mpi-comments

Download

[email protected]

April 2016

2 participants
2 discussions

Re: [Mpi-comments] typo in MPI_*_SET_ATTR parameter
by William Gropp 27 Apr '16

27 Apr '16

The definitions of IN and INOUT are given in section 2.3, page 10, and are not identical to the Fortran terms. INOUT means that the call may update the arguments - see lines 23-27 on page 10. The MPI standard is correct as is. Bill William Gropp Director, Parallel Computing Institute Thomas M. Siebel Chair in Computer Science Chief Scientist, NCSA University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign On Apr 27, 2016, at 6:37 PM, Gilles Gouaillardet <gilles(a)rist.or.jp> wrote: > Folks, > > i noticed 3 similar and minor typos in the MPI 3.1 standard > > > 1) MPI_COMM_SET_ATTR page 270 line 43 reads > > "INOUT comm ..." > > but should be > > "IN comm ..." > > > 2) MPI_WIN_SET_ATTR page 274 line 33 reads > > "INOUT win ..." > > but should be > > "IN win ..." > > > 3) MPI_TYPE_SET_ATTR page 278 line 3 reads > > "INOUT datatype ..." > > but should be > > "IN datatype ..." > > > note Fortran 2008 correctly reads "INTENT(IN)" > > > Cheers, > > > Gilles > _______________________________________________ > mpi-comments mailing list > mpi-comments(a)mpi-forum.org > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-comments

1 0

typo in MPI_*_SET_ATTR parameter
by Gilles Gouaillardet 27 Apr '16

27 Apr '16

Folks, i noticed 3 similar and minor typos in the MPI 3.1 standard 1) MPI_COMM_SET_ATTR page 270 line 43 reads "INOUT comm ..." but should be "IN comm ..." 2) MPI_WIN_SET_ATTR page 274 line 33 reads "INOUT win ..." but should be "IN win ..." 3) MPI_TYPE_SET_ATTR page 278 line 3 reads "INOUT datatype ..." but should be "IN datatype ..." note Fortran 2008 correctly reads "INTENT(IN)" Cheers, Gilles

1 0