- Microbe - mailman3.cels.anl.gov

Re: [Microbe] [Kbase-devel] [Kbase-ui] UI graphic identity side-table at build meeting?
by Neal Conrad 19 Nov '12

19 Nov '12

My thoughts about frameworks: If you compare Bootstrap and jQuery UI, I prefer Bootstrap because it seems to focus more on layout and has a modern, simplistic feel to it, more along the philosophies of 37 Signals. I think a framework that encourages simplicity in design and functionality is important. Of course, there may be better options out there besides Bootstrap or jQuery UI. Neal On Nov 19, 2012, at 3:19 PM, Christopher Henry wrote: > I don't really think it's "early". Shouldn't this have been the first thing we did? > > I understand that the UI team isn't planning to produce anything for the February demo, but that doesn't mean we won't have a UI by the demo. We've had to bootstrap up temporary UIs ourselves, because we do need to have a UI at the demo, and a lot of people are going to see that UI. Like it or not, that's going to set the look and feel of KBase to a certain extent… Lots of users are going to see and start using the demo system. This is one reason why I really wanted to encourage UI people to try and produce *something* by the demo even if it's not the final product… not sure if that's in the plan at the moment. > > If there's some way we can come to some decisions now to frame and standardize the look and feel of our UIs…. that will help the KBase demo have a common look and feel, and it will prevent us from completely jarring our fledgling user community with the first UI team prototypes start to emerge. > > -Chris > > On Nov 19, 2012, at 3:04 PM, Annette Greiner <amgreiner(a)lbl.gov> wrote: > >> The UI team has not been planning on going to the build, because we were told that the work was going to focus on code development and we should let the developers do that work. If there were discussion of the look and feel of the site, we would of course want to be involved. >> >> It's a little early to worry about the graphics (the look) for the narrative UI, though we could certainly start thinking about it. The UI design team has been focusing on the interaction design (the feel) thus far. For the look, we are recommending JQuery smoothness as a temporary, neutral theme so that we can show and test the feel without influence from the look. I would recommend that KBase use a professional graphic designer for developing the final graphic identity. Maybe someone with purse strings--Adam?--can clarify what the plan is in that regard. >> >> -Annette >> >> >> On Nov 19, 2012, at 12:04 PM, Thomason, James wrote: >> >>> At least some of that stuff is already going ahead, or is being worked on in sub-groups already. >>> >>> I've been building the narrative in JqueryUI, for example. The UIx team is defining a lot more of the look-and-feel side of things (e.g., the recommendation is to use the smoothness jqueryui theme). They're also gathering feedback from the users and are planning on getting more, as I get useable stuff churned out. So a lot of the look-and-feel will end up evolving over time. >>> >>> For a CSS doc, if we don't end up using a standard jqui theme, then a custom one through there will define most of the styles anyway. >>> >>> At the moment, at least, if you're building in jqueryui and using the smoothness theme, then you're close to the overall look and feel of where the narrative is. >>> >>> I'm not opposed to a side-table, but it might end up being more of a show-and-share from the UI subgroups than a free-for-all to define stuff. Or maybe there's lots of stuff that can be defined. I can say that I'm very strongly in favor of jqueryui, but don't really care what fonts or colors we end up with, for example. >>> >>> On Nov 19, 2012, at 1:50 PM, Scott Devoid <devoid(a)ci.uchicago.edu<mailto:[email protected]>> >>> wrote: >>> >>> There was discussion during today's microbe's call about holding a brief side-table during the build week to go over the web-UI look and feel. >>> >>> The goal of this side-table would be to define an initial "graphic identity" for the KBase web UI. At the very least this would include choice of fonts, color palette, use of the logo. >>> Hopefully we can also come to agreement on a basic UI look (e.g. Twitter Bootstrap or jQuery UI) and then codify things in a standard CSS document. This shouldn't take more than an hour. >>> >>> Does this sound like a good idea? Who would be interested in participating (particularly those who are not coming to Chicago for the build week)? >>> >>> Example of basic graphic identity statements: >>> http://identity.uchicago.edu/ >>> http://mit.edu/graphicidentity/ >>> http://www.identity.ucla.edu/ >>> >>> ~ Scott >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Kbase-ui mailing list >>> Kbase-ui(a)lists.kbase.us<mailto:[email protected]> >>> https://lists.kbase.us/mailman/listinfo/kbase-ui >>> >>> -- >>> -Jim Thomason... >>> >>> Scientific Informatics Developer @ The Ware Lab, >>> a USDA-ARS Laboratory at Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory >>> http://www.warelab.org/ >>> http://www.cshl.edu/ >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Kbase-ui mailing list >>> Kbase-ui(a)lists.kbase.us >>> https://lists.kbase.us/mailman/listinfo/kbase-ui >> >> -- >> Annette Greiner >> Outreach, Software, and Programming Group >> NERSC, LBNL >> amgreiner(a)lbl.gov >> 510-495-2935 >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Kbase-devel mailing list >> Kbase-devel(a)lists.kbase.us >> https://lists.kbase.us/mailman/listinfo/kbase-devel > > _______________________________________________ > Kbase-devel mailing list > Kbase-devel(a)lists.kbase.us > https://lists.kbase.us/mailman/listinfo/kbase-devel

