told the team that would look at the nightly test results > today, and that we would base a release on the wed nightly build. > > > Tom > > > > Begin forwarded message: > > > > From: Andreas Wilke < wilke(a)mcs.anl.gov > > > Subject: Update on NR > > Date: September 9, 2013 10:32:38 AM CDT > > To: Brettin Thomas < brettin(a)mcs.anl.gov >, Andreas Wilke < > wilke(a)mcs.anl.gov > > > Cc: Rick Stevens < stevens(a)anl.gov >, Folker Meyer < folker(a)anl.gov > > > > Hi all, > I believe we are on track for a deployment on Wednesday. > > > > Tasks before production deployment: > > > > > > * Create deploy.cfg file and move config from Conf.pm into > deploy.cfg > * Modify service and scripts to read from deployment.cfg > * Modify the templating in the Makefile > * Load data > * Better test coverage > * Documentation and Tutorial > > > > > > Tom, please add/correct me if I missed something significant. > > > Andreas > > > > > > > PS: > > > I briefly talked to Shinjae Yoo < sjyoo(a)bnl.gov > who is interested > in the service, mainly for ID lookups: > > > * Uniprot ID to KBase ID > * > * "What other information do we have to do the direct map to a > KBase fid, and how would we resolve a case where one identifier > maps consistently to a UniProt id (3702.AT2G30970.2-P) but > another does not (3702.AT2G30970.1-P)?" > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Release-team mailing list > Release-team(a)lists.kbase.us > https://lists.kbase.us/mailman/listinfo/release-team >

1 0

Fwd: Update on NR
by Thomas Brettin 09 Sep '13

09 Sep '13

I didn't see an email on the automated build this am. Did they stop? We had told the team that would look at the nightly test results today, and that we would base a release on the wed nightly build. Tom Begin forwarded message: > From: Andreas Wilke <wilke(a)mcs.anl.gov> > Subject: Update on NR > Date: September 9, 2013 10:32:38 AM CDT > To: Brettin Thomas <brettin(a)mcs.anl.gov>, Andreas Wilke <wilke(a)mcs.anl.gov> > Cc: Rick Stevens <stevens(a)anl.gov>, Folker Meyer <folker(a)anl.gov> > > Hi all, > I believe we are on track for a deployment on Wednesday. > > Tasks before production deployment: > > Create deploy.cfg file and move config from Conf.pm into deploy.cfg > Modify service and scripts to read from deployment.cfg > Modify the templating in the Makefile > Load data > Better test coverage > Documentation and Tutorial > > > Tom, please add/correct me if I missed something significant. > > Andreas > > > > PS: > > I briefly talked to Shinjae Yoo <sjyoo(a)bnl.gov> who is interested in the service, mainly for ID lookups: > Uniprot ID to KBase ID > "What other information do we have to do the direct map to a KBase fid, and how would we resolve a case where one identifier maps consistently to a UniProt id (3702.AT2G30970.2-P) but another does not (3702.AT2G30970.1-P)?" > > >

1 0

Re: [Release-team] Lab/UI release (and state of this release in general)
by Nomi Harris 06 Sep '13

06 Sep '13

Ok--so are the only remaining hurdles to getting the release out deploying jnomics and finishing the IRIS release? Are the dmg and ubuntu images ready? Is there a new type compiler tarball (not required for this release, but would be nice)? Also, https://kbase.us/developer-zone/downloads/ has a link for "vmdk Daily Development Snapshot" that links to https://kbase.us/vm-images/KBase_snapshot.vmdk.gz but that gives "page not found". Are there any other issues that stand in the way of completing this release? (I'm working with Neal and Tom Brown on getting the documentation and web pages updated.) Nomi On Sep 6, 2013, at 10:25 AM, Dan Olson <dolson(a)mcs.anl.gov> wrote: > The iris release is incomplete, jnomics failed to deploy yesterday when we pushed it to > production. We're working on it right now. Once that is fixed, we can send an announcement > regarding iris. > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Nomi Harris" <nlharris(a)lbl.gov> >> To: release-team(a)kbase.us >> Cc: "Matthew Henderson" <mhenderson(a)lbl.gov> >> Sent: Friday, September 6, 2013 12:13:00 PM >> Subject: [Release-team] Lab/UI release (and state of this release in general) >> >> >> Hey, thank you to whoever pushed the new IRIS to the production >> server. Jim T. had been asking for weeks when his latest version >> would go live, and was surprised to discover this morning that it >> was live. Neither he nor I had heard anything about that. We are >> glad you did it, but next time it would be great to be notified--Jim >> so he can test it on the live server (and send the link to his >> mother or whatever) and me so I know where we're at on the release >> and what to put on the website. (I was planning to announce some of >> the IRIS improvements as part of the release announcement.) In the >> future, we're hoping for a more organized, transparent release >> process for UIs/Labs. Matt Henderson is thinking about this, so >> please be sure to include him in any relevant discussions. >> >> >> I was also wondering how we're doing in terms of wrapping up this >> release. Is it almost done? Is there a new dmg and ubuntu image? Can >> we see a list of what still needs to be completed? >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> Nomi >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Release-team mailing list >> Release-team(a)lists.kbase.us >> https://lists.kbase.us/mailman/listinfo/release-team >>

