Yes. The intent was to see how people's schedules work out on alternating weeks to find which is better, and not for those particular dates. It makes more sense to start back up the week of the 17th or 24th since people won't likely get anything done immediately after the forum. Let me know if I didn't explain my intention well. One of these days I'll set up a doodle poll properly :-)

Kathryn

On May 30, 2013, at 5:40 PM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) <jsquyres@cisco.com> wrote:

I assume that we'll actually have a teleconf *2 weeks* after the Forum, not *1 week*, right?


On May 30, 2013, at 12:32 PM, Kathryn Mohror <kathryn@llnl.gov> wrote:

Hi all,

There have been requests to try to change the time for our bi-weekly working group telecon. I have made a doodle poll to help us decide this.

http://www.doodle.com/v79ywsuqckavywuc

Please do this by next Tuesday June 4 as we will discuss this at the forum meeting on Wednesday June 5 to make a decision on the meeting time.

Kathryn

______________________________________________________________
Kathryn Mohror, kathryn@llnl.gov, http://people.llnl.gov/mohror1
CASC @ Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, USA




_______________________________________________
Mpi3-tools mailing list
Mpi3-tools@lists.mpi-forum.org
http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi3-tools


--
Jeff Squyres
jsquyres@cisco.com
For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/


_______________________________________________
Mpi3-tools mailing list
Mpi3-tools@lists.mpi-forum.org
http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi3-tools

______________________________________________________________
Kathryn Mohror, kathryn@llnl.gov, http://people.llnl.gov/mohror1
CASC @ Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, USA