- Release-team - mailman3.cels.anl.gov

minor release update last week
by Thomas Brettin 29 Apr '13

29 Apr '13

On the release last week, genome annotation didn't make it through testing of the scripts. Miriam is going to dig a little deeper and iterate with Bob this week. So, no go on a new ubuntu or dmg release. However, I would like to get a new release of the invocation service to production, if it doesn't break anything. The issue here is that the plant expression services were manually put into a dev instance of the invocation service for the Feb release, but when we cut over to the production instance of the invocation service, the plant expression commands were lost.

1 0

Re: [Release-team] May Build--team assignments?
by Thomas Brettin 29 Apr '13

29 Apr '13

Yes, the standard teams for minor build/deploy, but these will be overkill, except for testing. Black box testing on search will require more resources than a normal minor build. I'll go over the list of things to do early this week and see if I can have a concrete plan by cob wed. t On Apr 28, 2013, at 10:25 PM, Nomi Harris <nlharris(a)lbl.gov> wrote: > Are we going to have team assignments for the build-related activities* at the May Build, or are the Build activities now done entirely by the team leads? > > * which I know will not consume the entire week, since we're also going to have sprints/hackathons/short-term programming efforts. > > Nomi >

1 0

Re: [Release-team] [Kbase-devel] targets for next week's minor release
by Land, Miriam L. 29 Apr '13

29 Apr '13

Tom, Did you get my email Friday afternoon an all the problems I found with the scripts? Miriam On 4/28/13 9:31 PM, "Thomas Brettin" <brettin(a)mcs.anl.gov> wrote: >I haven't seen a successful pass on the genome annotation scripts of the >https port. > >Dan, Miriam where does this stand? > >t > >On Apr 28, 2013, at 8:04 PM, Nomi Harris <nlharris(a)lbl.gov> wrote: > >> How are we doing with last week's minor release? Is there anything I >>need to change on kbase.us or is that taken care of? >> Nomi >> >> On Apr 25, 2013, at 9:51 PM, Thomas Brettin <brettint(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> It looks like we're on target. >>> >>> I need to do a status check tomorrow to see if it's worth rebuilding >>>the DMG and ubuntu image. >>> >>> t >>> >>> >>> On Apr 25, 2013, at 11:23 PM, Nomi Harris <nlharris(a)lbl.gov> wrote: >>> >>>> Are we on target to finish this week's minor release? >> _______________________________________________ >> Release-team mailing list >> Release-team(a)lists.kbase.us >> https://lists.kbase.us/mailman/listinfo/release-team > >_______________________________________________ >Release-team mailing list >Release-team(a)lists.kbase.us >https://lists.kbase.us/mailman/listinfo/release-team

1 0

May Build--team assignments?
by Nomi Harris 28 Apr '13

28 Apr '13

Are we going to have team assignments for the build-related activities* at the May Build, or are the Build activities now done entirely by the team leads? * which I know will not consume the entire week, since we're also going to have sprints/hackathons/short-term programming efforts. Nomi

1 0

Re: [Release-team] [Kbase-devel] targets for next week's minor release
by Thomas Brettin 28 Apr '13

28 Apr '13

I haven't seen a successful pass on the genome annotation scripts of the https port. Dan, Miriam where does this stand? t On Apr 28, 2013, at 8:04 PM, Nomi Harris <nlharris(a)lbl.gov> wrote: > How are we doing with last week's minor release? Is there anything I need to change on kbase.us or is that taken care of? > Nomi > > On Apr 25, 2013, at 9:51 PM, Thomas Brettin <brettint(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> It looks like we're on target. >> >> I need to do a status check tomorrow to see if it's worth rebuilding the DMG and ubuntu image. >> >> t >> >> >> On Apr 25, 2013, at 11:23 PM, Nomi Harris <nlharris(a)lbl.gov> wrote: >> >>> Are we on target to finish this week's minor release? > _______________________________________________ > Release-team mailing list > Release-team(a)lists.kbase.us > https://lists.kbase.us/mailman/listinfo/release-team

1 0

Re: [Release-team] [Kbase-devel] targets for next week's minor release
by Nomi Harris 28 Apr '13

28 Apr '13

How are we doing with last week's minor release? Is there anything I need to change on kbase.us or is that taken care of? Nomi On Apr 25, 2013, at 9:51 PM, Thomas Brettin <brettint(a)gmail.com> wrote: > It looks like we're on target. > > I need to do a status check tomorrow to see if it's worth rebuilding the DMG and ubuntu image. > > t > > > On Apr 25, 2013, at 11:23 PM, Nomi Harris <nlharris(a)lbl.gov> wrote: > >> Are we on target to finish this week's minor release?

