Hi all, Yes, Jeff is correct in that the deadline was the 12th for announcing any official items and we need to stick to this, as we went through the setting the rules with these clauses on purpose. However, these items (vote on 6, reading of 67 and 77) were on the agenda before the weekend with links and descriptions and as I said in my email on Sunday, I consider these (plus all others with links) as announced (since they were accessible by the forum and informed about it via email). Unless I hear objections, I would suggest to keep them on the agenda. Otherwise we should talk about more formally defining what “announced” means. Thanks, Martin — Prof. Dr. Martin Schulz, Lehrstuhl für Rechnertechnik und Rechnerorganisation Fakultät für Informatik, TU-München, Boltzmannstraße 3, D-85748 Garching Email: [email protected]
On 15. Feb 2018, at 00:14, Jeff Hammond <[email protected]> wrote:
Deadline was announced as 2/12 (see below), but please don't interpret me posting this information as an indication that I support the draconian enforcement of deadlines ;-)
Jeff
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Martin Schulz <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 6:34 AM Subject: [Mpi-forum] Call for Agenda Items / February MPI Forum Meeting To: Main MPI Forum mailing list <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
Hi all,
I have compiled a preliminary agenda based on the feedback from the WG chairs. It is (as usual) at:
http://mpi-forum.org/meetings/2018/02/agenda <http://mpi-forum.org/meetings/2018/02/agenda>
Please take a look at it and see if anything is wrong or missing and/or let me know if there are any additional requests.
Also, please keep in mind that the 2 week deadline to submit any reading or ballot requests is coming up next Monday (Feb. 12th) - please send all items to me, but also publish them on the MPI forum mailing list.
Thanks!
Martin
PS: We are working on improving the logistics page and providing the registration link. Hopefully soon.
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 3:01 PM, Marc-Andre Hermanns <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Dear all,
I might be a little late with this, as I assumed the deadline for this to be today (2 weeks before the plenary, not the first day of the meeting).
Vote:
#6: MPIR: Include line numbers in specification https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-issues/issues/6 <https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-issues/issues/6>
Redings:
#67: MPI_T: Consistent reference to MPI processes https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-issues/issues/67 <https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-issues/issues/67>
#77: Add integer-based access to MPI_Wtime https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-issues/issues/77 <https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-issues/issues/77>
If the deadline passed on Monday, consider these as "Discussion" for the plenary.
Cheers, Marc-Andre
-- Marc-Andre Hermanns Jülich Aachen Research Alliance, High Performance Computing (JARA-HPC) Jülich Supercomputing Centre (JSC)
Wilhelm-Johnen-Str. 52425 Jülich Germany
Phone: +49 2461 61 2509 | +49 241 80 24381 Fax: +49 2461 80 6 99753 www.jara.org/jara-hpc <http://www.jara.org/jara-hpc> email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
_______________________________________________ mpi-forum mailing list [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> https://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/mpi-forum <https://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/mpi-forum>
-- Jeff Hammond [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> http://jeffhammond.github.io/ <http://jeffhammond.github.io/>_______________________________________________ mpi-forum mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/mpi-forum