October 2016 - Intel-nda - mailman3.cels.anl.gov

Re: [JLSE-Intel-NDA] [EarlyScience] Production Intel compiler segfaults
by Hammond, Jeff R 06 Oct '16

06 Oct '16

Thanks, Steve. I don’t know how many loops are in the relevant source file, but if you remove the -no-vec flag and bisect the code with “!DIR$ NOVECTOR” (https://software.intel.com/en-us/node/680017<https://software.intel.com/en-us/node/680017?language=en>) on loops, you can localize the problem. Martyn noted that one regression from beta to 17.0 release has already been fixed and will be in the update. It is possible that this will fix your problem. I have no ETA for 17.0 update 1 but my guess is that it will be available soon, based upon two important bug fixes I know about. The license issue was addressed by Martyn already. Kumar and Ben have details. I assume they will update the license file, but in the event that your beta compiler stops working tomorrow, you can use the file-specific -no-vec workaround, or a loop-specific NOVECTOR if you can find where it is necessary. Best, Jeff From: "Steven C. Pieper" <spieper(a)anl.gov<mailto:[email protected]>> Organization: Physics, Argonne National Laboratory Reply-To: "spieper(a)anl.gov<mailto:[email protected]>" <spieper(a)anl.gov<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Thursday, October 6, 2016 at 11:07 AM To: Jeff R Hammond <jeff.r.hammond(a)intel.com<mailto:[email protected]>>, "Kumaran, Kalyan" <kumaran(a)alcf.anl.gov<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: "intel-nda(a)jlse.anl.gov<mailto:[email protected]>" <intel-nda(a)jlse.anl.gov<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: [JLSE-Intel-NDA] [EarlyScience] Production Intel compiler segfaults Using -no-vec does fix the problem. I have just submitted this and the compiler segfault bugs to the Intel site: reference number is : 6000163313. I included a 7 MB tar file which has a readme. The jlse beta version still says: [jlselogin1 ~] ifort -V Intel(R) Fortran Intel(R) 64 Compiler for applications running on Intel(R) 64, Version 17.0.0.042 Beta Build 20160315 Copyright (C) 1985-2016 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. ifort: NOTE: The Beta evaluation period for this product ends on 7-oct-2016 UTC. Steve Steven C. Pieper, Senior Physicist Emeritus: spieper(a)anl.gov<mailto:[email protected]> Argonne National Laboratory, Physics Division, Bldg. 203, Argonne, IL 60439 Phone: 630-252-4232 Fax -6008 Secretary, Debra Beres, -4100 http://www.phy.anl.gov/theory/staff/scp.html On 10/05/16 18:35, Hammond, Jeff R wrote: Martyn suggests you try with -no-vec. If that also fixes the issue, then you can narrow it down to the specific loop that breaks with novector directives. Martyn said the beta license situation was fixed. I don’t yet know if any action is required on ALCF’s part. Jeff On 10/5/16, 1:04 PM, "Steven C. Pieper" <spieper(a)anl.gov><mailto:[email protected]> wrote: Jeff and/or Kalyan: I have isolated the wrong numerical result to one (large) subroutine. It is not the same one that causes the compiler to segfault; that subroutine is not involved in this wrong numerical result. I can compile everything with the production v17 using -O2 and openmp (I haven't tried more optimization yet). Then if I compile this one subroutine with -O0 and no openmp, it works. But if I compile it with -O2 and no openmp, it gives the wrong numbers. So this is not an OpenMP bug; it is a -O2 optimization error. This is a bit of a mess to make a demo for -- the subroutine is large and has a big table of input indices, etc., and it needs lots of other subroutines to have run before it is called. As I said, all of this works fine with -O3, AVX512 with the v17-beta compiler. I don't know what to do next. I can make an ugly package to give to you for Intel, but making a simple demo is probably too difficult. Is there any further update to the production v17 that could be installed for me to try? Steve Steven C. Pieper, Senior Physicist Emeritus: spieper(a)anl.gov<mailto:[email protected]> Argonne National Laboratory, Physics Division, Bldg. 203, Argonne, IL 60439 Phone: 630-252-4232 Fax -6008 Secretary, Debra Beres, -4100 http://www.phy.anl.gov/theory/staff/scp.html On 10/05/16 13:40, Hammond, Jeff R wrote: On 10/5/16, 11:04 AM, "intel-nda-bounces(a)lists.jlse.anl.gov on behalf of Kumaran, Kalyan"<mailto:[email protected],Kalyan> <intel-nda-bounces(a)lists.jlse.anl.gov on behalf of kumaran(a)alcf.anl.gov><mailto:[email protected]@alcf.anl.gov> wrote: Steve, are you saying the Beta compilers have been removed, or will be removed in 2 days, from the JLSE cluster? If this is the case I can request Ben to keep it though I have not see any message about removing it. I asked Martyn about this just now. Will post the substance of his response as soon as I get it. Please do report bugs on the GA compilers. Without these I fear it will never get fixed. Please report every bug to IPS. It¹s possible that the same bug will be identified by a different codes, but it is not good to rely upon this. Jeff -Kumar On Oct 5, 2016, at 12:51 PM, Steven C. Pieper <spieper(a)anl.gov><mailto:[email protected]> wrote: Tim, I didn't know where to send it. I just want it to be worked on. The non-beta V17 compiler is on jlse -- that is what is failing for me. Some more recent info: Only this one subroutine file causes the compiler to segfault. However much more seriously, I am getting the wrong numerical results using the non-beta compiler. They are wrong in that they differ from both the v17 beta and xlf on cetus. v17 beta and cetus give the same results. I'm trying now to narrow down where the wrong results are coming from. Can we keep the beta compiler going for more than 2 more days???? Steve Steven C. Pieper, Senior Physicist Emeritus: spieper(a)anl.gov<mailto:[email protected]> Argonne National Laboratory, Physics Division, Bldg. 203, Argonne, IL 60439 Phone: 630-252-4232 Fax -6008 Secretary, Debra Beres, -4100 http://www.phy.anl.gov/theory/staff/scp.html On 10/05/16 12:45, Williams, Timothy J. wrote: Hi Steve, Did you mean to send this to early-users-discuss or intel-nda? I think we should now have the non-beta V17 compilers on the white boxes. Will try to find out. Tim ------- Timothy J. Williams, Ph.D. --- Argonne Leadership Computing Facility --- tjwilliams(a)anl.gov<mailto:[email protected]> --- 630-252-1154 ------- On Oct 5, 2016, at 11:25 AM, Steven C. Pieper <spieper(a)anl.gov><mailto:[email protected]> wrote: I am trying to recompile everything using the production intel compiler rather than the beta version which I previously used. With the beta version, it works: [jlselogin2 mc] source /soft/compilers/intel_beta/compilers_and_libraries/linux/bin/compiler va rs.sh intel64 [jlselogin2 mc] ifort -V Intel(R) Fortran Intel(R) 64 Compiler for applications running on Intel(R) 64, Version 17.0.0.042 Beta Build 20160315 Copyright (C) 1985-2016 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. ifort: NOTE: The Beta evaluation period for this product ends on 7-oct-2016 UTC. [jlselogin2 mc] ifort -FR -g -O2 -xMIC-AVX512 -qopenmp -lpthread -mcmodel=medium -r8 -WB -traceback -fpe3 -I../common/ -I../mc/ -fpp -DSPIN_SUF= -DPARAMNUC=nclude/paramnuc.12c-11_states-pn -DM0_DIV=1 -DDOCASE=0 -DPARAMCASE=nclude/paramcase.12c-11_states-pn -c make_3pi.f [jlselogin2 mc] <<compile is OK> The production verson segfaults: [jlselogin2 mc] source /soft/compilers/intel/compilers_and_libraries/linux/bin/compilervars. sh intel64[jlselogin2 mc] ifort -V Intel(R) Fortran Intel(R) 64 Compiler for applications running on Intel(R) 64, Version 17.0.0.098 Build 20160721 Copyright (C) 1985-2016 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. [jlselogin2 mc] ifort -FR -g -O2 -xMIC-AVX512 -qopenmp -lpthread -mcmodel=medium -r8 -WB -traceback -fpe3 -I../common/ -I../mc/ -fpp -DSPIN_SUF= -DPARAMNUC=nclude/paramnuc.12c-11_states-pn -DM0_DIV=1 -DDOCASE=0 -DPARAMCASE=nclude/paramcase.12c-11_states-pn -c make_3pi.f catastrophic error: **Internal compiler error: segmentation violation signal raised** Please report this error along with the circumstances in which it occurred in a Software Problem Report. Note: File and line given may not be explicit cause of this error. compilation aborted for make_3pi.f (code 1) If I remove the -xMIC-AVX512 then the production version compiles without error. Lots of other subroutines are compiling OK. The files are all in ~b21541/gfmc/mc/ I see the beta version is due to expire in 2 days. Can this be extended? Steve -- Steven C. Pieper, Senior Physicist Emeritus: spieper(a)anl.gov<mailto:[email protected]> Argonne National Laboratory, Physics Division, Bldg. 203, Argonne, IL 60439 Phone: 630-252-4232 Fax -6008 Secretary, Debra Beres, -4100 http://www.phy.anl.gov/theory/staff/scp.html _______________________________________________ EarlyScience mailing list EarlyScience(a)lists.alcf.anl.gov<mailto:[email protected]>https://lists.alcf.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/earlyscience _______________________________________________ Intel-nda mailing list Intel-nda(a)lists.jlse.anl.gov<mailto:[email protected]>https://lists.jlse.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/intel-nda _______________________________________________ Intel-nda mailing list Intel-nda(a)lists.jlse.anl.gov<mailto:[email protected]>https://lists.jlse.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/intel-nda

