- Mpi3-bwcompat - mailman3.cels.anl.gov

Re: [Mpi3-bwcompat] Meeting notes and Working Group Charter
by unknown＠example.com 06 Nov '09

06 Nov '09

Yes, we need to do that -- it's for presentation at the SC09 MPI Forum BOF. Each WG is supposed to have a short (1-3 slides?) description of what they're doing. On Nov 6, 2009, at 11:19 AM, Solt, David George wrote: > I put some notes on the wiki. Please feel free to edit: > > https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/wiki/BackCompatMeetings > > I also recall that two forum meetings ago the working groups were > asked to come up with a "summary statement?" I was not at the last > meeting. Does anyone know if we still need to do that? Maybe the > idea was less formal than I'm thinking and our planned presentation > is sufficient? > > Thanks, > Dave > > _______________________________________________ > Mpi3-bwcompat mailing list > Mpi3-bwcompat_at_[hidden] > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi3-bwcompat > -- Jeff Squyres jsquyres_at_[hidden]

1 0

Meeting notes and Working Group Charter
by unknown＠example.com 06 Nov '09

06 Nov '09

I put some notes on the wiki. Please feel free to edit: https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/wiki/BackCompatMeetings I also recall that two forum meetings ago the working groups were asked to come up with a "summary statement?" I was not at the last meeting. Does anyone know if we still need to do that? Maybe the idea was less formal than I'm thinking and our planned presentation is sufficient? Thanks, Dave

1 0

Re: [Mpi3-bwcompat] mpi3-bwcompat
by unknown＠example.com 06 Nov '09

06 Nov '09

LOL! Let's try that again without CC'ing the list this time... :-) Sorry folks! On Nov 6, 2009, at 10:32 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote: > DongInn -- > > Can you reset the password on the mailman list mpi3-bwcompat to > "backforward"? > > Thanks! > > -- > Jeff Squyres > jsquyres_at_[hidden] > -- Jeff Squyres jsquyres_at_[hidden]

1 0

mpi3-bwcompat
by unknown＠example.com 06 Nov '09

06 Nov '09

DongInn -- Can you reset the password on the mailman list mpi3-bwcompat to "backforward"? Thanks! -- Jeff Squyres jsquyres_at_[hidden]

1 0

Re: [Mpi3-bwcompat] Meet this friday?
by unknown＠example.com 04 Nov '09

04 Nov '09

Then we should probably have a teleconf this week. On Nov 4, 2009, at 11:01 AM, Solt, David George wrote: > I will be there, but I don't believe we have any time scheduled. > Dave > > -----Original Message----- > From: mpi3-bwcompat-bounces_at_[hidden] [mailto:mpi3-bwcompat-bounces_at_[hidden] > ] On Behalf Of Jeff Squyres > Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 2009 10:48 AM > To: mpi3-bwcompat_at_[hidden] > Subject: Re: [Mpi3-bwcompat] Meet this friday? > > On Nov 3, 2009, at 11:41 AM, Solt, David George wrote: > > > Since no one met last week, do we want to try a makeup meeting this > > week? > > Is anyone getting these e-mails? > > > > > Who's going to be in Portland next week -- did we get time on the > schedule for a bwcompat meeting? (I'll be there) > > -- > Jeff Squyres > jsquyres_at_[hidden] > > _______________________________________________ > Mpi3-bwcompat mailing list > Mpi3-bwcompat_at_[hidden] > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi3-bwcompat > > _______________________________________________ > Mpi3-bwcompat mailing list > Mpi3-bwcompat_at_[hidden] > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi3-bwcompat > -- Jeff Squyres jsquyres_at_[hidden]

1 0

Re: [Mpi3-bwcompat] Meet this friday?
by unknown＠example.com 04 Nov '09

04 Nov '09

I will be there, but I don't believe we have any time scheduled. Dave -----Original Message----- From: mpi3-bwcompat-bounces_at_[hidden] [mailto:mpi3-bwcompat-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Jeff Squyres Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 2009 10:48 AM To: mpi3-bwcompat_at_[hidden] Subject: Re: [Mpi3-bwcompat] Meet this friday? On Nov 3, 2009, at 11:41 AM, Solt, David George wrote: > Since no one met last week, do we want to try a makeup meeting this > week? > Is anyone getting these e-mails? > Who's going to be in Portland next week -- did we get time on the schedule for a bwcompat meeting? (I'll be there) -- Jeff Squyres jsquyres_at_[hidden] _______________________________________________ Mpi3-bwcompat mailing list Mpi3-bwcompat_at_[hidden] http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi3-bwcompat

