Hi Martin, Thanks for the feedback. I incorporated it and attached the new copy. Anyone else have comments? Thanks! Kathryn _________________________________________________________________ Kathryn Mohror, [email protected], http://scalability.llnl.gov/ Scalability Team @ Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, USA On 8/30/14, 1:22 AM, "Schulz Martin" <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Kathryn, all,
Thanks for putting this together. I think, this looks almost right. Just the string returns are not quite right, I think. What about adding the following:
Page 15:
If the name of a control variable is the same across connected processes, the following OUT parameters must be identical: verbosity, datatype, enumtype, desc, desc_len, bind, scope. -> If the name of a control variable is the same across connected processes, the following INOUT/OUT parameters must be identical: verbosity, datatype, enumtype, desc, desc_len, bind, scope (assuming identical values are passed in desc_len).
Same on page 24: If the name and class of a performance variable are the same across connected processes, the following OUT parameters must be identical: verbosity, varclass, datatype, enumtype, desc, desc_len, bind, readonly, continuous, atomic. ->
If the name and class of a performance variable are the same across connected processes, the following INOUT/OUT parameters must be identical: verbosity, varclass, datatype, enumtype, desc, desc_len, bind, readonly, continuous, atomic (assuming identical values are passed in desc_len).
Same on page 34
If the name of a category is the same across connected processes, the following OUT parameters must be identical: desc, desc_len. -> If the name of a category is the same across connected processes, the following INOUT/OUT parameters must be identical: desc, desc_len (assuming identical values are passed in desc_len).
Martin
________________________________________________________________________ Martin Schulz, [email protected], http://scalability.llnl.gov/ CASC @ Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, USA
On 8/29/14, 6:10 PM, "Kathryn Mohror" <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi all,
Here¹s a draft of the tools chapter with changes for ticket #383 based on our last discussion. Let¹s see if we can get this nailed down to read in Japan.
Please see the attached, and keep in mind that the due date for ticket announcements is MONDAY!
Thanks, Kathryn
_________________________________________________________________ Kathryn Mohror, [email protected], http://scalability.llnl.gov/ Scalability Team @ Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, USA
_______________________________________________ mpiwg-tools mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-tools