- mpi-comments - mailman3.cels.anl.gov

Test mail #2
by Jeff Squyres 03 Aug '12

03 Aug '12

Just making sure that mpi-comments(a)mpi-forum.org works properly. -- Jeff Squyres jsquyres(a)cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/

1 0

Test Mail
by Jeff Squyres 03 Aug '12

03 Aug '12

Just making sure that mpi-comments(a)lists.mpi-forum.org works properly. -- Jeff Squyres jsquyres(a)cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/

1 0

MPI_Is_thread_main: usage allowed for any thread in MPI_THREAD_FUNNELED mode?
by Philippe Wautelet 13 Apr '12

13 Apr '12

Dear all, It is not clear to me if I am allowed to make calls to MPI_Is_thread_main from any thread if I initialized MPI with the MPI_THREAD_FUNNELED mode. For this mode, the norm says: "the application must ensure that only the main thread makes MPI calls" (page 384, lines 46-47) Therefore, a call to MPI_Is_thread_main should be incorrect. But in this case, how can I determine which thread is the main one? Or, maybe, some MPI calls could be explicitly allowed to be made by any thread? Best regards, Philippe Wautelet -------------------------------------------------------------------- Philippe Wautelet (Research Engineer) wautelet(a)idris.fr Tel. : 01 69 35 85 76 Fax : 01 69 85 37 75 IDRIS, Batiment 506, BP 167, 91403 ORSAY Cedex, France Prof. website : http://www.idris.fr Private website : http://www.fractalzone.be --------------------------------------------------------------------

1 0

Re: [Mpi-comments] A few issues with the MPI-2.2 standard
by Rolf Rabenseifner 24 Nov '09

24 Nov '09

Hello Chris, I've put your report into ticket 201 https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/201 This is the way how it will go into MPI-3.0. Thanks and best regards Rolf On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 00:31:16 -0500 Chris Thiel <cthiel(a)cse.unl.edu> wrote: > I have noticed what appear to be a few mistakes in the MPI-2.2 > standard. > >First of all, in two places, the functions > MPI_DIST_GRAPH_NEIGHBORS_COUNT and > MPI_DIST_GRAPH_NEIGHBORS > are misspelled as > MPI_DIST_NEIGHBORS_COUNT and > MPI_DIST_NEIGHBORS. >First on page 247 at line 30 and then again on page 595 at line 3. > These misspellings also appear in the function index. > > The second issue I noticed is that the function > MPI_REDUCE_SCATTER_BLOCK is omitted from several lists in Chapter 5. > I believe it should appear in the list of collective operations at >the > very beginning of Section 5.1. Also it should appear in the list of > all-to-all functions on page 135, line 1, and in the list of > collective operations that apply to intercommunicators on page 135, > line 32. > > > Chris Thiel > _______________________________________________ > mpi-comments mailing list > mpi-comments(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-comments Dr. Rolf Rabenseifner . . . . . . . . . .. email rabenseifner(a)hlrs.de High Performance Computing Center (HLRS) . phone ++49(0)711/685-65530 University of Stuttgart . . . . . . . . .. fax ++49(0)711 / 685-65832 Head of Dpmt Parallel Computing . . . www.hlrs.de/people/rabenseifner Nobelstr. 19, D-70550 Stuttgart, Germany . (Office: Allmandring 30)

1 0

A few issues with the MPI-2.2 standard
by Chris Thiel 20 Oct '09

20 Oct '09

I have noticed what appear to be a few mistakes in the MPI-2.2 standard. First of all, in two places, the functions MPI_DIST_GRAPH_NEIGHBORS_COUNT and MPI_DIST_GRAPH_NEIGHBORS are misspelled as MPI_DIST_NEIGHBORS_COUNT and MPI_DIST_NEIGHBORS. First on page 247 at line 30 and then again on page 595 at line 3. These misspellings also appear in the function index. The second issue I noticed is that the function MPI_REDUCE_SCATTER_BLOCK is omitted from several lists in Chapter 5. I believe it should appear in the list of collective operations at the very beginning of Section 5.1. Also it should appear in the list of all-to-all functions on page 135, line 1, and in the list of collective operations that apply to intercommunicators on page 135, line 32. Chris Thiel

1 0

notice protect-- internet trademark intellectual property safeguard
by John 04 Sep '09

04 Sep '09

Dear Manager: We are a Domain Name registration service company, which is a professional Internet Domain Name Registration and dispute resolution organization in China. On September.4th,2009, We received HAITONG Investment company's application that they are registering the name " mpi-forum " as their Internet Keyword and " mpi-forum .cn "、" mpi-forum .com.cn " 、" mpi-forum .asia "domain names etc..,It is China and ASIA domain names.But after auditing we found the brand name been used by your company. As the domain name registrar in China, it is our duty to notice you, so I am sending you this Email to check.According to the principle in China,your company is the owner of the trademark,In our auditing time we can keep the domain names safe for you firstly, but our audit period is limited, if you object the third party application these domain names and need to protect the brand in china and Asia by yourself, please let the responsible officer contact us as soon as possible. Thank you! Best regards, John Oversea marketing manager Tel:+86(0)21 6296 2950 Fax:+86(0)21 6296 1557 web:www.ygregistry.cn

1 0

Web archives for mpi-comments
by Jeff Squyres 23 Apr '08

23 Apr '08

Because the hosting for this mailing list has moved between sites, the web archives for this list are currently incomplete. There are plans to eventually consolidate all the prior posts to mpi-comments into the lists.mpi-forum.org site -- they may be incorporated into a single web archive, or they may be listed separately. We'll see how it goes. -- Jeff Squyres Cisco Systems

1 0