February 2013 - Release-team - mailman3.cels.anl.gov

Are we ready to announce the release now?
by Nomi Harris 22 Feb '13

22 Feb '13

Can I go ahead and post the new Services page now (even though some of the API docs aren't there yet--I will add links when they become available)? Should I post the release announcement yet or wait? Nomi

1 0

Re: [Release-team] [Kbase-devel] problem with getting locations from fids
by Nomi Harris 22 Feb '13

22 Feb '13

I agree with Bob--I wouldn't put anything new into production now unless it's a critical fix. Nomi On Feb 22, 2013, at 9:48 AM, Robert Olson <olson(a)mcs.anl.gov> wrote: > I'm thinking unless this is critical, it'll go into production after the demo panic. > > On Feb 22, 2013, at 11:40 AM, Terry Disz wrote: > >> BIll, >> >> Thanks for pointing this out, I found the problem in the server API routine for fids_to_feature_data and fixed it. The fix should find it's way into production soon. >> >> Terry >> >> On Feb 22, 2013, at 1:29 AM, William Riehl <wjriehl(a)lbl.gov> wrote: >> >>> Hey all, >>> >>> I ran into a problem tonight: calling fids_to_locations and fids_to_feature_data returns two different locations for the same feature when that feature is on the minus-strand. >>> >>> >/ echo "kb|g.9865.peg.0" | fids_to_feature_data >>> kb|g.9865.peg.0 kb|g.9865.peg.0 Acetobacter aceti kb|g.9865.c.0_7246-2895 2895 putative transposase >>> >>> >/ echo "kb|g.9865.peg.0" | fids_to_locations >>> kb|g.9865.peg.0 kb|g.9865.c.0_4352-2895 >>> >>> also: >>> >>> >/ echo "kb|g.1965.peg.1959" | fids_to_feature_data >>> kb|g.1965.peg.1959 kb|g.1965.peg.1959 Accumulibacter phosphatis clade IIA str. UW-1 kb|g.1965.c.1_7071-765 765 Orotidine 5'-phosphate decarboxylase (EC 4.1.1.23) >>> >>> >/ echo "kb|g.1965.peg.1959" | fids_to_locations >>> kb|g.1965.peg.1959 kb|g.1965.c.1_6307-765 >>> >>> >>> It looks like fids_to_locations is returning the right answer - I looked up these two features in their sources (MicrobesOnline and SEED, respectively) and found them to match. It also seems like, for features on the minus-strand, fids_to_feature_data is adding the length of the feature to its correct starting position. >>> >>> - Bill >>> _______________________________________________

1 0

Re: [Release-team] CDMI Client Libraries on Downloads page
by Thomas Brettin 21 Feb '13

