On Aug 26, 2013, at 7:23 PM, "Schulz, Martin" <[email protected]> wrote:
I am now on the SUCCESS side of the fence. Does it need to be clarified as an errata? I would suggest (from 3.0 clean doc):
Just to be totally clear: I don't really care which way it goes. I just saw this issue as an ambiguity that should be resolved.
page 580, line 41: In this case, the routine returns MPI_SUCCESS if all variables are started successfully, otherwise MPI_T_ERR_PVAR_NO_STARTSTOP is returned. MPI_SUCCESS is also returned if no handles are valid for session and MPI_T_PVAR_ALL_HANDLES is passed in handle.
Hmm - I fear we would have to be even more explicit: MPI_SUCCESS is also returned if MPI_T_PVAR_ALL_HANDLES is passed in handles and if no handles are valid for session or all valid handles represent continuous (read only for reset) variables.
+1. -- Jeff Squyres [email protected] For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/