1 0

Re: [Microbe] [Kbase-devel] [Kbase-ui] UI graphic identity side-table at build meeting?
by Christopher Henry 19 Nov '12

19 Nov '12

I don't really think it's "early". Shouldn't this have been the first thing we did? I understand that the UI team isn't planning to produce anything for the February demo, but that doesn't mean we won't have a UI by the demo. We've had to bootstrap up temporary UIs ourselves, because we do need to have a UI at the demo, and a lot of people are going to see that UI. Like it or not, that's going to set the look and feel of KBase to a certain extent… Lots of users are going to see and start using the demo system. This is one reason why I really wanted to encourage UI people to try and produce *something* by the demo even if it's not the final product… not sure if that's in the plan at the moment. If there's some way we can come to some decisions now to frame and standardize the look and feel of our UIs…. that will help the KBase demo have a common look and feel, and it will prevent us from completely jarring our fledgling user community with the first UI team prototypes start to emerge. -Chris On Nov 19, 2012, at 3:04 PM, Annette Greiner <amgreiner(a)lbl.gov> wrote: > The UI team has not been planning on going to the build, because we were told that the work was going to focus on code development and we should let the developers do that work. If there were discussion of the look and feel of the site, we would of course want to be involved. > > It's a little early to worry about the graphics (the look) for the narrative UI, though we could certainly start thinking about it. The UI design team has been focusing on the interaction design (the feel) thus far. For the look, we are recommending JQuery smoothness as a temporary, neutral theme so that we can show and test the feel without influence from the look. I would recommend that KBase use a professional graphic designer for developing the final graphic identity. Maybe someone with purse strings--Adam?--can clarify what the plan is in that regard. > > -Annette > > > On Nov 19, 2012, at 12:04 PM, Thomason, James wrote: > >> At least some of that stuff is already going ahead, or is being worked on in sub-groups already. >> >> I've been building the narrative in JqueryUI, for example. The UIx team is defining a lot more of the look-and-feel side of things (e.g., the recommendation is to use the smoothness jqueryui theme). They're also gathering feedback from the users and are planning on getting more, as I get useable stuff churned out. So a lot of the look-and-feel will end up evolving over time. >> >> For a CSS doc, if we don't end up using a standard jqui theme, then a custom one through there will define most of the styles anyway. >> >> At the moment, at least, if you're building in jqueryui and using the smoothness theme, then you're close to the overall look and feel of where the narrative is. >> >> I'm not opposed to a side-table, but it might end up being more of a show-and-share from the UI subgroups than a free-for-all to define stuff. Or maybe there's lots of stuff that can be defined. I can say that I'm very strongly in favor of jqueryui, but don't really care what fonts or colors we end up with, for example. >> >> On Nov 19, 2012, at 1:50 PM, Scott Devoid <devoid(a)ci.uchicago.edu<mailto:[email protected]>> >> wrote: >> >> There was discussion during today's microbe's call about holding a brief side-table during the build week to go over the web-UI look and feel. >> >> The goal of this side-table would be to define an initial "graphic identity" for the KBase web UI. At the very least this would include choice of fonts, color palette, use of the logo. >> Hopefully we can also come to agreement on a basic UI look (e.g. Twitter Bootstrap or jQuery UI) and then codify things in a standard CSS document. This shouldn't take more than an hour. >> >> Does this sound like a good idea? Who would be interested in participating (particularly those who are not coming to Chicago for the build week)? >> >> Example of basic graphic identity statements: >> http://identity.uchicago.edu/ >> http://mit.edu/graphicidentity/ >> http://www.identity.ucla.edu/ >> >> ~ Scott >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Kbase-ui mailing list >> Kbase-ui(a)lists.kbase.us<mailto:[email protected]> >> https://lists.kbase.us/mailman/listinfo/kbase-ui >> >> -- >> -Jim Thomason... >> >> Scientific Informatics Developer @ The Ware Lab, >> a USDA-ARS Laboratory at Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory >> http://www.warelab.org/ >> http://www.cshl.edu/ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Kbase-ui mailing list >> Kbase-ui(a)lists.kbase.us >> https://lists.kbase.us/mailman/listinfo/kbase-ui > > -- > Annette Greiner > Outreach, Software, and Programming Group > NERSC, LBNL > amgreiner(a)lbl.gov > 510-495-2935 > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Kbase-devel mailing list > Kbase-devel(a)lists.kbase.us > https://lists.kbase.us/mailman/listinfo/kbase-devel

