Howard, I am still in vacations, so I only took a quick glance at issue 22, I think it is a good starting point to summarize our ideas. I will not attend the meeting today. Best Aurelien

On Jul 24, 2022, at 00:50, Pritchard Jr., Howard via mpiwg-sessions <[email protected]> wrote:

HI All,

I’ve got a very busy Monday coming up so wanted to get this out today.

I’ve been finding it somewhat difficult to keep track of our various discussions and presentations, so I decided to do some issue generation/cleanup on

https://github.com/mpiwg-sessions/sessions-issues/issues

For Monday’s agenda I have

• Discuss Sessions and MPI-T https://github.com/mpiwg-sessions/sessions-issues/issues/8 . Is there anything we missed for MPI 4.1? If not, maybe we should close it. • MPI_Comm_from_group – does issue https://github.com/mpiwg-sessions/sessions-issues/issues/22 capture the essentials of our discussions? • Process set definition - https://github.com/mpiwg-sessions/sessions-issues/issues/24 • Should we leave issue https://github.com/mpiwg-sessions/sessions-issues/issues/11 open or close it (concept of a MPI_Session_abort)

A contractor is coming over to our house on Monday at a somewhat ill-defined time, so it’s possible I may need to drop off early or join late. Could someone capture discussion of these items on the respective issues in the event I’m absent?

Thanks very much,

Howard

—

<image001.png> Howard Pritchard Research Scientist HPC-ENV

Los Alamos National Laboratory [email protected]

<image002.png><image003.png><image004.png><image005.png>

_______________________________________________ mpiwg-sessions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/mpiwg-sessions