1 0

Re: [Mpi3-bwcompat] Welcome to the backward compatibility mailing list
by unknown＠example.com 03 Nov '09

03 Nov '09

I was told that at least someone did not receive this message, so I am resending. You can also check http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mpi3-bwcompat/ Thanks, Dave -----Original Message----- From: mpi3-bwcompat-bounces_at_[hidden] [mailto:mpi3-bwcompat-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Solt, David George Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2009 1:21 PM To: mpi3-bwcompat_at_[hidden] Subject: [Mpi3-bwcompat] Welcome to the backward compatibility mailing list Welcome at last to the backward compatibility mailing list. We have had some difficulty getting this setup which is why you have not seen any traffic. I posted the meeting notes for the first three meetings on the Twiki at https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/wiki/BackCompatMeetings I added a column to the list of tickets on the Twiki at https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/wiki/MPI3Backwards to include a column for our analysis of the following question: HDF Approach - does the API versioning strategy as outlined in APICompat5.txt address this type of backward compatibility issue. Is the API versioning approach really needed for this ticket? I propose the following entries: Has problems - the API versioning strategy does not completely address this backward compatibility issue. OK - there are no problems with using the API versioning strategy for this ticket. Required - the API versioning strategy works for this ticket and appears to be needed to address this backward compatibility issue involved. We planned to break down the tickets into groups so that people could start working on marking them based on the labels shown above. If you have plans to help with this activity, could you please send me a quick note and I can perhaps assist on dividing up the tickets. We discussed at the last meeting, that it may be helpful to be able to make some comments about some tickets, since many have oddities that do not make them perfect fits for one category. I will see what I can do to set something up for that, but for now keep track of any notes you generate. Torsten told me that he will not be able to participate in this working group. I propose that we may want to query the general MPI-3.0 mailing list for some additional volunteers. Any thoughts? Thanks, Dave _______________________________________________ Mpi3-bwcompat mailing list Mpi3-bwcompat_at_[hidden] http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi3-bwcompat

1 0

Re: [Mpi3-bwcompat] Meet this friday?
by unknown＠example.com 03 Nov '09

03 Nov '09

On Nov 3, 2009, at 11:41 AM, Solt, David George wrote: > Since no one met last week, do we want to try a makeup meeting this > week? > Is anyone getting these e-mails? > Who's going to be in Portland next week -- did we get time on the schedule for a bwcompat meeting? (I'll be there) -- Jeff Squyres jsquyres_at_[hidden]

1 0

Meet this friday?
by unknown＠example.com 03 Nov '09

03 Nov '09

Since no one met last week, do we want to try a makeup meeting this week? Is anyone getting these e-mails? Dave

1 0

Welcome to the backward compatibility mailing list
by unknown＠example.com 20 Oct '09

20 Oct '09

Welcome at last to the backward compatibility mailing list. We have had some difficulty getting this setup which is why you have not seen any traffic. I posted the meeting notes for the first three meetings on the Twiki at https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/wiki/BackCompatMeetings I added a column to the list of tickets on the Twiki at https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/wiki/MPI3Backwards to include a column for our analysis of the following question: HDF Approach - does the API versioning strategy as outlined in APICompat5.txt address this type of backward compatibility issue. Is the API versioning approach really needed for this ticket? I propose the following entries: Has problems - the API versioning strategy does not completely address this backward compatibility issue. OK - there are no problems with using the API versioning strategy for this ticket. Required - the API versioning strategy works for this ticket and appears to be needed to address this backward compatibility issue involved. We planned to break down the tickets into groups so that people could start working on marking them based on the labels shown above. If you have plans to help with this activity, could you please send me a quick note and I can perhaps assist on dividing up the tickets. We discussed at the last meeting, that it may be helpful to be able to make some comments about some tickets, since many have oddities that do not make them perfect fits for one category. I will see what I can do to set something up for that, but for now keep track of any notes you generate. Torsten told me that he will not be able to participate in this working group. I propose that we may want to query the general MPI-3.0 mailing list for some additional volunteers. Any thoughts? Thanks, Dave

1 0