Hi all,

We could (should?) debate the MPI_COMM_COMPARE and MPI_GROUP_COMPARE issue for the MPI Endpoints proposal. A face-to-face debate of the various options/problems/suggestions would likely be much more efficient than the current email/teleconference approach.

Cheers,
Dan.

On 27/02/2015 16:24, Jim Dinan wrote:

Apart from reviewing the endpoints proposal (which I still have not updated), I don't have anything for the WG.

On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 7:46 PM, Balaji, Pavan <balaji@anl.gov> wrote:

Folks,

I had requested for some WG time at the Forum meeting, but it looks like we don't need it this time. Should I give up that time on Monday? Please let me know as soon as possible.

Regards,

-- Pavan

--
Pavan Balaji ✉️
http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji

_______________________________________________
mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list
mpiwg-hybridpm@lists.mpi-forum.org
http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm
_______________________________________________
mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list
mpiwg-hybridpm@lists.mpi-forum.org
http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm

-- 
Dan Holmes
Applications Consultant in HPC Research
EPCC, The University of Edinburgh
James Clerk Maxwell Building
The Kings Buildings
Peter Guthrie Tait Road 
Edinburgh
EH9 3FD
T: +44(0)131 651 3465
E: dholmes@epcc.ed.ac.uk

*Please consider the environment before printing this email.*