I suppose. The users who have not requested new projects may not be happy with the result. John J. Low Principal Computational Science Specialist Computing, Environment and Life Sciences Building 240, 2143 9700 South Cass Avenue Argonne National Laboratory Argonne, IL 60439. 630-252-0045 www.linkedin.com/pub/john-low/15/8b0/5aa/ From: <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of "Leggett, Ti" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Reply-To: LCRC Allocations Admins <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Wednesday, September 23, 2015 at 10:34 AM To: LCRC Allocations Admins <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: [allocations-admins] 15 more new projects If we do that, it will hinder the POC from making a decision in the meantime (and us getting this spreadsheet in the POCs hands). So we can get the sheet out to the committee, can we do what I suggested in parallel with what you did? From: <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of "Low, John J." <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Reply-To: LCRC Allocations Admins <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Wednesday, September 23, 2015 at 10:28 AM To: LCRC Allocations Admins <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: [allocations-admins] 15 more new projects I think we should remind them to “renew” their new 2015 project for 2016. With some explanation of why they need to do this. John J. Low Principal Computational Science Specialist Computing, Environment and Life Sciences Building 240, 2143 9700 South Cass Avenue Argonne National Laboratory Argonne, IL 60439. 630-252-0045 www.linkedin.com/pub/john-low/15/8b0/5aa/ From: <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of "Leggett, Ti" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Reply-To: LCRC Allocations Admins <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Wednesday, September 23, 2015 at 10:15 AM To: LCRC Allocations Admins <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: [allocations-admins] 15 more new projects Most of these projects never requested a FY16 allocation but were granted a 50k startup in FY15. For those that didn't request FY16, should I just put their FY15 initial request as the FY16 request? From: <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of John Blaas <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Reply-To: LCRC Allocations Admins <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Wednesday, September 16, 2015 at 3:26 PM To: LCRC Allocations Admins <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: [allocations-admins] 15 more new projects Going to grant all of the following projects with 50k initial allocation tomorrow morning if no one has any comments. The following projects are: CataAgCl CCCTMO CoC_tersoff Comp_POP_Catalysts FF-opt HEHV_modeling iro-catal IVwire Lanthanide_FF Li-air_phase Li-S_Trans Meso_Nuclear PhotoCu2O polarons PrtnAdp_CG Superlubricity_ND_2D VO2_thermal WEST Waiting off on BrewerDefectForm since the proposal made it sound like this was the proprietary project from Brewer, unless things have been worked out with legal of course to give this project the greenlight? Thanks, JB On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 1:57 PM, Bair, Raymond A. <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: We suddenly have 15 requests for new projects this week, all requesting time in Q4. Earlier in the month we capped new requests at 100K. That should be less now, perhaps 75K or 50K? Also, each of these 15 will need to be reminded to turn in a FY16 request too. I suppose they need to wait until their FY15 time is approved, so time is if the essence. Ray _______________________________________________ allocations-admins mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://lists.lcrc.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/allocations-admins _______________________________________________ allocations-admins mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://lists.lcrc.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/allocations-admins