1 0

Re: [Release-team] Lab/UI release (and state of this release in general)
by Thomas Brettin 06 Sep '13

06 Sep '13

We have been communicating with Jim throughout the week. On Sep 6, 2013, at 12:13 PM, Nomi Harris <nlharris(a)lbl.gov> wrote: > Hey, thank you to whoever pushed the new IRIS to the production server. Jim T. had been asking for weeks when his latest version would go live, and was surprised to discover this morning that it was live. Neither he nor I had heard anything about that. We are glad you did it, but next time it would be great to be notified--Jim so he can test it on the live server (and send the link to his mother or whatever) and me so I know where we're at on the release and what to put on the website. (I was planning to announce some of the IRIS improvements as part of the release announcement.) In the future, we're hoping for a more organized, transparent release process for UIs/Labs. Matt Henderson is thinking about this, so please be sure to include him in any relevant discussions. > > I was also wondering how we're doing in terms of wrapping up this release. Is it almost done? Is there a new dmg and ubuntu image? Can we see a list of what still needs to be completed? > > Thanks, > Nomi > > _______________________________________________ > Release-team mailing list > Release-team(a)lists.kbase.us > https://lists.kbase.us/mailman/listinfo/release-team

1 0

Re: [Release-team] Lab/UI release (and state of this release in general)
by Dan Olson 06 Sep '13

06 Sep '13

The iris release is incomplete, jnomics failed to deploy yesterday when we pushed it to production. We're working on it right now. Once that is fixed, we can send an announcement regarding iris. ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Nomi Harris" <nlharris(a)lbl.gov> > To: release-team(a)kbase.us > Cc: "Matthew Henderson" <mhenderson(a)lbl.gov> > Sent: Friday, September 6, 2013 12:13:00 PM > Subject: [Release-team] Lab/UI release (and state of this release in general) > > > Hey, thank you to whoever pushed the new IRIS to the production > server. Jim T. had been asking for weeks when his latest version > would go live, and was surprised to discover this morning that it > was live. Neither he nor I had heard anything about that. We are > glad you did it, but next time it would be great to be notified--Jim > so he can test it on the live server (and send the link to his > mother or whatever) and me so I know where we're at on the release > and what to put on the website. (I was planning to announce some of > the IRIS improvements as part of the release announcement.) In the > future, we're hoping for a more organized, transparent release > process for UIs/Labs. Matt Henderson is thinking about this, so > please be sure to include him in any relevant discussions. > > > I was also wondering how we're doing in terms of wrapping up this > release. Is it almost done? Is there a new dmg and ubuntu image? Can > we see a list of what still needs to be completed? > > > > Thanks, > Nomi > > _______________________________________________ > Release-team mailing list > Release-team(a)lists.kbase.us > https://lists.kbase.us/mailman/listinfo/release-team >

1 0

Lab/UI release (and state of this release in general)
by Nomi Harris 06 Sep '13

06 Sep '13

Hey, thank you to whoever pushed the new IRIS to the production server. Jim T. had been asking for weeks when his latest version would go live, and was surprised to discover this morning that it was live. Neither he nor I had heard anything about that. We are glad you did it, but next time it would be great to be notified--Jim so he can test it on the live server (and send the link to his mother or whatever) and me so I know where we're at on the release and what to put on the website. (I was planning to announce some of the IRIS improvements as part of the release announcement.) In the future, we're hoping for a more organized, transparent release process for UIs/Labs. Matt Henderson is thinking about this, so please be sure to include him in any relevant discussions. I was also wondering how we're doing in terms of wrapping up this release. Is it almost done? Is there a new dmg and ubuntu image? Can we see a list of what still needs to be completed? Thanks, Nomi

1 0

Re: [Release-team] Deployment to Production
by Thomas Brettin 01 Sep '13

01 Sep '13

thanks shane. I''ll be back in my office on Tuesday, maybe you, dan and I can sync up and finish the release. t On Aug 30, 2013, at 1:02 PM, Shane Canon <scanon(a)lbl.gov> wrote: > > Tom, > > I apologize that I haven't been able to do the deployment to production this week. My concern has been starting something and then > potentially having to split in the middle of it for Jury duty. I will be done with Jury duty today or early next week. So I can more effectively > help with this then. In the mean time, I would like to clarify what tags should be switched to production for each service. You may recall > that during the last deployment, you and I walked down each service and figured out which tag to use. I think we need to do something similar > here. Alternatively we could judge it based on Dan's nightly testing. I'm flexible, I just want to make sure I'm choosing the right tag to mark as > production. > > --Shane

1 0