1 0

Re: [JLSE-Intel-NDA] [EarlyScience] Production Intel compiler segfaults
by Steven C. Pieper 06 Oct '16

06 Oct '16

Using -no-vec does fix the problem. I have just submitted this and the compiler segfault bugs to the Intel site: reference number is : 6000163313. I included a 7 MB tar file which has a readme. The jlse beta version still says: [jlselogin1 ~] ifort -V Intel(R) Fortran Intel(R) 64 Compiler for applications running on Intel(R) 64, Version 17.0.0.042 Beta Build 20160315 Copyright (C) 1985-2016 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. ifort: NOTE: The Beta evaluation period for this product ends on 7-oct-2016 UTC. Steve Steven C. Pieper, Senior Physicist Emeritus: spieper(a)anl.gov Argonne National Laboratory, Physics Division, Bldg. 203, Argonne, IL 60439 Phone: 630-252-4232 Fax -6008 Secretary, Debra Beres, -4100 http://www.phy.anl.gov/theory/staff/scp.html On 10/05/16 18:35, Hammond, Jeff R wrote: > Martyn suggests you try with -no-vec. If that also fixes the issue, then > you can narrow it down to the specific loop that breaks with novector > directives. > > Martyn said the beta license situation was fixed. I don’t yet know if any > action is required on ALCF’s part. > > Jeff > > On 10/5/16, 1:04 PM, "Steven C. Pieper" <spieper(a)anl.gov> wrote: > >> Jeff and/or Kalyan: >> >> I have isolated the wrong numerical result to one (large) subroutine. >> It is not the same one that causes the compiler to segfault; that >> subroutine is not involved in this wrong numerical result. >> I can compile everything with the production v17 using -O2 and openmp >> (I haven't tried more optimization yet). Then if I compile this >> one subroutine with -O0 and no openmp, it works. But if I compile >> it with -O2 and no openmp, it gives the wrong numbers. So this is >> not an OpenMP bug; it is a -O2 optimization error. This is >> a bit of a mess to make a demo for -- the subroutine is large and >> has a big table of input indices, etc., and it needs lots of other >> subroutines to have run before it is called. >> >> As I said, all of this works fine with -O3, AVX512 with the v17-beta >> compiler. >> >> I don't know what to do next. I can make an ugly package to give >> to you for Intel, but making a simple demo is probably too difficult. >> Is there any further update to the production v17 that could be >> installed for me to try? >> >> Steve >> >> >> Steven C. Pieper, Senior Physicist Emeritus: >> spieper(a)anl.gov >> Argonne National Laboratory, Physics Division, Bldg. 203, Argonne, IL >> 60439 >> Phone: 630-252-4232 Fax -6008 Secretary, Debra Beres, >> -4100 >> http://www.phy.anl.gov/theory/staff/scp.html >> >> On 10/05/16 13:40, Hammond, Jeff R wrote: >>> On 10/5/16, 11:04 AM, "intel-nda-bounces(a)lists.jlse.anl.gov on behalf of >>> Kumaran, Kalyan" <intel-nda-bounces(a)lists.jlse.anl.gov on behalf of >>> kumaran(a)alcf.anl.gov> wrote: >>> >>>> Steve, are you saying the Beta compilers have been removed, or will be >>>> removed in 2 days, from the JLSE cluster? If this is the case I can >>>> request Ben to keep it though I have not see any message about removing >>>> it. >>> I asked Martyn about this just now. Will post the substance of his >>> response as soon as I get it. >>> >>>> Please do report bugs on the GA compilers. Without these I fear it will >>>> never get fixed. >>> Please report every bug to IPS. It¹s possible that the same bug will be >>> identified by a different codes, but it is not good to rely upon this. >>> >>> Jeff >>> >>>> -Kumar >>>> >>>>> On Oct 5, 2016, at 12:51 PM, Steven C. Pieper <spieper(a)anl.gov> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Tim, >>>>> I didn't know where to send it. I just want it to be worked on. >>>>> The non-beta V17 compiler is on jlse -- that is what is failing for >>>>> me. >>>>> >>>>> Some more recent info: >>>>> Only this one subroutine file causes the compiler to segfault. >>>>> >>>>> However much more seriously, I am getting the wrong numerical >>>>> results >>>>> using the non-beta compiler. They are wrong in that they differ >>>>> from both the v17 beta and xlf on cetus. v17 beta and cetus give >>>>> the same results. I'm trying now to narrow down where the wrong >>>>> results are coming from. >>>>> >>>>> Can we keep the beta compiler going for more than 2 more days???? >>>>> >>>>> Steve >>>>> >>>>> Steven C. Pieper, Senior Physicist Emeritus: >>>>> spieper(a)anl.gov >>>>> Argonne National Laboratory, Physics Division, Bldg. 203, Argonne, IL >>>>> 60439 >>>>> Phone: 630-252-4232 Fax -6008 Secretary, Debra Beres, >>>>> -4100 >>>>> http://www.phy.anl.gov/theory/staff/scp.html >>>>> >>>>> On 10/05/16 12:45, Williams, Timothy J. wrote: >>>>>> Hi Steve, >>>>>> >>>>>> Did you mean to send this to early-users-discuss or intel-nda? >>>>>> >>>>>> I think we should now have the non-beta V17 compilers on the white >>>>>> boxes. Will try to find out. >>>>>> >>>>>> Tim >>>>>> >>>>>> ------- Timothy J. Williams, Ph.D. --- Argonne Leadership Computing >>>>>> Facility --- tjwilliams(a)anl.gov --- 630-252-1154 ------- >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Oct 5, 2016, at 11:25 AM, Steven C. Pieper <spieper(a)anl.gov> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I am trying to recompile everything using the production intel >>>>>>> compiler >>>>>>> rather than the beta version which I previously used. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> With the beta version, it works: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> [jlselogin2 mc] source >>>>>>> >>>>>>> /soft/compilers/intel_beta/compilers_and_libraries/linux/bin/compiler >>>>>>> va >>>>>>> rs.sh intel64 >>>>>>> [jlselogin2 mc] ifort -V >>>>>>> Intel(R) Fortran Intel(R) 64 Compiler for applications running on >>>>>>> Intel(R) 64, Version 17.0.0.042 Beta Build 20160315 >>>>>>> Copyright (C) 1985-2016 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ifort: NOTE: The Beta evaluation period for this product ends on >>>>>>> 7-oct-2016 UTC. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> [jlselogin2 mc] ifort -FR -g -O2 -xMIC-AVX512 -qopenmp -lpthread >>>>>>> -mcmodel=medium -r8 -WB -traceback -fpe3 -I../common/ -I../mc/ -fpp >>>>>>> -DSPIN_SUF= -DPARAMNUC=nclude/paramnuc.12c-11_states-pn -DM0_DIV=1 >>>>>>> -DDOCASE=0 -DPARAMCASE=nclude/paramcase.12c-11_states-pn -c >>>>>>> make_3pi.f >>>>>>> [jlselogin2 mc] <<compile is OK> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The production verson segfaults: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> [jlselogin2 mc] source >>>>>>> >>>>>>> /soft/compilers/intel/compilers_and_libraries/linux/bin/compilervars. >>>>>>> sh >>>>>>> intel64[jlselogin2 mc] ifort -V >>>>>>> Intel(R) Fortran Intel(R) 64 Compiler for applications running on >>>>>>> Intel(R) 64, Version 17.0.0.098 Build 20160721 >>>>>>> Copyright (C) 1985-2016 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> [jlselogin2 mc] ifort -FR -g -O2 -xMIC-AVX512 -qopenmp -lpthread >>>>>>> -mcmodel=medium -r8 -WB -traceback -fpe3 -I../common/ -I../mc/ -fpp >>>>>>> -DSPIN_SUF= -DPARAMNUC=nclude/paramnuc.12c-11_states-pn -DM0_DIV=1 >>>>>>> -DDOCASE=0 -DPARAMCASE=nclude/paramcase.12c-11_states-pn -c >>>>>>> make_3pi.f >>>>>>> catastrophic error: **Internal compiler error: segmentation >>>>>>> violation >>>>>>> signal raised** Please report this error along with the >>>>>>> circumstances >>>>>>> in which it occurred in a Software Problem Report. Note: File and >>>>>>> line >>>>>>> given may not be explicit cause of this error. >>>>>>> compilation aborted for make_3pi.f (code 1) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If I remove the -xMIC-AVX512 then the production version >>>>>>> compiles without error. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Lots of other subroutines are compiling OK. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The files are all in ~b21541/gfmc/mc/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I see the beta version is due to expire in 2 days. Can this be >>>>>>> extended? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Steve >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Steven C. Pieper, Senior Physicist Emeritus: >>>>>>> spieper(a)anl.gov >>>>>>> Argonne National Laboratory, Physics Division, Bldg. 203, Argonne, >>>>>>> IL >>>>>>> 60439 >>>>>>> Phone: 630-252-4232 Fax -6008 Secretary, Debra >>>>>>> Beres, >>>>>>> -4100 >>>>>>> http://www.phy.anl.gov/theory/staff/scp.html >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> EarlyScience mailing list >>>>>>> EarlyScience(a)lists.alcf.anl.gov >>>>>>> https://lists.alcf.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/earlyscience >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Intel-nda mailing list >>>>> Intel-nda(a)lists.jlse.anl.gov >>>>> https://lists.jlse.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/intel-nda >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Intel-nda mailing list >>>> Intel-nda(a)lists.jlse.anl.gov >>>> https://lists.jlse.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/intel-nda

