December 2014 - mpiwg-fortran - mailman3.cels.anl.gov

PDF review for #441
by Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) 11 Dec '14

11 Dec '14

Per ticket #441 which was passed yesterday, I have text ready to commit once a few people can review the PDF I generated to ensure that I transcribed the solution from the ticket to the text properly. Please review the PDF attached to #441: https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/441 The new text is on page 626, lines 37-40. Please put your review on the ticket. Thanks! -- Jeff Squyres jsquyres(a)cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/

1 0

Deprecate MPI_SIZEOF
by Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) 11 Dec '14

11 Dec '14

Ticket created, proposed PDF attached: https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/465 -- Jeff Squyres jsquyres(a)cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/

1 0

Re: [MPIWG Fortran] Simple / quick errata PDF reviews
by Bill Long 08 Dec '14

08 Dec '14

Hi Jeff, Thanks for the PDF links. They all look OK. I updated the three tickets with approval of the PDF changes. Cheers, Bill On Dec 8, 2014, at 5:50 AM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) <jsquyres(a)cisco.com> wrote: > Bill -- > > The intent of the review is to ensure that I faithfully put the text from the ticket into the actual MPI 3.1 document. So if you wouldn't mind checking to ensure that I did it right, that would be great. > > I uploaded all 3 PDFs here, in case your email client is stripping the PDFs for some reason: > > http://www.open-mpi.org/~jsquyres/mpi-forum/ > > Thanks! > > > On Dec 8, 2014, at 12:33 AM, Bill Long <longb(a)cray.com> wrote: > >> >> On Dec 6, 2014, at 3:52 AM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) <jsquyres(a)cisco.com> wrote: >> >>> Now that the bulk of the Fortran errata text has been committed, there are two more open errata tickets regarding the language bindings chapter. Can you please review the PDF to ensure that I have applied them correctly? Both are short / easy to review: >>> >>> 1. Ticket 393: Fortran module CONTAINS - Advice to implementors (the "Bill Long" ticket) >>> >>> https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/393 >>> >>> Reader cache refresh: after much debate about CONTAINS, we resolved to add a simple AtoI that implies that you can implement the Fortran modules however you want, as long as the profiling rules are obeyed. >>> >>> *** PLEASE REVIEW: 1st attached PDF. The AtoI is added in the first PDF, on page 611, lines 27-30. >> >> My mail program says the attachment is an empty file. However, if the text is the same as in Comment 7 of the ticket, that’s fine with me. >> >> Cheers, >> Bill >> >> >>> >>> 2. Ticket 424: Incorrect Fortran type for flag in IMPROBE >>> >>> https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/424 >>> >>> Reader cache refresh: trivial errata -- change the "flag" dummy parameter from INTEGER to LOGICAL. >>> >>> *** PLEASE REVIEW: 2nd attached PDF. Page 68, lines 21 and 27-28. >>> >>> -- >>> Jeff Squyres >>> jsquyres(a)cisco.com >>> For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/ >>> <mpi31-report-ticket-393.pdf><mpi31-report-ticket-424.pdf>_______________________________________________ >>> mpiwg-fortran mailing list >>> mpiwg-fortran(a)lists.mpi-forum.org >>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-fortran >> >> Bill Long longb(a)cray.com >> Fortran Technical Suport & voice: 651-605-9024 >> Bioinformatics Software Development fax: 651-605-9142 >> Cray Inc./ Cray Plaza, Suite 210/ 380 Jackson St./ St. Paul, MN 55101 >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> mpiwg-fortran mailing list >> mpiwg-fortran(a)lists.mpi-forum.org >> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-fortran > > > -- > Jeff Squyres > jsquyres(a)cisco.com > For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/ > > _______________________________________________ > mpiwg-fortran mailing list > mpiwg-fortran(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-fortran Bill Long longb(a)cray.com Fortran Technical Suport & voice: 651-605-9024 Bioinformatics Software Development fax: 651-605-9142 Cray Inc./ Cray Plaza, Suite 210/ 380 Jackson St./ St. Paul, MN 55101

1 0

Re: [MPIWG Fortran] Oops: one more trivial errata PDF review
by Hubert Ritzdorf 08 Dec '14

08 Dec '14

I reviewed it and the ticket is correctly integrated. Hubert ________________________________________ From: mpiwg-fortran [mpiwg-fortran-bounces(a)lists.mpi-forum.org] on behalf of Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) [jsquyres(a)cisco.com] Sent: Saturday, December 06, 2014 3:00 PM To: MPI Fortran WG Subject: [MPIWG Fortran] Oops: one more trivial errata PDF review I missed that there is a 3rd trivial errata ticket to review: 3. Ticket 415: Errata: mpi_f08 MPI_Status must use INTEGER fields https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/415 Reader cache refresh: trivial clarification to ensure that TYPE(MPI_Status) has INTEGER public fields (without this clarification, implementors could have used INTEGER(C_INT), for example). *** PLEASE REVIEW: Page 30, line 24. -- Jeff Squyres jsquyres(a)cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/ Click https://www.mailcontrol.com/sr/RmeTlh+53a7WQxILzJ5p98vbwKNQcrHngaiIUx9XfgQ6… to report this email as spam.

1 0

Re: [MPIWG Fortran] Simple / quick errata PDF reviews
by Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) 08 Dec '14

08 Dec '14

Bill -- The intent of the review is to ensure that I faithfully put the text from the ticket into the actual MPI 3.1 document. So if you wouldn't mind checking to ensure that I did it right, that would be great. I uploaded all 3 PDFs here, in case your email client is stripping the PDFs for some reason: http://www.open-mpi.org/~jsquyres/mpi-forum/ Thanks! On Dec 8, 2014, at 12:33 AM, Bill Long <longb(a)cray.com> wrote: > > On Dec 6, 2014, at 3:52 AM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) <jsquyres(a)cisco.com> wrote: > >> Now that the bulk of the Fortran errata text has been committed, there are two more open errata tickets regarding the language bindings chapter. Can you please review the PDF to ensure that I have applied them correctly? Both are short / easy to review: >> >> 1. Ticket 393: Fortran module CONTAINS - Advice to implementors (the "Bill Long" ticket) >> >> https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/393 >> >> Reader cache refresh: after much debate about CONTAINS, we resolved to add a simple AtoI that implies that you can implement the Fortran modules however you want, as long as the profiling rules are obeyed. >> >> *** PLEASE REVIEW: 1st attached PDF. The AtoI is added in the first PDF, on page 611, lines 27-30. > > My mail program says the attachment is an empty file. However, if the text is the same as in Comment 7 of the ticket, that’s fine with me. > > Cheers, > Bill > > >> >> 2. Ticket 424: Incorrect Fortran type for flag in IMPROBE >> >> https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/424 >> >> Reader cache refresh: trivial errata -- change the "flag" dummy parameter from INTEGER to LOGICAL. >> >> *** PLEASE REVIEW: 2nd attached PDF. Page 68, lines 21 and 27-28. >> >> -- >> Jeff Squyres >> jsquyres(a)cisco.com >> For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/ >> <mpi31-report-ticket-393.pdf><mpi31-report-ticket-424.pdf>_______________________________________________ >> mpiwg-fortran mailing list >> mpiwg-fortran(a)lists.mpi-forum.org >> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-fortran > > Bill Long longb(a)cray.com > Fortran Technical Suport & voice: 651-605-9024 > Bioinformatics Software Development fax: 651-605-9142 > Cray Inc./ Cray Plaza, Suite 210/ 380 Jackson St./ St. Paul, MN 55101 > > > _______________________________________________ > mpiwg-fortran mailing list > mpiwg-fortran(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-fortran -- Jeff Squyres jsquyres(a)cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/

1 0

Re: [MPIWG Fortran] Simple / quick errata PDF reviews
by Bill Long 08 Dec '14

08 Dec '14

On Dec 6, 2014, at 3:52 AM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) <jsquyres(a)cisco.com> wrote: > Now that the bulk of the Fortran errata text has been committed, there are two more open errata tickets regarding the language bindings chapter. Can you please review the PDF to ensure that I have applied them correctly? Both are short / easy to review: > > 1. Ticket 393: Fortran module CONTAINS - Advice to implementors (the "Bill Long" ticket) > > https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/393 > > Reader cache refresh: after much debate about CONTAINS, we resolved to add a simple AtoI that implies that you can implement the Fortran modules however you want, as long as the profiling rules are obeyed. > > *** PLEASE REVIEW: 1st attached PDF. The AtoI is added in the first PDF, on page 611, lines 27-30. My mail program says the attachment is an empty file. However, if the text is the same as in Comment 7 of the ticket, that’s fine with me. Cheers, Bill > > 2. Ticket 424: Incorrect Fortran type for flag in IMPROBE > > https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/424 > > Reader cache refresh: trivial errata -- change the "flag" dummy parameter from INTEGER to LOGICAL. > > *** PLEASE REVIEW: 2nd attached PDF. Page 68, lines 21 and 27-28. > > -- > Jeff Squyres > jsquyres(a)cisco.com > For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/ > <mpi31-report-ticket-393.pdf><mpi31-report-ticket-424.pdf>_______________________________________________ > mpiwg-fortran mailing list > mpiwg-fortran(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-fortran Bill Long longb(a)cray.com Fortran Technical Suport & voice: 651-605-9024 Bioinformatics Software Development fax: 651-605-9142 Cray Inc./ Cray Plaza, Suite 210/ 380 Jackson St./ St. Paul, MN 55101

