Hi all, We could (should?) debate the MPI_COMM_COMPARE and MPI_GROUP_COMPARE issue for the MPI Endpoints proposal. A face-to-face debate of the various options/problems/suggestions would likely be much more efficient than the current email/teleconference approach. Cheers, Dan. On 27/02/2015 16:24, Jim Dinan wrote:
Apart from reviewing the endpoints proposal (which I still have not updated), I don't have anything for the WG.
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 7:46 PM, Balaji, Pavan <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Folks,
I had requested for some WG time at the Forum meeting, but it looks like we don't need it this time. Should I give up that time on Monday? Please let me know as soon as possible.
Regards,
-- Pavan
-- Pavan Balaji ✉️ http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji <http://www.mcs.anl.gov/%7Ebalaji>
_______________________________________________ mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm
_______________________________________________ mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm
-- Dan Holmes Applications Consultant in HPC Research EPCC, The University of Edinburgh James Clerk Maxwell Building The Kings Buildings Peter Guthrie Tait Road Edinburgh EH9 3FD T: +44(0)131 651 3465 E: [email protected] *Please consider the environment before printing this email.* The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in Scotland, with registration number SC005336.