21 Feb '13

On Feb 21, 2013, at 11:18 PM, Shiran Pasternak <shiranpasternak(a)gmail.com> wrote: > I generated the JavaScript libraries (both uncompressed and compressed versions) for 18 services. They're right now checked into the kbapi_common git repo (that's also temporarily where I maintain the script that builds the libraries from the virtual machine). The directory is 'javascript/lib/kbase{,.min}.js'. There are, however, a few caveats, recorded on the KBase Services spreadsheet (Client Libraries sheet): > > * 5 services did not yet get deployed into production (aux_store, cdd_service, invocation, microbes_model_builder, probabilistic_annotation). Are those expected to be deployed or are they deployed and not marked as such? They will not likely be deployed for various reasons. Just ignore them. > * 4 deployed services did not create JavaScript API libraries (assembly, auth, jnomics, and matR). None of these actually have type docs. I guess these can be ignored, but I'm not sure. Please advise. Yes, Ignore. > * Some services write their JS libraries into non-standard locations (most write a 'lib/[% MODULE_NAME %]/Client.js'). Not a big deal but should standardize in the future. A list of these would be helpful. We can encourage standardization of the make files. > > Barring those caveats, the libraries are good to go. 232K uncompressed, 98K compressed. :) > > As for Python, I still want to hear from the Python devs about the best way to package the client libraries. > Gavin usually has good input on the python stuff. he did the mods to the type compiler for python. you might ping him directly. he's not on the release-engineering mail list. t > Shiran > > > > > > On Feb 21, 2013, at 11:32 PM, Thomas Brettin <brettin(a)mcs.anl.gov> wrote: > >> hey shiran, >> >> the preamble looks good, thanks. >> >> t >> >> On Feb 21, 2013, at 10:22 PM, Shiran Pasternak <shiranpasternak(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> By the way, I created yet another sheet in the KBase Services spreadsheet. It actually uses formulas to remove human (Shiran) error by tapping into both the Master sheet (for modules that are services and not internal) and the Feb 4 build for their pass status. The list I included in my last email to kbase-devel is straight out of there. Anything I missed (or should not include)? >>> >>> Shiran >>> >>> On Feb 21, 2013, at 9:46 PM, Shiran Pasternak <shiranpasternak(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Yes, I have a process that does that compression/uglification/minification (I use UglifyJS). >>>> >>>> I think that folks that want to use their own custom one can build it themselves using their desired set of services. Usually, JS libraries are distributed in both forms, so that the unminified version can be used for debugging. We'd call it kbase.js and kbase.min.js. What do you think? >>>> >>>> For both, I include a preamble at the top that looks like this: >>>> >>>> /** >>>> * The KBase API >>>> * http://kbase.us >>>> * >>>> * API documentation: http://kbase.us/developer-zone/api-documentation/ >>>> * @license Copyright (c) 2013, The DOE Systems Biology Knowledgebase Project >>>> */ >>>> >>>> Shiran >>>> >>>> On Feb 21, 2013, at 9:36 PM, Thomas Brettin <brettin(a)mcs.anl.gov> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Not sure. I thought I saw some talk that looked like concatenating all kbase js libs into a single one, then folks saying that they custom select what they use. >>>>> >>>>> I think in any case, you could run the js libs through one of those js compressors, I forget what they are called, but you know, they take out whitespace, make the libs significantly smaller. >>>>> >>>>> Really though, I;m worse than a js000nb. What makes sense to you? >>>>> >>>>> We can always change our mind in the future, and make old libs available in the archives area of downloads. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> t >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Feb 21, 2013, at 8:31 PM, Shiran Pasternak <shiranpasternak(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I handle the JS client APIs, but can also distribute the python libraries as a package, which are being deployed alongside the JavaScript libraries. But isn't it misleading to only release the CDMI API as a standalone? >>>>>> >>>>>> Thoughts? >>>>>> Shiran >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Feb 21, 2013, at 8:35 PM, Thomas Brettin <brettin(a)mcs.anl.gov> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> shiran maybe? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Feb 21, 2013, at 7:34 PM, Nomi Harris <nlharris(a)lbl.gov> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Is someone planning to update these today or tomorrow? >>>>>>>> <Screen Shot 2013-02-21 at 5.33.08 PM.png> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>> Nomi >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> Release-team mailing list >>>>>>>> Release-team(a)lists.kbase.us >>>>>>>> https://lists.kbase.us/mailman/listinfo/release-team >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thomas Brettin >>>>>>> 865-603-7760 (cell) >>>>>>> brettin(a)mcs.anl.gov >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Release-team mailing list >>>>>>> Release-team(a)lists.kbase.us >>>>>>> https://lists.kbase.us/mailman/listinfo/release-team >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Thomas Brettin >>>>> 865-603-7760 (cell) >>>>> brettin(a)mcs.anl.gov >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >> Thomas Brettin >> 865-603-7760 (cell) >> brettin(a)mcs.anl.gov >> >> >> > Thomas Brettin 865-603-7760 (cell) brettin(a)mcs.anl.gov

1 0

Re: [Release-team] CDMI Client Libraries on Downloads page
by Shiran Pasternak 21 Feb '13

