Thanks - I've found it and fixed it for 3.1. Bill William Gropp Director, Parallel Computing Institute Thomas M. Siebel Chair in Computer Science University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign On May 30, 2014, at 12:17 PM, Jed Brown wrote:

"Zhao, Xin" <[email protected]> writes:

...

This is the same model we have been using for other info arguments, e.g.,

"no_locks — if set to true, then the implementation may assume that passive target syn- chronization (i.e., MPI_WIN_LOCK, MPI_LOCK_ALL) will not be used on the given window."

BTW, this quote from the MPI-3 standard contains a typo. It should be MPI_WIN_LOCK_ALL. I don't have access to the report repository so I don't know if it has been fixed. _______________________________________________ mpiwg-rma mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-rma