1 0

Ticket #456 - set of slides for the discussion in San Jose on #456 on shared memory synchronization
by Rolf Rabenseifner 07 Dec '14

07 Dec '14

> For ticket 456, the probability is small that it can be put into the > reading/voting process, but it should be mentioned in the agenda for that > case. Dear all, for the RMA WG discussion, I prepared a set of slides with the current status of background on #456 on shared memory synchronization. Best regards Rolf ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Rolf Rabenseifner" <rabenseifner(a)hlrs.de> > To: "Main MPI Forum mailing list" <mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org> > Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 12:46:48 PM > Subject: Re: [Mpi-forum] Don't forget to register > > Dear Martin, > > please take from the kobe Agenda all errata tickets > to the December agenda: ... > For ticket 456, the probability is small that it can be put into the > reading/voting process, but it should be mentioned in the agenda for that > case. > > Best regards > Rolf -- Dr. Rolf Rabenseifner . . . . . . . . . .. email rabenseifner(a)hlrs.de High Performance Computing Center (HLRS) . phone ++49(0)711/685-65530 University of Stuttgart . . . . . . . . .. fax ++49(0)711 / 685-65832 Head of Dpmt Parallel Computing . . . www.hlrs.de/people/rabenseifner Nobelstr. 19, D-70550 Stuttgart, Germany . . . . (Office: Room 1.307)

1 0

Re: [MPIWG Fortran] Agenda for meeting today (in ~10 mins)
by Malcolm Cohen 06 Dec '14

06 Dec '14

Hi folks, >3. Deprecate MPI_SIZEOF ... >Bill: implementation of storage_size() is pretty trivial >JeffH: there's also c_sizeof() (Bill says this is F03) Actually C_SIZEOF like STORAGE_SIZE was added in F2008; it does not appear in F2003. >Bill: c_sizeof() uses C rules -- e.g., you get size of total array, >etc. (returns answer in bytes, not bits). Yes, but it only works for "interoperable" objects... so not on Fortran derived types that do not have the BIND attribute. Some compilers might do C_SIZEOF on anything, but it is certainly not in the standard. So STORAGE_SIZE(thingo)/STORAGE_SIZE(byte) would seem to be the recommended formulation, multiplied by SIZE(thingo) if it is an array and you want the total size of the array. Cheers, -- ...........................Malcolm Cohen, NAG Oxford/Tokyo.

1 0

Re: [MPIWG Fortran] Oops: one more trivial errata PDF review
by Jeff Hammond 06 Dec '14

06 Dec '14

I reviewed this and see no issues. Jeff On Sat, Dec 6, 2014 at 6:00 AM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) <jsquyres(a)cisco.com> wrote: > I missed that there is a 3rd trivial errata ticket to review: > > 3. Ticket 415: Errata: mpi_f08 MPI_Status must use INTEGER fields > > https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/415 > > Reader cache refresh: trivial clarification to ensure that TYPE(MPI_Status) has INTEGER public fields (without this clarification, implementors could have used INTEGER(C_INT), for example). > > *** PLEASE REVIEW: Page 30, line 24. > > -- > Jeff Squyres > jsquyres(a)cisco.com > For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/ > > _______________________________________________ > mpiwg-fortran mailing list > mpiwg-fortran(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-fortran -- Jeff Hammond jeff.science(a)gmail.com http://jeffhammond.github.io/

1 0

Oops: one more trivial errata PDF review
by Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) 06 Dec '14

06 Dec '14

I missed that there is a 3rd trivial errata ticket to review: 3. Ticket 415: Errata: mpi_f08 MPI_Status must use INTEGER fields https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/415 Reader cache refresh: trivial clarification to ensure that TYPE(MPI_Status) has INTEGER public fields (without this clarification, implementors could have used INTEGER(C_INT), for example). *** PLEASE REVIEW: Page 30, line 24. -- Jeff Squyres jsquyres(a)cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/

1 0