Hi Dan and others, I'm through with my iteration & I'm up for other changes / suggestions / acceptance of my changes, etc. I see two major discussion points: * The slow/medium/fast changes where I wonder if this is the right direction. I've tried to define this slightly different. Maybe this could be also defined in terms of the success of coercive requests and whether this is asynchronous or not. I'm not sure about this. * Do we want to include fault tolerance? This would significantly complicate things. Cheers, Martin On Tue, 2021-03-30 at 19:12 +0100, Dan Holmes wrote:
Hi Martin (et al),
I just went through and added my tuppence throughout.
Cheers, Dan. — Dr Daniel Holmes PhD Executive Director Chief Technology Officer CHI Ltd [email protected]
On 29 Mar 2021, at 19:49, Schreiber, Martin via mpiwg-sessions <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi all,
there's the document from Today: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1NLAMZtH5B3bVSnWk-ZxM9FhCJesZ92rL
For those not attending the meeting: We plan to extend this document and iterate over it to generate an API covering all important aspects.
You're welcome anytime to add changes / comments (please with tracking of changes and using your real username). We very much appreciate any feedback.
Seems like it's public/bank holiday next week, so we meet again in 2 weeks.
Cheers,
Martin
-- Dr. Martin Schreiber +49 (89) 289-17661
Technical University of Munich Informatics 10: Computer Architecture and Parallel Systems Boltzmannstrasse 3, Room 1.4.38 85748 Garching, Germany _______________________________________________ mpiwg-sessions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/mpiwg-sessions
-- Dr. Martin Schreiber +49 (89) 289-17661 Technical University of Munich Informatics 10: Computer Architecture and Parallel Systems Boltzmannstrasse 3, Room 1.4.38 85748 Garching, Germany