1 0

Re: [Release-team] Google docs and folders
by Land, Miriam L. 26 Apr '13

26 Apr '13

I'm just going to plead ignorance. I didn't know how to put a document into the KBase Project, I didn't know that I could, and I didn't realize that it made a difference to people. It seems that the one and only document that I've ever created in Google docs is the one causing the problem. Sorry. I think I have it fixed now. Miriam On 4/25/13 6:32 PM, "Nomi Harris" <nlharris(a)lbl.gov> wrote: >I agree that juggling multiple google accounts is a pain; I wrestle with >that too (I have three--gmail, lbl, and a kbase one). Whenever I try to >visit a doc, it seems like I'm logged into the wrong account. >As far as Google Docs folders (such as the "KBase Project" folder), the >Google Docs interface makes it hard to see and use those. There are three >different ways I access Google docs: >- Individual docs (you can't easily move docs into folders from that >interface) >- docs.google.com (good way to see docs that have been shared with you, >but not folder) >- the Google Drive client, which lets you browse your google doc folders >as if they were on your computer. This one is easy to see folders in and >move docs between folders, but not easy (is it even possible?) to create >new docs. >So what I usually end up doing is creating a new Google doc via File -> >New, and then later, if I remember, looking at the Google drive folder >and moving the new doc into KBase Project (or the appropriate folder). >It's annoying, though. > >I had dinner the other day with two friends who work at Google and I >complained to them about the awkward Google docs interface and they both >agreed with me. > > Nomi > >On Apr 22, 2013, at 9:03 AM, Dan Olson <dolson(a)mcs.anl.gov> wrote: > >> So, having multiple g* accounts is somewhat of a nightmare.. It looks >>like google is getting better about linking support for multiple >>accounts, but still not perfect. >> >> My dan(a)olsonsolutions.net account has access to the "KBase Project" >>folder. Are these docs not in that folder? If not, why? >> >> It seems like I run across this a lot - it would be nice if folks would >>uniformly use the "KBase Project" folder. >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "Nomi Harris" <nlharris(a)lbl.gov> >>> To: "Thomas Brettin" <brettin(a)mcs.anl.gov> >>> Cc: "Dan Olson" <dolson(a)mcs.anl.gov>, release-team(a)lists.kbase.us >>> Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 10:57:44 AM >>> Subject: Re: [Release-team] [Kbase-devel] starting a new minor release >>> >>> Dan, I gave you access to these docs with your personal email >>> address. (You already had access with your anl address.) >>> >>> On Apr 22, 2013, at 8:42 AM, Nomi Harris <nlharris(a)lbl.gov> wrote: >>> >>>> For today's release meeting, do we want to look at / revise these? >>>> Minor Release Punch List: >>>> >>>>https://docs.google.com/a/lbl.gov/document/d/12e_r8w7ean5hTp-WYiKbWdxET >>>>7EmtohOH0TPuy3qUqs/edit >>>> (last edited Feb 1) >>> Sorry, wrong URL, should be >>> >>>https://docs.google.com/document/d/1QxZtbKUtAp_7Dj6ArEEaQvUcyl92xn80PzIV >>>m_KtKLo/edit >>> >>>> Minor Release Standard Emails: >>>> >>>>https://docs.google.com/a/lbl.gov/document/d/12e_r8w7ean5hTp-WYiKbWdxET >>>>7EmtohOH0TPuy3qUqs/edit >>>> (last edited Feb 19) >>>> Nomi >>>> >>> >>> > >_______________________________________________ >Release-team mailing list >Release-team(a)lists.kbase.us >https://lists.kbase.us/mailman/listinfo/release-team

