- mpiwg-sessions - mailman3.cels.anl.gov

Sessions WG - meet today
by Pritchard Jr., Howard 11 Oct '21

11 Oct '21

Hi All, Let’s meet today. Agenda items so far: * Continue with dynamic process set discussions https://miro.com/app/board/o9J_l_Rxe9Q=/ * Scheduling joint FT/Sessions WGs * MPI T WG follow-up * Any followup on https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-standard/pull/629 . I’ve not updated this since our discussion last week. Thanks, Howard — [signature_61897647] Howard Pritchard Research Scientist HPC-ENV Los Alamos National Laboratory howardp(a)lanl.gov [signature_1976438395]<https://www.instagram.com/losalamosnatlab/>[signature_2101209692]<https://twitter.com/LosAlamosNatLab>[signature_1340983813]<https://www.linkedin.com/company/los-alamos-national-laboratory/>[signature_408096122]<https://www.facebook.com/LosAlamosNationalLab/>

1 0

Sessions WG - meet today
by Pritchard Jr., Howard 04 Oct '21

04 Oct '21

HI All, Sorry for the short notice. We’ll meet today. Items to discuss: * Quick check on PR https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-standard/pull/629 * Continue with dynamic process set discussions https://miro.com/app/board/o9J_l_Rxe9Q=/ Howard — [signature_61897647] Howard Pritchard Research Scientist HPC-ENV Los Alamos National Laboratory howardp(a)lanl.gov [signature_252885794]<https://www.instagram.com/losalamosnatlab/>[signature_29161697]<https://twitter.com/LosAlamosNatLab>[signature_1749439255]<https://www.linkedin.com/company/los-alamos-national-laboratory/>[signature_1580863228]<https://www.facebook.com/LosAlamosNationalLab/>

1 0

Running a bit late - 5 minutes (EOM)
by Pritchard Jr., Howard 27 Sep '21

27 Sep '21

— [signature_61897647] Howard Pritchard Research Scientist HPC-ENV Los Alamos National Laboratory howardp(a)lanl.gov [signature_2109681759]<https://www.instagram.com/losalamosnatlab/>[signature_104855017]<https://twitter.com/LosAlamosNatLab>[signature_945937568]<https://www.linkedin.com/company/los-alamos-national-laboratory/>[signature_1154017685]<https://www.facebook.com/LosAlamosNationalLab/>

1 0

Re: [mpiwg-sessions] FTWG & Sessions WG Joint Discussions
by Wesley Bland 27 Sep '21

27 Sep '21

Hi all, I want to remind folks to please reply to this email with your preferences. Right now, I have an even split of 1s (Sessions folks) and 2s (FT folks). Logistically, it would probably be simpler to do 1 so we don’t have to shuffle between topics, so that would be my preference, but please indicate your's by replying. I’ll work with the WG leaders on Wednesday to set up whatever we pick. Thanks, Wes > On Sep 20, 2021, at 12:12 PM, Wesley Bland <work(a)wesbland.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > In the recent plenary discussion in the MPI Forum about future fault tolerance proposals, it became clear that our two working groups needed to coordinate some of our work to avoid duplication and promote interoperability. In the FTWG today, we discussed this a little more with Dan “representing” the Sessions WG. At this point, it probably makes sense to try to find a few times over the next few months where we can all meet together to cover topics that our two groups are exploring. I think we have three options to do this: > > 1. The FTWG meets every other week. On weeks where the FTWG isn’t meeting anyway, we could have a joint meeting during the Sessions WG time slot (12pm US Central I think). The FTWG met this week so this would theoretically start next week (or two weeks after that). > > 2. Merge the meeting time slots and share the middle hour. The FTWG meets in the hour before the Sessions WG. So we could have the middle hour (11:30am - 12:30pm US Central time) be common time every other week to discuss common items while leaving time for the two WGs during their normal time slots. This would involve some Zoom link merging, but we could figure that out. > > 3. Pick a completely different time to meet in addition to our existing WG times. > > So as an action item for each person who is interested in participating here are two things to do: > > a. Indicate your availability for a meeting on this doodle poll: https://doodle.com/poll/2wztvc68b8gw6e7m?utm_source=poll&utm_medium=link <https://doodle.com/poll/2wztvc68b8gw6e7m?utm_source=poll&utm_medium=link>. While the poll is anchored to this week, the times are for a recurring meeting every other week, so ignore any one-off conflicts you have this week. > > b. Pick your preference between 1, 2, and 3 above and respond to this email. If you’re not on both mailing lists, this will likely generate a bunch of bounces for you. Feel free to register for the list you’re not currently on to avoid that problem. You can also reply just to me, but you won’t impose your preferences on the rest of the group that way. :) > > Based on the responses, I’ll try to find a time that works best for the most people. > > Thanks, > Wes

