option 1: separate docs (e.g., MPIR, MQS, DLL, ...etc.) option 2: single combined doc option 3: in the MPI spec itself So yes, we agreed to do a single external doc with MPIR, MQS, etc. On May 2, 2013, at 4:52 PM, Kathryn Mohror <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Jeff,
Here's what I have from my notes from the forum. The straw vote breakdown was:
option 1: 5 option 2: 15 option 3: 2
I had to go back to your slides to remember what option 2 was! It was the single side document option.
Kathryn
On May 2, 2013, at 11:46 AM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) <[email protected]> wrote:
Anh --
Nicely done. Attached is a scan of my comments on the draft. We can chat about them on a phone call if they don't make sense...
One big comment: didn't we agree at the last Forum meeting to have 1 big document with MPIR and MQS (and whatever else we dream up)? I can't find the notes from last meeting to remember what the Forum decided. If we did agree on one document: now that much of the MQS text has been written, perhaps it would make sense to combine these into a single doc...?
-- Jeff Squyres [email protected] For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/ <2013_05_02_14_39_09-mqs-draft.pdf>_______________________________________________ Mpi3-tools mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi3-tools
______________________________________________________________ Kathryn Mohror, [email protected], http://people.llnl.gov/mohror1 CASC @ Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, USA
_______________________________________________ Mpi3-tools mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi3-tools
-- Jeff Squyres [email protected] For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/