1 0

[JLSE-Intel-NDA] May I publish results obtained on JLSE KNL boxes?
by Kumaran, Kalyan 06 Oct '16

06 Oct '16

https://wiki.jlse.anl.gov/display/knl/Publication+of+results+obtained+at+JL… Text included below for your convenience: Rack-Mounted Nodes (JLSE) knl00: Software Development Platform (SDP), Intel Xeon Phi 7210 64c 1.3Ghz (bin3). These are lent by Intel under an Intel Loan Agreement. They’re subject to NDA. More detailed note from Intel: We probably prefer that you don’t post performance numbers base on using these and when you share data, it is noted that these were at best beta systems. Preference is to rerun them on newer machines and/or work with Intel before publishing or sharing externally. knl01 - knl08: Purchased (From Colfax) Developer Access Program (DAP) machines, Intel Xeon Phi 7210 64c 1.3Ghz (bin3). No loan agreements, no NDA, etc. Share and publish any results/benchmarks freely. knl09, knl10: Software Development Platform (SDP), Intel Xeon Phi 7250 68c 1.4Ghz (bin1), these are lent by Intel under an Intel Loan Agreement. They’re subject to NDA. More detailed note from Intel: We probably prefer that you don’t post performance numbers base on using these and when you share data, it is noted that these were at best beta systems. Preference is to rerun them on newer machines and/or work with Intel before publishing or sharing externally. Note, SDP and DAP just describe the Intel program they're associated with. They don’t denote hardware config, so those terms are largely meaningless for us to represent to users.

1 0

Re: [JLSE-Intel-NDA] [EarlyScience] Production Intel compiler segfaults
by Hammond, Jeff R 05 Oct '16

05 Oct '16

Martyn suggests you try with -no-vec. If that also fixes the issue, then you can narrow it down to the specific loop that breaks with novector directives. Martyn said the beta license situation was fixed. I don’t yet know if any action is required on ALCF’s part. Jeff On 10/5/16, 1:04 PM, "Steven C. Pieper" <spieper(a)anl.gov> wrote: >Jeff and/or Kalyan: > >I have isolated the wrong numerical result to one (large) subroutine. >It is not the same one that causes the compiler to segfault; that >subroutine is not involved in this wrong numerical result. >I can compile everything with the production v17 using -O2 and openmp >(I haven't tried more optimization yet). Then if I compile this >one subroutine with -O0 and no openmp, it works. But if I compile >it with -O2 and no openmp, it gives the wrong numbers. So this is >not an OpenMP bug; it is a -O2 optimization error. This is >a bit of a mess to make a demo for -- the subroutine is large and >has a big table of input indices, etc., and it needs lots of other >subroutines to have run before it is called. > >As I said, all of this works fine with -O3, AVX512 with the v17-beta >compiler. > >I don't know what to do next. I can make an ugly package to give >to you for Intel, but making a simple demo is probably too difficult. >Is there any further update to the production v17 that could be >installed for me to try? > >Steve > > >Steven C. Pieper, Senior Physicist Emeritus: >spieper(a)anl.gov >Argonne National Laboratory, Physics Division, Bldg. 203, Argonne, IL >60439 >Phone: 630-252-4232 Fax -6008 Secretary, Debra Beres, >-4100 >http://www.phy.anl.gov/theory/staff/scp.html > >On 10/05/16 13:40, Hammond, Jeff R wrote: >> >> On 10/5/16, 11:04 AM, "intel-nda-bounces(a)lists.jlse.anl.gov on behalf of >> Kumaran, Kalyan" <intel-nda-bounces(a)lists.jlse.anl.gov on behalf of >> kumaran(a)alcf.anl.gov> wrote: >> >>> Steve, are you saying the Beta compilers have been removed, or will be >>> removed in 2 days, from the JLSE cluster? If this is the case I can >>> request Ben to keep it though I have not see any message about removing >>> it. >> I asked Martyn about this just now. Will post the substance of his >> response as soon as I get it. >> >>> Please do report bugs on the GA compilers. Without these I fear it will >>> never get fixed. >> Please report every bug to IPS. It¹s possible that the same bug will be >> identified by a different codes, but it is not good to rely upon this. >> >> Jeff >> >>> -Kumar >>> >>>> On Oct 5, 2016, at 12:51 PM, Steven C. Pieper <spieper(a)anl.gov> wrote: >>>> >>>> Tim, >>>> I didn't know where to send it. I just want it to be worked on. >>>> The non-beta V17 compiler is on jlse -- that is what is failing for >>>> me. >>>> >>>> Some more recent info: >>>> Only this one subroutine file causes the compiler to segfault. >>>> >>>> However much more seriously, I am getting the wrong numerical >>>>results >>>> using the non-beta compiler. They are wrong in that they differ >>>> from both the v17 beta and xlf on cetus. v17 beta and cetus give >>>> the same results. I'm trying now to narrow down where the wrong >>>> results are coming from. >>>> >>>> Can we keep the beta compiler going for more than 2 more days???? >>>> >>>> Steve >>>> >>>> Steven C. Pieper, Senior Physicist Emeritus: >>>> spieper(a)anl.gov >>>> Argonne National Laboratory, Physics Division, Bldg. 203, Argonne, IL >>>> 60439 >>>> Phone: 630-252-4232 Fax -6008 Secretary, Debra Beres, >>>> -4100 >>>> http://www.phy.anl.gov/theory/staff/scp.html >>>> >>>> On 10/05/16 12:45, Williams, Timothy J. wrote: >>>>> Hi Steve, >>>>> >>>>> Did you mean to send this to early-users-discuss or intel-nda? >>>>> >>>>> I think we should now have the non-beta V17 compilers on the white >>>>> boxes. Will try to find out. >>>>> >>>>> Tim >>>>> >>>>> ------- Timothy J. Williams, Ph.D. --- Argonne Leadership Computing >>>>> Facility --- tjwilliams(a)anl.gov --- 630-252-1154 ------- >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On Oct 5, 2016, at 11:25 AM, Steven C. Pieper <spieper(a)anl.gov> >>>>>>wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> I am trying to recompile everything using the production intel >>>>>> compiler >>>>>> rather than the beta version which I previously used. >>>>>> >>>>>> With the beta version, it works: >>>>>> >>>>>> [jlselogin2 mc] source >>>>>> >>>>>>/soft/compilers/intel_beta/compilers_and_libraries/linux/bin/compiler >>>>>>va >>>>>> rs.sh intel64 >>>>>> [jlselogin2 mc] ifort -V >>>>>> Intel(R) Fortran Intel(R) 64 Compiler for applications running on >>>>>> Intel(R) 64, Version 17.0.0.042 Beta Build 20160315 >>>>>> Copyright (C) 1985-2016 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. >>>>>> >>>>>> ifort: NOTE: The Beta evaluation period for this product ends on >>>>>> 7-oct-2016 UTC. >>>>>> >>>>>> [jlselogin2 mc] ifort -FR -g -O2 -xMIC-AVX512 -qopenmp -lpthread >>>>>> -mcmodel=medium -r8 -WB -traceback -fpe3 -I../common/ -I../mc/ -fpp >>>>>> -DSPIN_SUF= -DPARAMNUC=nclude/paramnuc.12c-11_states-pn -DM0_DIV=1 >>>>>> -DDOCASE=0 -DPARAMCASE=nclude/paramcase.12c-11_states-pn -c >>>>>>make_3pi.f >>>>>> [jlselogin2 mc] <<compile is OK> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> The production verson segfaults: >>>>>> >>>>>> [jlselogin2 mc] source >>>>>> >>>>>>/soft/compilers/intel/compilers_and_libraries/linux/bin/compilervars. >>>>>>sh >>>>>> intel64[jlselogin2 mc] ifort -V >>>>>> Intel(R) Fortran Intel(R) 64 Compiler for applications running on >>>>>> Intel(R) 64, Version 17.0.0.098 Build 20160721 >>>>>> Copyright (C) 1985-2016 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. >>>>>> >>>>>> [jlselogin2 mc] ifort -FR -g -O2 -xMIC-AVX512 -qopenmp -lpthread >>>>>> -mcmodel=medium -r8 -WB -traceback -fpe3 -I../common/ -I../mc/ -fpp >>>>>> -DSPIN_SUF= -DPARAMNUC=nclude/paramnuc.12c-11_states-pn -DM0_DIV=1 >>>>>> -DDOCASE=0 -DPARAMCASE=nclude/paramcase.12c-11_states-pn -c >>>>>>make_3pi.f >>>>>> catastrophic error: **Internal compiler error: segmentation >>>>>>violation >>>>>> signal raised** Please report this error along with the >>>>>>circumstances >>>>>> in which it occurred in a Software Problem Report. Note: File and >>>>>>line >>>>>> given may not be explicit cause of this error. >>>>>> compilation aborted for make_3pi.f (code 1) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> If I remove the -xMIC-AVX512 then the production version >>>>>> compiles without error. >>>>>> >>>>>> Lots of other subroutines are compiling OK. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> The files are all in ~b21541/gfmc/mc/ >>>>>> >>>>>> I see the beta version is due to expire in 2 days. Can this be >>>>>> extended? >>>>>> >>>>>> Steve >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Steven C. Pieper, Senior Physicist Emeritus: >>>>>> spieper(a)anl.gov >>>>>> Argonne National Laboratory, Physics Division, Bldg. 203, Argonne, >>>>>>IL >>>>>> 60439 >>>>>> Phone: 630-252-4232 Fax -6008 Secretary, Debra >>>>>>Beres, >>>>>> -4100 >>>>>> http://www.phy.anl.gov/theory/staff/scp.html >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> EarlyScience mailing list >>>>>> EarlyScience(a)lists.alcf.anl.gov >>>>>> https://lists.alcf.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/earlyscience >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Intel-nda mailing list >>>> Intel-nda(a)lists.jlse.anl.gov >>>> https://lists.jlse.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/intel-nda >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Intel-nda mailing list >>> Intel-nda(a)lists.jlse.anl.gov >>> https://lists.jlse.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/intel-nda >