1 0

Sessions WG - meet today
by Pritchard Jr., Howard 27 Sep '21

27 Sep '21

Hi All, We’ll meet today to pick up on where we left over a while ago with dynamic process set discussions, and discuss coordination with the FT working group. Howard — [signature_61897647] Howard Pritchard Research Scientist HPC-ENV Los Alamos National Laboratory howardp(a)lanl.gov [signature_764170054]<https://www.instagram.com/losalamosnatlab/>[signature_1575488158]<https://twitter.com/LosAlamosNatLab>[signature_1944054083]<https://www.linkedin.com/company/los-alamos-national-laboratory/>[signature_1613426247]<https://www.facebook.com/LosAlamosNationalLab/>

1 0

Re: [mpiwg-sessions] [EXTERNAL] Re: [mpiwg-ft] FTWG & Sessions WG Joint Discussions
by Aurelien Bouteiller 23 Sep '21

23 Sep '21

I prefer option 2 but can work with 1 as well, don’t like 3. Aurelien > On Sep 22, 2021, at 16:15, Pritchard Jr., Howard via mpiwg-sessions <mpiwg-sessions(a)lists.mpi-forum.org> wrote: > > HI Wesley > > Option 1 would work best for me, although 2 would be okay. > > Howard > > From: mpiwg-ft <mpiwg-ft-bounces(a)lists.mpi-forum.org> on behalf of Dan Holmes via mpiwg-ft <mpiwg-ft(a)lists.mpi-forum.org> > Reply-To: MPI WG Fault Tolerance and Dynamic Process Control working Group <mpiwg-ft(a)lists.mpi-forum.org> > Date: Wednesday, September 22, 2021 at 10:05 AM > To: Wesley Bland <work(a)wesbland.com> > Cc: Dan Holmes <danholmes(a)chi.scot>, MPI Forum Fault Tolerance Working Group <mpiwg-ft(a)lists.mpi-forum.org>, MPI Sessions working group <mpiwg-sessions(a)lists.mpi-forum.org> > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [mpiwg-ft] [mpiwg-sessions] FTWG & Sessions WG Joint Discussions > > Hi all, > > I prefer option 1 but could do option 2 instead. I don’t like option 3. > > Cheers, > Dan. > — > Dr Daniel Holmes PhD > Executive Director > Chief Technology Officer > CHI Ltd > danholmes(a)chi.scot > > > > >> On 20 Sep 2021, at 18:12, Wesley Bland via mpiwg-sessions <mpiwg-sessions(a)lists.mpi-forum.org> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> In the recent plenary discussion in the MPI Forum about future fault tolerance proposals, it became clear that our two working groups needed to coordinate some of our work to avoid duplication and promote interoperability. In the FTWG today, we discussed this a little more with Dan “representing” the Sessions WG. At this point, it probably makes sense to try to find a few times over the next few months where we can all meet together to cover topics that our two groups are exploring. I think we have three options to do this: >> >> 1. The FTWG meets every other week. On weeks where the FTWG isn’t meeting anyway, we could have a joint meeting during the Sessions WG time slot (12pm US Central I think). The FTWG met this week so this would theoretically start next week (or two weeks after that). >> >> 2. Merge the meeting time slots and share the middle hour. The FTWG meets in the hour before the Sessions WG. So we could have the middle hour (11:30am - 12:30pm US Central time) be common time every other week to discuss common items while leaving time for the two WGs during their normal time slots. This would involve some Zoom link merging, but we could figure that out. >> >> 3. Pick a completely different time to meet in addition to our existing WG times. >> >> So as an action item for each person who is interested in participating here are two things to do: >> >> a. Indicate your availability for a meeting on this doodle poll: https://doodle.com/poll/2wztvc68b8gw6e7m?utm_source=poll&utm_medium=link. While the poll is anchored to this week, the times are for a recurring meeting every other week, so ignore any one-off conflicts you have this week. >> >> b. Pick your preference between 1, 2, and 3 above and respond to this email. If you’re not on both mailing lists, this will likely generate a bunch of bounces for you. Feel free to register for the list you’re not currently on to avoid that problem. You can also reply just to me, but you won’t impose your preferences on the rest of the group that way. :) >> >> Based on the responses, I’ll try to find a time that works best for the most people. >> >> Thanks, >> Wes >> _______________________________________________ >> mpiwg-sessions mailing list >> mpiwg-sessions(a)lists.mpi-forum.org >> https://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/mpiwg-sessions > > _______________________________________________ > mpiwg-sessions mailing list > mpiwg-sessions(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > https://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/mpiwg-sessions

1 0

Re: [mpiwg-sessions] [EXTERNAL] Re: [mpiwg-ft] FTWG & Sessions WG Joint Discussions
by Pritchard Jr., Howard 22 Sep '21

22 Sep '21

HI Wesley Option 1 would work best for me, although 2 would be okay. Howard From: mpiwg-ft <mpiwg-ft-bounces(a)lists.mpi-forum.org> on behalf of Dan Holmes via mpiwg-ft <mpiwg-ft(a)lists.mpi-forum.org> Reply-To: MPI WG Fault Tolerance and Dynamic Process Control working Group <mpiwg-ft(a)lists.mpi-forum.org> Date: Wednesday, September 22, 2021 at 10:05 AM To: Wesley Bland <work(a)wesbland.com> Cc: Dan Holmes <danholmes(a)chi.scot>, MPI Forum Fault Tolerance Working Group <mpiwg-ft(a)lists.mpi-forum.org>, MPI Sessions working group <mpiwg-sessions(a)lists.mpi-forum.org> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [mpiwg-ft] [mpiwg-sessions] FTWG & Sessions WG Joint Discussions Hi all, I prefer option 1 but could do option 2 instead. I don’t like option 3. Cheers, Dan. — Dr Daniel Holmes PhD Executive Director Chief Technology Officer CHI Ltd danholmes(a)chi.scot<mailto:[email protected]> On 20 Sep 2021, at 18:12, Wesley Bland via mpiwg-sessions <mpiwg-sessions(a)lists.mpi-forum.org<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi all, In the recent plenary discussion in the MPI Forum about future fault tolerance proposals, it became clear that our two working groups needed to coordinate some of our work to avoid duplication and promote interoperability. In the FTWG today, we discussed this a little more with Dan “representing” the Sessions WG. At this point, it probably makes sense to try to find a few times over the next few months where we can all meet together to cover topics that our two groups are exploring. I think we have three options to do this: 1. The FTWG meets every other week. On weeks where the FTWG isn’t meeting anyway, we could have a joint meeting during the Sessions WG time slot (12pm US Central I think). The FTWG met this week so this would theoretically start next week (or two weeks after that). 2. Merge the meeting time slots and share the middle hour. The FTWG meets in the hour before the Sessions WG. So we could have the middle hour (11:30am - 12:30pm US Central time) be common time every other week to discuss common items while leaving time for the two WGs during their normal time slots. This would involve some Zoom link merging, but we could figure that out. 3. Pick a completely different time to meet in addition to our existing WG times. So as an action item for each person who is interested in participating here are two things to do: a. Indicate your availability for a meeting on this doodle poll: https://doodle.com/poll/2wztvc68b8gw6e7m?utm_source=poll&utm_medium=link. While the poll is anchored to this week, the times are for a recurring meeting every other week, so ignore any one-off conflicts you have this week. b. Pick your preference between 1, 2, and 3 above and respond to this email. If you’re not on both mailing lists, this will likely generate a bunch of bounces for you. Feel free to register for the list you’re not currently on to avoid that problem. You can also reply just to me, but you won’t impose your preferences on the rest of the group that way. :) Based on the responses, I’ll try to find a time that works best for the most people. Thanks, Wes _______________________________________________ mpiwg-sessions mailing list mpiwg-sessions(a)lists.mpi-forum.org<mailto:[email protected]> https://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/mpiwg-sessions

1 0

Re: [mpiwg-sessions] FTWG & Sessions WG Joint Discussions
by Dan Holmes 22 Sep '21