21 Feb '13

I generated the JavaScript libraries (both uncompressed and compressed versions) for 18 services. They're right now checked into the kbapi_common git repo (that's also temporarily where I maintain the script that builds the libraries from the virtual machine). The directory is 'javascript/lib/kbase{,.min}.js'. There are, however, a few caveats, recorded on the KBase Services spreadsheet (Client Libraries sheet): * 5 services did not yet get deployed into production (aux_store, cdd_service, invocation, microbes_model_builder, probabilistic_annotation). Are those expected to be deployed or are they deployed and not marked as such? * 4 deployed services did not create JavaScript API libraries (assembly, auth, jnomics, and matR). None of these actually have type docs. I guess these can be ignored, but I'm not sure. Please advise. * Some services write their JS libraries into non-standard locations (most write a 'lib/[% MODULE_NAME %]/Client.js'). Not a big deal but should standardize in the future. Barring those caveats, the libraries are good to go. 232K uncompressed, 98K compressed. :) As for Python, I still want to hear from the Python devs about the best way to package the client libraries. Shiran On Feb 21, 2013, at 11:32 PM, Thomas Brettin <brettin(a)mcs.anl.gov> wrote: > hey shiran, > > the preamble looks good, thanks. > > t > > On Feb 21, 2013, at 10:22 PM, Shiran Pasternak <shiranpasternak(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> By the way, I created yet another sheet in the KBase Services spreadsheet. It actually uses formulas to remove human (Shiran) error by tapping into both the Master sheet (for modules that are services and not internal) and the Feb 4 build for their pass status. The list I included in my last email to kbase-devel is straight out of there. Anything I missed (or should not include)? >> >> Shiran >> >> On Feb 21, 2013, at 9:46 PM, Shiran Pasternak <shiranpasternak(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Yes, I have a process that does that compression/uglification/minification (I use UglifyJS). >>> >>> I think that folks that want to use their own custom one can build it themselves using their desired set of services. Usually, JS libraries are distributed in both forms, so that the unminified version can be used for debugging. We'd call it kbase.js and kbase.min.js. What do you think? >>> >>> For both, I include a preamble at the top that looks like this: >>> >>> /** >>> * The KBase API >>> * http://kbase.us >>> * >>> * API documentation: http://kbase.us/developer-zone/api-documentation/ >>> * @license Copyright (c) 2013, The DOE Systems Biology Knowledgebase Project >>> */ >>> >>> Shiran >>> >>> On Feb 21, 2013, at 9:36 PM, Thomas Brettin <brettin(a)mcs.anl.gov> wrote: >>> >>>> Not sure. I thought I saw some talk that looked like concatenating all kbase js libs into a single one, then folks saying that they custom select what they use. >>>> >>>> I think in any case, you could run the js libs through one of those js compressors, I forget what they are called, but you know, they take out whitespace, make the libs significantly smaller. >>>> >>>> Really though, I;m worse than a js000nb. What makes sense to you? >>>> >>>> We can always change our mind in the future, and make old libs available in the archives area of downloads. >>>> >>>> >>>> t >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Feb 21, 2013, at 8:31 PM, Shiran Pasternak <shiranpasternak(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I handle the JS client APIs, but can also distribute the python libraries as a package, which are being deployed alongside the JavaScript libraries. But isn't it misleading to only release the CDMI API as a standalone? >>>>> >>>>> Thoughts? >>>>> Shiran >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Feb 21, 2013, at 8:35 PM, Thomas Brettin <brettin(a)mcs.anl.gov> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> shiran maybe? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Feb 21, 2013, at 7:34 PM, Nomi Harris <nlharris(a)lbl.gov> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Is someone planning to update these today or tomorrow? >>>>>>> <Screen Shot 2013-02-21 at 5.33.08 PM.png> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> Nomi >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Release-team mailing list >>>>>>> Release-team(a)lists.kbase.us >>>>>>> https://lists.kbase.us/mailman/listinfo/release-team >>>>>> >>>>>> Thomas Brettin >>>>>> 865-603-7760 (cell) >>>>>> brettin(a)mcs.anl.gov >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Release-team mailing list >>>>>> Release-team(a)lists.kbase.us >>>>>> https://lists.kbase.us/mailman/listinfo/release-team >>>>> >>>> >>>> Thomas Brettin >>>> 865-603-7760 (cell) >>>> brettin(a)mcs.anl.gov >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> > > Thomas Brettin > 865-603-7760 (cell) > brettin(a)mcs.anl.gov > > >

1 0

Re: [Release-team] CDMI Client Libraries on Downloads page
by Thomas Brettin 21 Feb '13

