I have no idea. :-) The current rules are so loosey-goosey that I'm not sure what requires a ticket, what can just be read, ...etc. This fix obviously fits in the "trivial / doesn't change semantics" category, but I'm honestly not sure what the next step is... On Mar 8, 2013, at 11:30 AM, Kathryn Mohror <[email protected]> wrote:
Good catch Jeff! How did that get by so many eyes?
So, since it's really just a typo, do we need to create an errata entry for it?
Kathryn
On Mar 8, 2013, at 5:36 AM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) <[email protected]> wrote:
I just noticed the following typo: MPI-3 p582, line 21.
In "MPI_T_UMQ_LENGTH":
- the first quote is facing the wrong way - only the first M is the appropriate font; the rest of the name is in the wrong font
-- Jeff Squyres [email protected] For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
_______________________________________________ Mpi3-tools mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi3-tools
______________________________________________________________ Kathryn Mohror, [email protected], http://people.llnl.gov/mohror1 CASC @ Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, USA
_______________________________________________ Mpi3-tools mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi3-tools
-- Jeff Squyres [email protected] For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/