22 Sep '21

Hi all, I prefer option 1 but could do option 2 instead. I don’t like option 3. Cheers, Dan. — Dr Daniel Holmes PhD Executive Director Chief Technology Officer CHI Ltd danholmes(a)chi.scot > On 20 Sep 2021, at 18:12, Wesley Bland via mpiwg-sessions <mpiwg-sessions(a)lists.mpi-forum.org> wrote: > > Hi all, > > In the recent plenary discussion in the MPI Forum about future fault tolerance proposals, it became clear that our two working groups needed to coordinate some of our work to avoid duplication and promote interoperability. In the FTWG today, we discussed this a little more with Dan “representing” the Sessions WG. At this point, it probably makes sense to try to find a few times over the next few months where we can all meet together to cover topics that our two groups are exploring. I think we have three options to do this: > > 1. The FTWG meets every other week. On weeks where the FTWG isn’t meeting anyway, we could have a joint meeting during the Sessions WG time slot (12pm US Central I think). The FTWG met this week so this would theoretically start next week (or two weeks after that). > > 2. Merge the meeting time slots and share the middle hour. The FTWG meets in the hour before the Sessions WG. So we could have the middle hour (11:30am - 12:30pm US Central time) be common time every other week to discuss common items while leaving time for the two WGs during their normal time slots. This would involve some Zoom link merging, but we could figure that out. > > 3. Pick a completely different time to meet in addition to our existing WG times. > > So as an action item for each person who is interested in participating here are two things to do: > > a. Indicate your availability for a meeting on this doodle poll: https://doodle.com/poll/2wztvc68b8gw6e7m?utm_source=poll&utm_medium=link <https://doodle.com/poll/2wztvc68b8gw6e7m?utm_source=poll&utm_medium=link>. While the poll is anchored to this week, the times are for a recurring meeting every other week, so ignore any one-off conflicts you have this week. > > b. Pick your preference between 1, 2, and 3 above and respond to this email. If you’re not on both mailing lists, this will likely generate a bunch of bounces for you. Feel free to register for the list you’re not currently on to avoid that problem. You can also reply just to me, but you won’t impose your preferences on the rest of the group that way. :) > > Based on the responses, I’ll try to find a time that works best for the most people. > > Thanks, > Wes > _______________________________________________ > mpiwg-sessions mailing list > mpiwg-sessions(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > https://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/mpiwg-sessions

1 0

FTWG & Sessions WG Joint Discussions
by Wesley Bland 20 Sep '21

20 Sep '21

Hi all, In the recent plenary discussion in the MPI Forum about future fault tolerance proposals, it became clear that our two working groups needed to coordinate some of our work to avoid duplication and promote interoperability. In the FTWG today, we discussed this a little more with Dan “representing” the Sessions WG. At this point, it probably makes sense to try to find a few times over the next few months where we can all meet together to cover topics that our two groups are exploring. I think we have three options to do this: 1. The FTWG meets every other week. On weeks where the FTWG isn’t meeting anyway, we could have a joint meeting during the Sessions WG time slot (12pm US Central I think). The FTWG met this week so this would theoretically start next week (or two weeks after that). 2. Merge the meeting time slots and share the middle hour. The FTWG meets in the hour before the Sessions WG. So we could have the middle hour (11:30am - 12:30pm US Central time) be common time every other week to discuss common items while leaving time for the two WGs during their normal time slots. This would involve some Zoom link merging, but we could figure that out. 3. Pick a completely different time to meet in addition to our existing WG times. So as an action item for each person who is interested in participating here are two things to do: a. Indicate your availability for a meeting on this doodle poll: https://doodle.com/poll/2wztvc68b8gw6e7m?utm_source=poll&utm_medium=link <https://doodle.com/poll/2wztvc68b8gw6e7m?utm_source=poll&utm_medium=link>. While the poll is anchored to this week, the times are for a recurring meeting every other week, so ignore any one-off conflicts you have this week. b. Pick your preference between 1, 2, and 3 above and respond to this email. If you’re not on both mailing lists, this will likely generate a bunch of bounces for you. Feel free to register for the list you’re not currently on to avoid that problem. You can also reply just to me, but you won’t impose your preferences on the rest of the group that way. :) Based on the responses, I’ll try to find a time that works best for the most people. Thanks, Wes

1 0

Meet today
by Pritchard Jr., Howard 20 Sep '21

20 Sep '21

Hi All, Let’s meet today. I’d like to discuss outcome of the September MPI Forum and continue where we were with sessions round 2. Thanks, Howard — [signature_61897647] Howard Pritchard Research Scientist HPC-ENV Los Alamos National Laboratory howardp(a)lanl.gov [signature_1997368385]<https://www.instagram.com/losalamosnatlab/>[signature_1606677857]<https://twitter.com/LosAlamosNatLab>[signature_1860537118]<https://www.linkedin.com/company/los-alamos-national-laboratory/>[signature_782307095]<https://www.facebook.com/LosAlamosNationalLab/>

1 0