1 0

Re: [JLSE-Intel-NDA] [EarlyScience] Production Intel compiler segfaults
by Hammond, Jeff R 05 Oct '16

05 Oct '16

Just submit the bug against full GFMC. I can transfer the files to them so you don’t have to attach to the ticket. Just tell them to contain me after you tell me where I can get the files from an ALCF system. Jeff On 10/5/16, 1:04 PM, "Steven C. Pieper" <spieper(a)anl.gov> wrote: >Jeff and/or Kalyan: > >I have isolated the wrong numerical result to one (large) subroutine. >It is not the same one that causes the compiler to segfault; that >subroutine is not involved in this wrong numerical result. >I can compile everything with the production v17 using -O2 and openmp >(I haven't tried more optimization yet). Then if I compile this >one subroutine with -O0 and no openmp, it works. But if I compile >it with -O2 and no openmp, it gives the wrong numbers. So this is >not an OpenMP bug; it is a -O2 optimization error. This is >a bit of a mess to make a demo for -- the subroutine is large and >has a big table of input indices, etc., and it needs lots of other >subroutines to have run before it is called. > >As I said, all of this works fine with -O3, AVX512 with the v17-beta >compiler. > >I don't know what to do next. I can make an ugly package to give >to you for Intel, but making a simple demo is probably too difficult. >Is there any further update to the production v17 that could be >installed for me to try? > >Steve > > >Steven C. Pieper, Senior Physicist Emeritus: >spieper(a)anl.gov >Argonne National Laboratory, Physics Division, Bldg. 203, Argonne, IL >60439 >Phone: 630-252-4232 Fax -6008 Secretary, Debra Beres, >-4100 >http://www.phy.anl.gov/theory/staff/scp.html > >On 10/05/16 13:40, Hammond, Jeff R wrote: >> >> On 10/5/16, 11:04 AM, "intel-nda-bounces(a)lists.jlse.anl.gov on behalf of >> Kumaran, Kalyan" <intel-nda-bounces(a)lists.jlse.anl.gov on behalf of >> kumaran(a)alcf.anl.gov> wrote: >> >>> Steve, are you saying the Beta compilers have been removed, or will be >>> removed in 2 days, from the JLSE cluster? If this is the case I can >>> request Ben to keep it though I have not see any message about removing >>> it. >> I asked Martyn about this just now. Will post the substance of his >> response as soon as I get it. >> >>> Please do report bugs on the GA compilers. Without these I fear it will >>> never get fixed. >> Please report every bug to IPS. It¹s possible that the same bug will be >> identified by a different codes, but it is not good to rely upon this. >> >> Jeff >> >>> -Kumar >>> >>>> On Oct 5, 2016, at 12:51 PM, Steven C. Pieper <spieper(a)anl.gov> wrote: >>>> >>>> Tim, >>>> I didn't know where to send it. I just want it to be worked on. >>>> The non-beta V17 compiler is on jlse -- that is what is failing for >>>> me. >>>> >>>> Some more recent info: >>>> Only this one subroutine file causes the compiler to segfault. >>>> >>>> However much more seriously, I am getting the wrong numerical >>>>results >>>> using the non-beta compiler. They are wrong in that they differ >>>> from both the v17 beta and xlf on cetus. v17 beta and cetus give >>>> the same results. I'm trying now to narrow down where the wrong >>>> results are coming from. >>>> >>>> Can we keep the beta compiler going for more than 2 more days???? >>>> >>>> Steve >>>> >>>> Steven C. Pieper, Senior Physicist Emeritus: >>>> spieper(a)anl.gov >>>> Argonne National Laboratory, Physics Division, Bldg. 203, Argonne, IL >>>> 60439 >>>> Phone: 630-252-4232 Fax -6008 Secretary, Debra Beres, >>>> -4100 >>>> http://www.phy.anl.gov/theory/staff/scp.html >>>> >>>> On 10/05/16 12:45, Williams, Timothy J. wrote: >>>>> Hi Steve, >>>>> >>>>> Did you mean to send this to early-users-discuss or intel-nda? >>>>> >>>>> I think we should now have the non-beta V17 compilers on the white >>>>> boxes. Will try to find out. >>>>> >>>>> Tim >>>>> >>>>> ------- Timothy J. Williams, Ph.D. --- Argonne Leadership Computing >>>>> Facility --- tjwilliams(a)anl.gov --- 630-252-1154 ------- >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On Oct 5, 2016, at 11:25 AM, Steven C. Pieper <spieper(a)anl.gov> >>>>>>wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> I am trying to recompile everything using the production intel >>>>>> compiler >>>>>> rather than the beta version which I previously used. >>>>>> >>>>>> With the beta version, it works: >>>>>> >>>>>> [jlselogin2 mc] source >>>>>> >>>>>>/soft/compilers/intel_beta/compilers_and_libraries/linux/bin/compiler >>>>>>va >>>>>> rs.sh intel64 >>>>>> [jlselogin2 mc] ifort -V >>>>>> Intel(R) Fortran Intel(R) 64 Compiler for applications running on >>>>>> Intel(R) 64, Version 17.0.0.042 Beta Build 20160315 >>>>>> Copyright (C) 1985-2016 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. >>>>>> >>>>>> ifort: NOTE: The Beta evaluation period for this product ends on >>>>>> 7-oct-2016 UTC. >>>>>> >>>>>> [jlselogin2 mc] ifort -FR -g -O2 -xMIC-AVX512 -qopenmp -lpthread >>>>>> -mcmodel=medium -r8 -WB -traceback -fpe3 -I../common/ -I../mc/ -fpp >>>>>> -DSPIN_SUF= -DPARAMNUC=nclude/paramnuc.12c-11_states-pn -DM0_DIV=1 >>>>>> -DDOCASE=0 -DPARAMCASE=nclude/paramcase.12c-11_states-pn -c >>>>>>make_3pi.f >>>>>> [jlselogin2 mc] <<compile is OK> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> The production verson segfaults: >>>>>> >>>>>> [jlselogin2 mc] source >>>>>> >>>>>>/soft/compilers/intel/compilers_and_libraries/linux/bin/compilervars. >>>>>>sh >>>>>> intel64[jlselogin2 mc] ifort -V >>>>>> Intel(R) Fortran Intel(R) 64 Compiler for applications running on >>>>>> Intel(R) 64, Version 17.0.0.098 Build 20160721 >>>>>> Copyright (C) 1985-2016 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. >>>>>> >>>>>> [jlselogin2 mc] ifort -FR -g -O2 -xMIC-AVX512 -qopenmp -lpthread >>>>>> -mcmodel=medium -r8 -WB -traceback -fpe3 -I../common/ -I../mc/ -fpp >>>>>> -DSPIN_SUF= -DPARAMNUC=nclude/paramnuc.12c-11_states-pn -DM0_DIV=1 >>>>>> -DDOCASE=0 -DPARAMCASE=nclude/paramcase.12c-11_states-pn -c >>>>>>make_3pi.f >>>>>> catastrophic error: **Internal compiler error: segmentation >>>>>>violation >>>>>> signal raised** Please report this error along with the >>>>>>circumstances >>>>>> in which it occurred in a Software Problem Report. Note: File and >>>>>>line >>>>>> given may not be explicit cause of this error. >>>>>> compilation aborted for make_3pi.f (code 1) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> If I remove the -xMIC-AVX512 then the production version >>>>>> compiles without error. >>>>>> >>>>>> Lots of other subroutines are compiling OK. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> The files are all in ~b21541/gfmc/mc/ >>>>>> >>>>>> I see the beta version is due to expire in 2 days. Can this be >>>>>> extended? >>>>>> >>>>>> Steve >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Steven C. Pieper, Senior Physicist Emeritus: >>>>>> spieper(a)anl.gov >>>>>> Argonne National Laboratory, Physics Division, Bldg. 203, Argonne, >>>>>>IL >>>>>> 60439 >>>>>> Phone: 630-252-4232 Fax -6008 Secretary, Debra >>>>>>Beres, >>>>>> -4100 >>>>>> http://www.phy.anl.gov/theory/staff/scp.html >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> EarlyScience mailing list >>>>>> EarlyScience(a)lists.alcf.anl.gov >>>>>> https://lists.alcf.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/earlyscience >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Intel-nda mailing list >>>> Intel-nda(a)lists.jlse.anl.gov >>>> https://lists.jlse.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/intel-nda >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Intel-nda mailing list >>> Intel-nda(a)lists.jlse.anl.gov >>> https://lists.jlse.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/intel-nda >

