I'm out on vacation this week and can't easily join a Webex or participate deeply. So if you're convinced that you can make the enum var *names* be equivalent and not its *values*, then I'll be happy. Regardless, I think you all understand my example/concern, so if it's not an issue, great. :) I'll leave it to you folks to figure out. Sent from my phone. No type good.
On Nov 24, 2014, at 6:33 AM, Michael Knobloch <[email protected]> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
here I have to disagree with Jeff - only the important part highlighted:
On 11/22/2014 02:45 PM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote:
Enumerations ============
Yes, enumerated values must *not* be defined as equivalent.
I have a concrete example why they should not be equivalent:
- Remember that I want to use enumerated values to contain information about the underlying network - The network interface used by MPI processes on server A has network address "A.B.C.D", but the NI used by MPI processes on server B has address "W.X.Y.Z".
No one wants enumerated values to be equivalent - just the names of enum items iff the corresponding enums are equivalent - and I think that was clear from the text Kathryn sent around. So if I understand your example correctly we have on both processes an enum "network_info" with variable name "network_address" with the value "A.B.C.D" on process A and "W.X.Y.Z" on process B. And I think this is covered by our definition of having semantically the same behavior.
Am I'm missing a point here?
- -Michael - -- Michael Knobloch Institute for Advanced Simulation (IAS) Jülich Supercomputing Centre (JSC) Telefon: +49 2461 61-3546 Telefax: +49 2461 61-6656 E-Mail: [email protected] Internet: http://www.fz-juelich.de/jsc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1
iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUcxdkAAoJENAucJeJjnBJ0OsP/0mr1o1W4Jjmr98SJ43g9i2M IEd6zHMf8cceS0UA9pitmg/fdMXLTGsI/HH6WIAZuznPP4cINqNPB+i2EVYKJLOn saqPKwjQINQzoJZCxrNtFh7nntJlol5JCnqXt6DH1WtHy0Z3qR6B8YTDGUgPSCpN Z6D///9e00WAC2EcY6djQCmRra0cGmdfz5ui9WmwUcNnzZGEynKT97pqvgcfFBhQ RtdsbbO3zpWPBS8pHtQyf/Lz117eVAhqCgoIsehwiLBXJvbP7XNpmjCRBJM6miMJ 0nfvLBMlZ80HRq5dBi20XwqQNEDkYSyD15XNvDNAVq6yvXksMUxqenwnbSgj2puA Ti+RU3SmndkHo4hLhO6RiEHSbn0w5Bdckmvbj1IqqAelkIB/NH2X+yCsNNv7aCvB jxYcnPdWa4sw+QfbEkjP1eqhvYeEWKMuwvrVOr1Ns4C/S95WiwiMCXw4f5dmUn5q u6+PjZRuJVLMc0u1PBx0UmWO5Kmt0xu3C9D4X/1g5BhP2gBvydk0y7IvqeJYqQxh 5+bzy0Vjzr6Ly/pp+pjP51xPeZq2q1GlzAp1l4gFnqi6zSpQDrMpnuZSxM/KuBLS P3BisCJDBP4woy4nNCnRZZnPsWjhqwDpdb73RQ2tSaOK1bXt0oJRZkyJJkGc9CWR R58VxGZvH9B2ppqBEUGj =WPBk -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Forschungszentrum Juelich GmbH 52425 Juelich Sitz der Gesellschaft: Juelich Eingetragen im Handelsregister des Amtsgerichts Dueren Nr. HR B 3498 Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: MinDir Dr. Karl Eugen Huthmacher Geschaeftsfuehrung: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Wolfgang Marquardt (Vorsitzender), Karsten Beneke (stellv. Vorsitzender), Prof. Dr.-Ing. Harald Bolt, Prof. Dr. Sebastian M. Schmidt ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ mpiwg-tools mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-tools