1 0

Re: [Microbe] [Kbase-ui] UI graphic identity side-table at build meeting?
by Annette Greiner 19 Nov '12

19 Nov '12

The UI team has not been planning on going to the build, because we were told that the work was going to focus on code development and we should let the developers do that work. If there were discussion of the look and feel of the site, we would of course want to be involved. It's a little early to worry about the graphics (the look) for the narrative UI, though we could certainly start thinking about it. The UI design team has been focusing on the interaction design (the feel) thus far. For the look, we are recommending JQuery smoothness as a temporary, neutral theme so that we can show and test the feel without influence from the look. I would recommend that KBase use a professional graphic designer for developing the final graphic identity. Maybe someone with purse strings--Adam?--can clarify what the plan is in that regard. -Annette On Nov 19, 2012, at 12:04 PM, Thomason, James wrote: > At least some of that stuff is already going ahead, or is being worked on in sub-groups already. > > I've been building the narrative in JqueryUI, for example. The UIx team is defining a lot more of the look-and-feel side of things (e.g., the recommendation is to use the smoothness jqueryui theme). They're also gathering feedback from the users and are planning on getting more, as I get useable stuff churned out. So a lot of the look-and-feel will end up evolving over time. > > For a CSS doc, if we don't end up using a standard jqui theme, then a custom one through there will define most of the styles anyway. > > At the moment, at least, if you're building in jqueryui and using the smoothness theme, then you're close to the overall look and feel of where the narrative is. > > I'm not opposed to a side-table, but it might end up being more of a show-and-share from the UI subgroups than a free-for-all to define stuff. Or maybe there's lots of stuff that can be defined. I can say that I'm very strongly in favor of jqueryui, but don't really care what fonts or colors we end up with, for example. > > On Nov 19, 2012, at 1:50 PM, Scott Devoid <devoid(a)ci.uchicago.edu<mailto:[email protected]>> > wrote: > > There was discussion during today's microbe's call about holding a brief side-table during the build week to go over the web-UI look and feel. > > The goal of this side-table would be to define an initial "graphic identity" for the KBase web UI. At the very least this would include choice of fonts, color palette, use of the logo. > Hopefully we can also come to agreement on a basic UI look (e.g. Twitter Bootstrap or jQuery UI) and then codify things in a standard CSS document. This shouldn't take more than an hour. > > Does this sound like a good idea? Who would be interested in participating (particularly those who are not coming to Chicago for the build week)? > > Example of basic graphic identity statements: > http://identity.uchicago.edu/ > http://mit.edu/graphicidentity/ > http://www.identity.ucla.edu/ > > ~ Scott > > _______________________________________________ > Kbase-ui mailing list > Kbase-ui(a)lists.kbase.us<mailto:[email protected]> > https://lists.kbase.us/mailman/listinfo/kbase-ui > > -- > -Jim Thomason... > > Scientific Informatics Developer @ The Ware Lab, > a USDA-ARS Laboratory at Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory > http://www.warelab.org/ > http://www.cshl.edu/ > > _______________________________________________ > Kbase-ui mailing list > Kbase-ui(a)lists.kbase.us > https://lists.kbase.us/mailman/listinfo/kbase-ui -- Annette Greiner Outreach, Software, and Programming Group NERSC, LBNL amgreiner(a)lbl.gov 510-495-2935