21 Feb '13

hey shiran, the preamble looks good, thanks. t On Feb 21, 2013, at 10:22 PM, Shiran Pasternak <shiranpasternak(a)gmail.com> wrote: > By the way, I created yet another sheet in the KBase Services spreadsheet. It actually uses formulas to remove human (Shiran) error by tapping into both the Master sheet (for modules that are services and not internal) and the Feb 4 build for their pass status. The list I included in my last email to kbase-devel is straight out of there. Anything I missed (or should not include)? > > Shiran > > On Feb 21, 2013, at 9:46 PM, Shiran Pasternak <shiranpasternak(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> Yes, I have a process that does that compression/uglification/minification (I use UglifyJS). >> >> I think that folks that want to use their own custom one can build it themselves using their desired set of services. Usually, JS libraries are distributed in both forms, so that the unminified version can be used for debugging. We'd call it kbase.js and kbase.min.js. What do you think? >> >> For both, I include a preamble at the top that looks like this: >> >> /** >> * The KBase API >> * http://kbase.us >> * >> * API documentation: http://kbase.us/developer-zone/api-documentation/ >> * @license Copyright (c) 2013, The DOE Systems Biology Knowledgebase Project >> */ >> >> Shiran >> >> On Feb 21, 2013, at 9:36 PM, Thomas Brettin <brettin(a)mcs.anl.gov> wrote: >> >>> Not sure. I thought I saw some talk that looked like concatenating all kbase js libs into a single one, then folks saying that they custom select what they use. >>> >>> I think in any case, you could run the js libs through one of those js compressors, I forget what they are called, but you know, they take out whitespace, make the libs significantly smaller. >>> >>> Really though, I;m worse than a js000nb. What makes sense to you? >>> >>> We can always change our mind in the future, and make old libs available in the archives area of downloads. >>> >>> >>> t >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Feb 21, 2013, at 8:31 PM, Shiran Pasternak <shiranpasternak(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> I handle the JS client APIs, but can also distribute the python libraries as a package, which are being deployed alongside the JavaScript libraries. But isn't it misleading to only release the CDMI API as a standalone? >>>> >>>> Thoughts? >>>> Shiran >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Feb 21, 2013, at 8:35 PM, Thomas Brettin <brettin(a)mcs.anl.gov> wrote: >>>> >>>>> shiran maybe? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Feb 21, 2013, at 7:34 PM, Nomi Harris <nlharris(a)lbl.gov> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Is someone planning to update these today or tomorrow? >>>>>> <Screen Shot 2013-02-21 at 5.33.08 PM.png> >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Nomi >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Release-team mailing list >>>>>> Release-team(a)lists.kbase.us >>>>>> https://lists.kbase.us/mailman/listinfo/release-team >>>>> >>>>> Thomas Brettin >>>>> 865-603-7760 (cell) >>>>> brettin(a)mcs.anl.gov >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Release-team mailing list >>>>> Release-team(a)lists.kbase.us >>>>> https://lists.kbase.us/mailman/listinfo/release-team >>>> >>> >>> Thomas Brettin >>> 865-603-7760 (cell) >>> brettin(a)mcs.anl.gov >>> >>> >>> >> > Thomas Brettin 865-603-7760 (cell) brettin(a)mcs.anl.gov

1 0

Re: [Release-team] CDMI Client Libraries on Downloads page
by Shiran Pasternak 21 Feb '13