1 0

Re: [JLSE-Intel-NDA] [EarlyScience] Production Intel compiler segfaults
by Steven C. Pieper 05 Oct '16

05 Oct '16

Jeff and/or Kalyan: I have isolated the wrong numerical result to one (large) subroutine. It is not the same one that causes the compiler to segfault; that subroutine is not involved in this wrong numerical result. I can compile everything with the production v17 using -O2 and openmp (I haven't tried more optimization yet). Then if I compile this one subroutine with -O0 and no openmp, it works. But if I compile it with -O2 and no openmp, it gives the wrong numbers. So this is not an OpenMP bug; it is a -O2 optimization error. This is a bit of a mess to make a demo for -- the subroutine is large and has a big table of input indices, etc., and it needs lots of other subroutines to have run before it is called. As I said, all of this works fine with -O3, AVX512 with the v17-beta compiler. I don't know what to do next. I can make an ugly package to give to you for Intel, but making a simple demo is probably too difficult. Is there any further update to the production v17 that could be installed for me to try? Steve Steven C. Pieper, Senior Physicist Emeritus: spieper(a)anl.gov Argonne National Laboratory, Physics Division, Bldg. 203, Argonne, IL 60439 Phone: 630-252-4232 Fax -6008 Secretary, Debra Beres, -4100 http://www.phy.anl.gov/theory/staff/scp.html On 10/05/16 13:40, Hammond, Jeff R wrote: > > On 10/5/16, 11:04 AM, "intel-nda-bounces(a)lists.jlse.anl.gov on behalf of > Kumaran, Kalyan" <intel-nda-bounces(a)lists.jlse.anl.gov on behalf of > kumaran(a)alcf.anl.gov> wrote: > >> Steve, are you saying the Beta compilers have been removed, or will be >> removed in 2 days, from the JLSE cluster? If this is the case I can >> request Ben to keep it though I have not see any message about removing >> it. > I asked Martyn about this just now. Will post the substance of his > response as soon as I get it. > >> Please do report bugs on the GA compilers. Without these I fear it will >> never get fixed. > Please report every bug to IPS. Itï¿½s possible that the same bug will be > identified by a different codes, but it is not good to rely upon this. > > Jeff > >> -Kumar >> >>> On Oct 5, 2016, at 12:51 PM, Steven C. Pieper <spieper(a)anl.gov> wrote: >>> >>> Tim, >>> I didn't know where to send it. I just want it to be worked on. >>> The non-beta V17 compiler is on jlse -- that is what is failing for >>> me. >>> >>> Some more recent info: >>> Only this one subroutine file causes the compiler to segfault. >>> >>> However much more seriously, I am getting the wrong numerical results >>> using the non-beta compiler. They are wrong in that they differ >>> from both the v17 beta and xlf on cetus. v17 beta and cetus give >>> the same results. I'm trying now to narrow down where the wrong >>> results are coming from. >>> >>> Can we keep the beta compiler going for more than 2 more days???? >>> >>> Steve >>> >>> Steven C. Pieper, Senior Physicist Emeritus: >>> spieper(a)anl.gov >>> Argonne National Laboratory, Physics Division, Bldg. 203, Argonne, IL >>> 60439 >>> Phone: 630-252-4232 Fax -6008 Secretary, Debra Beres, >>> -4100 >>> http://www.phy.anl.gov/theory/staff/scp.html >>> >>> On 10/05/16 12:45, Williams, Timothy J. wrote: >>>> Hi Steve, >>>> >>>> Did you mean to send this to early-users-discuss or intel-nda? >>>> >>>> I think we should now have the non-beta V17 compilers on the white >>>> boxes. Will try to find out. >>>> >>>> Tim >>>> >>>> ------- Timothy J. Williams, Ph.D. --- Argonne Leadership Computing >>>> Facility --- tjwilliams(a)anl.gov --- 630-252-1154 ------- >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> On Oct 5, 2016, at 11:25 AM, Steven C. Pieper <spieper(a)anl.gov> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I am trying to recompile everything using the production intel >>>>> compiler >>>>> rather than the beta version which I previously used. >>>>> >>>>> With the beta version, it works: >>>>> >>>>> [jlselogin2 mc] source >>>>> /soft/compilers/intel_beta/compilers_and_libraries/linux/bin/compilerva >>>>> rs.sh intel64 >>>>> [jlselogin2 mc] ifort -V >>>>> Intel(R) Fortran Intel(R) 64 Compiler for applications running on >>>>> Intel(R) 64, Version 17.0.0.042 Beta Build 20160315 >>>>> Copyright (C) 1985-2016 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. >>>>> >>>>> ifort: NOTE: The Beta evaluation period for this product ends on >>>>> 7-oct-2016 UTC. >>>>> >>>>> [jlselogin2 mc] ifort -FR -g -O2 -xMIC-AVX512 -qopenmp -lpthread >>>>> -mcmodel=medium -r8 -WB -traceback -fpe3 -I../common/ -I../mc/ -fpp >>>>> -DSPIN_SUF= -DPARAMNUC=nclude/paramnuc.12c-11_states-pn -DM0_DIV=1 >>>>> -DDOCASE=0 -DPARAMCASE=nclude/paramcase.12c-11_states-pn -c make_3pi.f >>>>> [jlselogin2 mc] <<compile is OK> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> The production verson segfaults: >>>>> >>>>> [jlselogin2 mc] source >>>>> /soft/compilers/intel/compilers_and_libraries/linux/bin/compilervars.sh >>>>> intel64[jlselogin2 mc] ifort -V >>>>> Intel(R) Fortran Intel(R) 64 Compiler for applications running on >>>>> Intel(R) 64, Version 17.0.0.098 Build 20160721 >>>>> Copyright (C) 1985-2016 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. >>>>> >>>>> [jlselogin2 mc] ifort -FR -g -O2 -xMIC-AVX512 -qopenmp -lpthread >>>>> -mcmodel=medium -r8 -WB -traceback -fpe3 -I../common/ -I../mc/ -fpp >>>>> -DSPIN_SUF= -DPARAMNUC=nclude/paramnuc.12c-11_states-pn -DM0_DIV=1 >>>>> -DDOCASE=0 -DPARAMCASE=nclude/paramcase.12c-11_states-pn -c make_3pi.f >>>>> catastrophic error: **Internal compiler error: segmentation violation >>>>> signal raised** Please report this error along with the circumstances >>>>> in which it occurred in a Software Problem Report. Note: File and line >>>>> given may not be explicit cause of this error. >>>>> compilation aborted for make_3pi.f (code 1) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> If I remove the -xMIC-AVX512 then the production version >>>>> compiles without error. >>>>> >>>>> Lots of other subroutines are compiling OK. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> The files are all in ~b21541/gfmc/mc/ >>>>> >>>>> I see the beta version is due to expire in 2 days. Can this be >>>>> extended? >>>>> >>>>> Steve >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Steven C. Pieper, Senior Physicist Emeritus: >>>>> spieper(a)anl.gov >>>>> Argonne National Laboratory, Physics Division, Bldg. 203, Argonne, IL >>>>> 60439 >>>>> Phone: 630-252-4232 Fax -6008 Secretary, Debra Beres, >>>>> -4100 >>>>> http://www.phy.anl.gov/theory/staff/scp.html >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> EarlyScience mailing list >>>>> EarlyScience(a)lists.alcf.anl.gov >>>>> https://lists.alcf.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/earlyscience >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Intel-nda mailing list >>> Intel-nda(a)lists.jlse.anl.gov >>> https://lists.jlse.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/intel-nda >> _______________________________________________ >> Intel-nda mailing list >> Intel-nda(a)lists.jlse.anl.gov >> https://lists.jlse.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/intel-nda

1 0

Re: [JLSE-Intel-NDA] [EarlyScience] Production Intel compiler segfaults
by Hammond, Jeff R 05 Oct '16