1 0

Re: [Microbe] [Kbase-devel] UI graphic identity side-table at build meeting?
by Land, Miriam L. 19 Nov '12

19 Nov '12

Scott, I suppose that I could be in favor of it as long as it doesn't pull anybody off my testing team. I've pretty much got the testers tied up Tues-Friday. Miriam From: Scott Devoid <devoid(a)ci.uchicago.edu<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Monday, November 19, 2012 2:50 PM To: "kbase-ui(a)lists.kbase.us<mailto:[email protected]>" <kbase-ui(a)lists.kbase.us<mailto:[email protected]>>, "microbe(a)lists.kbase.us<mailto:[email protected]>" <microbe(a)lists.kbase.us<mailto:[email protected]>>, KBase developers <kbase-devel(a)lists.kbase.us<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: [Kbase-devel] UI graphic identity side-table at build meeting? There was discussion during today's microbe's call about holding a brief side-table during the build week to go over the web-UI look and feel. The goal of this side-table would be to define an initial "graphic identity" for the KBase web UI. At the very least this would include choice of fonts, color palette, use of the logo. Hopefully we can also come to agreement on a basic UI look (e.g. Twitter Bootstrap or jQuery UI) and then codify things in a standard CSS document. This shouldn't take more than an hour. Does this sound like a good idea? Who would be interested in participating (particularly those who are not coming to Chicago for the build week)? Example of basic graphic identity statements: http://identity.uchicago.edu/ http://mit.edu/graphicidentity/ http://www.identity.ucla.edu/ ~ Scott

1 0

Re: [Microbe] [Kbase-ui] UI graphic identity side-table at build meeting?
by Thomason, James 19 Nov '12

19 Nov '12

At least some of that stuff is already going ahead, or is being worked on in sub-groups already. I've been building the narrative in JqueryUI, for example. The UIx team is defining a lot more of the look-and-feel side of things (e.g., the recommendation is to use the smoothness jqueryui theme). They're also gathering feedback from the users and are planning on getting more, as I get useable stuff churned out. So a lot of the look-and-feel will end up evolving over time. For a CSS doc, if we don't end up using a standard jqui theme, then a custom one through there will define most of the styles anyway. At the moment, at least, if you're building in jqueryui and using the smoothness theme, then you're close to the overall look and feel of where the narrative is. I'm not opposed to a side-table, but it might end up being more of a show-and-share from the UI subgroups than a free-for-all to define stuff. Or maybe there's lots of stuff that can be defined. I can say that I'm very strongly in favor of jqueryui, but don't really care what fonts or colors we end up with, for example. On Nov 19, 2012, at 1:50 PM, Scott Devoid <devoid(a)ci.uchicago.edu<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: There was discussion during today's microbe's call about holding a brief side-table during the build week to go over the web-UI look and feel. The goal of this side-table would be to define an initial "graphic identity" for the KBase web UI. At the very least this would include choice of fonts, color palette, use of the logo. Hopefully we can also come to agreement on a basic UI look (e.g. Twitter Bootstrap or jQuery UI) and then codify things in a standard CSS document. This shouldn't take more than an hour. Does this sound like a good idea? Who would be interested in participating (particularly those who are not coming to Chicago for the build week)? Example of basic graphic identity statements: http://identity.uchicago.edu/ http://mit.edu/graphicidentity/ http://www.identity.ucla.edu/ ~ Scott _______________________________________________ Kbase-ui mailing list Kbase-ui(a)lists.kbase.us<mailto:[email protected]> https://lists.kbase.us/mailman/listinfo/kbase-ui -- -Jim Thomason... Scientific Informatics Developer @ The Ware Lab, a USDA-ARS Laboratory at Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory http://www.warelab.org/ http://www.cshl.edu/