1 0

Google docs and folders
by Nomi Harris 25 Apr '13

25 Apr '13

I agree that juggling multiple google accounts is a pain; I wrestle with that too (I have three--gmail, lbl, and a kbase one). Whenever I try to visit a doc, it seems like I'm logged into the wrong account. As far as Google Docs folders (such as the "KBase Project" folder), the Google Docs interface makes it hard to see and use those. There are three different ways I access Google docs: - Individual docs (you can't easily move docs into folders from that interface) - docs.google.com (good way to see docs that have been shared with you, but not folder) - the Google Drive client, which lets you browse your google doc folders as if they were on your computer. This one is easy to see folders in and move docs between folders, but not easy (is it even possible?) to create new docs. So what I usually end up doing is creating a new Google doc via File -> New, and then later, if I remember, looking at the Google drive folder and moving the new doc into KBase Project (or the appropriate folder). It's annoying, though. I had dinner the other day with two friends who work at Google and I complained to them about the awkward Google docs interface and they both agreed with me. Nomi On Apr 22, 2013, at 9:03 AM, Dan Olson <dolson(a)mcs.anl.gov> wrote: > So, having multiple g* accounts is somewhat of a nightmare.. It looks like google is getting better about linking support for multiple accounts, but still not perfect. > > My dan(a)olsonsolutions.net account has access to the "KBase Project" folder. Are these docs not in that folder? If not, why? > > It seems like I run across this a lot - it would be nice if folks would uniformly use the "KBase Project" folder. > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Nomi Harris" <nlharris(a)lbl.gov> >> To: "Thomas Brettin" <brettin(a)mcs.anl.gov> >> Cc: "Dan Olson" <dolson(a)mcs.anl.gov>, release-team(a)lists.kbase.us >> Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 10:57:44 AM >> Subject: Re: [Release-team] [Kbase-devel] starting a new minor release >> >> Dan, I gave you access to these docs with your personal email >> address. (You already had access with your anl address.) >> >> On Apr 22, 2013, at 8:42 AM, Nomi Harris <nlharris(a)lbl.gov> wrote: >> >>> For today's release meeting, do we want to look at / revise these? >>> Minor Release Punch List: >>> https://docs.google.com/a/lbl.gov/document/d/12e_r8w7ean5hTp-WYiKbWdxET7Emt… >>> (last edited Feb 1) >> Sorry, wrong URL, should be >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1QxZtbKUtAp_7Dj6ArEEaQvUcyl92xn80PzIVm_K… >> >>> Minor Release Standard Emails: >>> https://docs.google.com/a/lbl.gov/document/d/12e_r8w7ean5hTp-WYiKbWdxET7Emt… >>> (last edited Feb 19) >>> Nomi >>> >> >>

1 0

Re: [Release-team] Minor Build Tech Doc update
by Thomas Brettin 24 Apr '13

24 Apr '13

looks like a deployment problem. Dan is it the deployment tools or the module itself? t On Apr 24, 2013, at 6:51 PM, Michael Sneddon <mwsneddon(a)lbl.gov> wrote: > I finished the initial review of API and command line documentation. > > All of the current docs have reasonably good coverage/descriptions, and properly deploy to webroot. However, the deployed documents for 'auth_service' and 'protein_info_service', as well as a couple of the dependent deployments, are not visible via: http://140.221.84.191/services/docs/ . I'm not sure if this is a major problem or not. > > Additionally, it's only a dependent service, but there was a strange error in the 'erdb_service' webroot directory, where the webroot directory was recursively copied somehow. See: http://140.221.84.191/services/docs/erdb_service/ > > > These issues are also documented in the Services spreadsheet. > > > -Michael > _______________________________________________ > Release-team mailing list > Release-team(a)lists.kbase.us > https://lists.kbase.us/mailman/listinfo/release-team

1 0

Minor Build Tech Doc update
by Michael Sneddon 24 Apr '13

24 Apr '13

I finished the initial review of API and command line documentation. All of the current docs have reasonably good coverage/descriptions, and properly deploy to webroot. However, the deployed documents for 'auth_service' and 'protein_info_service', as well as a couple of the dependent deployments, are not visible via: http://140.221.84.191/services/docs/ . I'm not sure if this is a major problem or not. Additionally, it's only a dependent service, but there was a strange error in the 'erdb_service' webroot directory, where the webroot directory was recursively copied somehow. See: http://140.221.84.191/services/docs/erdb_service/ These issues are also documented in the Services spreadsheet. -Michael

1 0