05 Oct '16

On 10/5/16, 11:04 AM, "intel-nda-bounces(a)lists.jlse.anl.gov on behalf of Kumaran, Kalyan" <intel-nda-bounces(a)lists.jlse.anl.gov on behalf of kumaran(a)alcf.anl.gov> wrote: >Steve, are you saying the Beta compilers have been removed, or will be >removed in 2 days, from the JLSE cluster? If this is the case I can >request Ben to keep it though I have not see any message about removing >it. I asked Martyn about this just now. Will post the substance of his response as soon as I get it. > >Please do report bugs on the GA compilers. Without these I fear it will >never get fixed. Please report every bug to IPS. It¹s possible that the same bug will be identified by a different codes, but it is not good to rely upon this. Jeff > >-Kumar > >> On Oct 5, 2016, at 12:51 PM, Steven C. Pieper <spieper(a)anl.gov> wrote: >> >> Tim, >> I didn't know where to send it. I just want it to be worked on. >> The non-beta V17 compiler is on jlse -- that is what is failing for >>me. >> >> Some more recent info: >> Only this one subroutine file causes the compiler to segfault. >> >> However much more seriously, I am getting the wrong numerical results >> using the non-beta compiler. They are wrong in that they differ >> from both the v17 beta and xlf on cetus. v17 beta and cetus give >> the same results. I'm trying now to narrow down where the wrong >> results are coming from. >> >> Can we keep the beta compiler going for more than 2 more days???? >> >> Steve >> >> Steven C. Pieper, Senior Physicist Emeritus: >>spieper(a)anl.gov >> Argonne National Laboratory, Physics Division, Bldg. 203, Argonne, IL >>60439 >> Phone: 630-252-4232 Fax -6008 Secretary, Debra Beres, >>-4100 >> http://www.phy.anl.gov/theory/staff/scp.html >> >> On 10/05/16 12:45, Williams, Timothy J. wrote: >>> Hi Steve, >>> >>> Did you mean to send this to early-users-discuss or intel-nda? >>> >>> I think we should now have the non-beta V17 compilers on the white >>>boxes. Will try to find out. >>> >>> Tim >>> >>> ------- Timothy J. Williams, Ph.D. --- Argonne Leadership Computing >>>Facility --- tjwilliams(a)anl.gov --- 630-252-1154 ------- >>> >>> >>> >>>> On Oct 5, 2016, at 11:25 AM, Steven C. Pieper <spieper(a)anl.gov> wrote: >>>> >>>> I am trying to recompile everything using the production intel >>>>compiler >>>> rather than the beta version which I previously used. >>>> >>>> With the beta version, it works: >>>> >>>> [jlselogin2 mc] source >>>>/soft/compilers/intel_beta/compilers_and_libraries/linux/bin/compilerva >>>>rs.sh intel64 >>>> [jlselogin2 mc] ifort -V >>>> Intel(R) Fortran Intel(R) 64 Compiler for applications running on >>>>Intel(R) 64, Version 17.0.0.042 Beta Build 20160315 >>>> Copyright (C) 1985-2016 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. >>>> >>>> ifort: NOTE: The Beta evaluation period for this product ends on >>>>7-oct-2016 UTC. >>>> >>>> [jlselogin2 mc] ifort -FR -g -O2 -xMIC-AVX512 -qopenmp -lpthread >>>>-mcmodel=medium -r8 -WB -traceback -fpe3 -I../common/ -I../mc/ -fpp >>>>-DSPIN_SUF= -DPARAMNUC=nclude/paramnuc.12c-11_states-pn -DM0_DIV=1 >>>>-DDOCASE=0 -DPARAMCASE=nclude/paramcase.12c-11_states-pn -c make_3pi.f >>>> [jlselogin2 mc] <<compile is OK> >>>> >>>> >>>> The production verson segfaults: >>>> >>>> [jlselogin2 mc] source >>>>/soft/compilers/intel/compilers_and_libraries/linux/bin/compilervars.sh >>>> intel64[jlselogin2 mc] ifort -V >>>> Intel(R) Fortran Intel(R) 64 Compiler for applications running on >>>>Intel(R) 64, Version 17.0.0.098 Build 20160721 >>>> Copyright (C) 1985-2016 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. >>>> >>>> [jlselogin2 mc] ifort -FR -g -O2 -xMIC-AVX512 -qopenmp -lpthread >>>>-mcmodel=medium -r8 -WB -traceback -fpe3 -I../common/ -I../mc/ -fpp >>>>-DSPIN_SUF= -DPARAMNUC=nclude/paramnuc.12c-11_states-pn -DM0_DIV=1 >>>>-DDOCASE=0 -DPARAMCASE=nclude/paramcase.12c-11_states-pn -c make_3pi.f >>>> catastrophic error: **Internal compiler error: segmentation violation >>>>signal raised** Please report this error along with the circumstances >>>>in which it occurred in a Software Problem Report. Note: File and line >>>>given may not be explicit cause of this error. >>>> compilation aborted for make_3pi.f (code 1) >>>> >>>> >>>> If I remove the -xMIC-AVX512 then the production version >>>>compiles without error. >>>> >>>> Lots of other subroutines are compiling OK. >>>> >>>> >>>> The files are all in ~b21541/gfmc/mc/ >>>> >>>> I see the beta version is due to expire in 2 days. Can this be >>>>extended? >>>> >>>> Steve >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Steven C. Pieper, Senior Physicist Emeritus: >>>>spieper(a)anl.gov >>>> Argonne National Laboratory, Physics Division, Bldg. 203, Argonne, IL >>>>60439 >>>> Phone: 630-252-4232 Fax -6008 Secretary, Debra Beres, >>>>-4100 >>>> http://www.phy.anl.gov/theory/staff/scp.html >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> EarlyScience mailing list >>>> EarlyScience(a)lists.alcf.anl.gov >>>> https://lists.alcf.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/earlyscience >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Intel-nda mailing list >> Intel-nda(a)lists.jlse.anl.gov >> https://lists.jlse.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/intel-nda > >_______________________________________________ >Intel-nda mailing list >Intel-nda(a)lists.jlse.anl.gov >https://lists.jlse.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/intel-nda

1 0

Re: [JLSE-Intel-NDA] [EarlyScience] Production Intel compiler segfaults
by Steven C. Pieper 05 Oct '16

