Should I infer from the lack of reply that no tools properly handle either Fortran descriptors or the descriptor-based symbols?
On Aug 25, 2019, at 11:31 AM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) via mpiwg-tools <[email protected]> wrote:
In Open MPI, we are finally working towards supporting Fortran descriptors for choice buffers (i.e., "TYPE(*), DIMENSION(..)").
Per MPI-3.1 p613 table 17.1, this means ***changing all the back-end symbols*** that are used for PMPI-style interception.
A concrete example:
- in mpif.h / the mpi module, MPI_SEND will become MPI_SEND_FTS - in the mpi_f08 module, MPI_SEND will become MPI_SEND_F08TS
I.e., anywhere the application calls MPI_SEND, it will be transmogrified to either MPI_SEND_FTS or MPI_SEND_F08TS. And the choice buffer passed will be a descriptor (which may therefore be a subarray, not a contiguous buffer), not a naked pointer.
Here's my questions:
1. Do any tools support Fortran descriptors as choice buffers? 2. Do any tools intercept the symbols as described in MPI-3.1 table 17.1?
-- Jeff Squyres [email protected]
_______________________________________________ mpiwg-tools mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/mpiwg-tools
-- Jeff Squyres [email protected]