21 Feb '13

By the way, I created yet another sheet in the KBase Services spreadsheet. It actually uses formulas to remove human (Shiran) error by tapping into both the Master sheet (for modules that are services and not internal) and the Feb 4 build for their pass status. The list I included in my last email to kbase-devel is straight out of there. Anything I missed (or should not include)? Shiran On Feb 21, 2013, at 9:46 PM, Shiran Pasternak <shiranpasternak(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Yes, I have a process that does that compression/uglification/minification (I use UglifyJS). > > I think that folks that want to use their own custom one can build it themselves using their desired set of services. Usually, JS libraries are distributed in both forms, so that the unminified version can be used for debugging. We'd call it kbase.js and kbase.min.js. What do you think? > > For both, I include a preamble at the top that looks like this: > > /** > * The KBase API > * http://kbase.us > * > * API documentation: http://kbase.us/developer-zone/api-documentation/ > * @license Copyright (c) 2013, The DOE Systems Biology Knowledgebase Project > */ > > Shiran > > On Feb 21, 2013, at 9:36 PM, Thomas Brettin <brettin(a)mcs.anl.gov> wrote: > >> Not sure. I thought I saw some talk that looked like concatenating all kbase js libs into a single one, then folks saying that they custom select what they use. >> >> I think in any case, you could run the js libs through one of those js compressors, I forget what they are called, but you know, they take out whitespace, make the libs significantly smaller. >> >> Really though, I;m worse than a js000nb. What makes sense to you? >> >> We can always change our mind in the future, and make old libs available in the archives area of downloads. >> >> >> t >> >> >> >> >> On Feb 21, 2013, at 8:31 PM, Shiran Pasternak <shiranpasternak(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I handle the JS client APIs, but can also distribute the python libraries as a package, which are being deployed alongside the JavaScript libraries. But isn't it misleading to only release the CDMI API as a standalone? >>> >>> Thoughts? >>> Shiran >>> >>> >>> >>> On Feb 21, 2013, at 8:35 PM, Thomas Brettin <brettin(a)mcs.anl.gov> wrote: >>> >>>> shiran maybe? >>>> >>>> >>>> On Feb 21, 2013, at 7:34 PM, Nomi Harris <nlharris(a)lbl.gov> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Is someone planning to update these today or tomorrow? >>>>> <Screen Shot 2013-02-21 at 5.33.08 PM.png> >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Nomi >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Release-team mailing list >>>>> Release-team(a)lists.kbase.us >>>>> https://lists.kbase.us/mailman/listinfo/release-team >>>> >>>> Thomas Brettin >>>> 865-603-7760 (cell) >>>> brettin(a)mcs.anl.gov >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Release-team mailing list >>>> Release-team(a)lists.kbase.us >>>> https://lists.kbase.us/mailman/listinfo/release-team >>> >> >> Thomas Brettin >> 865-603-7760 (cell) >> brettin(a)mcs.anl.gov >> >> >> >

1 0

Re: [Release-team] CDMI Client Libraries on Downloads page
by Shiran Pasternak 21 Feb '13

21 Feb '13

Yes, I have a process that does that compression/uglification/minification (I use UglifyJS). I think that folks that want to use their own custom one can build it themselves using their desired set of services. Usually, JS libraries are distributed in both forms, so that the unminified version can be used for debugging. We'd call it kbase.js and kbase.min.js. What do you think? For both, I include a preamble at the top that looks like this: /** * The KBase API * http://kbase.us * * API documentation: http://kbase.us/developer-zone/api-documentation/ * @license Copyright (c) 2013, The DOE Systems Biology Knowledgebase Project */ Shiran On Feb 21, 2013, at 9:36 PM, Thomas Brettin <brettin(a)mcs.anl.gov> wrote: > Not sure. I thought I saw some talk that looked like concatenating all kbase js libs into a single one, then folks saying that they custom select what they use. > > I think in any case, you could run the js libs through one of those js compressors, I forget what they are called, but you know, they take out whitespace, make the libs significantly smaller. > > Really though, I;m worse than a js000nb. What makes sense to you? > > We can always change our mind in the future, and make old libs available in the archives area of downloads. > > > t > > > > > On Feb 21, 2013, at 8:31 PM, Shiran Pasternak <shiranpasternak(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> I handle the JS client APIs, but can also distribute the python libraries as a package, which are being deployed alongside the JavaScript libraries. But isn't it misleading to only release the CDMI API as a standalone? >> >> Thoughts? >> Shiran >> >> >> >> On Feb 21, 2013, at 8:35 PM, Thomas Brettin <brettin(a)mcs.anl.gov> wrote: >> >>> shiran maybe? >>> >>> >>> On Feb 21, 2013, at 7:34 PM, Nomi Harris <nlharris(a)lbl.gov> wrote: >>> >>>> Is someone planning to update these today or tomorrow? >>>> <Screen Shot 2013-02-21 at 5.33.08 PM.png> >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Nomi >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Release-team mailing list >>>> Release-team(a)lists.kbase.us >>>> https://lists.kbase.us/mailman/listinfo/release-team >>> >>> Thomas Brettin >>> 865-603-7760 (cell) >>> brettin(a)mcs.anl.gov >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Release-team mailing list >>> Release-team(a)lists.kbase.us >>> https://lists.kbase.us/mailman/listinfo/release-team >> > > Thomas Brettin > 865-603-7760 (cell) > brettin(a)mcs.anl.gov > > >