05 Oct '16

The only things that I am aware of are 17 beta and 17 production. I don't see other possibilities in /soft/compilers. Steve Steven C. Pieper, Senior Physicist Emeritus: spieper(a)anl.gov Argonne National Laboratory, Physics Division, Bldg. 203, Argonne, IL 60439 Phone: 630-252-4232 Fax -6008 Secretary, Debra Beres, -4100 http://www.phy.anl.gov/theory/staff/scp.html On 10/05/16 13:34, Hammond, Jeff R wrote: > Have you tried Intel 16 update 4? > > Jeff > > On 10/5/16, 11:09 AM, "intel-nda-bounces(a)lists.jlse.anl.gov on behalf of > Steven C. Pieper" <intel-nda-bounces(a)lists.jlse.anl.gov on behalf of > spieper(a)anl.gov> wrote: > >> when using the beta compiler, ifort -V returns: >> >> [jlselogin2 tests] ifort -V >> Intel(R) Fortran Intel(R) 64 Compiler for applications running on >> Intel(R) 64, Version 17.0.0.042 Beta Build 20160315 >> Copyright (C) 1985-2016 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. >> >> ifort: NOTE: The Beta evaluation period for this product ends on >> 7-oct-2016 UTC. >> >> >> That is what I'm referring to. >> >> Steve >> >> Steven C. Pieper, Senior Physicist Emeritus: >> spieper(a)anl.gov >> Argonne National Laboratory, Physics Division, Bldg. 203, Argonne, IL >> 60439 >> Phone: 630-252-4232 Fax -6008 Secretary, Debra Beres, >> -4100 >> http://www.phy.anl.gov/theory/staff/scp.html >> >> On 10/05/16 13:04, Kumaran, Kalyan wrote: >>> Steve, are you saying the Beta compilers have been removed, or will be >>> removed in 2 days, from the JLSE cluster? If this is the case I can >>> request Ben to keep it though I have not see any message about removing >>> it. >>> >>> Please do report bugs on the GA compilers. Without these I fear it will >>> never get fixed. >>> >>> -Kumar >>> >>>> On Oct 5, 2016, at 12:51 PM, Steven C. Pieper <spieper(a)anl.gov> wrote: >>>> >>>> Tim, >>>> I didn't know where to send it. I just want it to be worked on. >>>> The non-beta V17 compiler is on jlse -- that is what is failing for >>>> me. >>>> >>>> Some more recent info: >>>> Only this one subroutine file causes the compiler to segfault. >>>> >>>> However much more seriously, I am getting the wrong numerical >>>> results >>>> using the non-beta compiler. They are wrong in that they differ >>>> from both the v17 beta and xlf on cetus. v17 beta and cetus give >>>> the same results. I'm trying now to narrow down where the wrong >>>> results are coming from. >>>> >>>> Can we keep the beta compiler going for more than 2 more days???? >>>> >>>> Steve >>>> >>>> Steven C. Pieper, Senior Physicist Emeritus: >>>> spieper(a)anl.gov >>>> Argonne National Laboratory, Physics Division, Bldg. 203, Argonne, IL >>>> 60439 >>>> Phone: 630-252-4232 Fax -6008 Secretary, Debra Beres, >>>> -4100 >>>> http://www.phy.anl.gov/theory/staff/scp.html >>>> >>>> On 10/05/16 12:45, Williams, Timothy J. wrote: >>>>> Hi Steve, >>>>> >>>>> Did you mean to send this to early-users-discuss or intel-nda? >>>>> >>>>> I think we should now have the non-beta V17 compilers on the white >>>>> boxes. Will try to find out. >>>>> >>>>> Tim >>>>> >>>>> ------- Timothy J. Williams, Ph.D. --- Argonne Leadership Computing >>>>> Facility --- tjwilliams(a)anl.gov --- 630-252-1154 ------- >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On Oct 5, 2016, at 11:25 AM, Steven C. Pieper <spieper(a)anl.gov> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> I am trying to recompile everything using the production intel >>>>>> compiler >>>>>> rather than the beta version which I previously used. >>>>>> >>>>>> With the beta version, it works: >>>>>> >>>>>> [jlselogin2 mc] source >>>>>> /soft/compilers/intel_beta/compilers_and_libraries/linux/bin/compilerv >>>>>> ars.sh intel64 >>>>>> [jlselogin2 mc] ifort -V >>>>>> Intel(R) Fortran Intel(R) 64 Compiler for applications running on >>>>>> Intel(R) 64, Version 17.0.0.042 Beta Build 20160315 >>>>>> Copyright (C) 1985-2016 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. >>>>>> >>>>>> ifort: NOTE: The Beta evaluation period for this product ends on >>>>>> 7-oct-2016 UTC. >>>>>> >>>>>> [jlselogin2 mc] ifort -FR -g -O2 -xMIC-AVX512 -qopenmp -lpthread >>>>>> -mcmodel=medium -r8 -WB -traceback -fpe3 -I../common/ -I../mc/ -fpp >>>>>> -DSPIN_SUF= -DPARAMNUC=nclude/paramnuc.12c-11_states-pn -DM0_DIV=1 >>>>>> -DDOCASE=0 -DPARAMCASE=nclude/paramcase.12c-11_states-pn -c make_3pi.f >>>>>> [jlselogin2 mc] <<compile is OK> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> The production verson segfaults: >>>>>> >>>>>> [jlselogin2 mc] source >>>>>> /soft/compilers/intel/compilers_and_libraries/linux/bin/compilervars.s >>>>>> h intel64[jlselogin2 mc] ifort -V >>>>>> Intel(R) Fortran Intel(R) 64 Compiler for applications running on >>>>>> Intel(R) 64, Version 17.0.0.098 Build 20160721 >>>>>> Copyright (C) 1985-2016 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. >>>>>> >>>>>> [jlselogin2 mc] ifort -FR -g -O2 -xMIC-AVX512 -qopenmp -lpthread >>>>>> -mcmodel=medium -r8 -WB -traceback -fpe3 -I../common/ -I../mc/ -fpp >>>>>> -DSPIN_SUF= -DPARAMNUC=nclude/paramnuc.12c-11_states-pn -DM0_DIV=1 >>>>>> -DDOCASE=0 -DPARAMCASE=nclude/paramcase.12c-11_states-pn -c make_3pi.f >>>>>> catastrophic error: **Internal compiler error: segmentation >>>>>> violation signal raised** Please report this error along with the >>>>>> circumstances in which it occurred in a Software Problem Report. >>>>>> Note: File and line given may not be explicit cause of this error. >>>>>> compilation aborted for make_3pi.f (code 1) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> If I remove the -xMIC-AVX512 then the production version >>>>>> compiles without error. >>>>>> >>>>>> Lots of other subroutines are compiling OK. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> The files are all in ~b21541/gfmc/mc/ >>>>>> >>>>>> I see the beta version is due to expire in 2 days. Can this be >>>>>> extended? >>>>>> >>>>>> Steve >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Steven C. Pieper, Senior Physicist Emeritus: >>>>>> spieper(a)anl.gov >>>>>> Argonne National Laboratory, Physics Division, Bldg. 203, Argonne, >>>>>> IL 60439 >>>>>> Phone: 630-252-4232 Fax -6008 Secretary, Debra >>>>>> Beres, -4100 >>>>>> http://www.phy.anl.gov/theory/staff/scp.html >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> EarlyScience mailing list >>>>>> EarlyScience(a)lists.alcf.anl.gov >>>>>> https://lists.alcf.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/earlyscience >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Intel-nda mailing list >>>> Intel-nda(a)lists.jlse.anl.gov >>>> https://lists.jlse.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/intel-nda >> _______________________________________________ >> Intel-nda mailing list >> Intel-nda(a)lists.jlse.anl.gov >> https://lists.jlse.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/intel-nda

1 0

Re: [JLSE-Intel-NDA] [EarlyScience] Production Intel compiler segfaults
by Hammond, Jeff R 05 Oct '16

05 Oct '16

Have you tried Intel 16 update 4? Jeff On 10/5/16, 11:09 AM, "intel-nda-bounces(a)lists.jlse.anl.gov on behalf of Steven C. Pieper" <intel-nda-bounces(a)lists.jlse.anl.gov on behalf of spieper(a)anl.gov> wrote: >when using the beta compiler, ifort -V returns: > >[jlselogin2 tests] ifort -V >Intel(R) Fortran Intel(R) 64 Compiler for applications running on >Intel(R) 64, Version 17.0.0.042 Beta Build 20160315 >Copyright (C) 1985-2016 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. > >ifort: NOTE: The Beta evaluation period for this product ends on >7-oct-2016 UTC. > > >That is what I'm referring to. > >Steve > >Steven C. Pieper, Senior Physicist Emeritus: >spieper(a)anl.gov >Argonne National Laboratory, Physics Division, Bldg. 203, Argonne, IL >60439 >Phone: 630-252-4232 Fax -6008 Secretary, Debra Beres, >-4100 >http://www.phy.anl.gov/theory/staff/scp.html > >On 10/05/16 13:04, Kumaran, Kalyan wrote: >> Steve, are you saying the Beta compilers have been removed, or will be >>removed in 2 days, from the JLSE cluster? If this is the case I can >>request Ben to keep it though I have not see any message about removing >>it. >> >> Please do report bugs on the GA compilers. Without these I fear it will >>never get fixed. >> >> -Kumar >> >>> On Oct 5, 2016, at 12:51 PM, Steven C. Pieper <spieper(a)anl.gov> wrote: >>> >>> Tim, >>> I didn't know where to send it. I just want it to be worked on. >>> The non-beta V17 compiler is on jlse -- that is what is failing for >>>me. >>> >>> Some more recent info: >>> Only this one subroutine file causes the compiler to segfault. >>> >>> However much more seriously, I am getting the wrong numerical >>>results >>> using the non-beta compiler. They are wrong in that they differ >>> from both the v17 beta and xlf on cetus. v17 beta and cetus give >>> the same results. I'm trying now to narrow down where the wrong >>> results are coming from. >>> >>> Can we keep the beta compiler going for more than 2 more days???? >>> >>> Steve >>> >>> Steven C. Pieper, Senior Physicist Emeritus: >>>spieper(a)anl.gov >>> Argonne National Laboratory, Physics Division, Bldg. 203, Argonne, IL >>>60439 >>> Phone: 630-252-4232 Fax -6008 Secretary, Debra Beres, >>>-4100 >>> http://www.phy.anl.gov/theory/staff/scp.html >>> >>> On 10/05/16 12:45, Williams, Timothy J. wrote: >>>> Hi Steve, >>>> >>>> Did you mean to send this to early-users-discuss or intel-nda? >>>> >>>> I think we should now have the non-beta V17 compilers on the white >>>>boxes. Will try to find out. >>>> >>>> Tim >>>> >>>> ------- Timothy J. Williams, Ph.D. --- Argonne Leadership Computing >>>>Facility --- tjwilliams(a)anl.gov --- 630-252-1154 ------- >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> On Oct 5, 2016, at 11:25 AM, Steven C. Pieper <spieper(a)anl.gov> >>>>>wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I am trying to recompile everything using the production intel >>>>>compiler >>>>> rather than the beta version which I previously used. >>>>> >>>>> With the beta version, it works: >>>>> >>>>> [jlselogin2 mc] source >>>>>/soft/compilers/intel_beta/compilers_and_libraries/linux/bin/compilerv >>>>>ars.sh intel64 >>>>> [jlselogin2 mc] ifort -V >>>>> Intel(R) Fortran Intel(R) 64 Compiler for applications running on >>>>>Intel(R) 64, Version 17.0.0.042 Beta Build 20160315 >>>>> Copyright (C) 1985-2016 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. >>>>> >>>>> ifort: NOTE: The Beta evaluation period for this product ends on >>>>>7-oct-2016 UTC. >>>>> >>>>> [jlselogin2 mc] ifort -FR -g -O2 -xMIC-AVX512 -qopenmp -lpthread >>>>>-mcmodel=medium -r8 -WB -traceback -fpe3 -I../common/ -I../mc/ -fpp >>>>>-DSPIN_SUF= -DPARAMNUC=nclude/paramnuc.12c-11_states-pn -DM0_DIV=1 >>>>>-DDOCASE=0 -DPARAMCASE=nclude/paramcase.12c-11_states-pn -c make_3pi.f >>>>> [jlselogin2 mc] <<compile is OK> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> The production verson segfaults: >>>>> >>>>> [jlselogin2 mc] source >>>>>/soft/compilers/intel/compilers_and_libraries/linux/bin/compilervars.s >>>>>h intel64[jlselogin2 mc] ifort -V >>>>> Intel(R) Fortran Intel(R) 64 Compiler for applications running on >>>>>Intel(R) 64, Version 17.0.0.098 Build 20160721 >>>>> Copyright (C) 1985-2016 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. >>>>> >>>>> [jlselogin2 mc] ifort -FR -g -O2 -xMIC-AVX512 -qopenmp -lpthread >>>>>-mcmodel=medium -r8 -WB -traceback -fpe3 -I../common/ -I../mc/ -fpp >>>>>-DSPIN_SUF= -DPARAMNUC=nclude/paramnuc.12c-11_states-pn -DM0_DIV=1 >>>>>-DDOCASE=0 -DPARAMCASE=nclude/paramcase.12c-11_states-pn -c make_3pi.f >>>>> catastrophic error: **Internal compiler error: segmentation >>>>>violation signal raised** Please report this error along with the >>>>>circumstances in which it occurred in a Software Problem Report. >>>>>Note: File and line given may not be explicit cause of this error. >>>>> compilation aborted for make_3pi.f (code 1) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> If I remove the -xMIC-AVX512 then the production version >>>>>compiles without error. >>>>> >>>>> Lots of other subroutines are compiling OK. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> The files are all in ~b21541/gfmc/mc/ >>>>> >>>>> I see the beta version is due to expire in 2 days. Can this be >>>>>extended? >>>>> >>>>> Steve >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Steven C. Pieper, Senior Physicist Emeritus: >>>>>spieper(a)anl.gov >>>>> Argonne National Laboratory, Physics Division, Bldg. 203, Argonne, >>>>>IL 60439 >>>>> Phone: 630-252-4232 Fax -6008 Secretary, Debra >>>>>Beres, -4100 >>>>> http://www.phy.anl.gov/theory/staff/scp.html >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> EarlyScience mailing list >>>>> EarlyScience(a)lists.alcf.anl.gov >>>>> https://lists.alcf.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/earlyscience >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Intel-nda mailing list >>> Intel-nda(a)lists.jlse.anl.gov >>> https://lists.jlse.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/intel-nda > >_______________________________________________ >Intel-nda mailing list >Intel-nda(a)lists.jlse.anl.gov >https://lists.jlse.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/intel-nda

