Thanks - I've found it and fixed it for 3.1.

Bill

William Gropp
Director, Parallel Computing Institute
Thomas M. Siebel Chair in Computer Science
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign





On May 30, 2014, at 12:17 PM, Jed Brown wrote:

"Zhao, Xin" <xinzhao3@illinois.edu> writes:
This is the same model we have been using for other info arguments, e.g.,

"no_locks — if set to true, then the implementation may assume that
passive target syn- chronization (i.e., MPI_WIN_LOCK, MPI_LOCK_ALL)
will not be used on the given window."

BTW, this quote from the MPI-3 standard contains a typo.  It should be
MPI_WIN_LOCK_ALL.  I don't have access to the report repository so I
don't know if it has been fixed.
_______________________________________________
mpiwg-rma mailing list
mpiwg-rma@lists.mpi-forum.org
http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-rma