- mpiwg-ft - mailman3.cels.anl.gov

[Mpi3-ft] Piggybacking Proposal
by Greg Bronevetsky 21 Feb '08

21 Feb '08

I've up just uploaded the initial proposal for Point-to-Point Piggybacking to the wiki. Give it a look. Greg Bronevetsky Post-Doctoral Researcher 1028 Building 451 Lawrence Livermore National Lab (925) 424-5756 bronevetsky1(a)llnl.gov

1 0

[Mpi3-ft] Transactional Messages
by Greg Bronevetsky 21 Feb '08

21 Feb '08

At 04:35 PM 2/19/2008, Josh Hursey wrote: >They are available on the Wiki at the link below: > http://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/wiki/Meeting-15-Feb-2008 I've up just written up and uploaded the initial proposal for Transactional Messages. Give it a look. BTW, I don't know how to use this Wiki, so I've just uploaded my .txt file as a page attachment. If there's a cleaner way to do this, someone please let me know. Greg Bronevetsky Post-Doctoral Researcher 1028 Building 451 Lawrence Livermore National Lab (925) 424-5756 bronevetsky1(a)llnl.gov

1 0

[Mpi3-ft] test
by Richard Graham 21 Feb '08

21 Feb '08

1 0

[Mpi3-ft] Notes from 15 Feb. 2008 Meeting
by Josh Hursey 19 Feb '08

19 Feb '08

They are available on the Wiki at the link below: http://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/wiki/Meeting-15-Feb-2008 -- Josh

1 0

Re: [Mpi3-ft] Proposal formats
by Supalov, Alexander 15 Feb '08

15 Feb '08

Hi, I'd suggest to upload this text into Wiki and make a template out of it. Best regards. Alexander -----Original Message----- From: mpi3-ft-bounces(a)lists.mpi-forum.org [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Richard Graham Sent: Friday, February 15, 2008 8:39 PM To: mpi3-ft(a)lists.mpi-forum.org Subject: [Mpi3-ft] Proposal formats Here is a suggestion for proposal format: ï¿½ï¿½ - An executive summary ï¿½ï¿½ - A detailed proposal which should include ï¿½ï¿½ ï¿½ ï¿½ - The problem being addressed - The approach being proposed ï¿½ï¿½ ï¿½ ï¿½ - Pro's (why this and not another approach) ï¿½ï¿½ ï¿½ ï¿½ - Con's (what are the issues that come up with this approach) - How does this impact other aspects of the standard - Semantics ï¿½ï¿½ ï¿½ ï¿½ - Can this same functionality be obtained within the current ï¿½ï¿½ ï¿½ ï¿½ ï¿½ ï¿½ standard, but maybe in a less convenient manner - Specific API proposal ** this would be a good point for input from others, before a lot of time is spent on implementation. ** ï¿½ï¿½ ï¿½ ï¿½ - Discussion of the prototyping work - pointer to buildable source for the implementation Any suggestions on how to improve this ? Rich _______________________________________________ Mpi3-ft mailing list Mpi3-ft(a)lists.mpi-forum.org http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi3-ft --------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel GmbH Dornacher Strasse 1 85622 Feldkirchen/Muenchen Germany Sitz der Gesellschaft: Feldkirchen bei Muenchen Geschaeftsfuehrer: Douglas Lusk, Peter Gleissner, Hannes Schwaderer Registergericht: Muenchen HRB 47456 Ust.-IdNr. VAT Registration No.: DE129385895 Citibank Frankfurt (BLZ 502 109 00) 600119052 This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

1 0

[Mpi3-ft] Proposal formats
by Richard Graham 15 Feb '08

15 Feb '08

Here is a suggestion for proposal format: ï¿½ï¿½ - An executive summary ï¿½ï¿½ - A detailed proposal which should include ï¿½ï¿½ ï¿½ ï¿½ - The problem being addressed - The approach being proposed ï¿½ï¿½ ï¿½ ï¿½ - Pro's (why this and not another approach) ï¿½ï¿½ ï¿½ ï¿½ - Con's (what are the issues that come up with this approach) - How does this impact other aspects of the standard - Semantics ï¿½ï¿½ ï¿½ ï¿½ - Can this same functionality be obtained within the current ï¿½ï¿½ ï¿½ ï¿½ ï¿½ ï¿½ standard, but maybe in a less convenient manner - Specific API proposal ** this would be a good point for input from others, before a lot of time is spent on implementation. ** ï¿½ï¿½ ï¿½ ï¿½ - Discussion of the prototyping work - pointer to buildable source for the implementation Any suggestions on how to improve this ? Rich

1 0

[Mpi3-ft] Next con-call
by Richard Graham 12 Feb '08

12 Feb '08

This is just a reminder that we have a call scheduled this coming Friday, 2/15/2008. Call details are posted at https://meetings.mpi-forum.org/MPI3.0_ft_main_page.html . Also, I took the notes that Josh posted on the web, pulled out the various "use-case" scenarios we discussed on the last call on a separate page. This is intended to start discussion on these topics - I have already added a few VERY brief comments to get a discussion started. Rich

1 0

[mpi3-ft] Notes from 1 Feb. 2008 Meeting
by Josh Hursey 04 Feb '08

04 Feb '08

They are available on the Wiki at the link below: http://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/wiki/Meeting-01-Feb-2008 -- Josh

1 0

[mpi3-ft] <no subject>
by Richard Graham 01 Feb '08

01 Feb '08

Josh, If you follow the links from meetings.mpi-forum.org through the ft working group you will find the link to the wiki page I mentioned on the call today. It is ready for use. Thanks, Rich

1 0

[mpi3-ft] FW: Telecon on 2/1/2008
by Richard Graham 31 Jan '08

31 Jan '08

Just a reminder. Rich ------ Forwarded Message From: Richard Graham <rlgraham(a)ornl.gov> Reply-To: Discussion of MPI 3 Fault Tolerance Support <mpi3-ft(a)cs.uiuc.edu> Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 12:24:12 -0500 To: Discussion of MPI 3 Fault Tolerance Support <mpi3-ft(a)cs.uiuc.edu> Conversation: [mpi3-ft] Telecon on 2/1/2008 Subject: Re: [mpi3-ft] Telecon on 2/1/2008 Forgot the call details: Toll free from within the US: 877-801-8130 Toll number: 1-203-692-8690 Code: 1044056 On 1/25/08 12:08 PM, "Richard Graham" <rlgraham(a)ornl.gov> wrote: > Looking at the times people are available for this telecon, looks like > Friday, 2/1/2008 from 12-2pm EST, 5-7pm GMT is the time that fits the most > people who responded, so lets go with this time. We will also stick to this > time slot on future calls, unless as a group we decide to change this. I > know this does not work for all, so my apologies up front. > > What I really want to cover on this call are the use case scenarios we want > to support, so we can have a target to shoot at. It you have some use cases > you would like to go over, please do your best to send these out to the list > by next wed, 1/30/2008, to give people time to look over these. > > Are there other items we need to discuss on this call ? > > Thanks, > Rich > > _______________________________________________ > mpi3-ft mailing list > mpi3-ft(a)cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/mpi3-ft _______________________________________________ mpi3-ft mailing list mpi3-ft(a)cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/mpi3-ft ------ End of Forwarded Message

1 0