1 0

Re: [JLSE-Intel-NDA] [EarlyScience] Production Intel compiler segfaults
by Steven C. Pieper 05 Oct '16

05 Oct '16

when using the beta compiler, ifort -V returns: [jlselogin2 tests] ifort -V Intel(R) Fortran Intel(R) 64 Compiler for applications running on Intel(R) 64, Version 17.0.0.042 Beta Build 20160315 Copyright (C) 1985-2016 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. ifort: NOTE: The Beta evaluation period for this product ends on 7-oct-2016 UTC. That is what I'm referring to. Steve Steven C. Pieper, Senior Physicist Emeritus: spieper(a)anl.gov Argonne National Laboratory, Physics Division, Bldg. 203, Argonne, IL 60439 Phone: 630-252-4232 Fax -6008 Secretary, Debra Beres, -4100 http://www.phy.anl.gov/theory/staff/scp.html On 10/05/16 13:04, Kumaran, Kalyan wrote: > Steve, are you saying the Beta compilers have been removed, or will be removed in 2 days, from the JLSE cluster? If this is the case I can request Ben to keep it though I have not see any message about removing it. > > Please do report bugs on the GA compilers. Without these I fear it will never get fixed. > > -Kumar > >> On Oct 5, 2016, at 12:51 PM, Steven C. Pieper <spieper(a)anl.gov> wrote: >> >> Tim, >> I didn't know where to send it. I just want it to be worked on. >> The non-beta V17 compiler is on jlse -- that is what is failing for me. >> >> Some more recent info: >> Only this one subroutine file causes the compiler to segfault. >> >> However much more seriously, I am getting the wrong numerical results >> using the non-beta compiler. They are wrong in that they differ >> from both the v17 beta and xlf on cetus. v17 beta and cetus give >> the same results. I'm trying now to narrow down where the wrong >> results are coming from. >> >> Can we keep the beta compiler going for more than 2 more days???? >> >> Steve >> >> Steven C. Pieper, Senior Physicist Emeritus: spieper(a)anl.gov >> Argonne National Laboratory, Physics Division, Bldg. 203, Argonne, IL 60439 >> Phone: 630-252-4232 Fax -6008 Secretary, Debra Beres, -4100 >> http://www.phy.anl.gov/theory/staff/scp.html >> >> On 10/05/16 12:45, Williams, Timothy J. wrote: >>> Hi Steve, >>> >>> Did you mean to send this to early-users-discuss or intel-nda? >>> >>> I think we should now have the non-beta V17 compilers on the white boxes. Will try to find out. >>> >>> Tim >>> >>> ------- Timothy J. Williams, Ph.D. --- Argonne Leadership Computing Facility --- tjwilliams(a)anl.gov --- 630-252-1154 ------- >>> >>> >>> >>>> On Oct 5, 2016, at 11:25 AM, Steven C. Pieper <spieper(a)anl.gov> wrote: >>>> >>>> I am trying to recompile everything using the production intel compiler >>>> rather than the beta version which I previously used. >>>> >>>> With the beta version, it works: >>>> >>>> [jlselogin2 mc] source /soft/compilers/intel_beta/compilers_and_libraries/linux/bin/compilervars.sh intel64 >>>> [jlselogin2 mc] ifort -V >>>> Intel(R) Fortran Intel(R) 64 Compiler for applications running on Intel(R) 64, Version 17.0.0.042 Beta Build 20160315 >>>> Copyright (C) 1985-2016 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. >>>> >>>> ifort: NOTE: The Beta evaluation period for this product ends on 7-oct-2016 UTC. >>>> >>>> [jlselogin2 mc] ifort -FR -g -O2 -xMIC-AVX512 -qopenmp -lpthread -mcmodel=medium -r8 -WB -traceback -fpe3 -I../common/ -I../mc/ -fpp -DSPIN_SUF= -DPARAMNUC=nclude/paramnuc.12c-11_states-pn -DM0_DIV=1 -DDOCASE=0 -DPARAMCASE=nclude/paramcase.12c-11_states-pn -c make_3pi.f >>>> [jlselogin2 mc] <<compile is OK> >>>> >>>> >>>> The production verson segfaults: >>>> >>>> [jlselogin2 mc] source /soft/compilers/intel/compilers_and_libraries/linux/bin/compilervars.sh intel64[jlselogin2 mc] ifort -V >>>> Intel(R) Fortran Intel(R) 64 Compiler for applications running on Intel(R) 64, Version 17.0.0.098 Build 20160721 >>>> Copyright (C) 1985-2016 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. >>>> >>>> [jlselogin2 mc] ifort -FR -g -O2 -xMIC-AVX512 -qopenmp -lpthread -mcmodel=medium -r8 -WB -traceback -fpe3 -I../common/ -I../mc/ -fpp -DSPIN_SUF= -DPARAMNUC=nclude/paramnuc.12c-11_states-pn -DM0_DIV=1 -DDOCASE=0 -DPARAMCASE=nclude/paramcase.12c-11_states-pn -c make_3pi.f >>>> catastrophic error: **Internal compiler error: segmentation violation signal raised** Please report this error along with the circumstances in which it occurred in a Software Problem Report. Note: File and line given may not be explicit cause of this error. >>>> compilation aborted for make_3pi.f (code 1) >>>> >>>> >>>> If I remove the -xMIC-AVX512 then the production version compiles without error. >>>> >>>> Lots of other subroutines are compiling OK. >>>> >>>> >>>> The files are all in ~b21541/gfmc/mc/ >>>> >>>> I see the beta version is due to expire in 2 days. Can this be extended? >>>> >>>> Steve >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Steven C. Pieper, Senior Physicist Emeritus: spieper(a)anl.gov >>>> Argonne National Laboratory, Physics Division, Bldg. 203, Argonne, IL 60439 >>>> Phone: 630-252-4232 Fax -6008 Secretary, Debra Beres, -4100 >>>> http://www.phy.anl.gov/theory/staff/scp.html >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> EarlyScience mailing list >>>> EarlyScience(a)lists.alcf.anl.gov >>>> https://lists.alcf.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/earlyscience >> _______________________________________________ >> Intel-nda mailing list >> Intel-nda(a)lists.jlse.anl.gov >> https://lists.jlse.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/intel-nda

1 0