Actually, whether we talk about a possible PMPI replacement depends on whether you and Martin were successful in shopping it around to tools people at LLNL. :-) On Oct 2, 2013, at 4:48 PM, Kathryn Mohror <[email protected]> wrote:
Also, I remembered that Jeff may want to discuss a PMPI replacement. So, that may come up as well.
Kathryn
On Oct 2, 2013, at 1:39 PM, Kathryn Mohror <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi all,
We'll have our regularly scheduled telecon tomorrow at 11AM EDT, 8AM PDT. As usual, the webex information is on the wiki: https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/wiki/MPI3Tools
Agenda: - Discuss happenings at the forum - We have tickets that may need discussion or work: ticket 383 (make variable of same name have consistent meaning) ticket 384 (dynamic strings ticket) ticket 392 (return code for read/readreset on unstarted variable) (bill comment - adopt code/class error structure from the rest of MPI) ticket 394 (clarification of values of watermark variables) - Any other topics that people want to discuss. In particular, we may need to talk about picking up the debugger work again since we have been busy with MPI_T items lately.
Kathryn ______________________________________________________________ Kathryn Mohror, [email protected], http://people.llnl.gov/mohror1 CASC @ Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, USA
_______________________________________________ mpiwg-tools mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-tools
______________________________________________________________ Kathryn Mohror, [email protected], http://people.llnl.gov/mohror1 CASC @ Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, USA
_______________________________________________ mpiwg-tools mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-tools
-- Jeff Squyres [email protected] For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/