1 0

UI graphic identity side-table at build meeting?
by Scott Devoid 19 Nov '12

19 Nov '12

There was discussion during today's microbe's call about holding a brief side-table during the build week to go over the web-UI look and feel. The goal of this side-table would be to define an initial "graphic identity" for the KBase web UI. At the very least this would include choice of fonts, color palette, use of the logo. Hopefully we can also come to agreement on a basic UI look (e.g. Twitter Bootstrap or jQuery UI) and then codify things in a standard CSS document. This shouldn't take more than an hour. Does this sound like a good idea? Who would be interested in participating (particularly those who are not coming to Chicago for the build week)? Example of basic graphic identity statements: http://identity.uchicago.edu/ http://mit.edu/graphicidentity/ http://www.identity.ucla.edu/ ~ Scott

1 0

Microbial call today at 11AM Pacific/1PM central/2PM eastern
by Christopher Henry 19 Nov '12

19 Nov '12

Hi all, Microbial call today at 11AM Pacific/1PM central/2PM eastern. Number:866-740-1260 Code: 4958182 Chris

1 0

Re: [Microbe] Microbes meeting today at 11P/1C/2E
by Ben Bowen 12 Nov '12

12 Nov '12

http://metaboliteatlas.lbl.gov/~bpb/Demo/scatter/matrix_vibriodata.html -------------- Email: BPBowen(a)lbl.gov Phone: (510) 214-6683 MS 977-221, Lawrence Berkeley Lab Web: ms.lbl.gov On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 8:51 AM, Christopher Henry <chrisshenry(a)gmail.com>wrote: > Hello all, > > Just a reminder, we have a microbes call today at the usual time: > 11P/1C/2E. > > Dial in information: 866-740-1260 > Code: 4958182# > > Best, > Chris > _______________________________________________ > Microbe mailing list > Microbe(a)lists.kbase.us > https://lists.kbase.us/mailman/listinfo/microbe >

1 0

Microbes meeting today at 11P/1C/2E
by Christopher Henry 12 Nov '12

12 Nov '12

Hello all, Just a reminder, we have a microbes call today at the usual time: 11P/1C/2E. Dial in information: 866-740-1260 Code: 4958182# Best, Chris

1 0

Re: [Microbe] nice d3 interactive visualization, fosters ideas relevant to model / phenotype reconciliation
by Christopher Henry 09 Nov '12

