Yes. The intent was to see how people's schedules work out on alternating weeks to find which is better, and not for those particular dates. It makes more sense to start back up the week of the 17th or 24th since people won't likely get anything done immediately after the forum. Let me know if I didn't explain my intention well. One of these days I'll set up a doodle poll properly :-) Kathryn On May 30, 2013, at 5:40 PM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: I assume that we'll actually have a teleconf *2 weeks* after the Forum, not *1 week*, right? On May 30, 2013, at 12:32 PM, Kathryn Mohror <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi all, There have been requests to try to change the time for our bi-weekly working group telecon. I have made a doodle poll to help us decide this. http://www.doodle.com/v79ywsuqckavywuc Please do this by next Tuesday June 4 as we will discuss this at the forum meeting on Wednesday June 5 to make a decision on the meeting time. Kathryn ______________________________________________________________ Kathryn Mohror, [email protected], http://people.llnl.gov/mohror1 CASC @ Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, USA _______________________________________________ Mpi3-tools mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi3-tools -- Jeff Squyres [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/ _______________________________________________ Mpi3-tools mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi3-tools ______________________________________________________________ Kathryn Mohror, [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>, http://people.llnl.gov/mohror1 CASC @ Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, USA