1 0

Re: [Release-team] CDMI Client Libraries on Downloads page
by Thomas Brettin 21 Feb '13

21 Feb '13

Not sure. I thought I saw some talk that looked like concatenating all kbase js libs into a single one, then folks saying that they custom select what they use. I think in any case, you could run the js libs through one of those js compressors, I forget what they are called, but you know, they take out whitespace, make the libs significantly smaller. Really though, I;m worse than a js000nb. What makes sense to you? We can always change our mind in the future, and make old libs available in the archives area of downloads. t On Feb 21, 2013, at 8:31 PM, Shiran Pasternak <shiranpasternak(a)gmail.com> wrote: > I handle the JS client APIs, but can also distribute the python libraries as a package, which are being deployed alongside the JavaScript libraries. But isn't it misleading to only release the CDMI API as a standalone? > > Thoughts? > Shiran > > > > On Feb 21, 2013, at 8:35 PM, Thomas Brettin <brettin(a)mcs.anl.gov> wrote: > >> shiran maybe? >> >> >> On Feb 21, 2013, at 7:34 PM, Nomi Harris <nlharris(a)lbl.gov> wrote: >> >>> Is someone planning to update these today or tomorrow? >>> <Screen Shot 2013-02-21 at 5.33.08 PM.png> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Nomi >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Release-team mailing list >>> Release-team(a)lists.kbase.us >>> https://lists.kbase.us/mailman/listinfo/release-team >> >> Thomas Brettin >> 865-603-7760 (cell) >> brettin(a)mcs.anl.gov >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Release-team mailing list >> Release-team(a)lists.kbase.us >> https://lists.kbase.us/mailman/listinfo/release-team > Thomas Brettin 865-603-7760 (cell) brettin(a)mcs.anl.gov

1 0

Re: [Release-team] CDMI Client Libraries on Downloads page
by Shiran Pasternak 21 Feb '13

21 Feb '13

I handle the JS client APIs, but can also distribute the python libraries as a package, which are being deployed alongside the JavaScript libraries. But isn't it misleading to only release the CDMI API as a standalone? Thoughts? Shiran On Feb 21, 2013, at 8:35 PM, Thomas Brettin <brettin(a)mcs.anl.gov> wrote: > shiran maybe? > > > On Feb 21, 2013, at 7:34 PM, Nomi Harris <nlharris(a)lbl.gov> wrote: > >> Is someone planning to update these today or tomorrow? >> <Screen Shot 2013-02-21 at 5.33.08 PM.png> >> >> Thanks, >> Nomi >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Release-team mailing list >> Release-team(a)lists.kbase.us >> https://lists.kbase.us/mailman/listinfo/release-team > > Thomas Brettin > 865-603-7760 (cell) > brettin(a)mcs.anl.gov > > > > _______________________________________________ > Release-team mailing list > Release-team(a)lists.kbase.us > https://lists.kbase.us/mailman/listinfo/release-team

1 0

Re: [Release-team] CDMI Client Libraries on Downloads page
by Thomas Brettin 21 Feb '13

21 Feb '13

shiran maybe? On Feb 21, 2013, at 7:34 PM, Nomi Harris <nlharris(a)lbl.gov> wrote: > Is someone planning to update these today or tomorrow? > <Screen Shot 2013-02-21 at 5.33.08 PM.png> > > Thanks, > Nomi > > _______________________________________________ > Release-team mailing list > Release-team(a)lists.kbase.us > https://lists.kbase.us/mailman/listinfo/release-team Thomas Brettin 865-603-7760 (cell) brettin(a)mcs.anl.gov

1 0