09 Nov '12

This looks good Ben and Gavin. It's exactly what we need, and the JSON specs are something I can definitely produce from the models. Just make the specs for what you needs, and I'll make sure the modeling tools produce it. Chris On Nov 8, 2012, at 4:15 PM, Ben Bowen <ben.bowen(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Not that I've given up on moving the little circles around on the web-page, but Gavin and I came up with a different version of what the reconciliation explorer might look like (attached). I leave it to your imagination to envision little tooltips on mouseover that have lots of info for the different reconciliations and new-tabs that open up when you click on a compound or reaction. > > We have also begun to specify what the JSON object would look like. Next time I sit down to work on this, I'll make a toy JSON object and a web-page with the table and graphic. This probably won't be for several days; so if you want to add terms to the object or revise the "artists-rendering" please go crazy and put in whatever you want. It might be a good use of time to simultaneously, specify what the POST request will look like, where it will go, and what JSON object will be sent away from this page. > > > -------------- > Email: BPBowen(a)lbl.gov > Phone: (510) 214-6683 > MS 977-221, Lawrence Berkeley Lab > Web: ms.lbl.gov > > > On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Christopher Henry <chrisshenry(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Well, this gets more interesting when we lump in stats about how accuracy and model stats change when you select various solutions. > Accepting a model modification is a trade off in a variety of ways: > 1.) You may fix some errors but cause others > 2.) You may reduce the number of active reactions in the model > 3.) You may reduce the biomass reaction > 4.) You may lose annotations > > We need to report these stats in the interface so the user can see what they're trading off... > > On Nov 5, 2012, at 5:47 PM, Gavin Price wrote: > > > will the model changes be clustered or linked somehow? I'm not quite sure how this interface makes displaying the results clearer/easier to understand - it looks like the model changes are arbitrarily placed. > > > > -g > > > > On 11/5/2012 3:43 PM, Ben Bowen wrote: > >> I just put together the beginnings of what the user interface might look like. You can check progress here: > >> > >> http://metaboliteatlas.lbl.gov/~bpb/Demo/reconExplorer/reconciliationExplor… > >> > >> Some imagination is still required, but the majority of the mechanics are in place. > >> > >> Next, I'll import a toy json object that looks like what the gapfillGlobal will generate, and post a json object when your done selecting changes to the model. > >> > >> > >> ----------------------------- > >> Email: BPBowen(a)lbl.gov > >> Phone: (510) 214-6683 > >> MS 977-221, Lawrence Berkeley Lab > >> Web: ms.lbl.gov > >> > >> > >> On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 11:33 PM, Adam Paul Arkin <aparkin(a)lbl.gov> wrote: > >> That is really nice. > >> > >> Sent from my mobile device. Please excuse any seeming terseness or errors. > >> > >> Adam Paul Arkin > >> Dean A. Richard Newton Memorial Chair > >> ------------------------------------- > >> Director, Physical Biosciences Division > >> E.O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory > >> > >> Professor, Department of Bioengineering > >> University of California > >> Berkeley, CA, 94720 > >> > >> PI and Co-Director, Virtual Institute of Microbial Stress and Survival, http://vimss.lbl.gov > >> Director of Bioinformatics, The Joint Bioenergy Institute, http://jbei.lbl.gov > >> Investigator, Energy Biosciences Institute, http://energybiosciencesinstitute.org > >> Head, Synthetic Biology, Physical Biosciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory > >> > >> > >> Office: 309B Hildebrand Hall (Berkeley Campus) > >> Mailing address: > >> E.O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory > >> 1 Cyclotron Road, MS Stanley-922 > >> Berkeley, CA 94720 > >> > >> Contact: > >> W: http://genomics.lbl.gov > >> V: 510-495-2366 > >> C: 510-206-1389 > >> F: 510-486-6219 > >> > >> Assistant: > >> Gwyneth A. Terry > >> V: 510-495-2116 > >> E: GATerry(a)lbl.gov > >> ------------------------------------- > >> > >> On Nov 3, 2012, at 9:03 PM, Christopher Henry <chrisshenry(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> > i love it!!!! We most definitely should do it. ASAP. > >> > Something like that could bring real shock and awe to the demo... > >> > > >> > On Nov 3, 2012, at 8:59 PM, Ben Bowen wrote: > >> > > >> >> If you go to this link and click "next" > >> >> http://elections.nytimes.com/2012/electoral-map > >> >> there is a nice d3 visualization. > >> >> > >> >> Instead of states: think media conditions (we have ~100) > >> >> Instead of electoral votes for radius: think how many discrepancies were resolved > >> >> Instead of dragging to explore voting outcomes: think which changes to the model you want to accept. > >> >> Instead of tooltips with electoral votes: have option to select 1, 2, or 3 best modification to the model. > >> >> > >> >> Add a button at the bottom for "commit" and get a nice, shiny new model to play with. > >> >> > >> >> ----------------------------- > >> >> Email: BPBowen(a)lbl.gov > >> >> Phone: (510) 214-6683 > >> >> MS 977-221, Lawrence Berkeley Lab > >> >> Web: ms.lbl.gov > >> >> _______________________________________________ > >> >> Microbe mailing list > >> >> Microbe(a)lists.kbase.us > >> >> https://lists.kbase.us/mailman/listinfo/microbe > >> > > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > Microbe mailing list > >> > Microbe(a)lists.kbase.us > >> > https://lists.kbase.us/mailman/listinfo/microbe > >> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Microbe mailing list > >> > >> Microbe(a)lists.kbase.us > >> https://lists.kbase.us/mailman/listinfo/microbe > > _______________________________________________ > > Microbe mailing list > > Microbe(a)lists.kbase.us > > https://lists.kbase.us/mailman/listinfo/microbe > > _______________________________________________ > Microbe mailing list > Microbe(a)lists.kbase.us > https://lists.kbase.us/mailman/listinfo/microbe > > <SpecificationsForReconciliationExplorer.pdf>

1 0