9 Oct
2012
9 Oct
'12
10:34 a.m.
I guess I don't understand why we're having the discussion at all. We had a vote, the results of which are 3 US meetings, 1 foreign meeting alternating between Japan and EuroMPI's location. Just because people don't like the outcome of the vote doesn't mean it should come up for vote again. Brian On 10/9/12 9:10 AM, "Richard Graham" <[email protected]> wrote: >We will make "final" decisions here in Dec. > >>From my perspective the decision to be made was between the meeting >>schedule >- Japan, Chicago, SJ, Chicago (what we voted for) >And >- Japan, Chicago, Madrid, SJ (with the understanding that meetings in >Japan would be every other year) > >That is what came up at the end of the last meeting. > >Rich > >-----Original Message----- >From: [email protected] >[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Anthony >Skjellum >Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 11:05 AM >To: Main MPI Forum mailing list >Subject: Re: [Mpi-forum] Meeting schedule for 2013 > >It would be very nice to hold one meeting in San Jose. Is it colder in >Chicago in March or December? Perhaps that could guide the decision. > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Jeff Squyres" <[email protected]> >To: "Main MPI Forum mailing list" <[email protected]> >Sent: Tuesday, October 9, 2012 9:57:08 AM >Subject: Re: [Mpi-forum] Meeting schedule for 2013 > >There were 12 responses on the spreadsheet; many thanks. See the >spreadsheet yourself: > > >https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AtJBC25MGsp3dDd3bmhuRllybEpqR >npPbEhZT3JFd3c > >Summary of results (easy ones first), including my conclusions from the >responses: > >1. June meeting is uniformly ok with Chicago on Jun 10-13. One >organization has a conflict with the dates. > --> My conclusion: this meeting is probably ok. > >2. December meeting is uniformly ok with Dec 9-12. 3 votes for San Jose. > 7 votes for Chicago. 3 votes for "don't care". > --> My conclusion: first choice: Chicago, second choice: San Jose > >3. March meeting is uniformly ok with the Mar 11-14 dates. A lot of >"Prefer Chicago" and "Prefer San Jose" votes. Several "Cannot attend if >in Japan" votes, paired with several Japan as last preference for those >who could attend in Japan. 5 votes for "only 1 non-US meeting per year". > --> My conclusion: first choice: Chicago, second choice San Jose, >third choice: Japan. > >==> Sidenote: speaking as a hosting organization -- if we have US >meetings, it would be nice to alternate between Chicago and San Jose (vs. >3 meetings in Chicago). I like the wifi in San Jose better. ;-) > >4. September meeting: most votes about the dates are "don't care" or >"near EuroMPI". 2 votes for before EuroMPI; 1 vote for after EuroMPI. 9 >votes for Madrid/colo with EuroMPI, 4 "don't care". 5 explicit mentions >of "only 1 non-US meeting per year." > --> My conclusion: Madrid, before EuroMPI. > > > >On Oct 3, 2012, at 10:54 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote: > >> On Oct 1, 2012, at 4:58 AM, Rolf Rabenseifner wrote: >> >>> Therefore, I would like that Jeff is doing a email voting by >>> institutions after we fixed the questions: >> >> I will not do a formal vote on this via email. There's all kinds of >>issues involved with that (e.g., who gets to vote?). >> >> I suggest a much simpler solution. Please visit the following public >>Google spreadsheet and fill in the meeting location/date preferences for >>your organization: >> >> >> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AtJBC25MGsp3dDd3bmhuRllyb >> EpqRnpPbEhZT3JFd3c >> >> This is informal, but please fill it out on a per-organization basis. >> >> *********************************************** >> *** Please do so by COB, Monday, 8 Oct, 2012*** >> *********************************************** >> >> -- >> Jeff Squyres >> [email protected] >> For corporate legal information go to: >> http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/ >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> mpi-forum mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum > > >-- >Jeff Squyres >[email protected] >For corporate legal information go to: >http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/ > > >_______________________________________________ >mpi-forum mailing list >[email protected] >http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum > >-- >Anthony Skjellum, PhD >Professor and Chair >Dept. of Computer and Information Sciences >Director, UAB Center for Information Assurance and Joint Forensics >Research ("The Center") >University of Alabama at Birmingham >+1-(205)934-8657; FAX: +1- (205)934-5473 > >___________________________________________ >CONFIDENTIALITY: This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and >may be privileged. If you are not a named recipient, please notify the >sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to another person, >use it for any purpose or store or copy the information in any medium. > >Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail >_______________________________________________ >mpi-forum mailing list >[email protected] >http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum > >_______________________________________________ >mpi-forum mailing list >[email protected] >http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum > >