Discussed the complex types in COMPARE_AND_SWAP issue. "Fortran Integer" category is permitted, but "Complex" category is not, primarily because of width. Since "Fortran Integer" contains wide types, shouldn't we just permit "Complex" and "Floating point" as well? Consensus was to stick with the existing text which permits only "C integer, Fortran integer, Logical, Multi-language types, or Byte". Group review (esp. Jim & Sreeram): https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/187 incorporate Jim suggested change (Torsten): https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/271 we think we are unaffected, but need a second check (Jim): https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/278 Double-check that C++ is not referenced in the RMA chapter (Pavan): https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/281 Needs review (Dave): https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/300 Think unaffected, but slim chance of Rput/Rget being affected (Pavan): https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/317 Need to check implementation of various (4?) "flush is non-local" changes (Dave): https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/270 Need to check disp_unit change (Jim & Sreeram): https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/284 After the above items have all been dealt with, all chapter committee members should re-read the whole chapter in the *clean* document (the one _without_ the changebars and colored text) to look for obvious typos and inconsistencies. -Dave